|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Threads with no replies in 31 days may be automatically moved.|
Thelartman I was trying to re-add a long standing relevant link to a website that was removed recently for no good reason.
Hello, we will revise our language soon and try to find the the primary source for reference 1. However, since the original account of the another of the comic is now blocked, we may cite it from another similar source. Another issue is about the keyboard man and keyboard warrior, actually in today's China, keyboard man contains the characteristics of American keyboard warrior, so when we first edit this page, we take no consideration on distinguishing the two concepts. Shall we try to analyze their similarity and difference in Keyboard man page? Best regards, Enzo
Escape room games
I'm not affiliated with any company in the genre of real escape games.
I added some links and have edited a few over the months as this page appears to me tp be extremely biased.
Why are some companies mentioned and not others? It would make sense to allow all or none or as a compromise the most noteworthy. I added Escape Hunt as they seems to me to be the world's l;largest and I have played in several of their rooms worldwide. They are a professional company whereas many who have clearly listed themselves on this page are less so in my opinion as they simply self promote. For example. why are you allowing a shambles self promotion of Adventure Rooms Canada? Its a single franchise amongst many worldwide. According to their sites many other companies are franchising worldwide so why allow this one and not others to write on the page?
Thanks and look forward to understanding how the page can be fair to all.
On its talk page it says its prod was contested by Brilliantradience, however in the history of the article it seems to me that it the prod was removed by GrahamJQuirk. Am I missing something? —George8211 / T 19:40, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your message that a citation I added to Mobile marketing was removed. You said that it's not appropriate for an encyclopedia. Sorry about that! I'm just getting my feet wet and trying to do small edits. I read the external link guidelines over a few times. I thought the link I chose would be ok because it was a .org, but was the problem that it was also a blog? Or that it was a subjective take? I suppose it was also kind of speculative, looking back. Sorry to pester! I just want to make sure I understand so I don't make the same mistakes in the future. Thanks for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SonofaSubmariner (talk • contribs) 16:03, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|The Original Barnstar|
|hi nice page|
Greetings from Mexico
Hi McGeddon, is very complicated a relation between immigration with Etnic group, Mexicans are a people mixing with many races, Mexican is a nationality but aren't a Etnic group, in Spanish Wikipedia we make this changes in all articles about immigration. See ypu nest time. --Marrovi (talk) 04:14, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
Response to Comments
McGeddon: The link to a git source repository is perfectly fine, since it was a publicly available source-code. Many existing Wikipedia articles also do provide such links, for example, see "These tools include the open-source CACTI cache simulator and the open-source SimpleScalar instruction set simulator." in CPU_cache article. As per your suggestion, in future, I will discuss on talk page before editing a Wikipedia article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Newwikieditor678 (talk • contribs) 17:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)