User talk:Msrag/Archive 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hello! This is my Archived Talk Page 3

← Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 →

Re: Aging!

I have replied :D Btw, I want the criticism section back. We will neeed to again vote on it, and more and more people should be invited to reach the consensus. What say? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:55, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Perfect idea. But, we will need voting for that too I guess, consensus to be precise. Otherwise, we have editors who will be removing it. So instead of adding in and then coming in to controversy :P, we can have a discussion and than add. Sounds better? -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
What all with be the part of critics section? Any idea? Tell me, I will get sources and will add all that with you :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
DUDE, how active you are :) I was thinking if we can create a separate article for criticisms as List of criticisms involving Shahrukh Khan B-), being such a long list :P Thanks for links, I'd seen all. Even those need to be added. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:01, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
If the section becomes too large, that's the only option. But I don't think so it will be much long enough tough, with lots of fans (trolls) will be interested in removing the infos. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 10:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Tag and Assess

Hi, can you please update your stats in Tag and Assess individual tally'. Thanks. Ssriram mt (talk) 04:07, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Check your inbox,...

Hello, Msrag. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.
-- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 17:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Neutrality discussion

Hello. This message is to inform you that there is an important discussion currently at the talk page of the article Shahrukh Khan. Since you have been involved in a prior dispute related to this, your views are welcomed here. With (hopeful) consensus, we can initiate a neutrality-aimed change in the said article. Thank you. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 15:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Re:Kahaani nominated for GA

Yeah, sure dude. I'll be there :) -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 07:29, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for nominating Kahaani for GA though I am little mad on you because that was my job!--Plea$ant 1623 08:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for that advice, dude!--Plea$ant 1623 08:55, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Yes, sure will be there.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey Msrag, I have started the review process :). Best of luck. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 14:44, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey, apologies Msrag, but I am no longer as active as I used to be on Wiki, especially in the article space. But I see that Ankitbhatt has started it, and it is likely to pass, so best of luck with this and your future ventures. Keeping my fingers crossed for FA. :) Secret of success (talk) 07:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Hey Msrag, the lead looks very much fine. Otherwise I must have worked on it. I don't think any need to work on that. It talks about characters, box office, reception, filming and all, which is enough for the lead section. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 08:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


I posted the note on just some random editor's talk pages, mostly the ones with whom i have interacted before. No one would want to exclude you. I will keep you posted too from next time. And thanks for your views. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 16:40, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Could you take a look at the lead of Mughal-e-Azam and give your comments? I've just re-worked it :). ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 13:12, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


Kahaani has passed the GA nomination. Well done! As a standard, I encourage you to take up a review yourself; I can see two Smarojit-nominated articles which need reviewing prior to June 26. Perhaps you could take one of those up? :) And yes, this is definitely not the end of the road for Kahaani, and you should work to make it an FA. All the best! ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 08:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Sure, no problem :). I hope your FAC goes better than mine (which was a disaster practically all the way through) :P. Take your time, there's no hurry, and in the meanwhile even I may start another film review. Cheers! ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 09:06, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Export hell seidel steiner.png Beer for your outstanding working on Kahaani,waiting for Paan Singh Tomar 25 CENTS VICTORIOUS (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

No rest, time for peer review!!!

Congrats! Yes, you should take some rest. Meanwhile, put the article in peer review. This is essentially to get it reviewed by editors who are totally unattached with the article. There is no binding in PR, I mean no time-bound limit, like GA review, where you are expected to answer queries promptly. IMO it is right time for PR. Following PR, it can be moved towards FAC.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:10, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

So, did you find a bunch of inconsistencies in reference formatting? I think |agency parameter may be an issue? Also, Ankit raised an issue about using IBNLive versus CNN-IBN. I do not know which one is what.--Dwaipayan (talk) 19:03, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
It is indeed a very nice and succinct gist of plans for reference formatting. I don't have anything to add. Indeed this list should be placed in the talk page of most of the articles that are undergoing improvement. Only one thing that may be somewhat extra is "Breaking a single reference in multiple lines for better readability". I personally think that is a good idea, but do not know whether this will add to article size at the end.--Dwaipayan (talk) 13:19, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
That's not too bad. 10 kb won't be a problem.--Dwaipayan (talk) 14:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi! I see you have done a lot of "reference formatting" so that each look similar in the edit mode. Indeed this is not required as such, as long as the output of all the references are similar in the reading mode. Anyway, IMO it is time to put this up for peer review, as this might take a long time. Do you have any other wishes, structure and content-wise? Prose in some places is not up to the mark. But that will improve.--Dwaipayan (talk) 03:45, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

INCINE notification

Hello. This is to inform you that there is a discussion going on at WT:INCINE regarding a specific user. The discussion can be viewed here. Your comments would be appreciated. Thanks. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 12:03, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Panipuri for you!

Though I am a little late, I want to thank you for taking Kahaani to GA level. Fingers crossed for FA and I'll be there!--Plea$ant 1623 11:55, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Peer review

That's great. While we think about other issues, the article will gain from peer review, if someone does the review. I think a heads up in wiki project films may be helpful. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 12:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

A small cup of coffee.JPG Thank-you very much for your peer review of 'Gangs of Wasseypur'. I am looking forward to your work, and think i can contribute as well! So, we better get started ! Cheers ! Superb Work ! Bineet Ojha |BINEET| 15:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Help for Kahaani's FA

If you need any help for taking Kahaani to FA, just ask me. I'll be available tommorow for the whole day. Cheers!--Plea$ant 1623 12:21, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Bol Bachchan

I saw your message to me, based on the critical reception of Bol Bachchan. The style which I typed the review is the basic style of writing the section in movies. But I don't mean that your writing was wrong. So,I hope you won't change the section again. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 2:26 pm, Today (UTC+5.5)

I told you that my style of writing is not wrong. You could see it if see Critical Reception section of movies like Pyaar Ka Punchnama and Ishaqzaade. You better understand. (talk) 08:56, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Gangs of Wasseypur

Thought you'd like to know that I have listed Gangs of Wasseypur to be moved to Gangs of Wasseypur Part 1.Ayanosh (talk) 12:18, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Cheeseburger.png Enjoy! Zeeyanketu (talk) 07:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

Here i am again !!

A small cup of coffee.JPG Hi, i noticed that you are interested in working on the article of Indian film personality Aamir Khan, so i am sure you will be interested in posting your views Here], in the meanwhile enjoy the coffee !! Bineet Ojha |BINEET| 16:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

some queries

I am new to wikipedia and i usually edit box office gross of bollywood films and after getting early warning messages i have always try to do my best and put boxofficeindia as reference and sometimes remove content which is not according to it but still getting warnings so please help me on this matter. thanks zeeyanketu (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

I did it because i got early warning that "at Wikipedia we use only Box Office India as a reliable source".So thats why i think some ip's adding boxofice numbers for fun and they are still doing it. Rowdy rathore's box office section is completely done by me with accurate figures.Can i change BOl bachchan,s box office to two parts as i did in rowdy rathore.Thanx a lot:) zeeyanketu (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Ok,how do you come to know that i do copy and paste the entire article and other than boxofficeindia ,other references are liable to be add to boxofficeindia.Can you help me furture when i required some help.zeeyanketu (talk) 13:48, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

My user talk page is full of warnings from the scratch because of my bad editing earlier.Can i remove these by editing?

zeeyanketu (talk) 01:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

ok sir!Then how to archive those instead of deleting them.zeeyanketu (talk) 01:36, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Uttar Pradesh

Hi, I've listed this page for peer review.Please i request you to give your valuable suggestions.Thank You -25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 16:58, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Hey, please leave your suggestion here Thank You --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS 07:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Another PR Face-smile.svg

Well there seems to be too many PR requests for you, but still if you get time please have a look at this PR also.Thanks Ayanosh (talk) 18:42, 20 July 2012 (UTC)


I hereby accept the honor bestowed on me :) Thanks for the barnstar. Bye the way, Kahaani has received a wonderful peer review. I have not started working on the article based on the PR though. --Dwaipayan (talk) 14:34, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Consider adding info about the film's journey with the censors. Secret of success (talk) 12:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

I have added you to Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians

Just to let you know (I am supposed to - this is what it says).----Plea$ant 1623 09:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding me that am missing.. :) I shall return soon but not sure when.. Was damn busy at work and in personal life too... TC till then ...Msrag talk2me 10:32, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
It's good for wiki whenever you will be back.---zeeyanketu talk to me 16:36, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Weihnachten10.gif The Glowing Christmas Tree
Merry Christmas to you, Msrag! P.S. - I have done almost all the work in Kahaani's peer review. --Plea$ant 1623 08:44, 25 December 2012 (UTC)