- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia
- Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
- Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
- Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
- No edit warring or sock puppetry.
- If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to .
- Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
- Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.
The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! -- Aunva6talk - contribs 16:32, 1 October 2013 (UTC)
Talk Page N0n3up
Your request on my page
Hi, N0n3up! Welcome to Wikipedia. How can I help you? I notice that you're currently edit warring with User:BilCat on Americans with regard to the religion/ethnicity of Einstein. Is that what you're worried about?
I have to say, I don't quite understand your view there. Your note on the article talkpage is very short and general, and you don't offer any sources for what you say. Considering that the article Albert Einstein contradicts your claim that Einstein was a Jew "religiously", you really need to offer some evidence for your view. I note from Albert Einstein that Albert's parents were non-observant Jews, that he went to a Catholic elementary school, and that he's in the category Category:Jewish agnostics (plus various other kinds of agnostics). What's your basis for saying he was a Jew "religiously"? Did you notice that BilCat referred you, in an edit summary, to "his bio article" (i.e. Albert Einstein) and sources there? (N.b., please don't edit war.) Bishonen | talk 13:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC).
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Michelangelo requested to be buried in "his beloved city of Florence". Can I ask you why you changed a referenced statement that was quite specific to a generalised statement? I don't think it had anything to do with his "birthplace". It had to do with his love and loyalty for the city where he was educated as an artist. Amandajm (talk) 00:44, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Your change to the article seems to be quite arbitrary, and I cannot understand why you made it, or why you imagined that what was stated in the article might be erroneous, since it was referenced, and since it was so very obviously correct, from the context of the article itself!
- There is a whole section in the article about Michelangelo's apprenticeship in Florence.
- There are three sections in the article in which the city name '"Florence" is given.
- There is a sentence in the article that states: "A siege of the city ensued, and Michelangelo went to the aid of his beloved Florence by working on the city's fortifications from 1528 to 1529. "
- So why would anyone who had actually read the article, imagine that the region of Tuscany (which includes the rival city Siena, among others) be what was meant, instead of "Florence"?
- The source is Coughlan. The page number is given. The exact words, as written by Coughlan are "As he wanted, his body was taken home to Florence". Coughlan's source is Vasari.
- Please don't make changes like this unless you really know the subject, know that what you are reading is wrong, and can reference the change you have made. You can do a lot of damage to an article by stuffing up referenced material. If your change is slight, you allow the reference to remain, and the person who watches the article doesn't have detailed knowledge and presumes your change has been sourced, then you have lost an accurate fact, in favour of an inaccurate one.
- Amandajm (talk) 11:43, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 27 July
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Peru, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Paracas and Moche. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grid plan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antiquity. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- ] [[Sistine Chapel ceiling]]]][[File:Acropolis of Athens 01361.JPG|thumb|250px|The [[Parthenon]]]]]]
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Chowder (TV series), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.
Wikipedia is pretty clear about how it treats contributed information. If information comes from reliable sources, it is typically acceptable, assuming that the content isn't trivial. Though your edits were intended in good faith, you have submitted improperly sourced claims about what sort of creature the title character in Chowder is. Though you have resubmitted the content in this edit, and though you make some sort of an attempt to explain your sources, both of your sources (TV.com and Wikia.com,) are not acceptable for our purposes on Wikipedia, because both sources rely on user contributions, and have no clear editorial oversight. For this reason, your contribution has been reverted again. Please do not resubmit this content until you can support it with a reliable published source as explained by WP:RS. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- Submitting the content after I explained in significant detail why your contribution is inappropriate to add, is disruptive. If you add the content again without finding a suitable reliable source, it will be considered vandalism. As I have explained to you above and at my talk page, TV.com is not a reliable source because it can be edited by TV.com users. Notice the "Edit" link next to "SHOW SUMMARY" in this link. Sites that allow community submissions are not considered reliable sources: TV.com, Wikia, IMDb, Wikipedia, Answers.com, Yahoo! Answers, blogs, etc. are some examples of sites that do not meet WP:RS Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:06, 10 September 2014 (UTC)