User talk:N0n3up

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! -- Aunva6talk - contribs 16:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

Talk Page N0n3up[edit]

User page.

Your request on my page[edit]

Hi, N0n3up! Welcome to Wikipedia. How can I help you? I notice that you're currently edit warring with User:BilCat on Americans with regard to the religion/ethnicity of Einstein. Is that what you're worried about?

I have to say, I don't quite understand your view there. Your note on the article talkpage is very short and general, and you don't offer any sources for what you say. Considering that the article Albert Einstein contradicts your claim that Einstein was a Jew "religiously", you really need to offer some evidence for your view. I note from Albert Einstein that Albert's parents were non-observant Jews, that he went to a Catholic elementary school, and that he's in the category Category:Jewish agnostics (plus various other kinds of agnostics). What's your basis for saying he was a Jew "religiously"? Did you notice that BilCat referred you, in an edit summary, to "his bio article" (i.e. Albert Einstein) and sources there? (N.b., please don't edit war.) Bishonen | talk 13:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

WP teahouse logo 3.png
Hello, N0n3up. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived. Message added by Howicus (Did I mess up?) 02:29, 5 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Michelangelo[edit]

Michelangelo requested to be buried in "his beloved city of Florence". Can I ask you why you changed a referenced statement that was quite specific to a generalised statement? I don't think it had anything to do with his "birthplace". It had to do with his love and loyalty for the city where he was educated as an artist. Amandajm (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your change to the article seems to be quite arbitrary, and I cannot understand why you made it, or why you imagined that what was stated in the article might be erroneous, since it was referenced, and since it was so very obviously correct, from the context of the article itself!
  • There is a whole section in the article about Michelangelo's apprenticeship in Florence.
  • There are three sections in the article in which the city name '"Florence" is given.
  • There is a sentence in the article that states: "A siege of the city ensued, and Michelangelo went to the aid of his beloved Florence by working on the city's fortifications from 1528 to 1529. "
So why would anyone who had actually read the article, imagine that the region of Tuscany (which includes the rival city Siena, among others) be what was meant, instead of "Florence"?
The source is Coughlan. The page number is given. The exact words, as written by Coughlan are "As he wanted, his body was taken home to Florence". Coughlan's source is Vasari.
Please don't make changes like this unless you really know the subject, know that what you are reading is wrong, and can reference the change you have made. You can do a lot of damage to an article by stuffing up referenced material. If your change is slight, you allow the reference to remain, and the person who watches the article doesn't have detailed knowledge and presumes your change has been sourced, then you have lost an accurate fact, in favour of an inaccurate one.
Amandajm (talk) 11:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 27 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 29[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peru, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paracas and Moche. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grid plan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

September 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to High culture may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ] [[Sistine Chapel ceiling]]]][[File:Acropolis of Athens 01361.JPG|thumb|250px|The [[Parthenon]]]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:36, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Chowder[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chowder (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Diffs: [1][2][3] and resubmission here.

Wikipedia is pretty clear about how it treats contributed information. If information comes from reliable sources, it is typically acceptable, assuming that the content isn't trivial. Though your edits were intended in good faith, you have submitted improperly sourced claims about what sort of creature the title character in Chowder is. Though you have resubmitted the content in this edit, and though you make some sort of an attempt to explain your sources, both of your sources (TV.com and Wikia.com,) are not acceptable for our purposes on Wikipedia, because both sources rely on user contributions, and have no clear editorial oversight. For this reason, your contribution has been reverted again. Please do not resubmit this content until you can support it with a reliable published source as explained by WP:RS. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Submitting the content after I explained in significant detail why your contribution is inappropriate to add, is disruptive. If you add the content again without finding a suitable reliable source, it will be considered vandalism. As I have explained to you above and at my talk page, TV.com is not a reliable source because it can be edited by TV.com users. Notice the "Edit" link next to "SHOW SUMMARY" in this link. Sites that allow community submissions are not considered reliable sources: TV.com, Wikia, IMDb, Wikipedia, Answers.com, Yahoo! Answers, blogs, etc. are some examples of sites that do not meet WP:RS Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Café Procope, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Consort. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks boo ;) (N0n3up (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2014 (UTC))

KFC in Italy[edit]

Excuse me sir, could you explain me excatly what is your problem with KFC in Italy??? As you can see here (http://www.kfc.it/ristoranti-kfc-in-italia), the first KFC restaurant has been opened in Rome on 21st November and a second one will be opened in Turin on 27 November. Can you also explain me why don't you delete the "Sweden" section, country in which KFC is currently not operating and you still delete "Italy" in which KFC is currently operating? I cordially invite you to stop changing the "Italy" section. Thank you. --TeddyDTE (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

I totally agree with his statement. KFC has opened in Rome yesterday as you can see here, or here, or even here and again here. References can be provided even from its italian website KFC Italia. On the other hand, there are no outlets in Sweden opened yet and no official KFC website, but only few articles on the net dating back to February. So, why do you think references of KFC in Sweden (regarding a future event) are more reliable than the ones of an already operating outlet in Italy?–Kingston28 (talk) 10:08, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
I moved "Sweden" to "Currently abandoned markets or never opened" section.–Kingston28 (talk) 10:19, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

New World[edit]

No dictionary definition of the "New World" includes Oceania or Australia. If you want to include them in "New World" then please provide appropriate sources. Thank you. --Whattheheyhey (talk) 04:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Sources stating that the New World is North and South America, or the Western Hemisphere:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/New%20World?s=t
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/new%20world
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/american-english/new-world?q=New+World
http://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/the-new-world#the-new-world_1
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/New-World?q=New+World
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/english/New-World
--Whattheheyhey (talk) 05:25, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Discussion continues at the article talk page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:New_World#Reference_.2F_Australasia
--Whattheheyhey (talk) 06:05, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Thirteen Factories[edit]

Hi there. Not sure why you have an issue with the phrase "the United States". The country is always referred to in this way hence you don't say or write "flag of United States", it's "flag of the United States". Please leave the correct English as it is. Thanks.  Philg88 talk 07:35, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

Van Gogh[edit]

Discuss here: [4]...Modernist (talk) 15:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Lecce[edit]

Hallo N0n3up, can you please join the discussion on Talk:Lecce? thanks, Alex2006 (talk) 06:37, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Deunanknute. I noticed that you recently removed some content from BDSM without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Deunanknute (talk) 04:24, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

R welch[edit]

The source doesn't provide what I'm trying to prove?. I saw that interview with her on that show online but now they took it down and just left the dialog of what she said in the interview.. If the interview "video" can be found again i investigate and in the text too clearly states that she says her father was from Bolivia which is totally correct and then she goes on to say "he was of Spanish descent" .. what exactly do you think that means? She's knows what "descent" means otherwise she didn't need to say it... You think she is wrong?. and doesn't know what descent means?. Maybe you need to see the actual video.. but that's the dialog of it. ill see. Regards. Puertorico1 (talk)