User talk:NeoRetro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Information icon Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 22 November 2013 (UTC)


You say all these nice things here but on the edit page you start wıth Ugghh and state that endless stream of Fener fans are trying to mess up tha page. Plase check the version before mine and see who is really trying to mess up the pages.

Also, if it is not too much trouble for you also check the article 1461 Trabzon and also look for the version before mine and see who is really attacking who.

Thanks for your understanding and time and please let me know what you feel. I am really curious.Rivaner (talk) 11:49, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Curious about what? I couldn't find any edits you made to 1461 Trabzon... Now I'm curious too, lol. Why dit you start off with going to the DR/N ? I didn't revert any of your edits! And even after some other fenerbahce fan (? not you) deleted the entire segment, I haven't even tried to put it back up because I'm not interested in having a fight with anyone about unimportant stuff. And no, we don't know the final verdict. He still has one more appeal left as far as I know. But feel free to write whatever you want. I'm not going to remove it, I didn't in the first place and I have no intentions of doing so.NeoRetro (talk) 00:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=1461_Trabzon&action=history In this link you can find the edits made in the 1461 Trabzon page. In case you missed on my signature, my nickname is Rivaner. It is the 8th edit from the top. Now that hopefully ends your curiousty about the 1461 Trabzon article, let's get back to your "not wanting to fight" good wishes. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trabzonspor&diff=582788393&oldid=582118436 In this link you can see my version and your version. Now, be honest and tell me which one is more offensive and incriminating? You were writing these things well before the courts gave their final verdict. What happened to presumption of innocence? Let me know and also thanks for letting me write "whatever" I want.Rivaner (talk) 17:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.[edit]

Peacedove.svg

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Trabzonspor and 1461 Trabzon Articles". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot operator / talk 07:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Hagia Sophia[edit]

Hi! Could you provide a source for this change? Regards, Alæxis¿question? 09:32, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I will look into it this weekend.NeoRetro (talk) 12:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)