Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Excuse me. Just a moment I thought that you had merged those two sections and wanted to separate them. But I understood that I had made a mistake and reverted my edit. Thanks. Keivan.fTalk 15:06, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
Just running this by you, as you are the unofficial record keeper ;) According to Pasleim, he has finished the short description import into Wikidata, although I have left him a query as there seems to be a few that were missed. Based on my work, I do not want anything else imported - there are more reliable templates to extract the data from. My conclusion is that Wikidata no longer requires Persondata and is no longer relevant to the Persondata debate. When Pasleim responds next week, I will produce some figures and try to get a consensus on Wikidata no longer needing Persondata.
I would like to keep the debate in easy bite size pieces, so I think the next step should be to ascertain if anyone or anything does actually use the Persondata template. I suggest an RfC "Do you use Persondata" emphasising that it is not a debate for its removal. The outcome will decide the next steps. Periglio (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2015 (UTC)