User talk:Lufc83

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Lufc83! Thank you for your contributions. I am Cool.agent1234 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Cool ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:14, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your feedback! For help on how to start an article please look at Starting an article. For more help with getting started, please try Help desk and the help pages.

Harkey (talk) 16:08, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sean McDermott (footballer)[edit]

The article Sean McDermott (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL & WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sean McDermott (footballer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean McDermott (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean McDermott (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lee Peltier, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:03, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Liam Cooper Leeds Selfie.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Liam Cooper Leeds Selfie.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jak Alnwick, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Everton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlie Horton (July 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlie Horton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Lufc83, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 16:38, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Charlie Horton concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Charlie Horton, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charlie Horton[edit]

Hello, Lufc83. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Charlie Horton".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:23, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Club infobox dates[edit]

Hi, when updating club infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 20:19, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brian McDermott (footballer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Lufc83. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Vurnon Anita.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please refer to #Club infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Oliver Šarkić, you may be blocked from editing. There is no evidence of Sarkic moving to Leeds and you did not include references in your edits. Mountain^{cirque · Join the Karate Task Force?} 10:09, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt[edit]

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC) No problem.[reply]

September 2017[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Oliver Šarkić.

You actively reverted edits with a clear description as to why your unreferenced content had been removed and write no justification. Your new 'sources' added were all low level blogs and speculative football sites. There has been no announcement from either club on his move to date. Mountain^{cirque · Join the Karate Task Force?} 10:22, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly reverted edits of other editors when you had no reference that Sarkic had moved to Leeds. Yes, he has now joined the club, it was announced today, nine days after the close of the window that he has joined on a youth loan for 3 months. You have been repeatedly editing the page to say he had joined permanently for over a week and not showing any respect to any other editors, or even leaving a comment on your multiple reverts.
Please consider this a very final warning regarding your conduct as an editor and consider doing some research on the WP:Five Pillars, particularly WP:Civility. Mountain^{cirque · Join the Karate Task Force?} 14:16, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Show some respect yourself for those who go out of their way to update these pages, I can quite easily stop contributing and you will lose a valued contributor. Your attitude stinks if I'm honest.

@Lufc83: maybe this came across too harshly for which I apologise. I value the fact that you are trying to add content and I can see that you are not a vandal. If you want your content to stick and be useful to people though there are ways of going about editing to help yourself out. Add explanations when you edit, especially when you're reverting someone else who has worked on the page. Also, you shouldn't add football references from blogs before the academy/club announces the transfer unless it is in a very notable source like the BBC/Guardian/Times etc. Mountain^{cirque · Join the Karate Task Force?} 14:58, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lufc83. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Errors[edit]

Can someone describe how to edit this page, or request to edit this page? There are some distinct errors, especially with certain academy staff. Some are not employed by Leeds United and some have the wrong titles and/or age groups next to their name. Thanks in advance. LUFCBILLY (talk) 16:47, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please advise what changes you want to make, I can update on your behalf.

Proposed deletion of Jakub Bokiej and Jay Smith from academy staff.[edit]

Jakub Bokiej is a scout for Manchester City, not Leeds United.

Jay Smith cannot have the title as Academy Scout. He is a volunteer for foundation age 6-9.

Scott Gardener is U14 coach, not U9. LUFCBILLY (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I'll change that - any other changes to the academy?

I have a feeling I know why you are, if so then I emailed you the other day.

Leeds United first team staff[edit]

Hi. Can you change the Leeds Utd first team staff please? Wayne Moore is not a senior scout for the first team, he is a scout for the academy and senior describes the ages 14-19. He does not actually wish to be on the page if this could possibly be deleted please? LUFCBILLY (talk) 13:49, 20 March 2018 (UTC) Yes no problem Victor.[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Lufc83. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Leeds United F.C., you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. QEDK (後 🌸 桜) 15:03, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Adam Forshaw, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:09, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Lufc83. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]