- 1 New Page Patrol survey
- 2 Holiday Cheer
- 3 October 2013
- 4 Editing glitch
- 5 Ways to improve Chris Samnee
- 6 ANI notice
- 7 Re: refactoring comments
- 8 Talkback
- 9 Disambiguation link notification for April 21
- 10 Krause, F&W, GD
- 11 Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:BravadoGroup
- 12 May 2014
- 13 LA edit-a-thons on May 23 and 31
- 14 David Sehnal
- 15 That funfunfun letter you received about "that" article
- 16 L.A. events on June 21 and July 6
- 17 Deletion of Modern Future
- 18 FYI
- 19 Comic (publishing) company vs specialist publishing firm
New Page Patrol survey
New page patrol – Survey Invitation
Hello NatGertler! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part.
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey
|Michael Q. Schmidt talkback is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings. - MQS|
Ways to improve Chris Samnee
Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. NatGertler, thanks for creating Chris Samnee!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please choose some appropriate categories near the bottom of the article to help improve the overall article and make the article more easily searchable by wikipedia users. Thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 05:38, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your note. Yes most of the note is pre-written. I usually do stay at least about three days or more away from the creating date to avoid tagging an article if an editor is in the process of working on the article. The queue skipped over to the current date somehow, so you do have a great point. So sorry for the mishap.
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Yank Barry. Thank you. -- Atama頭 16:12, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Re: refactoring comments
I am censoring Roscelese's comments because she did the same thing to me, but no one is warning her. An eye for an eye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Artist's Edition, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manhunter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Krause, F&W, GD
- Well that was easy, I just googled your name...do you know anything about the old Charles Addams comics (source of the Addams Family)? I have always wondered if there was a collected book with all of those old comics in it.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 23:45, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:BravadoGroup
A tag has been placed on User talk:BravadoGroup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Vishal Bakhai - Works 19:16, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry. I had in error added the Speedy to that page. I have now removed the same. Apologies for this mistake. Also, thanks for letting me know. Oh and please update any comments on my talk page for this. Danke. Vishal Bakhai - Works 19:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Monty Canawati]] and based on a story by [[Alex Monty Canawati]] and [[Grigoris Daskalogriorakis]]). The fourth film by the director of ''[[Inevitable Grace]]'' and ''[[Return to Babylon]]''.
LA edit-a-thons on May 23 and 31
|LA meetups: Adrianne Wadewitz memorial edit-a-thons on May 23 and May 31|
Dear fellow Wikipedian,
There are two LA edit-a-thons in memory of Adrianne Wadewitz, a prolific Wikipedia editor, in the coming weeks. Please join us May 23 at Occidental College and May 31 at the Institute of Cultural Inquiry to combat systemic bias and help further Adrianne's legacy. No experience needed! Please RSVP at the relevant page(s) if you plan to attend.
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.
After having my editing being willfully misunderstood by the SPAs and also having my personal character being persistently attacked by them, I decided to walk away and not edit the article or post on the talk page but I do have to ask if I am one of the editors named by the "Law Corporation". Thx, Shearonink (talk) 22:59, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
L.A. events on June 21 and July 6
Dear fellow Wikipedian,
The L.A. Wikipedia community has two exciting events coming up in the next few weeks: an edit-a-thon sponsored by the online magazine East of Borneo, and the fourth annual Los Angeles Wiknic!
The East of Borneo event is an edit-a-thon that aims to build a better history of art in Southern California. This next chapter of their Unforgetting L.A. series will take place on Saturday, June 21, 2014 from 12pm to 5pm at 356 S. Mission Rd. (map). Beginners welcome! Please RSVP here if you plan to attend. For more info, see eastofborneo.org/unforgetting.
The Wiknic is a part of the nationwide Great American Wiknic. We'll be grilling, getting to know each other better, and building the L.A. Wikipedia community! The event is tentatively planned for Pan-Pacific Park (map) and will be held on Sunday, July 6, 2014 from 9:30am to 4pm or so. Please RSVP and volunteer to bring food or drinks if possible!
To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.
Deletion of Modern Future
I wanted to reach out to you to have a discussion about the deletion of Modern Future- aside from removing your template I didn't see how I could go back and forth with the editors that want the page gone.
Production companies seem to be in a bit of a grey area in terms of music notability. You're right - this page likely doesn't meet WP:BAND but hey, it's not a band. If you can't count credits toward a production companies notability there's not a lot else you can use - these people make the music but they're a pretty silent partner most of the time and labels and artists take the credit. I think notability as an organization would be more appropriate and since there are numerous second hand sources mentioning the company's work I feel it would pass notability.
Furthermore - I don't understand how pages like Frisbie (music company), Capellen Music Production, Ishlab Music or many of those listed Category:Music production have pages with little to no references and a company like Modern Future making music for many notable acts and w/ over 9 referenced sources doesn't warrant a page.
Again - hope to have a conversation with you about this page and would appreciate knowing what could be added to help pass notability requirements. Thank you.
- There may well be other pages out there that should be marked for deletion, in fact, I can almost guarantee there are. Music is one of the places where we most get people trying to promote their own selfs/groups/companies through Wikipedia... which is a really bad idea.
- The sources that you are using wouldn't seem to meet WP:ORG, our notability guidelines for companies and organizations, any more than it meets our guidelines for musical acts. Credits in a credit listing do not amount to the "significant coverage" that it calls for. As odd as it may sound, qualifying for a Wikipedia page has less to do with what you've done and more to do with whether the proper folks are talking about you. Does that bias Wikipedia in the same way that the rest of the media is biased, more likely to talk about actors and musicians than even the finest janitor? Yup. But those are the guidelines we work with.
- Working with notable acts also does not inherently make you notable; see WP:NOTINHERITED for that guideline.
- That doesn't mean that Modern Future won't have what it takes for a page some day; we certainly do have pages for folks best knowing for the record production. If they get some coverage, get some awards, things like that, sure. But merely having credits is simply what it takes to be a record producer, and record producers are not inherently notable. --Nat Gertler (talk) 00:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- Let me add that it is clearly not just my opinion. During the Article For Deletion discussion, only two other editors besides you and I voiced their opinions; both called for deletion. The administrator who was reviewing the discussion also judged for deletion. With the article in its new form, two additional editors have voiced their opinion, one by endorsing the PROD and the other by calling for a speedy deletion... i.e., both calling for deletion. --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:40, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for understanding, and please rest assured that my stance on the article is in no way personal; it is not a comment on your editing in general, nor for that matter a comment on the work of Modern Future, which I have not experienced. It's merely me trying my best to implemented the Wikipedia standards as I understand them. I, too, have had articles that I created deleted; it's part of the process. --Nat Gertler (talk) 18:24, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
Comic (publishing) company vs specialist publishing firm
Hi, the article about yours truly talks about "[your] specialist publishing firm called About Comics", About Comics says [...] publisher of comics and comics-related material. Is there a difference, is both to be used interchangeable, and which do you prefer? Regards. 18.104.22.168 (talk) 09:48, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not sure it makes much difference. About Comics is a publishing firm firmly rooted in comics; like many comics publishers, the line includes some things that are not comics but are related to comics, although thanks to the success of things such as Panel One (a book of scripts from which comic books have been drawn), the related-to comics category is a bit bigger portion of my sales than most. (And to confuse things further, About is now also publishing some things that are only vaguely related to comics, such as the novels by Robert Mayer and Sol Weinstein being released under the Combustoica imprint, although comics-related is the clear bulk of our sales.) Of the two, I'd probably prefer "publisher of comics and comics-related material" (it's clearer, and "specialist" should probably be "specialty" in the other phrase anyway); I'd be fine with that or "comics publisher". But I have not real problem with either; if your goal is to make sure the two articles match, don't worry about it. --Nat Gertler (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2014 (UTC)