If you must contact me and it's important, please use Special:EmailUser/NYKevin in addition to or in place of this page. I have Wikipedia set up to notify me of changes here via email, but I don't 100% trust it.
- 1 GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up
- 2 GOCE Blitz wrap-up and September 2013 drive invitation
- 3 GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up
- 4 Nomination for deletion of Template:Finalhist
- 5 Email OK?
- 6 Tagging Redirect pages (WP:RFD#Next Hungarian parliamentary election)
- 7 Beef Jerky listed at Redirects for discussion
GOCE July 2013 copy edit drive wrap-up
|Guild of Copy Editors July 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter
We have completed our July backlog elimination drive.
The drive wrap-up newsletter is now ready for review.
GOCE Blitz wrap-up and September 2013 drive invitation
|Guild of Copy Editors August Blitz wrap-up
Participation: Out of sixteen people who signed up for this blitz, nine copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.
GOCE September 2013 drive wrap-up
|Guild of Copy Editors September 2013 backlog elimination drive wrap-up newsletter
– Your project coordinators:.
Template:Finalhist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Magioladitis (talk) 21:51, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Tagging Redirect pages (WP:RFD#Next Hungarian parliamentary election)
The reason for tagging redirect pages is so that people coming to those pages can see that the redirect is up for discussion and so can join the discussion: they might also want to fix their bookmarks or at least keep an eye on them, if the result of the redirect is to retarget it, they will get a surprise. It's standard practice to tag the redirect when it is the redirect that is up for discussion. I mistakenly added another entry by doing so, and User:Steel1943 kindly fixed it up for me as I was away for a long weekend.
The COPYVIO I mentioned not because I believe it is such, but to allow other editors to judge: I've had no part in it, and since the redirect and the target are both being discussed it would seem helpful to me to tie the two together: I mentioned the redirect at the COPYVIO discussion for the same reason.
Beef Jerky listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beef Jerky. Since you had some involvement with the Beef Jerky redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 18:40, 13 June 2014 (UTC)