User talk:Meister und Margarita

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Huge fan of your recent edits in in top/bottom related matters. Good show old sport! If you need any help with anything, let me know. Zazaban (talk) 23:53, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

All the articles you've edited so far are already on my watchlist, we seem to share interests. Always good to see a new face. Zazaban (talk) 00:00, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Nothing better then a hot flipflop. By the way, there are still some versatile men in the "bottom" and in the "top" section. I'm keen to serve reality. Could you help? Tristan Paris for sure penetrated Thom Barron in Fever, but I don't know for sure about Jesse Santana and Pavel Novotny. --Meister und Margarita (talk) 00:07, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Indeed, flipflops are hot. And yeah, I'll check. Zazaban (talk) 00:16, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Hasn't Tommy Hansen topped a few times? I believe the only reason he bottoms more is because he dislikes condoms. Zazaban (talk) 00:20, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
I knew it charted well, but I didn't know that well. Are you a Zappa fan? Zazaban (talk) 00:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Of course. And a David-Bowie-fan as well. --Meister und Margarita (talk) 00:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
Awesome. Do you have a favourite album? Zazaban (talk) 00:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


Proposed deletion of Flip-flop (sex)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Flip-flop (sex) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

neologism, dictionary entry

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Powers T 15:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Flip-flop (sex)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Flip-flop (sex), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flip-flop (sex). Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Powers T 14:06, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Versatile (sex)[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated Versatile (sex), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Versatile (sex). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Irbisgreif (talk) 23:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

What a bizarre thing to try to delete. Zazaban (talk) 23:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
In fact, I'm proud to be a gay semi-versatile bottom. My nomination had nothing to do with having problems with the truth or a desire for censorship. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:38, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Bad-Faith[edit]

I'm sorry, but I feel that we've gotten off to a bad start. I never assumed that "Versatile (sex)" was submitted in bad faith, and I'm sorry if I came across that way. I catch a lot of flak for being a bit of a deletionist, but I've never wanted to bite anyone, newcomer or not. Perhaps we could try again to get off on the right foot? I'm quite aware, from my studies of linguistics, that two people can be totally well meaning and still get angry with one another, so I'd like to offer to bury the hatchet. Irbisgreif (talk) 02:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Porn Awards[edit]

Hi Meister, you seem to have a substantial knowledge of porn - perhaps you might be interested in the discussion above. Power.corrupts (talk) 11:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009[edit]

Information.svg Your recent edit to Trainfuck (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 20:23, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Nuvola apps important.svg Your recent edit to Trainfuck (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! (Report bot mistakes here) // VoABot II (talk) 20:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

I dont understand a word ... maybe because I am Austrian.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 21:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
It was a false positive. A bot thought your edit was vandalism, probably because it uses the word 'fuck'. Zazaban (talk) 22:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Flip-Flop[edit]

Just letting you know, merging content does not mean moving a copy to a new page. It can be cut, edited, removed and in general completely edited as a result. Reverting a user's efforts to incorporate the information and remove what he sees as irrelevant is not enforcing the decision of an AfD, but edit warring. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:18, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

This other user did not incorporate anything but deleted everything. This is what I call vandalism. --Meister und Margarita (talk) 08:49, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Louis Cozolino[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Louis Cozolino. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Ariadne[edit]

Nice to meet you, on Ariadne auf Naxos, I replied there. - An approach to show a picture related to the opera rather than always the same composer was tried for another Ariadne, L'Arianna and is successful in Fatinitza, while Carmen, Siegfried and several others failed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mozarteum Orchestra Salzburg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Creation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernd Purkrabek, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Polytechnic, Lazarus and Rodelinda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

forum[edit]

bitte auf der englischen begriffsklärungsseite eintragen--Das-Geheimnis-der-Sphinx (talk) 23:08, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rosa Antifa may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • rallies]] and [[Demonstration (protest)|demonstration]]s, they produce [[pamphlet]]s and flyers]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:03, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Patrick Kafka, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Weber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wolfgang Lindenhofer, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Austrian, Petar Petrov and Palmers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

A page you started (Thomas Lorenz) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Thomas Lorenz, Meister und Margarita!

Wikipedia editor Carriearchdale just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment on Carriearchdale's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for May 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited No Borders Orchestra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ORF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Inclusion of additional info box on Strauss articles[edit]

With a consensus amongst three editors who are members of WP:OPERA, the info boxes will be removed. For the discussion, please see: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera#Arabella et al: which comes first. Viva-Verdi (talk) 16:31, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Template:Hofmannsthal operas. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your edit summary here is utterly unacceptable. It's not your template, and anyone may edit it. Use dispute resolution if you disagree with edits others make. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 14:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Your warning and my request for help[edit]

Of what I can see you are a nice and reasonable guy and I kindly ask for your understanding. Since years this Mr. MB is blocking all my efforts to include appropriate pictures in several opera articles. So now finally I lost my temper and told him what I think about him. Of course I shouldn't have done it and I can fully understand that you find this unacceptable. I would be glad if you could voice an opinion on the issue. I think - and I proposed it for several times - that the lead picture of an opera should be dedicated to a scene from the opera, preferably from the best production available and with the best singers performing the roles. MB and his pressure group insist that every opera of Verdi is illustrated prominently by Mr. Verdi himself - so now we have 40 Verdi operas with a portrait of Mr. Verdi and seven of 7 Bizet operas always with a portrait of Mr. Bizet. MB is also active in the German WP and also there - together with one lady - he prevents that a scene from the opera is shown on top of the article. So in German Carmen you will see a simple text box without an image [1] and in the English version you see the composer [2]. My argument is: If someone wants to see the composer, he or she will go to the composers article. If someone is interested in the opera, he or she wants to get informations about the opera and mainly pics concerning the opera. This is valid for nearly every other Wikipedia. Just in English WP and German WP we have these stupid rules set up by little pressure groups. It took me a lot of time to convince Salzburg festival to donate a beautiful pic from a festival production of Carmen. Now we have the pic and I am not allowed to put it on top of the page were it ought to be in my eyes. Please help, I simply cannot understand the logic of the other side.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 15:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

As noted above - use dispute resolution. Note also the helpful suggestion at Template talk:Hofmannsthal operas; and see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Opera#Arabella et al: which comes first. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:38, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
In the case of the Hofmannsthal template I know very well that it is not mine. But I felt very frustrated and treated unfairly. Firstly, an opera consists of a libretto and a score. If the authors should be featured on the top of the page, IMHO both of them deserve to be featured - and as Hofmannsthal and Strauss collaborated in six cases, both of them deserve to be mentioned prominently. The opera pressure group deleted the author of the text, so that only the author of the music is represented. Mr. MB first made the template much more unattractive - by choosing an odd picture of the composer - and then removed it altogether. Now the template is not in use any more anywhere. I have endured this tactics for many many years, and I am fed up, I feel helpless in my endeavor to improve German and English WP and now punished as well. I have the impression that argument don't count at all, just the pressure groups.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 15:40, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
There is not an opera pressure group. There is a group of editors who work on opera articles and who have reached a consensus as to what an opera article should look like and consist of.
Now, there has been a revival of discussion here about the very thing which concerns you, that is 20 pictures of Mr. Verdi et al. I am in support of User talk:voceditenore's suggestion that we re-examine this issue.
Meanwhile, however, it is not very helpful to start removing composer boxes from articles until this is discussed. You do not have to be a member of the opera group to contribute, so please do so. Viva-Verdi (talk) 17:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Softlavender (talk) 17:48, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Opera info boxes: composer versus opera title[edit]

You appear to be jumping the gun here by arbitrarily removing composer info boxes before there has been a consensus developed. Comments were made regarding the addition of the librettists' boxes. In order to focus now on the info boxes for each opera, I have created a new section: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Opera#Composer info boxes on opera articles for comments to be made. Viva-Verdi (talk) 18:12, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

There is a broad consensus, just read the statements. I'm just bored by always seeing the same face when I want to read something about a different opera.--Meister und Margarita (talk) 22:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Well, from your summary of the "pro" and "con" views, it looks as though there is a majority in favour. Now Mr. M.B. seems to have come over as well, with the few changes he has made to the Rosenkavalier box....!
I like the way you've been making them look (with the minor quibble of the template hardly needing to Wikilink the work "opera" - which is not your fault!) so keep up the good work. Best, Viva-Verdi (talk) 14:00, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Questions for the template should go to the template talk, - thanks for your help, both, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Travatore and info boxes[edit]

Thanks for your note on my Talk page. Certainly, I'm not in for fighting. Consensus is the thing. Now, re: Trov. pix, I see elsewhere that you've said that Salzburg has donated many images, which is great, because that was to be my first question. Can you now legally upload them to WikiCommons? If so, that would be wonderful for use in the article and info box.

As it turns out, I've been doing a lot of work on Bellini articles recently, so have played around with a few Bellini info boxes in my Sandbox rather than deal with Verdi right now. But I'll get to him. I like the look of your Rosenkavalier" box very much. Nice image!

Please continue your discussions on the WP:OPERA page as the central place for discussion, but it looks as though (with one objection so far) that we'll get the info boxes per individual opera up pretty soon. Best, Viva-Verdi (talk) 03:47, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Thank You for Your nice words. We will have the Trovatore pictures by September 2nd, 2014 with all copy rights on WikiCommons. I hope You will like them. Very interested in Your Bellini work as well, but I only saw five of his opera till now. Liked them all. Best, --Meister und Margarita (talk) 07:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)