User talk:Maxx786

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Your revert on Modern equipment and uniform of the Pakistan Army[edit]

Hello. You reverted an edit about an hour ago on Modern equipment and uniform of the Pakistan Army with the edit summary "reverted vandalism", but that edit was most definitely not vandalism (see Wikipedia's rules regarding vandalism) but a removal of insufficiently sourced content. The 90 Norinco SH-1 that are listed in the article are sourced only to Military-Today, which is a personal website/blog, and not a reliable source according to Wikipedia's standards. So I suggest you find a better source for it if you want to keep it in the article... Thomas.W talk 10:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Use of of SH-1 by Pakistan has also been reported by armyrecognition, APDR, and a February 2011 Jane's article (now available only on a forum). Maxx786 (talk) 16:41, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Operation Zarb-e-Azb may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • title=Zarb-e-Azb operation: 120 suspected militants killed in N Waziristan|newspaper=[[Dawn (newspaper|Dawn]]|date=15 June 2014|accessdate=16 June 2014}}</ref><ref name="huffingtonpost" />

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Fixed Faizan 07:09, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Operation Zarb-e-Azb[edit]

The casualty figures were corrected. Maxx786 (talk) 05:30, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The problem with the casualty figures should be solved next time from the chronology. Discussion can be held at the article's talk, please make sure that the figures are per chronology. How you can judge that Tribune is not a credible source? If it wasn't 218, then it was 215. So, 241-3=238; because on 17 June, a total of 25+3 militants were killed. Regards. Faizan 07:46, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

The figures provided by ISPR are considered most reliable. If you put chronology from different newspapers (which get the figure from different sources), it is going to vary. (See: Dawn gives figure of 232). For most media outlets like PTI, ISPR remains the best source.
Today in the morning, The News as well as Geo News reported 50 militants killed citing 'sources', AFP reported 20 fatalities citing a 'security official". But ISPR confirmed only 12 militant fatalities. You can add all militant deaths from ISPR press releases from 15 to 20 June which will give you the figure of 235 + 12 = 247 .. Cheers .. Maxx786 (talk) 15:38, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Well, I agree that different sources are giving different death toll. But the point that I raised was that the figures that you unilaterally put in the info-box without updating the chronology section may confuse the readers. When they will add up the figures, the answer will be 3 more than the figures given in the infobox, eh? So please update the chronology section when updating the infobox. Now I am confused that at which point in the chronology, the figures need to amended. Anyway, I am having a look at all ISPR press releases. Do amend the chronology figures when you update the infobox. Faizan 17:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
I have updated the chronology section as per ISPR press releases. The problem before was the use of unofficial problematic sources. Faizan 18:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
The casualty figures come out to be 247, right! Thanks. Faizan 19:00, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Maxx786. You have new messages at Talk:Operation Zarb-e-Azb.
Message added 05:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Faizan 05:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Knock it off.[edit]

Baitullah and Qari Mehsud were top leaders of the TTP and their deaths have been confirmed. Quit removing their names for no reason. --Padraigo52 (talk) 00:17, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CS/VP3 MRAP vehicle concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/CS/VP3 MRAP vehicle, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)