User talk:Ndunruh

DYK nomination[edit]

Hi, I've nominated an article you worked on, [[57th Wing]], for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article at Template talk:Did you know#Articles created on May 16 where you can improve it if you see fit. MeegsC | Talk 22:19, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:325_CES.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:325_CES.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Warriors_of_the_North.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Warriors_of_the_North.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 15:05, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:82 TRW.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:82 TRW.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 02:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Space & Missile Systems Center.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Space & Missile Systems Center.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Conscious 07:03, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Military Barnstar[edit]

Thank you for your award and your kind words about the articles I've created and edited here. I'm a retired USAF captain (1972 - 1993) btw. I've been a bit under the weather the past few days and this is the first time I've been able to thank you :)

Bwmoll3 19:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Thank you for uploading images/media to Wikipedia! There is however another Wikimedia foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In the future, please consider creating an account and uploading media there instead. That way, all the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view images you have previously uploaded by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'image' namespace from the drop down box). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!

--OsamaK (talk) 19:05, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history banner tags[edit]

Hello. Is there a reason you are incorrectly re-assessing ship disambiguation pages from class NA to stub ([1], [2]) for WikiProject Military history? --Kralizec! (talk) 01:08, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your speedy assistance in fixing the issue! --Kralizec! (talk) 17:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Special Operations Squadron series[edit]

Kudos for very nice work! I did notice though that the articles lack inline citations. If there any chance you could provide a few while the project is still fresh in your mind? All the best, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 15:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

20th Special Operations Squadron[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 20th Special Operations Squadron, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.specialoperations.com/USAF/Units/16thSOW/20thSOS.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:36, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:NAF_Mildenhall.jpg[edit]

I'd like to know their website address since I do not think this is a work of the United States Federal Government (or Navy). MECU≈talk 20:16, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we're one step closer, but I couldn't find this image on that website. Can you give a more specific location? Thanks for working with me on this. MECU≈talk 01:17, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect! Thanks for your help. MECU≈talk 14:07, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for the barnstar! I haven't really had the courage to branch out from USMC articles until recently; but having passed my year and a half mark as an editer (one year with an account), I realized I wasn't a newbie anymore. Hope to see you around, airman! bahamut0013 ♠♣ 21:02, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(military history)[edit]

Comment: It's not a "really big issue", but I find your edit comment "(military history)" not particularly informative. Yes, it's better than no comment at all, but I still felt the need to go look at the diff to find out what it meant. Had your comment said something more informative (I don't know - maybe "add military history project box"?) my life (and everyone else in the WP community who saw it and didn't know what it meant), would have been simpler.
My 2¢- / tuppence- / whatever-worth; take it with a grain of salt. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:36, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

47th Fighter Squadron[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 47th Fighter Squadron, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.hawgsmoke2004.com/47FS.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:28, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCookie[edit]

Just stopping by with cookies for those editors who started new articles today. --Rosiestep (talk) 23:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And thank you for the Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar! --Rosiestep (talk) 20:15, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 90th Fighter Squadron[edit]

A tag has been placed on 90th Fighter Squadron requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nancy ^(talk) 19:32, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributions[edit]

Hi!

Congratulations on your stream of quality articles. I'm impressed by your industry! You can, by the way, self-assess your own articles, up to and including B-Class, by adding class=stub or class=start to the template perameters. Some editors prefer to have others rate their B-Class articles, which they do here. Please keep up the good work, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 05:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiChevrons
		For your many high-quality articles on US fighter formations, I hereby award you the Military history WikiProject WikiChevrons. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 05:43, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

57th Wing[edit]

Hi, nice article! I am actively seeking information on aerial victories claimed and losses sustained by 57th Fighter Group during the North African campaign, especially the timeframe August, September 1942. Do you happen to have some insight into this information? MisterBee1966 (talk) 15:58, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Missing image Image:60 APS.jpg[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:60 APS.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:60 APS.jpg is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:60 APS.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 02:01, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Response for User:RekonDog[edit]

Thanks for the cookies...oorah!! Semper Fi!

Cookies[edit]

Thank you! I appreciate it! LegoTech·(t)·(c) 01:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It looks good to eat. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gig 'em! Thanks for the appreciation. With so many Americans like yourself, it's a pleasure to serve. — BQZip01 — ^talk 02:40, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks a lot for the cookie.. cheers--Zer0~Gravity ^{(Roger - Out)} 03:34, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Double ditto from me:--Reedmalloy (talk) 04:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahahaha! Thanks. EvilCouch (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

(diff) (hist) . . User talk:Jason Palpatine‎; 00:33 . . (+358) . . Ndunruh (Talk | contribs) (OCM) Thank You! --Jason Palpatine (talk) 07:01, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks alot for the cookie ! I have transfered it over to my main page, displayed prominently. Neonblak (talk) 07:03, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thanks for the cookie! You have a great 4th of July! Brothejr (talk) 12:32, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet! Thanks for the cookie and the wishes. Happy 4th to you as well. Now I just have to find a glass of milk. :) Angrymansr (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Enjoy your weekend... ;-) JungleCat Shiny!/Oohhh! 14:43, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Baghdad: Thanks for the cookie and your friendly comments. Happy Independence Day! Brianhe (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Germany: Thank you very much! Amazing work you have done on military pages! T geier (talk) 09:49, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmmmmmm kooky NOM NOM NOM NOM!!!! Srlsy, though, thank you from me, and all squids everywhere, for the thought! Definitely put a smile on my face! Fair winds and following seas Supersquid (talk) 19:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

!Gracias por la gallete digital! Me voy a tomarlo con mucho gusto. Feliz Cuatro de Julio!Vampromero (talk) 02:21, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookie and nice words! Virgil61 (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the cookie! It was my honor to serve proudly. I wish my service wasn't cut short by my disability I suffered, but alas it was. The years I was blessed with in the USAF were more than I could have ever imagined or asked for. My only regret was that d*mn "bulletproof" vest that the military hands out. Bulletproof my a**. Anyhow... Thank you again for the cookie! It was my honor to serve for great Americans and imigrants to America, such as yourself =) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cbreseman (talk • contribs) 14:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OUTSTANDING! -RoBoTam^ice 17:05, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the cookie and your support! Happy Independence Day! -vi5in^[talk] 19:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This humble veteran thanks you for your support (and offers a Bartles & Jaymes reference in return). Nickersonl (talk) 22:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, better than the ones I ate in the service. Amerique^dialectics 01:16, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! bahamut0013 ♠♣ 13:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the cookie! --Ryancb06 (talk) 22:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From Kuwait: Thanks! Hope you had a good 4th of July weekend! Kant Lavar (talk) 13:34, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookie and good wishes! As above, it's a pleasure to serve with the support of people like yourself. Regards, SSgt H. Irishnightwish (talk) 14:21, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the cookie. -- VegitaU (talk) 20:18, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I got a cookie! Many thanks from Wiesbaden, Germany. Hzoi (talk) 08:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the cookie, a pleasant surprise. Zharmad (talk) 03:30, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the cookie! Kageskull (talk) 14:22, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! For the cookie. Everyone in the service can use one! -- Cecropia (talk) 14:22, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the cookie! Medicjm (talk) 07:09, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for being so late, but thanks for the cookie, and for taking the time to do so! Bugwit Speak / Spoken 18:44, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dito, Thanks for the Cookie!!! BRI70 (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is very late, but thank you for your support RFP15 (talk) 05:08, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Do we [do this regularly?

We certainly do. It's part of the Aggie War Hymn where the entire student body sways (more or less in unison) symbolizing the sawing off of Varsity's horns off. Not bad for 86,000+ people to sing in unison. The swaying of the entire stadium (no, not just the people but the actual structure itself!) is so intense that there is a warning for those in the press box that it will move a few feet during that part of the song. — BQZip01 — ^talk 23:48, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- - - Thanks for the cookies! Also thank you for your service! Sincerely and Very Respectfully, Mark Cutshall (talk) 22:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the cookie[edit]

Thanks a lot for the cookie. JaMikePA (talk) 03:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks From Jon Holly[edit]

Hey thanks for the Barnstar buddy, first one i've received on Wiki! Good to see another Airman around. You'll hear from me again —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jon Holly (talk • contribs) 22:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks From McA[edit]

Thanks for the cookie! It was my first award yet on the Wikipedia, and I am very grateful for the time you took to award it. I'll keep an eye out for you in the future. —Preceding unsigned comment added by McA (talk • contribs) 21:44, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

84th Flying Training Squadron[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of 84th Flying Training Squadron, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.tiger-lair.org/units/unitsDetail.asp?unitID=139. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I took care of this. The website in question copied their info from the Laughlin AFB website and then claimed a copyright on the info. This is another <sigh...yet another> example of bots run amok and not enough control by individuals. — BQZip01 — ^talk 23:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiproject San Francisco 49ers[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedian! I just wanted to let you know that WikiProject San Francisco 49ers is looking for participants who are interested in improving the quality of the articles on the San Francisco 49ers! If you want to help, you can add your name to our list of participants, check out our to-do list, and most importantly, improve the articles!

--pbroks13^talk? 23:53, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Project banners[edit]

Hi Ndunruh. Thanks for adding the boatload of project banners to all those articles, especially {{wptrade}}. We can also use more members of the Trade Wikiproject, if you care to join. Anyway, a helpful hint, if you could add {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} to talk pages when there is more then 3 or so project banners. It makes the page a little bit cleaner. Here is an example:

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{wptrade|class=|importance=|nested=yes}}
{{WikiProject Economics|class=|importance=}}
}}

Cheers, --Patrick (talk) 04:01, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

10th AS[edit]

I work at McChord. But I'll double check, and see if I can find a public source. Thanks! Proxy User (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, only the 4th is PNAF. I don't know what I was thinking. Good catch. I should have double checked. Proxy User (talk) 18:41, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

USAF portal[edit]

Hello, I noticed that you seem to have an interest in articles relating to the United States Air Force. The USAF portal is in need of editors to maintain it, I was wondering if you are interested? bahamut0013 ♠♣ 14:07, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see in the talk page, there are 7 monthly features. A maintainer would choose what to feature for each category, create a template for that month, and the portal will automatically transclusion switch from one month to another. If you look at each type of feature, you can see the format used in previous months. You can also see that maintenance hasn't happened in a while. bahamut0013 ♠♣ 17:34, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Entirely correct. ERCheck and I maintain the USMC portal, and it is set up almost identically. He's tone some tentative updates since he noticed the problem in November, but we really need somebody that knows the Air Force better than he and I, and is willing to stick to it. Your help would be greatly appreciated. bahamut0013 ♠♣ 01:10, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I see you have taken on some editing for the USAF portal. The way it is set up, on the first of each month, the new pages cycle in, with the exception of the news, which is manually added, as this can't be done well in advance. For the Jan 1, I'd set it up for the Question Mark flight to cycle in on Jan 1, since that was the anniversary of the flight. I see that today you made a change with a new story. For archival purposes, I'd like to suggest that if a new article has already been posted for the month and it is to be replaced with a new one

First move the existing to a file of the same name appended with _1 for the first change (2 for the second, and so on), as was done for Dec 2008.
Next post the new article in the original file (that has become a redirect) and save. This saves the history and preserves a clear archive of all postings;
Finally, add the information to the archive page for the news articles.

Hope this makes sense. Ask if it doesn't. Or feel free to suggest an alternative. — ERcheck (talk) 04:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning. If you have any questions, please let me know. Bahamut0013 will be away soon. Do you expect that you will have the time and inclination to take over the USAF Portal maintenance completely? (All I know about the USAF I learned on Wikipedia; ok, almost all...) — ERcheck (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:WADS.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:WADS.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:29, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for the barnstar. FYI: there are a few graphics related barnstars. Template:The Graphic Designer's Barnstar, Template:InvisibleBarnstar, or Template:The SVG Barnstar would have worked, but I do like the one you gave me a lot! You might want to throw some praise to User:Inductiveload, he actually created the SVGs I'm replacing at the graphics lab. bahamut0013^words _deeds 16:36, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Hey, thanks for the compliment. I'm about to do the same to the Army article; the Navy and Marine Corps articles were of much higher quality than the other two. LeAviateur537 (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Global Strike Command[edit]

Thanks for replying. If you would be so kind as to read the source of the second reference (or the material I quoted from it) you will find that these are two distinct commands. There is something logically wrong with the article, I simply don't know enough about it to fix it. One could either remove the reference, or distinguish between the two. I don't know which is appropriate, but if you are interested in the subject perhaps you might look into it. 72.70.5.156 (talk) 00:38, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I award you this Tireless Contributor Barnstar for all of your hard work on military avaiation- and United States Air Force-related articles and USAF Portal. bahamut0013^words _deeds 08:57, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, Lordy, did you make me laugh! bahamut0013^words _deeds 15:38, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

6514 Test Squadron Info[edit]

The 6514TS and 514FTS also flew C-130, H-53, H-1, and BQM-34 & AQM-34 Drones.

C-130 was used as airborne test platform for many unmanned arial vehicles including the drones. H-53's were used for mid-air retreaval of the drones, and H-1's were used to transport people and drones. Drones were mostly old leftovers from the Vietnam era. Our oldest C-130 was an A-model from 1957.

My experience is from 1990 to 1994 with the 6514 and 514 at Hill. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.53.130.219 (talk) 05:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AF Squadron Pages[edit]

Hey, nice work on the categorizing of the space squadron pages. I'm about to do a massive update of the Combat Communication Squadron pages, but I'm trolling for information. I wanted to pass along a tip, if you want to get the "meaty" historical details we AF historian-wannabes are usually after - send in a Freedom of Information Act request to the specific unit. The AF made it easy to do, and they can answer electronically. I got a good load of information on the Program 437 unit at Vandenberg AFB (10th Aerospace Defense Squadron) and it was electronic and free. See you around the sandbox! TDRSS (talk) 02:51, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Added a slew of ANG Combat Communication Squadron logos to [Wikimedia Commons] for usage. May get around to adding them to the pages this weekend... or I might not. Also got some FOIA requests back from Hawaii ANG about Combat Comm - will add those to with PDF of files received. I'm beginning to love FOIA. TDRSS (talk) 19:43, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More on the FOIA front - some requests I've put in have been included on the EFOIA Electronic Reading Room. Some AEWs, some Combat Comm, and a few space wings. Just FYI if you wanted to work on those pages (work has me swamped right now). TDRSS (talk) 11:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I am a current member of the 72d ARS, and have been given the task by my commander to help keep the wikipedia page you created updated with new information. I have never edited on Wikipedia and after attempting to work with the page you created, I figured I should be humble and see if you could help me get some more information posted. I am totally lost as to how to communicate with you other than this page so ill check back for more info. Thanks for the hard work. 72dars (talk) 01:12, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of SE-5[edit]

I have nominated SE-5, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SE-5. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mr. Vernon (talk) 05:19, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for this award, I enjoyed reading your articles and thought I could be of service. DocYako (talk) 02:56, 06 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Joint Rescue Coordination Centers[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you had edited the article Joint Rescue Coordination Centers. I stumbled upon this article and noticed that it is in dire need of attention. Most of the edit history is bots. Also a person added a statement complaining of inaccuracies to the introduction of the article (not the discussion page- actually there is no discussion page). Perhaps you or someone you know might be able to help with this page? Thanks. Tomyhoi (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories in the commons - your file[edit]

Hello Ndunruh, one of your files was transfered to the commons, but it is missing good categories, see please http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:10_AS.jpg - perhaps you can add them. Best wishes Plehn (talk) 08:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks for the head's up.--Ndunruh (talk) 14:11, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gerald Gustafson[edit]

Improved on website design. Will get photo tomorrow

03:48, 8 November 2009 (UTC)~sdsbassist —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sdsbassist (talk • contribs)

Update: Feb. 2010. Have a file uploaded to put in the spot but I can't seem to get it to work correctly ont he page. Cna you help me? The file is: File:Ggus.JPG.

Thanks!

Sdsbassist (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2010 (UTC)sdsbassist[reply]

Update: Thanks again for the help. If I get the oppurtunity to add more, I will let you know and thanks for allt he hard work you do.....

Sdsbassist (talk) 05:02, 7 February 2010 (UTC)sdsbassist[reply]

JB-2[edit]

Not a problem. Thought that article might have an interest to the causal viewer; as most people probably have no idea that the United States had it's own V-1 during World War II :) Bwmoll3 (talk) 17:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

Thanks for the recognition there. Looking at my barnstar page, it was 2 years and three days ago when you gave me my first barnstar. In recognition, I would like to thank you for being my most prolific barnstar recognizer. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 14:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 00:41, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New Template[edit]

Hi, I noticed you use {{FA user topicon}} and wanted to let you know that {{DYK user topicon}} has recently been created, so that you can showcase your DYK credits in your topicon space as well. It works exactly the same way as {{FA user topicon}} Happy editing! ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 12:38, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

66th Rescue Squadron[edit]

I have replied to your comments on that talk page, but I also wanted to congratulate you on becoming a Confirmer, and compliment you on your user page. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 16:00, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since 1998[edit]

Hi, Ndunruh, I noticed your comment at Ohconfucius's page concerning this phrase, rather than "1998–present" (BTW, it needs an en dash according to WP:MOSDASH). Can I say that I agree with him that "Since ..." is more elegant; but there are two other reasons for using this wording. First, it's shorter, in space-confined infoboxes; second, it doesn't put quite so much emphasis on the notion of some present point of time, and this is useful when situations change and editors don't immediately substitute "present" with a closing range. Thanks. Tony (talk) 17:29, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:80 FTW.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:80 FTW.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ^Alquery talk 18:04, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Air Force portal[edit]

Is it okay if I move the news section to below the intro header? It would make updating a little more worthwhile. Marcus Qwertyus 01:11, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:TeamMcChord.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:TeamMcChord.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:USAF weapons[edit]

Template:USAF weapons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MilborneOne (talk) 22:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:75 ABW.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:75 ABW.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:34, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:WADS.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WADS.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 00:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:RAF Mildenhall Logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RAF Mildenhall Logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for 98th Range Wing[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, 98th Range Wing, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Lineagegeek (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for 326th Fighter Group[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, 326th Fighter Group, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Lineagegeek (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually you may not have worked on the group article, only the wing's

Merge discussion for 79th Fighter Group[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, 79th Fighter Group, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Lineagegeek (talk) 23:09, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:C-119 Boxcar.jpg missing description details[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:C-119 Boxcar.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 09:41, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Team Eglin.jpg[edit]

The file File:Team Eglin.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 06:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Team Tinker.jpg[edit]

The file File:Team Tinker.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Soto Cano.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Soto Cano.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B dash (talk) 12:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Schriever AFB.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Schriever AFB.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B dash (talk) 12:39, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Rodeo APS.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Rodeo APS.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B dash (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:JTF Bravo Aid.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:JTF Bravo Aid.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B dash (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]