- 1 Welcome to my Teahouse, feel free to write your notes to me
- 2 Category:Spratly Islands
- 3 A brownie for you!
- 4 June 2014
- 5 Reference Errors on 17 June
- 6 Nomination of Priscilla Chan (Zuckerberg) for deletion
- 7 Disambiguation link notification for January 13
- 8 Nomination of Hayley Burroughs for deletion
- 9 Yes Prime Minister
Welcome to my Teahouse, feel free to write your notes to me
Thanks for the thanks! These "maritime features" all seem to have (at least) half-a-dozen names, so I thought it might be more useful if ALL the names were added to the category ... Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 11:12, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
- (P.S. At this point in time, I'm focusing on the Spratly Islands Dispute article, not on populating the Category:Spratly Islands. Pdfpdf (talk) 11:17, 19 May 2014 (UTC))
A brownie for you!
|To fill my WikiLove quota. ;) Cheers! Thanks, Lixxx235Got a complaint? 15:58, 3 June 2014 (UTC)|
- @ User:Lixxx235 - Thank you :)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Budruk.html|website=http://www.indiamapia.com|accessdate=17 June 2014}}</ref>) in [[Kolaba]] (now in [[Pen, India|Pen]], [[Raigad district]] of Maharashtra. Vinayaka was the eldest son of
Your edits to Max Gerson added POV tags to two sections. However, you did not explain on the talk page what problems you felt exist in those sections (the problems are not immediately obvious to me). Another editor removed the tags. Feel free to restore them with explanation on the talk page. Thanks. - SummerPhD (talk) 13:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
Reference Errors on 17 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
Nomination of Priscilla Chan (Zuckerberg) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Priscilla Chan (Zuckerberg) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priscilla Chan (Zuckerberg) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 20:50, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kakori conspiracy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kala Pani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Nomination of Hayley Burroughs for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hayley Burroughs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 03:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes Prime Minister
I removed your mentions of Yes Prime Minister from various UK newspaper articles because you did not provide a 3rd party reliable source demonstrating that the cited jokes are notable. If such sources exist your addition would be less likely to be removed, but as trivia sections are not encouraged on Wikipedia the addition might still be removed at some point in the future. At least some of these jokes had been around for a few years before they surfaced in Yes Prime Minister; the original source(s) are probably lost to time by now.
I was wrong in assuming that the You Tube clip is a copyright violation as it is clearly on the BBC channel, but this does not invalidate the other Wikipedia policies mentioned. Philip Cross (talk) 15:10, 13 April 2015 (UTC)