User talk:MusikAnimal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Crystal Clear app clock.svg It is around 01:35 where this user lives in New York City. (Purge)
Biohazard symbol.svg

Hello from[edit]

A Beko appliance could easily have burnt my friends place down, when it caught fire. And they don't give a flying fuck.

The public need to know. I'll reword it.

Hello from CesarLeto[edit]

Hello MusikAnimal. Sorry I forget to write the reason for changing the page. I just added Jay Park new Studio album EVOLUTION in his Studio albums discography, the album already been released in September 1, and couple of new singles but still nobody update his discography. Thank you. — CesarLeto 20:00, 16 September 2014 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CesarLeto (talkcontribs)

Alliance Global Group[edit]

Dear MusikAnimal, You have deleted a company article called Alliance Global Group before 2 months ago due to mareketing tone. The same deleted article has been recreated by a wikpedia editor. i wanted to notify that

  • the company is not notable one
  • they dont have enough sources for citation.
  • no newspapers have been mentioned about alliance global group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baxzius (talkcontribs)
@Baxzius: Hi there. Personally I think things look much better this time around, with some decent sources. However if you feel the article does not satisfy the notability guideline, or otherwise meets some deletion criteria, you can nominate it for deletion. Hope this helps. — MusikAnimal talk 00:56, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello from Greatblade12 code please[edit]

May i pleas have the code for the Dead Spirit page you deleted for improvement. thank you Greatblade12 (talk) 23:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)greatblade13

@Greatblade12: Hey! Your article can now be found at User:Greatblade12/Dead Spirit. I have set it up so that when you finish the article, you can submit it for review. Simply hit the "Submit your draft for review!" button. This way others can help you refine it before it gets published to the mainspace. However, before you go any further, I'd make sure the band meets the notability guideline, as even a well-sourced may still get deleted if the subject is not notable. The fact is, unfortunately, not everything can be on Wikipedia. Just please bear that in mind. Let me know if you need help. Best — MusikAnimal talk 01:05, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Please undelete article on Richie Shakin' Nagan[edit]

You deleted the article I posted for Richie Shakin' Nagan for copyright infringement based on it as being taken from the Grateful Garcia Gathering website. I gave them that bio to use. It is the bio from my facebook page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ShakinNagan (talkcontribs) 01:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@ShakinNagan: Please see the notice I left on your talk page. Even if you are the copyright owner, you need to license the content for use on Wikipedia. There are steps that must be taken to verify the licensing, see WP:DONATETEXT. In many cases it may be easier to simply reword the content altogether. Sorry for the inconvenience. Copyright is taken very seriously on Wikipedia as there are obvious legal concerns involved. Let me know if you need help. — MusikAnimal talk 01:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 September 2014[edit]

Hello from Cuno1234[edit]

Hi :), I made an edit on the Halo series page that you just got rid of, it was constructive information explaining that Bungie formally developed the franchise, but now 343 industries develop it, which is true. Please keep that minor change I made, thanks :D

18/09/2014 Cuno1234Cuno1234 (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Kevin Mitnick[edit]

Hello, requesting guidance for a proposed edit to the Kevin Mitnick page. I noticed that you mentioned that "Kevin Mitnick is an American convicted felon" normally wouldn't be noted in the first line of the article, UNLESS this is what the subject is known for. The rationale for this edit came from using the Frank Abagnale article as a model (Abagnale even wrote a promotional blurb for Mitnick's published autobiography), and from the fact that this is indeed what Mitnick is most famous for. See a simple Google image search resulting in his wanted posters, as well as the fact that he promotes his "most wanted" status himself to position himself in his current field. Given this information, would it be inappropriate to make such an edit in the opening line of the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boorsours (talkcontribs)

@Boorsours: The first sentence generally states the name and occupation, or why they are notable. This may be because of criminal matter, but I don't see the point in making a big fuss over it when the second sentence details the convictions. Not having it be the very first thing in the article makes it more neutral, and in my opinion feels more consistent with other BLPs. If I were you I'd bring my concerns to the talk page to gain input from other involved editors, and be careful no to start another edit war. — MusikAnimal talk 20:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Okay thank you for the advice. I will take the issue to the talk page of the article as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boorsours (talkcontribs) 01:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


Hi, I saw your comment on the AIV and I do have links to pages that support the idea that the person was evading a block. I've never reported such a thing like evasion/sockpuppetry, so I suppose I didn't know exactly what to do. Here are some revisions: from IP address from suspected sockpuppet. The pages that the person keeps editing and edit warring on are on the same topic (bog bodies) and they are formatted the same, which strongly indicates block evasion. They've also claimed other user's reverts are vandalism and even gave a personal attack in one instance. --GouramiWatcherpride 21:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello from NancyJeanGF[edit]

You just deleted my "article": Sorry, it was actually an empty page - a plug for a future article stub on the subject. I am a very new editor and this is my first try at my own article. I thought I created it in my Sandbox. I was actually working on another article stub in parallel. I would have unpublished it if I would have realized it went into the public space not my sandbox. Thank you for deleting it. Once again - it was not intentional.NancyJeanGF (talk) 02:47, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

@NancyJeanGF: Welcome! Don't worry about the mistake. You can find your sandbox here, or if you'd like you can use the article wizard to create new articles. That will set it up so that it can be submitted for review before being published to the mainspace. Let me know if you need any help! — MusikAnimal talk 03:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
@MusikAnimal: Thank you! I just did submit an article stub for review: I do not feel like I can do a whole article by myself yet, plus I hope others will help expanding/formatting it. NancyJeanGF (talk) 03:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)


Hi MusikAnimal - many thanks for granting Rollback and I promise not to abuse itEugene-elgato (talk) 06:11, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello from PapaDoc88[edit]

Hello MusikAnimal,

I contact you, because you are trusted admin and I know you'll help me. I company page was created in violation of Wikipedia laws by Indian agency and they made sure it bypass the Wikipedia standards with some tricks, like fake references. The is the page:

Please delete this page and ban if possible the following users: ans GB Fan. This users are commercial creators and don't have place in free content community.

If you need proofs that this people get money for creation of this page, please contact me.


Dennis — Preceding unsigned comment added by PapaDoc88 (talkcontribs) 07:41, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

@PapaDoc88: Hi, what you are referring to is called paid editing, and while strongly discouraged, it is not a violation of policy. Any issues you have with neutrality or unreliable sources can be expressed on article's talk page, or you could add any relevant maintenance templates to the article. Any users that persistently have issues maintaining a neutral point of view or exert a problematic conflict of interest may be subject to preventive measures. Based on their history and user group, I have serious doubts GB fan is affiliated with this organization. Hope this clears things up, thanks — MusikAnimal talk 14:55, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
@MusicANimal, I submitted the article for deletion, on request of the owner of the company. Hope it will not take long this article to be removed

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by PapaDoc88 (talkcontribs)

No attack[edit]

I did not make any personal attack on Winkelvi. Whatever I said was to explain why I didn't put forward that idea earlier. You do not have any right to remove my comment especially if it's non-disruptive. But still I do not want to start to conflict over comment. So I'll just modify it instead of adding it back outright. KahnJohn27 (talk) 07:56, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

@KahnJohn27: Manipulating other's comments on talk pages is most certainly not acceptable, but here I was trying to cool things down from what appeared to be a heated behavioural dispute. The portion of the comment that I removed did not seem to serve any purpose other than to disparage another editor. All I ask is to stay on topic, and don't comment on other contributors' actions. I do apologize for removing your words, and thank you for your understanding of my rationale. — MusikAnimal talk 15:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Help With Middle East Eye Please[edit] there anything you can do to help with Middle East Eye?....just look at the history and you will see quickly what is happening with the same editor using multiple accounts to delete the same content many, many times and despite repeated warnings and reversions by Cluebot, Administrators, other users. He has said over and over again that he is an employee of the company which is the subject of the article who simply disagrees with the content and wants it removed yet has never once come to the Talk page. I already requested page protection once but it was declined and I got a warning about Edit Warring but I am a loss here as what to do. He apparently will not stop vandalizing the article unless something is done. Susan belt74 (talk) 08:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Users blocked by Ks0stm. If disruption continues we may need to protect the page. Thanks — MusikAnimal talk 15:06, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Millfield House[edit]

Hello. MusikAnimal. Can you help? with the following articles; Millfield House, Millfield Theatre and Millfield Theatre, Edmonton, London. To cut a long story short the original article of Millfield House was redirected to Millfield Theatre without discussion with much of the original text being deleted. I have redirected the article back to its original location and rewrote the article. Can you try to repair the links to both articles? and remove the link to Millfield Theatre, Edmonton, London which I set up by mistake. Hope this is all clear. Thanks Northmetpit (talk) 10:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

@Northmetpit: I'm not sure if I follow. Millfield Theatre now redirects to Millfield House, is that not what you wanted? Also, you would like Millfield Theatre, Edmonton, London to be deleted entirely? — MusikAnimal talk 17:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi MusikAnimal. Thanks for swift reply. Sorry, I didn't explain myself correctly. I would like to see the redirect removed so there are separate links to the two articles and the Millfield Theatre, Edmonton, London removed. Thanks Northmetpit (talk) 12:28, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
@Northmetpit: Okay, I think I've done what you needed. I deleted Millfield Theatre and then moved Millfield Theatre, Edmonton, London there. So now you are left with Millfield House and Millfield Theatre. Millfield Theatre, Edmonton, London redirects to Millfield Theatre. Let me know if you need anything else! — MusikAnimal talk 23:30, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Hi MusikAnimal. Thanks for your help that's exactly what was needed. It's great to know there are really helpful people on here. Cheers Northmetpit (talk) 09:39, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello from Drdemartino[edit]

I posted this already under the fakestu talk page, but I wanted to put it here under my real account. You posted on several of my students' talk pages. I want to apologize for the error. I am the professor Drdemartino. Here is our course page. I want my students to learn how to edit Wikipedia for several reasons, noted in the project goals. Today was an attempt at practicing. I showed them, with the fakestu page, how to create userpages, and practice editing. I realize now I should have had them do that in their sandboxes (although last year a student was scolded for that, as well). Is there a more appropriate place for them to practice? I definitely don't want the students diving right into editing the assignment page. Thank you for your feedback and advice; you clearly care about Wikipedia, as do I. Drdemartino (talk) 17:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

@Drdemartino: Hey! First off no need to apologize, it was obvious what was going on and it's not like you were creating test pages in the mainspace. The only reason I was concerned was because some of the user pages they created read like social networking profiles, implying using Wikipedia as a web host. Looks like they've blanked their user pages, so no harm done. I'm honestly not that familiar with our education program, but I can attest that the sandbox is always a safe place to practice. The only things not welcome there (or anywhere) are copyrighted, offensive or libelous content.
If you need more information, you could ask at the education noticeboard. They know all the ins and outs of the program. As far as I can tell your course looks great, and would yield substantive improvement to a live article – something I welcome with open arms. Hope this helps, and thanks for helping improve Wikipedia :) — MusikAnimal talk 18:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello from Adostaler[edit]

Hey, I had made those edits because the information seemed irrelevant at the point in the article in which it was.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adostaler (talkcontribs) 20:18, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

FAC for xx (album)[edit]

Hi! Since you're an experienced editor in music-related articles and the alternative/rock WikiProjects, would you be interested reviewing or commenting on my FA nomination of the article xx (album)? The review page has been inactive for over a week, so another reviewer's input would be greatly appreciated. Cheers! Dan56 (talk) 07:46, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Dustz page[edit]

Hi, I was trying to update Dustz's band page since 1. KenT is no longer a member of the band 2. They have two new band members & 3. they have had two new singles out this year. I see that you have removed the changes i made. Please reconsider so that readers have up to date facts about this band. Thanks. Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). (talk) 01:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hey! I saw that you add "hello" as a band member. Arbitrarily added "hello", "hi", etc is a common form of vandalism. Through my own research I didn't find any correlation between Dustz and someone named hello, but nonetheless I've undone my revert. My apologies if I have incorrectly identified your edits as vandalism. — MusikAnimal talk 01:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Oh, i completely understand. but there is an actual person in the band named "hello" now ( [1] )(I don't think there's any info on his actual name). But anyway, thank you so much. (talk) 01:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Deliberate accusation by User: Winkelvi[edit]

On Talk: Robin Williams, User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) made this comment Creating a new infobox parameter to satisfy one person complaining about one celebrity is silly. Due to the nature of his comment I thought he was referring to me and I took objection to it. When I raised my objection others said Richard wasn't referring to me. However even though you said earlier not to comment on editors but to comment on content, User: Winkelvi in a comment accused me of trying to make the whole Rfc about me. This comment of Winkelvi is clearly an accusation on me in which he accuses me of starting the Rfc for my own personal purposes which I've stated many times isn't true. Was it my fault that I thought Richard was referring to me? Even if it was what right does Winkelvi have to accuse me of trying to make the Rfc about me? This is clearly an accusation against me. I think that comment of his should be removed since the whole comment is about accusing me instead of commenting on the Rfc. KahnJohn27 (talk) 06:13, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

@KahnJohn27: My best advice? Drop it. Ignore it. Return to constructive editing. I apologize for being blunt, but all of you are acting like children. All I ask is that you stay on topic. If someone says something negative about you, and you really let it get to you, bring it up on their talk page. Don't reply on the article talk page, you only escalate tension that leads to more off-topic drama. If you're so inclined, bring it to AN/I. — MusikAnimal talk 15:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)


MMORPG for four years Taera why u delete? --Goccie (talk) 15:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

@Goccie: See your talk page. — MusikAnimal talk 15:28, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Look at the article it deserves to stay! Goccie (talk) 15:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello from[edit]

Hi, I just tried to remove an album title on a band page that has not been officially announced. It is not officially confirmed or cited and should be taken down. The page is Walk The Moon (talk) 20:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello from Froman abe chi[edit]

Hi MusikAnimal,

Can you help me reverse the deletion of the following page so the copy can be changed and updated? Thanks!

19:03, 8 August 2014 MusikAnimal (talk | contribs) deleted page Seventy Seven Energy (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of — Preceding unsigned comment added by Froman abe chi (talkcontribs)

Hello from Rogers2098[edit]

Hi, i'm Rogers2098 and well I just want you to know that I change the information because the trailer of that specific movie has been release and the name "A Many Splintered Thing" has been replaced. Also a tried to change the name of the article but I didn't know how. Im new in this by the way, but if you think that os better that way ok. Rogers2098 (talk) 05:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
  1. ^