User talk:Nagle

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives of this talk page[edit]

Files missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media files you uploaded as:

are missing a description and/or other details on their image description pages. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the images, and they will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

== Remember the 13th ==--John Nagle (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC) Hey, the current people editing the article might be socks of the original people that created the first version of the article last year. It might be worthwhile to open up an SPI, but I'll leave it up to you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

  • I sent the article to AfD earlier today, but you know that.John Nagle (talk) 06:29, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

CBR at RegisterFly[edit]

You need to google the titles of all the CBR articles preferably inside the CBR site; they have moved the content around, e.g. the first article cited is now at Then you need to file a quest with the list of new/working URLs at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist. Otherwise sooner or later a busy body will come and remove all those references entirely. Hope this helps. Someone not using his real name (talk) 19:51, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

ANI notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Yank Barry. Thank you. -- Atama 16:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)


Why did you revert my legitimate edits? Talk:Mt._Gox#legitimate_edits_reverted -- (talk) 18:36, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Banc de Binary[edit]

Hello, thanks for suggesting rollback on the Banc de Binary page, it's been whitewashed by CorporateM, a paid for editor. Is there anything that can be done about these kinds of users and their huge text editing?HistorianofRecenttimes (talk) 11:38, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Talk:Banc De Binary. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Evidence. Okteriel (talk) 08:16, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
That Banc de Binary violated US law is clearly established. SEC litigation release: [1]. CFTC litigation release: [2]. Wall Street Journal article.[3]. Banc de Binary admitting their press release claiming CFTC clearance was "inaccurate": [4]. Banc de Binary agreed to stay out of the US, and the SEC and CFTC didn't take the matter further. John Nagle (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Okteriel was just blocked as a sockpuppet, so I wouldn't worry about his nonsense. I reverted his edit of your talk page comment as soon as I saw it. Coretheapple (talk) 20:24, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Hey, I know that things have been getting a bit heated with the Banc de Binary situation. I just wanted to reach out to you about this comment. While such comments may seem to be directed at an organization, we have to remember that sometimes individuals of these organizations could take it as a bit of a personal attack towards themselves. I think it might be best to focus on the content and not make comments towards the contributors. Hopefully we can all be mindful of what we say so that we can have a nice, civil discussion. Thanks for your consideration and I look forward to working with you and everyone else in improving the article. Mike VTalk 05:21, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

That particular issue has already been hashed out on WP:ANI. The consensus was that it's not an unreasonable statement given their record with regulatory agencies. John Nagle (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't think I could agree that there was a consensus formed on ANI that such comments were appropriate. Regardless, a discussion at ANI does not supersede one of the core principles of this project. All I'm asking is that we all refrain from any name calling and focus on building an article. Mike VTalk 17:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
Read this new CFTC litigation release.[5] Any questions left about this not being an illegal operation? John Nagle (talk) 18:25, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
I did see it and for the time being the most important point to note is that the article states "alleged violations". Until it has been proven in a court of law, the actions of the company shouldn't be deemed "illegal". Over time, the court matters will be finalized and more conclusive statements can be made. Remember, Wikipedia is first and foremost an encyclopedia, not a news source or the "court of public opinion". There's no deadline and there is no need to rush to any conclusions before due process has been done. Mike VTalk 19:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
True. We can also cite BdB's reply in court, if you can find it. The current issue in that case is that the court has ordered Oren Laurent to come to Washington DC for a deposition. His lawyers are fighting that. But he's a US citizen, and, as the court points, out, if you're a US citizen, you have to come when the courts call. That will be interesting. John Nagle (talk) 20:59, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
Regards, Nagle, and Mike V. Based on your discussion above, I wonder if you could discuss the validity of Nagle's statement in a new Incidents thread, "The CFTC told them in 2013 they were operating illegally in the US", as it appears to be relevant.
I must confess that I do not want to believe that some concern has set itself up to perpetuate in Wikipedia talkpages the rumor that BDB has committed criminal acts, recognizing not only Wikipedia's influence in public opinion, but also the influence of Wikipedia talkpage rumors upon Wikipedians who then shape public opinion. But the more evidence I am shown that there exists a coordinated effort to spread false rumors of our lawlessness on Wikipedia talkpages, the more I tend to view the hypothesis credible. BDBIsrael (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
We're well beyond rumor. BdB is in Federal court. Anyway, this belongs at Talk:Banc de Binary. John Nagle (talk) 22:00, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
User:TParis has convinced me that Nagle's statement is borderline rather than clearly a violation. However, the issue of coordinated effort to spread rumors is not a matter for the article talkpage. Suffice. BDBIsrael (talk) 22:10, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Nikita Kahn[edit]

Hello, can you have someone delete the page please, immediately. I will redo the page once I have fixed her IMDB credits and have more sources to cite. Infideastudios (talk) 22:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Yank Barry for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yank Barry is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yank Barry until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 02:54, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Megaphone screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 07:59, 4 July 2014 (UTC)