User talk:New Babylon 2

License tagging for Image:Jakub Arbes.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jakub Arbes.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:06, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

English[edit]

Please use spaces after periods (".") and commas (","). I also suggest that you use a spell checker. Thank you very much. --Nimakha 05:52, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi New Babylon,

What language do you speak? I recommend that you use a good spell checker before you submit anything to Wikipedia. Words like "gets" and "wants" don't need apostrophes. Also, when you make a word plural by adding an S, don't add an apostrophe. Please add spaces after commas and periods. Thank you, --Firsfron of Ronchester 03:38, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Paroubek active communist.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Paroubek active communist.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Kingdom of Zion[edit]

Hello! I noticed your addition to Monarchies of Ethiopia regarding a "Kingdom of Zion" under Negus Mikael of Wollo comprising Tigray, Gonder, Gojjam, and Semien. Can you provide further information on this, as I've never heard of it. Was it a gathering of foces by Mikael in an attempt to depose Iyasu V, or just the area governed by Negus Mikael and possibly better termed a province? Thanks for your help. — ዮም | (Yom) | Talk • contribs • Ethiopia 20:17, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Malietoa[edit]

Hi. I have just created the Malietoa article. I think it is far more important that this is developed first with all the info on the Maletoa articles be summaried here. It could include an historical timeline of malietoa rulers and links to there respective articles. Please develop it. Also maybe we could start a category Malietoa under Samoan people to link them further thanks Ernst Stavro Blofeld 15:41, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Laupepa.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Laupepa.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maori King - Potatau Te Wherowhero image[edit]

Tena koe New Babylon,

While some of your information in regards to Kingi Potatau Te Wherowhero seems correct you may wish to research the image further. The image you currently have is of Kingi Tawhiao Te Wherowhero the second Maori monarch.

Naku noa He Maori

License tagging for Image:Vijayanagara.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vijayanagara.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

No Discussion? Don't delete[edit]

Reguard your 3 Powers page.

Okay I don't think you quite understand how discussions WORK on wikipedia. Don't just delete a notice on a page UNLESS the discussion takes place. There are pages that have notices up but no discussions, doesn't matter you can't delete them. You MUST have a discussion first. Sometimes the discussions don't kick off for weeks.

A friendly piece of warning so someone doesn't slam you in the future for it. Whether it gets discussed or not doesn't matter... If you seriously care about keeping the page, get people onto the discussion to save it, don't just delete the deletation templates. Its considered very rude by some people. Equally, you can write a statment as to why this page is important. However, everything on that page is elsewhere in better orgainsed and higher detail... Why do we need this page at all? Its unness. and pretty much pointless. ^_-

Besides the point the template was barely up for 24 hours! Angel Emfrbl 19:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Ganzack.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ganzack.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:07, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Signing posts[edit]

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion).For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Not a dog 22:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can[edit]

The article Archbishops of Olomouc, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

Picture overload[edit]

Wikipedia is not a scrap book. I'm sure those buster call pictures are useful sure, but your cramming them in a tiny section of one single page. Page overload can bring down the quality of the page, instead of helping keep it up. Please know when to stand down and admit there are too many pictures. If you disagree talk in the discussion page. Otherwise, thos epictures will be removed. End of story.

I've actually seen picture overload become a factor in a page deletation on wikipedia. Please learn to stop. Angel Emfrbl 19:27, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply:To Corgi[edit]

You should give more details when you reply to something... I have no idea what your talking about. I go through a dozen things a day. Angel Emfrbl 14:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey thats funny! I never put a name to my statement when I removed that stuff, yet you put one there. Angel Emfrbl 22:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking in general to anyone reading, not just one person. Angel Emfrbl 22:15, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to "need to talk to someone"[edit]

Not quite following on that last note... You mean MSN pages aren't showing I think (correct me if I'm wrong!). MSN doesn't always show pics (talking from experience, its uch a sdrag). Refresh the page or:

Right click -> Show picture

Or view the page later. Its only temporary normally. BTW can you put four of these on the end of your messages on wikipedia: ~

Its just so your name shows, most people on wikipedia like to see signed statements. ;)Angel Emfrbl 22:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it... They will show eventually. I get this problem with a lot of MSN sites. I don't go to V.3 but I do go to the V.2 site. Seen it happen plenty of times there. BTW got a link to v.3? I don't have that and the version of chapter 439 on V.2 is rubbish. Angel Emfrbl 23:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! Someone with some brains. That was my bad since you shouldn't ask for links unless its to prove something ona a page. Thanks for not giving me a direct link (we all slip up every and again). Wow, some pages are green there too?

How long have I been a OP fan? Not as long as others. I had read info of the show for a long while, I've seen many major topics in anime forums, but never got involved. Then, one day, just to see how screwed up the dub was... I watched the show when it aired in the UK. I used to be a Beyblade fan, so having seen one anime screwed up I got used to the idea that not all is what it seems, so I got hold of the Japanese... After a few eps (and 300+ translation of chapters later) I was offically a fan of OP.

The trick with Wikipedia is too reread and rewatch things often every few weeks so the info is fresh in your mind. And to check interviews, SBS and chapters. Reference as much as possible for futher reminders in future. I wrote this: look here to see what I mena on that note its actually a requirment on wikipedia to prove correctness of info. So it helps to edit wikipedia, both as a fan and a editor. Angel Emfrbl 00:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean about the red Xs, visited the site. Half of it works, the other half is Xs. Its probaberly just a temporary bug as I said, but the photos might have gone or don't work anymore. There could be a dozen reasons actually looking at it. Angel Emfrbl 00:06, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery solved. heres the problem. I don't know if you know about that, but theres the reason for the missing pictures. Angel Emfrbl 16:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! Already read the pictures thing on MSN. Everyone is talking about the chapter. ;) Angel Emfrbl 00:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you go to Arlong Park or K-F Fansubs By any chance? Angel Emfrbl 21:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Potatau.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Potatau.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Think before you create![edit]

We're the English Wikipedia... We concern ourselves with English and Japanese only. No other aniem has other languages, its uneeded junk. Plus we have a heap of pages already, we've already been picked up on that twice already. Now 3 powers, alright uneeded but that came to nothing and no one realised just how unneeed it was... But really we don't need that German adatpion article.

Most editors are English speakers/readers - they can't check it.

Use some brains here New Babylon, think before you leap. Read the Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga rules and guidelines, read wikipedias rules and guidelines. Oh and BTW thats up for speedy delete that article. Next time you create something like that seek advice from the community on whether its really needed. If you can't be bothered to do that we have a nice wikia where no one will mind that sort of thing and they won't dig at us for the no. of articles.

I'm not being mean here, I'm just bringing some hard reality here. Angel Emfrbl 22:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not gunning for you New Babylon... But please stop doing things without reading rules and guidelines on wikipedia. If you fail to do that, stick to basic page editing. Its beginning to get annoying. Renaming a page and remodelling it does not instantly mean the delete thingy can be removed. As I said, we have a nice wikia where no one will mind that sort of page REALLY in the meantime, your just creating completely unneeded pages. Angel Emfrbl 10:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Name changes in One Piece[edit]

An editor has nominated the article Name changes in One Piece for deletion, under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the nomination (also see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on why the topic of the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome: participate in the discussion by editing Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Name changes in One Piece. Add four tildes like this ˜˜˜˜ to sign your comments. You can also edit the article Name changes in One Piece during the discussion, but do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top of the article), this will not end the deletion debate. Jayden54Bot 16:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Buster Call.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Buster Call.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Buster Call atacking other.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Buster Call atacking other.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:10, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Skypias God.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Skypias God.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:13 one piece.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:13 one piece.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:14, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Einstein stamp.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Einstein stamp.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Silver den den mushi.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Silver den den mushi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 21:17, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Smith2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Smith2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:09, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

Mihawk pic[edit]

You mean Mihawk + Shanks? thats the only one thats mine. And I'm not offended. This is wikipedia, not a fansite. Pics are alway replaced. Though I'd rather see the profile one replaced (thats rubbish!). Though, even if you have a better picture then mine (if thats the one your talking about), it wouldn't be much point uploading if it doesn't portray the right thing... Theres reason for Mihawk and Shanks, even if its not good, just as theres a reson for the Mihawk cutting Zoro one. Angel Emfrbl 20:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One Piece 542[edit]

I go to Arlong Park every day... I had the RAW as soon as it was out. Didn't know Manga V.2 was up though. Angel Emfrbl 19:47, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Troubel with pictures[edit]

Once Upon a time I was happy to see heaps of pics on wikipedia. But somewhere along the line I met a few people who were very against them. They run me by why. But the main reason is due to explaining the need for a heap load of free use images. We can get away with it in a few cases and others not. We need to avoid picture use unless it truly needed. And sadly characters apparently don't count as a needed picture, unless their main or an important character.

There are some other reasons, but I don't feel like repeating them for the umpteenth time. It gets... Boring... Angel Emfrbl 11:16, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay[edit]

I hate telling people off... But seriously NB... Think a moment here. What the HELL did any of that trash have to do with the Yonkou or cestrial guardians? That my friend was a forum type discussion you started there which isn't allowed on wikipedia and made no sense reading it anyway! If you want to rant, fine but there are plenty of other places you can do that. Keep it off wikipedia and the discussion pages. I would say more... But that random dribble was hard to grasp on what the point to it was... Please don't do that again.

Discussion pages are just for things related to the article, not the subject of the article, or your opinion of the article, or anything randomly insert there for no reason. These are wikipedia rules, but common sense should tell you this anyway. All that aside I'm really, but it was either have a go at you about these things or issue a warning... I know you mean well usually so I didn't go a warning template and stuff like that.

Next time I will though, wikipedia rules... Angel Emfrbl 14:05, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Battleship.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Battleship.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Help[edit]

Okay firstly... Have you tried asking them to send you a new password to your e-mail adress? If you go to "Log In", it will be there under the user name and password entry. Angel Emfrbl 19:07, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Try Help:Contents then if thats no help Wikipedia:Contact us. Angel Emfrbl 10:52, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of Shan State Rulers, etc[edit]

You moved and edited a lot of the entries there, including dates. I am sure that quite a few of your new dates are wrong, For example, Sao Hkun Hkio of Mongmit, was cheif until 1959, you changed it to 1952. And so on for quite a few others. Also included are states that are not part of Karenni or Shan states. Kanbawsa 12:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gecko Moria 2.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gecko Moria 2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Jozef Tiso.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Jozef Tiso.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Proposed Micronation Wikiproject[edit]

I've published a proposal to gauge the level of interest in setting up a micronation Wikiproject, which I thought might be of interest to you based on your past contributions. Comments and suggestions are welcome: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals#Micronations --Gene_poole 01:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest. The project proposal above has been successful, so I would like to invite you to add your name to the new project page: Wikipedia:WikiProject_Micronations. --Gene_poole 00:29, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya![edit]

Hmmm... The hardest part of any page is trying not to use too many pictures. Perhaps there is room for Oz as apparently he is going to become a big character in the TB arc. Go ahead and put one there, becareful you don't crowd the page with too many "free" images while doing it because images on wikipedia are demostrational/representations of the text. Not that it matters... Free images thing comes into question if:

Overlapping cauing the page layer probs.
There are far too many on a page
If they are being put up for the sake of it.
If being used to make the page look pretty.

Yeah go ahead as I said with these in mind. Angel Emfrbl 06:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemia[edit]

Regarding your statement on my talk page: Bohemia and Moravia, i.e. the historic territories comprising the present-day Czech Republic, did not comprise an independent country in the modern era prior to WWI. I am aware, of course, that in late medieval to early modern times the Kingdom of Bohemia was a powerful force in the "German" Empire, i.e. the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation — which as historians know was neither holy nor Roman and not entirely German.

The Encyclopedia Britannica Yearbook for 1913 — the last edition prior to WWI — lists Bohemia and Moravia as "provinces" of the Kingdom of Austria, one of the component kingdoms of the Austro-Hungarian Empire. Of Austria's 28.6 million inhabitants, 6.8 million lived in Bohemia and 2.6 million in Moravia, the Yearbook says. (The Kingdom of Hungary, meanwhile, had a population of about 20.8 million, and Bosnia-Herzegovina — annexed in 1910 — about 1.9 million.)

You may be interested to know that the Yearbook contains a brief summary of ethnic strife engendered by a 1909 law decreeing German to be the only language of education and government in the Kingdom of Austria, which was of course bitterly opposed by the Czech-speaking residents of Bohemia and Moravia. At the same time, it must be remembered that at that time Bohemia and Moravia contained a large German-speaking minority, whose descendents were forcibly removed after WWII.

I have no intention of insulting the Czechs on ethnic or any other grounds. However, I disagree with your assertion that Bohemia, politically and juridically speaking, was not a province of Austria-Hungary prior to 1918. This is history. Should I, an American, be "insulted" that the beginnings of my country were a colony of Britain 250 years ago? This also is history.

Sca 22:05, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures[edit]

Yeah several of the One Piece pages have had pictures removed due to freeuse terms not being accounted or something like that... Devil Fruit, Gold Roger and Arlong's page (I page on that last one) all got hit with the same thing. Angel Emfrbl 16:02, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Proces.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Proces.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:11, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Clementis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Clementis.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gecko Moria 3.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gecko Moria 3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Moria 4.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Moria 4.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Zapotocky.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Zapotocky.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Sunshine Man 15:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

One Piece Stuff[edit]

Actually when I think about it... Aside from minor characters and the terms page, none of the other OP pages have an order to them. So correcting the placement of the letters for alhphabetically reason is pointless since they weren't in that order anyhow. Angel Emfrbl 16:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well...[edit]

Considering the numbers of spammers on V.2 recently, they may just be cleaning up. Theres what, 2 pages of spam ablums in the albums section. Some are just titled "spam" literally. This is the trouble with MSN sites, I've had much experience in the past with them.

Well, if worst comes to worst and they are not sorted, when I see a translation and a scan on Arlong Park I can create for you with a substute if you want. But I don't suppose it will come to that. Angel Emfrbl 09:11, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol. It would be a handicap for you anyway if you were not able to see the full chapter when it is out and I don't want to see anyone in that position. Just remove the link from this page when I supply it and you've accessed it okay. ;-)

Yeah the spammers annoy me, with MSN sites there is little control over things. You can't even get a thing removed from a site without problems from the MSN crew. You've still got V.3 for high quality scans which is good at least. :-) Angel Emfrbl 09:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That depends... Several factors... Such as the task ahead... The speed of the team working on it. Etc. Angel Emfrbl 13:04, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Kage Kage no mi.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Kage Kage no mi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kalani‘opu‘u[edit]

Can you add some context to this article? I have no clue what it is about. Therefore, I can't categorise it. When you edit the article, perhaps you can categorise it! 172.145.161.8 16:41, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Čeněk Kožišovský Tunkl z Brníčka[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Čeněk Kožišovský Tunkl z Brníčka, by Valrith (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Čeněk Kožišovský Tunkl z Brníčka seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Čeněk Kožišovský Tunkl z Brníčka, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:28, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hledání antipoda[edit]

Hledání antipoda, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Hledání antipoda satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hledání antipoda and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Hledání antipoda during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Douglasmtaylor ^T/C 11:07, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sekai Seifu flag.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Sekai Seifu flag.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 05:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Oz1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Oz1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 06:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Image:One Piece Comparison.jpg. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You cannot remove that template until you provide a proper fair-use rationale. Read WP:NONFREE. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 05:27, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Monarchs with very long names[edit]

Do you still have a copy of that? I thought I had saved it to my hard drive, and it turned out that I had saved the editing history page instead. Thanks Mandsford 02:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pludek antipod.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pludek antipod.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:29, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Crew12.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Crew12.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:Crew13.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Crew13.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:32, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Inquisitors.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Inquisitors.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:29, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sekai Seifu flag.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sekai Seifu flag.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:16, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Inquisitors.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Inquisitors.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Allfather D'Aronique.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Allfather D'Aronique.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:38, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arkadia.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkadia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:14, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arkana.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:15, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arkadia.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkadia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:59, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arkana.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:01, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Antonin novotny..jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Antonin novotny..jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 17:33, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Inquisitors.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Inquisitors.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Inquisitors.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Inquisitors.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:17, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Inquisitors.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Inquisitors.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:11, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Inquisitors.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:The Inquisitors.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:16, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Oz1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Oz1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arkadia.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkadia.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Arkana.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Arkana.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One Piece: Defeat The Pirate Ganzak![edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article One Piece: Defeat The Pirate Ganzak!, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Goodraise (talk) 04:03, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

House of Bokassa - great article![edit]

Hello! I was doing New Page Patrol and I saw your article on House of Bokassa. I just wanted to commend you on bringing this fine article to Wikipedia. Job well done! Ecoleetage (talk) 12:08, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brood of the Witch Queen[edit]

I've explained on the talk page what needs to be done for the article, and I hope you're able to do it if that's what you want. I appreciate how worrying these tags can be, I myself certainly used to react strongly to them, and even now editors who should know better can get very defensive. So let me counsel you, if I may, not to prejudice any argument you might want in future to make by asserting in advance that you would put it up again if it were deleted — that almost never plays well. Richard Pinch (talk) 19:19, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cow and Chicken[edit]

I've reverted several changes you made to this article. Please check your spelling and punctuation when contributing to this encyclopedia. (Remember that you're writing, not texting.) — Rob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 22:38, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. I was not making a personal remark, but calling attention to the errors in the text. Thanks for your promise to correct them. — Rob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 22:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have a nice day. — Rob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 22:49, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, this sentence also caught my attention (diff): Also,he will sometims refer to himself indirctly as a woman (tlaking about a clock,passed to all the girls in his family,which his mother gave to him and which he later gave Cow) or to his wife as a man (telling chicken to "start your day of like a man-just like momma").

Do you see my point? — Rob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 22:57, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at your new edits. They have a number of serious errors. For one thing, you fail to insert a space after a comma [,] or period; I've noticed you make the same mistake throughout your user page. Please break this habit. Another problem is that you frequently misspell words. Perhaps English is not your first language (as you live in the Czech Republic). Whatever the reason, please be more careful about spelling. I'll make the corrections this time. — Rob C. alias ᴀʟᴀʀoʙ 23:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, New Babylon 2. You have new messages at List of One Piece characters's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Kraftlos (Talk | Contrib) 02:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sovinec.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sovinec.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:20, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Jozef Tiso.jpg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jozef Tiso.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 21:27, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zapotocky.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zapotocky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 06:07, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gottwald.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gottwald.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 17:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Andrianjaka Razakatsitakatrandriana[edit]

I have nominated Andrianjaka Razakatsitakatrandriana, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrianjaka Razakatsitakatrandriana. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 13:07, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello New Babylon 2! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 965 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Shimazu Narioki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enemas[edit]

Hi. I removed your question on Talk:Paraphilia per WP:NOTAFORUM because it was not about improving the article. As discussed in the article about him, John Harvey Kellogg was a proponent of colonics. Among those who think "paraphilia" is a legitimate concept, they use the term klismaphilia to diagnose erotic interest in enemas. Jokestress (talk) 23:13, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Clementis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Clementis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:41, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Clementis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Clementis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:50, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vasudeva of Kabul[edit]

The article Vasudeva of Kabul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references ("Vasudeva of Kabul") found no published (gBooks) support for this article (LLC is a wikimirror)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 17:44, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slansky at trial.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Slansky at trial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 20:15, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Jan Weiss.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Jan Weiss.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 20:03, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Proces.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Proces.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Clementis.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Clementis.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:24, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The Inquisitors.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:The Inquisitors.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:17, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slansky.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slansky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:52, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]