User talk:Mkdw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Please sign (~~~~) before you save. Beware SineBot!

User talk:Mkdw
Home Talk Contribs Email Me My Templates My Subpages
userpagetalk pagecontributionsmy templatesedit info
  • Please post new comments beneath those already posted by editing this page.
  • If you leave me a message here, I will reply here. If I leave a message on your page, feel free to reply either on your page or on my page.
  • Please don't mind if I refactor the page for organization.
  • Please reserve e-mail for conversations which must be kept private, or if you cannot communicate via my talkpage (i.e. you've been blocked).
For every capitalised word and repeated exclamation mark I find, I shall keel you!

The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 04 March 2015[edit]

A cookie for you![edit]

--L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:22, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 March 2015[edit]


You've all missed my point. Like I said before, I know better than to comment on these matters, no one reads what I write and no one gives a damn about any of it anyway. Never have, never will. As for your points, I get it. I invaded a process that was out of my domain and ruffled a number of feather in the process, so I'm done. I hence forth serve notice of my withdrawal from your domain on wikipedia, and hereby sue for peace. I'll leave the rfa stuff to the people like you and in exchange I hope that I will be left alone. Those are my terms. Do we have deal? TomStar81 (Talk) 21:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

And so you shall have it. You willfully instigated the conversation; I didn't hunt you down. You told someone that their "friendly suggestion" was "BS" and then you left a bunch of editors a message that ended with "Drop me a line if you have something to say about it". If you wanted to be left alone, why ping us all and leave us that message? No one was at war with you. And for the record, I got your point about wanting to run a different type of RFA that would standout and reinvent the process. All I can say to that is maybe you should have let the community and the candidate know your intentions in advance because I cannot help but feel sorry for Buggie111 for getting thrown into the pit of RFA without that being disclosed to him. It should have been his RFA, not your hopeful experiment to change the trajectory of RFA. Mkdwtalk 22:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 March 2015[edit]


The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015[edit]

Date formats[edit]

WP:STRONGNAT allows for either MDY or DMY in Canada. WP:DATERET does not. You're changing several articles with already established formats to DMY. Please stop and revert those onto which you've imposed DMY. Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

I see that the Albertans have explained this to you via edit wars. Cheers. Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
The WP:Vancouver already determined in 2009 and 2012 that DMY would be used for Metro Vancouver articles. Mkdwtalk 19:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Who cares what the editors there do. DATERET is the principle. You are editing against guidelines. Walter Görlitz (talk) 19:28, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
It's called consensus that basis for all decisions and something actually defined at DATERET. Mkdwtalk 19:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost, 1 April 2015[edit]