User talk:Lumos3/Archive 8
Archive of comments from September 2009 to September 2010 of Lumos3's Discussion page , placed here 21 January 2011. Lumos3 (talk) 17:22, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
NowCommons: File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg[edit]
File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:EuroDishSBP front.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 08:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- File:OTEC diagram.gif is now available as Commons:File:OTEC diagram.gif. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:13, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
- File:Alfred Jodl USA-E-Ardennes-2.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Alfred Jodl USA-E-Ardennes-2.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:58, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey there.
I've recently posted on WP:HERTS and User:Simply South's talk page about the possibility of bringing the project back to life, and if so how we would go about this and what we would do. I was wondering if you would be interested in getting involved? I think we have a small but dedicated and diverse group of editors, with interests including geography, sports, transport, mills, politics, music and history among others. If we could bring these talents together I reckon we could produce some fantastic work on some of the project's key areas, for instance (but not limited to) Hertfordshire, History of Hertfordshire, and the county's larger settlements.
Personally I believe the key to successfully bringing together the efforts of editors with interest in anything remotely Herts related will be to maintain at least a semi-active talk page at WT:HERTS. Feel free to give any thoughts or suggestions there, or even to ask if you simply want a second pair of eyes on something. Regards, WFCforLife (talk) 21:13, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'd forgotten I was a member but continue my interest in local history. I'll look for opportunities to get involved. Lumos3 (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Please desist[edit]
Thanks, but please desist from recommending that I log in. Your suggestion is not welcome. After my experiences with Wiki editors, I would never reveal a login name again.
Cheers,
Anonymous —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.115.54.127 (talk) 10:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
jesus man............i love babar. i got his face tattooed on my kids arm the other day. i even make the little lad eat out of a shoe box while wearin a crown coz they wouldnt let me rent an elephant at the zoo. i just rented a punto instead and selotaped ears onto the yoke.
nice talkin to ya.
babar out. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.125.111.194 (talk) 15:06, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Controversy[edit]
Regarding the extremely lengthy topic of renaming the CRU incident article, I just saw your comment about the alleged controversy just coming from "bloggers". I researched this earlier but you might've missed it, the talk page is a nightmare to follow. Both CNN, on this topic, and the BBC World while hosting a panel with this years Nobel Prize winners refer to this as a controversy and the latter even spend a lot of time talking this through in what it means for science. That would imply that this is a lot bigger than "some bloggers". Of course, maybe you knew this already and if so please disregard this comment. Troed (talk) 18:07, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- Neither of these use "Controversy" as the title for their reports which is what is being proposed in the discussion. There may be some who see a controversy here but this is not big enough to be the title of the article. Lets put it within the article as a section. Lumos3 (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs[edit]
Hello Lumos3! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 952 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Richard Turner (software) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Sundials[edit]
Thanks for taking up the challenge. The whole history section can be floated. The sole problem was the correct name for the article. If we can get an article on Sundial art then we can hoick out a lot of off focus images too. --ClemRutter (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
Could you please either strike or rewrite your comments in this section? You "opposed" the merger at 12:02 and then six minutes later you moved the article and redirected it. Such an oppose doesn't make much sense now. In any case, it would have been nice if there had been a bit more discussion, first, instead of the unilateral action. Viriditas (talk) 20:53, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- I opposed the merger of Analemma_calendar with Anelemma on the basis that the article was about the Anelemma sundial. I then realized that the article was in fact mis-named and tidied it up, moving material from the sundial article which is flagged as too long and in need of being split into many articles. I have now re titled and expanded the "(Analemma_calendar)" article now called Analemmatic sundial. No changes have been made to the Anelemma article itself. I am still opposed to a merger of the sundial material into Anelemma, but I will tidy my comments there for clarity. Sorry if this is confusing. Lumos3 (talk) 23:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- It's not confusing to me, but surely you can see how your oppose to the merge of a non-existent article appeared strange. Do you also understand that a "see also" is an indicator that a link or section discussing the topic the link describes, should be merged into the article? This does not necessarily mean merging the entire article but incorporating the subtopic. I have already posted a reference to an article in Centaurus by Nathan Sidoli that says, "The analemma appears to have had its origin in gnomonics, the theory of sundials." That's also obvious in the etymology, as the name of the topic comes from a sundial. Although that particular article is focused on specific methods, there are other articles that discuss the analemma in terms of sundials as well. I don't see the need for two articles at this time, but I'm not against it. However, there is no reason to keep the two subjects separate, and we should follow WP:SS. Viriditas (talk) 09:36, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
| ||||
Content
AfD nomination of List of fictional computers[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of fictional computers. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fictional computers. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
Why do you stick this in my house?[edit]
Why do you stick this in my house? from User 168.103.182.177
- This is a welcome message to the Wikipedia project. If it bothers you please ignore it. Lumos3 (talk) 09:23, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
frank[edit]
frank was a ledgend and did rock the school. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Psprulez (talk • contribs) 16:51, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Marketeer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non-notable neologism
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gobonobo T C 06:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
You may be interested in this proposal. --Michael C. Price talk 11:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Climatic Research Unit hacking incident, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 17:59, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Please consider signing our proposal.[edit]
A number of editors have been working on a proposal regarding the renaming of the Climatic Research Unit hacking incident and we are now in the process of working with people individually to try and garner support for this proposal. Please review the proposal and if you are willing to support and defend it please add your name to the list of signatories. If you have comments or concerns regarding the proposal please feel free to discuss them here. The goal of this effort is to find a name that everyone can live with and to make that name stick by having a strong show of unified support for it moving forward. Thanks. --GoRight (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
CRU article name[edit]
Hello,
I am writing you this message because you have participated in the RfC regarding the name of the Climatic Research Unit hacking incident article. As the previous discussion didn't actually propose a name, it was unfocused and didn't result in any measurable consensus. I have opened a new discussion on the same page, between the existing name and the proposed name Climatic Research Unit documents controversy. I have asked that no alternate names are proposed at this time. Please make your opinion known here. Thanks, Oren0 (talk) 05:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Vitamin C/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:58, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
The Spirit of the Beehive[edit]
I noticed you added lots of info to this film. The new "Symbolism" section does need references. Thx. Luigibob (talk) 20:03, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
hi[edit]
thanks for the welcome. i probably slipped in under the radar; my first edit was for a uni. project (systems -what else?) then i didn't do anything for a year. i'll try to 'do no harm' ;-D Littlerobbergirl (talk) 00:42, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hope you enjoy editing here. If you are interested in Feminism consider joining the Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies and / or Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies/Feminism Task Force which will give you an idea of where editing is needed. Or just edit where and whenever the mood takes you. If you need help or advice please feel free to drop a note here. Lumos3 (talk) 12:59, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
DYK for Auguste Fickert[edit]
|
On March 25, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Auguste Fickert, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
-- Cirt (talk) 08:22, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Crackerjack screenshot.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Crackerjack screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Louise Hay[edit]
Thanks for your contributions to Louise Hay. However I notice that, back in 2008, you added material that is almost a verbatim copy of the text in the source.[1][2] That's really not proper, per WP:plagiarism. Could you please review your work and make sure that the text is placed in quotation marks or is your own original writing? Will Beback talk 21:18, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- I don't believe direct quotations are appropriate here. I have strengthened the reported speech used in this section to make it clear it is Hay speaking through Oppenheimer. Lumos3 (talk) 23:22, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for making those improvements. However there are still some passages that appear to be taken straight from the NYT article. For example:
- NYT: ...she concluded that its cause was her unwillingness to let go of resentment over her childhood abuse and rape.
- WP: ...she concluded that its cause was her unwillingness to let go of resentment over her childhood abuse and rape.
- I know it's hard to reword material taken from a single source, and I appreciate your effort. Will Beback talk 23:33, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Lipton.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Lipton.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Crackerjack screenshot.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Crackerjack screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:25, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
press coverage[edit]
Not that mind visually combining press coverage regarding the same topic, but the box you've used seems somewhat inappropriate or misleading to readers at least. All the articles are about a common topic or incident in WP (the argument regarding the alleged porn pictures), but they are not about a common WP-page as the box/template suggests. Regards--Kmhkmh (talk) 13:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- I have noticed this myself. The template has been in use on the Press Coverage page since 2007. I think we need a new template or a switch in this one to adjust the wording. I have raised this on the Pressmulti Template talk page . see Template_talk:Press#Use_in_Wikipedia_Press_Coverage. Lumos3 (talk) 14:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Feminism[edit]
 |
Hello, Feminism Task Force Member! Please accept this invitation to join a discussion on creating a full-fledged WikiProject Feminism. If you support this idea, please register your support here. All feedback is appreciated! Thanks! |
An article that you have been involved in editing, SCIB, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 12:01, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Signpost comment[edit]
Hi Lumos3, it seems your edit here inadvertently corrupted the layout template and several comments by other users. Maybe it was caused by a malfunctioning automatic spellchecker or something similar? Apart from that, thanks for reading and commenting on the Signpost! Feedback helps us in deciding what kind of coverage we should have in future Signpost issues. Regards, HaeB (talk) 21:52, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Apologies , I used the Google toolbar spell checker which has caused problems for me in the past. Lumos3 (talk) 22:00, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Lyn Harding.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Lyn Harding.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Elsa Baye (talk) 04:01, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Rescue[edit]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Happy Birthday[edit]
File:Mrs Slokum.jpg listed for deletion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mrs Slokum.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξxplicit 05:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2010 (UTC)