User talk:Lpangelrob

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

GAN Reviewer of the Week[edit]

GA Award.png The Good Article Medal of Merit
Congratulations! Based on the number and thoroughness of reviews, I have chosen you as the GAN Reviewer of the Week for the week ending 13 April 2008. Dr. Cash (talk) 06:11, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Saskatchewan Highway 1[edit]

Thank you for your GA comments on review of this article. I believe I have addressed them all. I have added comments in reply on the talk page. They have just been completed, so will also re-read them shortly as well. I have added how I addressed the issues raised. (I am not really knowing how to do en-dash so tried a copy and paste for example) (I used another article for inflation ratio between now and 1963)SriMesh | talk 02:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for passing this article to GA status. Have entered the article to the League of Copy Editors for prose improvement as well as per comments. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 03:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

GA Review[edit]

Thanks for all your help clearing the Transport GA nom backlog. Regarding the Air Transport in the UK 2nd opinion you asked for – although I'm not a more experienced reviewer or an expert in the field – IMHO it's plenty good enough for Good Article status, and the time to go over the remaining issues with a fine toothed comb would be at a featured article candidacy. That's just one editor's very humble opinion though. -- Kéiryn talk 02:17, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for wading through this article. It's long and must have taken up a good deal of your time. I've responded to your outstanding concern on the article talk page. --FactotEm (talk) 06:42, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

NY 21[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you put the review template on NY 21's GAN a few days ago. I was wondering if, because it's been several days, you see something wrong with the article. Don't feel rushed, I just wanted to know the status. Thanks, Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Maronite mummies[edit]

Ummmm, there are a lot of citations on the article Maronite mummies. How sure are you that the text is copyvio? How closely did you follow.. the text of the entire article? Etc. Ling.Nut (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

NY 418[edit]

Just curious, what's holding this GAN up from passing. If the Dude Ranch Trail is taken out, there will be 1 sentence of history.Mitch32contribs 02:31, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

for this 3.5 mile road to nowhere, no. I can try merging it out, will take at least a week or a couple days. 418 is part of a FT of mine and I need it at least at GA to work on it.Mitch32contribs 02:44, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
That also reminds me, another article in the FT I'm working on, NY 9L, would end up being in the same condition of 418, with only 1 sentence of history, making the article look like junk. Is there a way we can compromise?Mitch32contribs 15:24, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
What do you wanna do? NY 418 has no history section, which doesn't help me at all. Is there a way you can help me get it audited for quality?Mitch32contribs 22:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Newsbank[edit]

I tried to use your newsbank for three refs at Crown Fountain. It is now asking for a password. What do I do?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 21:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

How do I obtain the open URLs for the 3 Crown Fountain links?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
O.K. I have those two fixed. Thanks for the help. I am wondering if I can use this service for Michigan newspapers. It seems that it is limited to Illinois. I have two citations at Tyrone Wheatley that I would love to clean up.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:16, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

A successful wikipedia article[edit]

I am doing a project for class and need to write a wikipedia article I was wondering if you could describe to me what goes into an article to make it successful on wikipedia.

Thanks Hochy15 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hochy15 (talkcontribs) 18:25, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Mirth & Girth[edit]

I don't know if you saw the 4/25 WP:RFC commentary, but it seems like you were left a lot of advice toward improviing the article.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

GA review[edit]

Just wanted to remind you, I'm waiting for your reply on the talk page at Federal Bridge Gross Weight Formula regarding your GA review of the article. Thanks! --ErgoSum88 (talk) 21:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I have updated the page with information about the history of the law, as you have requested. --ErgoSum88 (talk) 07:19, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar[edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For being a one man, lean, mean Good Article reviewing machine. Thanks for your hard work. And yes, I know this is long overdue. Dave (talk) 05:37, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 4[edit]

Apologies for the late delivery; my internet connection went down halfway through the delivery process.

I-blank.svg US blank.svg Autoroute icone.svg
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 4 • 30 April 2008About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here.Rschen7754bot (talk) 22:42, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Control cities[edit]

Can you explain this edit for me. I do not see any policy against control city boxes.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 05:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Fox river grove 1995 bus accident scene.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Image:Fox river grove 1995 bus accident scene.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Fox river grove 1995 bus accident scene.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. AEMoreira042281 (talk) 03:46, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Fox river grove 1995 bus accident crossing diagram.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

A tag has been placed on Image:Fox river grove 1995 bus accident crossing diagram.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Fox river grove 1995 bus accident crossing diagram.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. AEMoreira042281 (talk) 03:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

A favor...[edit]

I was wondering if you could take a peek at the M-35 (Michigan highway) FAC if you get a moment's time? Thanks in advance! Imzadi1979 (talk) 01:57, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

GA page moved[edit]

You promoted The Future of Air Transport white paper article to GA recently. Following your comments in the GAN about scope, and the subsequent failure of a FAC for the same reason, I have moved this article to Air transport and the environment (United Kingdom). Letting you know in case you feel that this move necessitates a review of the GA status. Regards. --FactotEm (talk) 10:45, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

USRD participants list[edit]

As discussed at WT:USRD, the participants list at WP:USRD is being split by state. Due to any of the following factors- your extended participation in WT:USRD discussions, your IRC participation, or your extended participation in Shields or Maps, I have guessed that you are a nationwide editor and have designated you as such in the USRD partiicpants table. This is part of the lengthy process. If this is in error, please let me know immediately. This is especially likely with this group as I have to guess whether you are a national or a state editor. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 21:55, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Historic Michigan Boulevard District map[edit]

Thanks for the help. See comments at Wikipedia:WikiProject_U.S._Roads/Maps_task_force/Requests#Request_for_various_GA.2B_articles.

Also, Rush Street (Chicago) is at FAC. Images have been an issue and I just did a major overhaul and could use some feedback.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:04, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Top Importance Chicago Articles[edit]

If you want to help me choose Category:Top-importance Chicago articles, come comment at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates by June 5th.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 13:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Review update[edit]

Are you still planning to review Channel Tunnel and M54 motorway? They've been marked as under review for awhile, and I was wondering if you forgot about them. Nikki311 21:33, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Everard Calthrop Good Article review[edit]

I have finished editing Everard Calthrop to include your suggested improvements. Where I have not been able to I have left an explanation at Talk:Everard Calthrop/GA1. Hope it is all in order. Thanks for reviewing this page, and thanks for your kind comments at the end of the review. Cheers --Michael Johnson (talk) 11:07, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Maryland Route 36[edit]

I made the changes you suggested. For the question about the speed limits, the state highway administration lists those in the Highway Location Reference. - Algorerhythms (talk) 05:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

GA Review of Kinzua Bridge[edit]

I believe I have taken care of all the problems. Details are on the review page. Let me know if there are any problems. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​talkcontribs 18:58, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks rewriting that paragraph, hope it wasn't too much trouble. I fixed a couple typos (i.e. "plants" -> "plans"). I appreciate you taking the time to review the article and then rewording one of the paragraphs. --​​​​D​​tbohrer​​​talkcontribs 15:12, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

New York Roads[edit]

Awaiting a reply from New York for the highways I am reviewing and have on hold. Should come tomorrow. Will notify you as well, as you are reviewing one or two articles. Kind Regards SriMesh | talk 00:53, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Info was to come last Friday of June, maybe the Canada Day July 1 and July 4 celebrations / stats held up the mail. So now must wait till Monday to see what the postman brings. The file was too big to email. SriMesh | talk 22:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Hatfield Government Center (MAX station) GA review[edit]

I believe I have addressed everything, let me know if the changes work. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:38, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Bridges[edit]

Are you thinking about nominating North Avenue Bridge for WP:GAC? You should. Also, take a look at BP Pedestrian Bridge. I am thinking of nominating it at WP:FAC. Any thoughts?--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 06:07, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Did you know you can find 100 year old pictures of this bridge at [Library of Congress]. Use the same type of image description tags as you see on the images at Chicago Race Riot of 1919 if you want to use any of them.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

GA review of SS Samuel Huntington?[edit]

I saw you had "adopted" SS Samuel Huntington for a GA review a week ago. Is your review still in progress? If not, can you please "release" the article so that it might get a more timely review? Many thanks in advance. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:29, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Hoped it was something simple like that. Thanks. — Bellhalla (talk) 19:36, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Truss bridge reference discussion[edit]

Hello. Please review the discussion going on at Talk:Truss bridge#Use of the HAER Publication on Truss Types as a Reference Document. Input from members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges would be appreciated. - PennySpender1983 (talk) 04:51, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Hillsboro Central/3rd Avenue Transit Center GA review[edit]

I think all the issues have now been addressed. Please let me know if the changes work. Aboutmovies (talk) 10:18, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 5[edit]

Apologies for the late delivery; here is the June edition of the newsletter.

I-blank.svg US blank.svg Autoroute icone.svg
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 5 • 21 June 2008About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Want to change your method of delivery? – It's all here.Rschen7754bot (talk) 20:33, 28 July 2008 (UTC)


Interstate Guide[edit]

How are they not a reliable source?Bodo920 (talk) 22:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

In the research I did, the best info I could come up with was this. It shows an overlap on I-55. In emails to the FHWA, they said they'd research the subject but never got back to me.Bodo920 (talk) 06:43, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO survey[edit]

WP:CHICAGO[edit]

You have been marked as an inactive member of WP:CHICAGO since you have not updated your status at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please correct your status. If you consider yourself a member you may want to get involved in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3. Also, if you are a member, be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 16:28, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO[edit]

You have been not signed up as an active member of WP:CHICAGO, but you have a userspace page linked to {{User WPChicago}}. If you consider yourself either an active or semi-active member of the project please sign up as such at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members where you may currently be listed as inactive. Also, if you are a member, be aware of Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago 3 and be advised that the project is now trying to keep all the project's WP:PR, WP:FAC, WP:FAR, WP:GAR, WP:GAC WP:FLC, WP:FLRC, WP:FTC, WP:FPOC, WP:FPC, and WP:AFD discussion pages in one location at the new Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/Review page. Please help add any discussion you are aware of at this location.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:36, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO leadership[edit]

This month you have indicated new or continuing interest in WP:CHICAGO as either an active or semi-active member. The response to the project membership survey was strong enough that we should attempt to organize it in a more fully functional way. Please sign up at Wikipedia:CHICAGO/leadership if you would be willing to serve as a leader of the project from September 1, 2008 to February 28, 2009. The various leadership responsibilities are listed there. The roles will be somewhat similar to the roles of Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Coordinators. We are a less mature and developed project than WP:MILHIST however, so our division of roles will be slightly different. Please respond by the 23rd.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 18:51, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

NY Route 38 GAN[edit]

What's going on? I am sorry for the long delay, but I solved all your laundry list issues. I was wondering if it was passable now?Mitch32(UP) 16:00, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar for you[edit]

Barnstar UTSH.png The Utah State Highways Barnstar
Utah State Route 128 passed FAC. Your GAC review and multiple copyedits were a big help, it would not have made it without your efforts. Thanks.Dave (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter, Issue 6 (FINAL ISSUE)[edit]

I-blank.svg US blank.svg Autoroute icone.svg
The U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 2, Issue 6 • 8 September 2008About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Rschen7754bot (talk) 03:40, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:RoselleIllinoisLogo.gif)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:RoselleIllinoisLogo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

I-55 in Illinois[edit]

Whoops forgot to make those 2 lvl headers. Thanks, RockManQ (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

A contest you may be interested in[edit]

Hello, Lpangelrob. There is a new contest for U.S. and Canada roads that you may be interested in. To sign up or for more information, please visit User:Rschen7754/USRDCRWPCup. The contest begins Saturday at 00:00 UTC. Regards, Rschen7754 (T C) 04:06, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar Interstate.svg The WikiProject U.S. Roads Contributor Barnstar
U.S. Route 50 in Nevada passed FAC, thank you for the GAC review and copyedits. It would not have passed without them.Dave (talk) 21:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

GAR of I-155 IL[edit]

Interstate 155 (Illinois) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. Articles are typically reviewed for one week. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to good article quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. Reviewers' concerns are here. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Yep[edit]

It's a couple years late but you're welcome (about I-355) glad to help.—JA10 TalkContribs 03:46, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Category:Top-importance Chicago articles[edit]

For the rest of this month we are looking for more candidates to be promoted to Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. We are hoping to bring the list of category members to a total of 50. Either you have participated in past votes and discussions or you have recently signed up to be a part of WP:CHICAGO. In either case, please come visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment where we are determining who to add to the September 1st ballot. Some candidate debates have lingered, but there are many new ones from the project's top 50 according to the Wikipedia:Release Version 0.7. Help us determine which pages to add to the ballot.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 03:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

WP:CHICAGO voting for Top-importance Chicago articles[edit]

Your status has been changed to inactive at Wikipedia:WikiProject Chicago/members since you did not respond to our confirmation of active status request. If this is an error please come update your status. Also feel free to come vote at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chicago/Assessment#Current_Top-importance_Candidates for our next Category:Top-importance Chicago articles. Voting continues until September 10 and nominations/discussions are ongoing for future ballot candidates at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Chicago/Assessment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 02:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Interstate 355[edit]

I have nominated Category:Interstate 355 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 00:15, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on your WP:TFA! --Rschen7754 (T C) 02:34, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Auxiliary routes of Interstate 80[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Auxiliary routes of Interstate 80 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Handled by {{I-80 aux}}.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rschen7754 04:05, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 USRD newsletter[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 3, Issue 1 • April 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
JCbot (talk) 19:12, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Il4.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Il4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:33, 1 May 2010 (UTC)

Summer 2010 USRD newsletter[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 3, Issue 2 • Summer 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
JCbot (talk) 02:11, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Fall 2010 USRD newsletter[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 3, Issue 3 • Fall 2010 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
JCbot (talk) 01:20, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

Winter 2010 USRD newsletter[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 4, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates

Project reports for

ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

JCbot (talk) 01:04, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2011[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 4, Issue 2 • Spring 2011 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates

Project reports for

ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Rschen7754bot (talk) 02:12, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Link Bridge[edit]

We miss you and could use your input at Talk:Link_Bridge#Merge.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:18, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Roanoke-tornado-july-04-parsons-after.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Roanoke-tornado-july-04-parsons-after.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 10:23, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 4, Issue 3 • Fall 2011 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates

Project reports for

ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
JCbot (talk) 01:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Chicagoland-highways.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Chicagoland-highways.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:23, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Imzadi 1979  22:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Spring 2012[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 5, Issue 2 • Spring 2012 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Imzadi 1979  00:12, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

USRD Summer 2012 Newsletter[edit]

USRD Newsletter header.svg
Volume 5, Issue 3 • Summer 2012 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
Imzadi 1979  22:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello![edit]

Just wanted to see how you were doing, and to say that we miss you! --Rschen7754 08:38, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

The Center Line: U.S. Roads WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2013[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 6, Issue 1 • Winter 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
EdwardsBot (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2013[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 6, Issue 2 • Spring 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
EdwardsBot (talk) 22:27, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre[edit]

Good Article Recruitment - Completion Award.png
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Summer 2013[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 6, Issue 3 • Summer 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
EdwardsBot (talk) 22:22, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fall 2013[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 6, Issue 4 • Fall 2013 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
EdwardsBot (talk) 03:14, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

The Center Line: Winter 2013[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 7, Issue 1 • Winter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:15, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2014[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 7, Issue 2 • Spring 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of Imzadi1979

The Center Line: Summer 2014[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 7, Issue 3 • Summer 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
  • None submitted
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979, 21:50, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Fourth Quarter 2014[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 7, Issue 4 • Fourth Quarter 2014 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 10:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

The Center Line: Winter 2015[edit]

The Center Line header.svg
Volume 8, Issue 1 • Winter 2015 • About the Newsletter
Departments
Features
State and national updates
ArchivesNewsroomFull IssueShortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 (talk · contribs) 18:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)