User talk:Mahtabshadi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you! Face-smile.svg

Welcome to Wikipedia, Mahtabshadi! Thank you for your contributions. I am Deejawwad and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Jawwad Durrani Talk to me 10:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Think originator[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Think originator requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. PKT(alk) 14:47, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hamid Rajaei may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:10, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hamid Rajaei may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hamid Rajaei[edit]

Hello Mahtabshadi. I have changed a couple of things you did, and i thought i'd mention here why i've done it, since your edits were reversions of previous ones. Headlines (the headings of each section) do not need to be made bold because they are bold already, so i've taken out that formatting. They also do not need to be numbered; if you want to see them as numbered, there is a choice on the Preferences page which will automatically number every headline for you. The problem with you numbering them, is that there is then a double system of numbers, which not only looks odd, but is wrong.
I would also say that the article itself needs some fairly heavy editing, which i might try to get to over the next few days; large chunks of it don't seem to make any sense, in that the English is not sufficiently coherent for anyone to understand it. I don't know if it is your writing or someone else's (i haven't looked at that), but i am just mentioning it since i'm here. Cheers, LindsayHello 04:37, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Further to this, please do not add material concerning Hamid Rajaei's theories into other articles unless you can first provide evidence that they have received significant academic recognition in the relevant fields. Wikipedia is not a platform for the promotion of new and unrecognised ideas. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:13, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamid Rajaei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Displacements, Term and Expansion
Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Systematic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Epistemology. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Use the talk page, stop inserting material that has been reverted ----Snowded TALK 12:56, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Please stop inserting material that has been reverted. As recommended, use the talk page if you must. Keithh (talk) 15:48, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Creativity, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dynamic and Static (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

  • dates
  • years
  • commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
  • common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This even applies for infoboxes.

I notice many items were inappropriately linked after I ran through them a while ago. Please ensure this doesn't happen again.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 01:59, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamid Rajaei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Relativity, True, Pragmatic, Opposite, Perspective, Interpenetration and Conversion
Rizi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Spanish, Iranian and Riz

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamid Rajaei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Excitation, Critical, Pragmatic and Persian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Creativity[edit]

Hello, Mahtabshadi. I made a large change to a section you have been editing in the article Creativity. The section is called "Epistemological theory, the phases and contextual planning." I am not sure whether you wrote most of the section, but I want to tell you why I moved it from the main article to the talk page. There are 3 main reasons, and they are all slightly different.

  • The most important problem with the section is: I cannot understand what many phrases mean. Some sentences are correct English, but I still can't understand their meaning. This is similar to what previous Wikipedia users have written on your talk page: "large chunks of it don't seem to make any sense, in that the English is not sufficiently coherent for anyone to understand it."
  • There are also many errors in English. This does not mean that the section needs to be removed permanently. But the section does need a lot of work before it goes back in to the article.
  • The tone does not match the rest of the article, and it does not match the tone that an encyclopedia should have. The section WP:TONE talks a little more about this.

You may want to continue working on the "Epistemological theory" section to improve it, but it probably needs a lot of changes before it is replaced in the article. Thank you, and best wishes. --Officiallyover (talk) 06:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello again, Mahtabshadi. I see that you added a section back to the article Creativity. This still has the same problems as before. It is very difficult to understand, it has many errors in English, and the tone is not appropriate. I hope this does not discourage you, but please do not put this section back unless you do a lot of work to improve it. --Officiallyover (talk) 23:37, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Mahtabshadi. I see that you added some text again to the article Creativity. I am disappointed to see that the text is still very difficult to understand, has errors in English, and does not have the tone appropriate for Wikipedia. I do not think there has been much work done to improve this section. We should not continue removing and adding this section repeatedly. This is considered edit warring on Wikipedia. We really need you to comment about this section on the talk page for the article Creativity. --Officiallyover (talk) 14:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamid Rajaei, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dynamic and Presses (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamid Rajaei, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Life style. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamid Rajaei, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Critical and Islamic education. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no reliable sources, nothing found via Google Books or Google Scholar.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 20:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 10:01, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hamid Rajaei
added links pointing to Contraction, MA, Opposition, Similarity, Expansion and Perspective

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

Removal of a valid AfD template from an article as you did at Galaxy-like and gradual correspondence theory is entirely contrary to Wikipedia policy - if you do that again I will report the matter, and request you be blocked from editing - which is likely to be a formality. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:08, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:A sample for Rajaei's theory.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:A sample for Rajaei's theory.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Hamid Rajaei[edit]

Hi Mahtabshadi. I don't know if you have noticed, but you should be aware that this article, Hamid Rajaei has been nominated for deletion. The reason given is that this person does not meet the standard of notability which is required to be the subject of an article on Wikipedia. You can find the discussion here should you wish to take part. I am giving no opinion, just want to be sure you have the opportunity to prove his notability. Cheers, LindsayHello 08:49, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hamid Rajaei Rizi, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MA and Critical. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Information icon A tag has been placed on Hamid Rajaei Rizi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: Speedy delete contest button.svg which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 13:03, 17 September 2014 (UTC)