User talk:Nhajivandi

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Greetings...[edit]

Hello, Nhajivandi, and welcome to Wikipedia!

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".
I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!
Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 17:09, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of University of Rio Grande, Meigs Center[edit]

Hello Nhajivandi, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created, University of Rio Grande, Meigs Center, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:Sopher99. This has been done because the page is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:Sopher99. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of Sopher99 (talk · contribs) 11:35, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of University of Rio Grande, Meigs Center[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

I have nominated University of Rio Grande, Meigs Center, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Rio Grande, Meigs Center. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ɔ ʃ 14:30, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Meigs center.JPG[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Meigs center.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to People's Republic of China has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. the wub "?!" 21:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at People's Republic of China, you may be blocked from editing. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:35, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

I was showing an example on how easy it was to blank out a page on Wikipedia, and i accidentally saved the changes. i was in the process of undoing it when the wub undid my changes. Very sorry and will not happened again. Nhajivandi (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

No worries. I guess you got to show the consequences too :). -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:15, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

International response[edit]

Hi, please see talk page of main article, the international response section was removed mainly because it was riddled with copyvios. Feel of course free to use the sources to rebuild the list properly. See also User talk:Dr. Blofeld#International response. Cheers, Amalthea 22:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:2010 obama logo.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:2010 obama logo.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:2010 obama logo.JPG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:2010 obama logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

I made a mistake by uploading it before putting the licensed on. I was going to delete the image, and put up a new one that is corected and one that has a license. Thing is I don't think i can delete it, so if you can delete it I would like that. Thanks you Nhajivandi (talk) 13:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

September 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Year of Hell, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 13:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Your sources[edit]

Hey! I appreciate your adding refrences, but please don't use yahoo as a source, find it from another site. Yahoo links die after about a week, and then can no longer be accessed. It mostly just reposts articles from the AP so there are plenty of other links to the same articles. Thanks!! Jeancey (talk) 01:26, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

TB[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Nhajivandi. You have new messages at Jnorton7558's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jnorton7558 (talk) 02:21, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

TB[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Nhajivandi. You have new messages at Achowat's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Again

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Republican Governors Association, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scott Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Kosovo and China[edit]

Look at both Kosovo and China. Kosovo-Russia relations has been either deleted or redirected to Russia-Serbia relations. That had been done long ago. I will make a deal for you. Do you know how to redirect pages. I am not an expert at redirecting articles. So here is what I think you should do. Since you know alot about redirecting, I wish that you can redirect the the articles People's Republic of China–Kosovo relations to People's Republic of China-Serbia relations. Iam telling you that when I looked at that page and I had found out that the Kosovo section of People's Republic of China-Serbia relations is almost 90% identical to People's Republic of China–Kosovo relations. So I hope that you can redirect the article of People's Republic of China–Kosovo relations to People's Republic of China-Serbia relations. That way the tensions that are existing between us over these articles can be avoided at Wikipedia. Also regarding Canada, I think that the article was already done and later redirected so that will have to be worked out. I hope you have some good suggestions for that. In the meantime Nhajivandi I hope you like my sugesstions for both Kosovo and China and that you will respond to me as soon as possible. MyRx talk 9:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

I will consider it and get back to you on it. I haven't had time to look today, but I will try looking at it tomorrow if I have time. In the meantime, the edits I made will stand until I make my discussion concerning your deal. Nhajivandi (talk) 05:12, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

I looked tonight instead and I have decided to keep the edits as they are. Furthermore, your editing history and your editing style is questionable as it is similar to sock-puppets from the past that have edited pages like you have with Kosovo pages. I apologize but under these reasons, I cannot make a deal with you at this time, sorry. Nhajivandi (talk) 06:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC) Nhajivandi I am sorry but I have to undo your edits because I have told you several times the one about Canada has been redirected and regarding China you can either redirect it or delete it from here. I am sorry but I must undo your edits and I am not the banned user Koov. I have told you the deal that it is still on offer and you must either delete the article about China or just leave it alone like Armenia-Kosovo relations or Bosnia and Herzegovina-Kosovo relations. So just trust me, I am not like the banned user Koov and I just want you to change the part about China. I can't accept this edits because we know that artlcle about Kosovo-Russia relations was redirected. The only option will be in my opinion is to redirect the artlcle of People's Republic of China-Kosovo relations to People's Republic of China-Serbia relations. Just look at that article and just redirect them. By redirecting the article we can end some of the tensions that exist between us. User:MyRx talk 9:36 23 February 2012 (UTC)

March 2012[edit]

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at User talk:Rokoop, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. SudoGhost 05:37, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm not seeing a single edit of Rokoop's that you reverted that would constitute vandalism, and being a suspected sockpuppet (which is not the same as a tagged or confirmed sockpuppet) doesn't make the edits vandalism. When you use twinkle in this way, it marks your edit as WP:MINOR, and because what you're reverting isn't vandalism, the edit isn't minor, which makes using twinkle in this way an improper use of the tool. Please keep this in mind when reverting edits. Thank you. - SudoGhost 05:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Ahh ok, I apologize on that one, I should have pressed rollback instead of vandalism on the TW tool. The reason I did that was because the person Rokoop is under investigation for being a sock puppet and I thought such warnings had to be left on there. I Just started using the tool today and im still figuring out the TW tool. but in no way am I trying to discourage anyone. including new users. Again I apologized again for this and I will make sure not to make that mistake again. Thank you for pointing that out. Nhajivandi (talk) 05:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok I Just saw your last comment on here. I always thought that it was considered vandlism when the tool pops up the rollback vandalism options. I will keep that in mind however some like the one on the kosovo template I would consder because the link for Canada was good and it did link to the right area and it was removed. But again thank you for pointing these things out. Nhajivandi (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Actually between the two you'd be better off using Twinkle than rollback, if you have rollback and use it incorrectly, you'd risk having rollback rights removed. However, you can use twinkle to revert back to a specific edit, which will prompt you for an edit summary, and wouldn't mark the edit as minor or as a vandalism reversion. However, I certainly understand why you did it, and I'm certainly not accusing you of anything, just letting you know. The talk page guidelines say that people are allowed to remove (almost) anything from their talk pages. Take care. - SudoGhost 06:03, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ohio University Credit Union[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ohio University Credit Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 06:03, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Ohio University Credit Union[edit]

I have deleted this page because it was directly or very closely copied from their official website. This is strictly prohibited by Wikipedia rules, see WP:Copyright. Feel free to re-create the article in your own words, but be sure to cite reliable sources in a way that shows the subject is notable. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Thank you -RunningOnBrains(talk) 07:32, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Nhajivandi. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 12:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria policy[edit]

Please do not place (or replace) non-free files anywhere except for articles as you did at Template:Republican Wikipedians. Such use is a clear violation of point 9 of the Non-free content policy and will be reverted. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

My apologize I did not know about this policy. I will abide by it thank you. But If that's the case, then what about the DNC logo in Template:Democrat Wikipedians? If im not allowed to put the GOP logo in the Republican template, should that also be taken off too? And I do not think that either political logos are copyrighted but again I could be wrong. Also sorry i didnt respond sooner. Thank you Nhajivandi (talk) 17:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Seal[edit]

No idea if it's in line with usual practice, but it looks fine to me. It actually improves the look of the infobox, imo. Just thought I'd say, since you went to the trouble of writing a detailed edit summary. Rivertorch (talk) 06:09, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Whoa, hold your horses. Please be careful not to edit war. I said I liked the look of it, but consensus appears to be against its inclusion, and we all need to respect consensus even if we disagree with it. Btw, I'm not an administrator. Rivertorch (talk) 06:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

My apolgoise. My intencions were not at all to cause an edit war. I just thought I had a good idea and I did thought you were an asministrator. im really sorry about this. Nhajivandi (talk) 18:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

No worries! The majority tends to rule in the short term, so it's important to listen to what other editors are saying in their edit summaries and on talk pages. There's still room for lots of creative ideas; you just have to either apply them in places where no one cares or else make the case for applying them first. Be bold but not reckless, and you'll do fine. In theory, administrators have no special authority over content—just some extra tools to enforce policies when they're not being followed voluntarily. (That's also true in practice 99.9% of the time.) Rivertorch (talk) 04:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Funeral of Margaret Thatcher[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Funeral of Margaret Thatcher has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia:NOT (Crystal Ball) - Futurism and no proper content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Humblesnore (talk) 23:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello Humblesnore , There was no reason to put the nomination for deletion on this page because it is classified as a current event due to Mrs Thatcher's passing, Plus when a head of state or head of government dies is it very common to create these pages. I see that you are new to Wikipedia. I welcome you on here, but please don't add stuff like this unless it is absolutely necessary. Ive made mistakes when I first started but you get the hang of it. Thank you Nhajivandi (talk) 00:18, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sheffield, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sheffield Hallam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:14, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Your RFA[edit]

I closed your Request for Adminship under WP:NOTNOW (as a non-bureaucrat), due to the many concerns about having enough experience and the obvious way that the voting had turned. It sounds like you are on the way towards adminship if you continue working like you have, but it is common for the community to want to see many more edits before allowing someone to have access to the tools. I hope you take the good advice given and consider another run for RFA when you have more edits. Thanks for putting yourself forward. Dennis Brown |  | WER 12:38, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Nhajivandi. You have new messages at 331dot's talk page.
Message added 23:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

331dot (talk) 23:51, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

THERE IS NO VANDALISM[edit]

…at the Rauner page, but a serious revision, because the earlier information (1) is unsourced, and (2) is based on premature media (rather than official) reporting. For the record, I am actually a supporter of this political change, but I am a bigger supporter of firm WP policies. BOTTOM LINE, YOU REVERTED TEXT THAT THREE PREVIOUS EDITORS HAVE SUPPORTED (BECAUSE IN THEIR EDITS, TWO OTHERS ONLY DID MINOR TOUCHUPS), AND EDITS THAT WERE EARNEST, AND CONSISTENT WITH WP POLICY. I am reverting your change, and will seek administrative protections if you reintroduce it without discussion AND CONSENSUS OF THE THREE EDITORS INVOLVED. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

My apologize, i did it because in my view it looked like it was starting to and i wanted to go to a earlier version to strat over, i thought it was and i misjudge. I am also half awake because it is 1 in the morning so i wasnt trying to cause trouble at all when i did the edit, and ive also taken a few months off from editing so im a bit rusty. But you are right what i did was out of line, Next time i do something like this, i will ask for disussion. Again my apolgize. Nhajivandi (talk) 06:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Please proceed cautiously[edit]

…at the Rauner article. First, there is no bias. Period. I am holding the reporting to the facts: that there is a media report of victory, and no official State Board of Elections result. Even to this standard, the earlier text failed, because it provides no sources, at all, for this edit to a BLP article. Second, there is no vandalism. I am a registered user with extensive experience and edits. Third, there is no mess. There is an extensive in-text note, in a markup form that is accepted, that explains clearly why the reversion of the premature declaration of the unofficial victory was edited out. I have asked the article be semi protected. Please seek consensus at talk, before returning this clearly flawed, clearly biased "victory text" to the article. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 06:47, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Ive sent a message to your talk page explaning what happened this evining. Nhajivandi (talk) 07:01, 5 November 2014 (UTC)