User talk:Mdann52

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
The Signpost
20 August 2014


I finally finished the answers to the lessons. Please take a look. Thanks--TerryAlex (talk) 15:18, 24 August 2014 (UTC) @TerryAlex: All looks good to me. I've left a mini-test for you to do next bwhahaha --Mdann52talk to me! 07:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Tech News: 2014-35[edit]

09:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

external links[edit]

Thank you for your edit to Samuel Bolton Colburn. I was unsure about what an appropriate external link should be. Also, I'm trying to address the note on this entry saying that this article has multiple issues. One of the issues being that it is an Orphan and is not linked. How do I resolve the issues mentioned and get this tag removed?

Sorry, I'm pretty new to Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Susan M Anderson (talkcontribs)

@Susan M Anderson: no problem! The problem with the links you used is that you used links to external sites in the text of the article; I didn't judge the links, only where they were located (I could of been clearer). The correct place to put them would be with an == External links== heading at the end of the article. I have removed the refimprove tag, but as for the other issue, you just need to link another article to the page. --Mdann52talk to me! 07:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


Shouldn't the "NENAW" with a W at Wikipedia_talk:Templates_for_discussion#Request_for_Comment:_WP:NENAN say "NENAN" with an N? --Jax 0677 (talk) 18:14, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Jax 0677: Nah, I've invented a new policy yeah, probably. Corrected. --Mdann52talk to me! 20:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

New edits to Suzannah Lipscomb article[edit]

Greetings! I know you've been involved in the Suzannah Lipscomb article and its OTRS ticket. Ajz1978 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · edit filter log · block user · block log) has made some edits to the article today. I've reverted them, generally. You've probably got the article watchlisted and have already seen them, but just in case, would you mind taking a look at the edits? Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

yeah, I spotted you had reverted them. I'm keeping an eye on this (one of the few articles I get email notifications on thigh my alt account). I've just warned them through the edit summary, but I'm going to assume it isn't the return of the socks yet again. --Mdann52talk to me! 20:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Can you please advise where I will find details of the OTRS action you suggested I read? (UTC)

The article talk page and page history are good starts; Due to the nature of OTRS, revealing the emails is counter intuitive. --Mdann52talk to me! 20:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

It really does not make sense to me why the ref of her DOB and middle names is included, yet they can't be mentioned in the article? Also her family can't be mentioned and the Daily Mail can't be used as a source? No other article I've seen has so many restrictions as this one. (UTC)

@Ajz1978: The Daily Mail is generally not accepted in any BLP article. --NeilN talk to me 21:27, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Can you please advise if it can be inserted into the article that she was a child actor and appeared in 'The house of Eliott' and 'witchcraft'? References: and

This info was in a very early version of the page. (UTC)

I have the same comments on those that you have already been given. --Mdann52talk to me! 07:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for undoing my edit, I think I may have made a mistake too. I was just about to revert the edit myself, I'm sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Talk archiving[edit]


I would like to know how to put comments and/or posts back onto the talkpage and get archived at again at a certain (for example) at "2160". I've possibly made a mistake at some point and would like to re-do my actions. While I know moving them back to the talkpage would leave them at the archived place and how would I remove the archival-old template to re-do them? Adamdaley (talk) 23:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Answered on IRC. --Mdann52talk to me! 07:35, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Tommy McGuigan[edit]

People are writing 'hearsay' on this guys page. I am erasing the false statements — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gunners1988 (talkcontribs) 16:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

The material appears well sourced to me. I'm going to take a look through and cut it down a bit, but it seems to be more than "hearsay". --Mdann52talk to me! 16:35, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/New Court of Corpus Christi College[edit]

Could you close this one for me? Thanks. Armbrust The Homunculus 21:24, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

@Armbrust: Yes check.svg Done --Mdann52talk to me! 05:40, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


Request to control page COMSATS Institute of Information Technology was already filed to the Institute. You have messed things up by removing the material. Edits were soon to be made in it. You were supposed to tailor the article, not remove it. Idiot! — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 13:35, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Yeah... I suggest you read WP:OWN and WP:NPA, and stop using Wikipedia for advertising. --Mdann52talk to me! 13:43, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I've blocked the account whose name indicated it was shared, and as such I shouldn't edit or revdel the article. Get someone else? DS (talk) 14:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
DS; Yeah, raised at AN. --Mdann52talk to me! 14:10, 29 August 2014 (UTC)