User talk:LymeRegis

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Champion House 1967.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Champion House 1967.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:On The Margin 1966.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:On The Margin 1966.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:22, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gail Garigner and Kenneth Williams - Carry On Abroad.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gail Garigner and Kenneth Williams - Carry On Abroad.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie[edit]

Just stopping by with wikicookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Sark Prison.jpg[edit]

~~Image Copyright problem~~
Thank you for uploading Image:Sark Prison.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

~~If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Brianga (talk) 12:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)~~ [reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:We five (2).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:We five (2).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Virginia Stride on Play School (2).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Virginia Stride on Play School (2).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello LymeRegis! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1,190 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Eleonora Daniele - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good lord! I had forgotten this and I doubt I can contribute more. I was hoping that others could raise it from being a stub. LymeRegis (talk) 16:49, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kristin Chenoweth[edit]

Hi, I removed the sentence "Indeed, she fell over on stage while co-hosting the Tony awards with Sean Hayes at Radio City Music Hall in New York in 2010.(ref)Metro, 15 June 2010(/ref)" from the Chenoweth article, because the cited reference does not appear to meet the quidelines for a "reliable source" per WP:RS. Do you have a more complete citation? Or, is there perhaps another source? Thanks. (By the way, here's a sentence on Chenoweth from [[1]]"Best pratfall (intentional):Chenoweth, who took a tumble in the name of comedy and “fainted” upon hearing the news that she wasn’t even nominated for her performance in Promises." ). JeanColumbia (talk) 16:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit[edit]

Switch it off! Or I'll be playing for the Harlem Globetrotters! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 20:07, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]