User talk:Nadirali

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

"A New Hope" wasn't added in the first "Star Wars" film until its re-release on April 10, 1981.[edit]

I really hate to break this to you, but the title "A New Hope" wasn't added in the first "Star Wars" film until its re-release on April 10, 1981. So I suggest that you change the year from 1979 to 1981. AdamDeanHall (talk) 23:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Articles/pages I created since I re-joined Wikipedia[edit]

Nomination of Trash Bag Bunch for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trash Bag Bunch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trash Bag Bunch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Euryalus (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Re: Requested move on original Star Wars films[edit]

How does it work? Where do I go?--00717F (talk) 04:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of Star Trek and Star Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Alexander. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:07, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cat coat genetics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Calico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

References[edit]

We at Wikipedia love evidence-based medicine. Please cite high-quality reliable sources. We typically use review articles, major textbooks and position statements of national or international organizations. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. The edit box has a build in citation tool to easily format references based on the PMID or ISBN. WP:MEDHOW walks through editing step by step. We also provide style advice about the structure and content of medicine-related encyclopedia articles. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 03:18, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

None of those are a high quality source. Please see WP:MEDRS. People can have constipation at any time. If you are trying to say that menstruation causes constipation you will need a proper reference. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Trash Bag Bunch[edit]

Please stop reverting the redirect link on this article as has been done here and here. The decision reached by discussion of other wikipedia editors was that the article did not meet Wikipedia's guidelines for inclusion but should not be deleted and should be redirected to the parent page instead. The result was not to "keep" the article as your reverts claim. Also please do not alter the note on the article's talk page as was done here. This will not change the outcome of that AFD. If you disagree with the outcome, you may initiate a new discussion and gain a different consensus for that article . --RadioFan (talk) 03:28, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

RadioFan is correct in his comments. The AfD was closed as redirect, and that decision cannot be overturned unless you take it to deletion review. Please do not change it to "keep". Rcsprinter123 (discuss) @ 15:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Nadirali. You have new messages at RadioFan's talk page.
Message added 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RadioFan (talk) 17:22, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Basic diagram of robots in the Lely Juno series.jpg, which you've attributed to An OTRS notice was applied over 30 days ago, but no message at OTRS has been logged since then. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:29, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

Hi Nadirali. This and this were very inappropriate edits. You deliberately altered someone else's AfD close to make it look like the AfD closed as keep in order to revert the article to its pre-discussion version. Don't do that again. Sam Walton (talk) 21:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Though I stand by my above comment - you definitely shouldn't have attempted to deceive another editor like that - I just wanted to let you know that I agree that the AfD should have closed as keep, and have changed the outcome of the discussion since the original was a non-admin closure. Sam Walton (talk) 21:47, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Helsinki Central Library, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cinema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Pseudoscience shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NeilN talk to me 01:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Mackenzee Wittke for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mackenzee Wittke is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mackenzee Wittke until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 04:48, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Move requests[edit]

If the matter (on Star Wars) was brought up again, wouldn't it just be rejected in a land slide? I have even began making preparations for a future RM but it would likely be rejected because the consensus last time seems to be hostile towards the situation. Are you sure it would be able to get a larger amount of participants if it was brought up on WikiProject Star Wars next time? Cheers. Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 22:19, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Assalam Alaikum[edit]

Hello brother: are u sindhi please reply on my talk page please brother..--محمد مجیب (talk) 09:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corruption in Canada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hero worship (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Christopher's Dairy: Echoes of Dollanganger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

WP:ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 11:23, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Now WP:AN#Topic ban violation. OccultZone (TalkContributionsLog) 16:51, 16 April 2015 (UTC)