User talk:Nickelroy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Nickelroy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Buster Seven Talk 18:30, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

New Page Patrol[edit]

Hi. Thank you for patrolling new pages. I saw you reviewed Sarah Grey but did not leave a message on the creator's talk page. I understand your enthusiasm to jump right in and help maintain the quality of our pages, however, New Page Patrolling requires considerable experience which is generally demonstrated through several hundred contributions to content.

As you have only made 11 edits to Wikipedia, I am asking you therefore not to patrol pages until you have read and fully understood the instructions at WP:NPP and the policies and guidelines at WP:DELETION, and gained considerably more experience. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:51, 17 November 2013 (UTC).

I have unreviewed a page you curated[edit]

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sarah Grey, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:52, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Your reverts in Aurangabad, Maharashtra[edit]

The culture of India refers to the way of life of the people of India. India's languages, religions, dance, music, architecture, food, and customs differ from place to place within the country. The Indian culture, often labelled as an amalgamation of several cultures, spans across the Indian subcontinent and has been influenced by a history that is several millennia old. This definition goes similar to Aurangabad culture. Read culture of India for more details. Namvistar Din is part of culture so you can not delete from Aurangabad culture. Two times you have deleted the photo of Namvistar Din celebration. Third time you will be blocked according to WP:BLOCK. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 21:33, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes, but you still fail the argument. There is nothing to suggest that suggests Namvistar day has anything to do with Aurangabad's culture or its people. Please come with a source that says that this celebration is a part of Aurangabadi culture. Please refer to Wikipedia:Citing sources before you add any content. Thanks.Nickelroy (talk) 05:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

The source is added with PHOTOGRAPH. Now you refer WP:BLOCK. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 12:21, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

--Your source is not connected with the article Nickelroy (talk) 03:50, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

I am waiting to get your answer on Auragabad talk page for removing Namvistar Din photograph[edit]

Namvistar Din celebrations in Aurangabad.

In teahouse you stated "I have no personal reason to strike out the picture." You have targeted this particular image for more than month. Since you targeting photograph in culture section, your answer over your editing is relevant. Why you did not remove pictures of Ajanta and Ellora caves pictures? Do you support ISKON is called integral part of Aurangabad culture? The culture does not depend on time period length or as you stated "The ceremony does not imbibe any traditional values" this is your POV. You have stated "The issue is your picture here which has nothing to do with the tradition of Aurangabad." The source itself states Political parties arranging the gatherings (here) have become a "tradition". . Your editing in general states Namvistar Din related with University celebrations. Is it true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JAIBHIM5 (talkcontribs) 12:05, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

waiting[edit]

You should have a look at WP:HA and WP:BRD for your image removal in various articles. Still waiting to get answers on Aurangabad page. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 00:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Still waiting[edit]

Still waiting to get answers on Aurangabad talk page for removing Namvistar Din photograph. If not satisfactorily answered, image will be inserted in culture section. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 18:49, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

You have not answered. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 14:29, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

WP:HA and WP:BRD, images fulfill wiki policies[edit]

You should have a look at WP:HA and WP:BRD for your recent image removal in various articles. Answer separately on each talk page of article if you find an irrelevant image. Waiting to get answers on Aurangabad page and all pages. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 13:32, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Did you read it? Still waiting. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 21:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
You are affiliated with this community that celebrates the Namvistar ceremony. You are promoting pictures related with your community in every other article hence it does not qualify under Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and Wikipedia:Vested interest.
Images fulfill wiki policies. Your are doing Wikipedia:Harassment. You have to discuss for your removal according to Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle. You can not remove unless you discuss on each talk page. JAIBHIM5 (talk) 20:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

JAIBHIM5 and Nickleroy edit reversions[edit]

Peace dove.svg

JAIBHIM5 (talk · contribs) and Nickelroy (talk · contribs): The constant reverting of each others' work is borderline disruptive. Regardless of which of you is "right" regarding a given edit and regardless of whether or note either or both of you have violated Wikipedia's 3 revert rule, you both need to find a better way to collaborate. Assuming both of you are relatively new to Wikipedia and have not edited before under other accounts, it's doubtful you both have a complete understanding of Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

I recommend that you both come to some kind of agreement like "before either of us inserts a picture on a topic we care about or reverts each other's edit, we will put a note on the article's talk page and notify the other editor, then wait 24 hours after any discussion dies down before making the edit." The agreement doesn't have to be what I just said - just make some kind of agreement with each other so the rest of us don't see rapid-fire back-and-forth edits.

If you cannot agree with each other about how to collaborate effectively, you both might consider utilizing one of Wikipedia's established dispute resolution procedures.

I am posting this message to both of your talk pages. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Diffs: [1] and [2]. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 23:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)