User talk:Lordmetroid

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Discussion is open for query, for old discussion see history.

Agorism sidebar[edit]

I invite you to share your opinion about the nomination for deletion of the Agorism and Agorism sidebar. I am doing this since there appears to lack a broad range of libertarians reaching a consensus. Thank you for your time. PublicSquare (talk) 15:47, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion for free market healthcare[edit]

Deletion review for Free market healthcare[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Free market healthcare. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 72.94.48.58 (talk) 21:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Possible sock using email with your user name[edit]

Pretends to be a libertarian. Please email me for details. (I haven't figured out how to email.) CarolMooreDC (talk) 23:49, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

King Kong[edit]

Yo LM, nice to see you at the King Kong defence talkpage. Is there any chance you could help out with the references? I'm trying to make the article look respectable so it isn't deleted, but I don't speak Swedish so can't use those source. Cheers, Skomorokh 22:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Labor / Worker's Rights project[edit]

I recently drafted a proposal for a Worker's Rights & Labor Issues WikiProject ... I thought you might be interested, since you are working on the Anarchism project ...

Cheers! Jrtayloriv (talk) 05:20, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Zathura (software)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Zathura (software) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of why this is notable, completely unreferenced

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Terrillja talk 19:33, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010[edit]

Information.svg Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Zathura (software). Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Terrillja talk 14:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

I deter user from contributing to wikipedia by trying to stop you being a deletionist so that new user will not be detered to contribute as their contributions gets deleted, yeah that is such a nice spin you have on it. Lord Metroid (talk) 18:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zathura (software)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

A tag has been placed on Zathura (software), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja talk 01:37, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Alright I give up, you have converted me to your religion of delitionism, may all articles with perfectly good information which the public can have use of but lacks mainstream notability. My only contributions hereforth will be delete tags to all articles I find obscure and badly referenced. May Wikipedia fall into obscurity by self-deletion! Lord Metroid (talk) 03:58, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Re:Please undo the deletion of Zathura (software)[edit]

Hi Lordmetroid. Although it may have not been your intent, your article, "Zathura (software)", read like an advertisement. Here on Wikipedia, we have a policy in which advertising/spam is speedy deleted per deletion criterion G11. Please note that articles for deletion are judged on their own merit, not in comparison to other articles (See WP:OTHERSTUFF). You are certainly welcome to resubmit the article, but please revise the text so that it complies with the policies and guidelines noted at WP:ADS and WP:MOS; otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again. FASTILY (TALK) 05:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Zathura (software)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Zathura (software), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zathura (software). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Terrillja talk 22:08, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Zathura-0.0.2-bestfit.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zathura-0.0.2-bestfit.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Terrillja talk 02:33, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nana to Kaoru[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Nana to Kaoru has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability. Search for third party sources only comes up with a couple of trivial mentions related to changes in a manga magazine. No significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources found to pass WP:BK.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Farix (t | c) 15:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)


Articles for deletion nomination of Nana to Kaoru[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Nana to Kaoru, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana to Kaoru. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Farix (t | c) 12:44, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

You article is saved over at the manga wikia[edit]

A small group of people that frequent all anime and manga AFD have constantly and relentlessly been erasing articles. They state that sales figures don't matter, even if its sold more than 15 million copies [1], that being in a long running highly circulated manga magazine for years doesn't matter, nor anything else. That only mention in third party coverage matters to prove something is notable, despite the fact that manga magazines aren't going to review things that their competition is publishing, and you will almost never find any coverage at all. After awhile you give up trying to reason with them, since its a hopeless cause. Anyway, you can continue working on your article at http://manga.wikia.com/wiki/Nana_to_Kaoru without fear of deletion. I transwikied over thousands of articles from Wikipedia, and have been doing the full history transfer of anything I see up for deletion that should obviously be saved, as well as copying over the images in those article. Dream Focus 02:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nana to kaoru cover.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nana to kaoru cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Nana to Kaoru for deletion[edit]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Nana to Kaoru, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana to Kaoru until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Farix (t | c) 01:33, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

FRAME:S[edit]

Hi, thanks for creating this. It's been tagged for notability for 5 years now. Could you please look it over and see if you can improve it? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of FRAME:S for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article FRAME:S is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FRAME:S until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. dci | TALK 18:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:Boleuf.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:56, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bookmachineryoffreedomdavidfreidman.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bookmachineryoffreedomdavidfreidman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Marc Stevens (radio host) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marc Stevens (radio host) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Stevens (radio host) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 (talk) 17:02, 6 September 2014 (UTC)