You have deleted the page and that's a disaster but like phoenix the ashes will rise. when o when will busybodies like you stop interfering in the business of future prophets and science fiction which require a very refined level of undersrtanding , you and Anthony are mistaken I say in the habit of editing beyond their remit in our land — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dabokam (talk • contribs) 23:36, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
...Me become an administrator on Wikipedia I noticed that you were an administrator on Wikipedia so would you help.And also my first cab Calloway edit was an accident.Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BuddyRedBow (talk • contribs) 21:50, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
BuddyRedBow, please read Wikipedia:Administrators - you have to have a lot, lot more experience before you should even consider applying to be an admin. Nthep (talk) 21:42, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
I think the author just wants to get rid of this draft since the article now exists as Porch (company). I left him instructions, but you may want to remove your AFC. Meters (talk) 20:43, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks to the contributions of our many members and supporters, WP:YORKS has become a leading local British WikiProject in terms of the total number of articles supported (up from 11,230 last month to 11,399 on July 29th). In the area of GAs WP:YORKS at 113 is ahead of WP:GM who have 82. WP:GM has the lead in FAs at 57 out of a total number of 3,358 articles.
Currently we have thirty two Yorkshire featured articles:
The project is subscribed to a clean-up listing which lists articles tagged with various clean-up tags that need attention. The listing is refreshed by a bot on a regular basis.
Monitoring is essential
Use the watchlist to keep an eye on changes to the project's articles so that vandalism and spamming can be removed as quickly as possible.
Please be careful when performing articles moves and ensure that you also move all the talk sub-pages and update any image fair use rational. Otherwise the archives, to-do lists, assessment comments and GA reviews get lost and the image may be deleted as it has an incorrect FUR. You will also have to check that the Commons link is set correctly.
Comments, questions and suggestions about this, or any, issue of the newsletter are always welcome and can be made by pressing the feedback button below...
Delivered August 2014 by MediaWiki message delivery.
If you do not wish to receive the newsletter, please add an N to the column against your username on the Project Mainpage.
Although other stations do not have a logo, St Pancras does and it is a prominent and recognisable part of the station, displayed instead of the Network Rail or TOC logo. The station is used by many people as a shopping centre or to access hotels, people who are not just boarding trains and they use the logo to recognise the station. There are appropriate fair use templates on the image. JaJaWa |talk 04:27, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
in your opinion, I disagree hence the proposed deletion. Nthep (talk) 07:20, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tamerton Foliot railway station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Railway. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for all your suggestions for improving the Molokai Advertiser-News Wikipedia page. I am a retiree and did not anticipate that my new hobby of being a Wikipedia editor would be such an involved process. Yet I still enjoy it. I attempted to edit this Hawaiian page with the three principles of fairness, balance, and neutrality in mind. I hope I was successful. Mahalo nui loa, Leilani.
Thanks for the kitten. I'm glad you're enjoying the experience and my actions weren't critical as such just suggestions of things to address and/or bringing the article in line with Wikipedia's manual of style. I still have concerns that the article is more about Peabody than the paper and while the two may be inextricably linked there are ways of giving more information about the paper rather than it's editor-in-chief/main reporter/dogsbody etc. If it's a one man band then so be it i nwhich case there needs to transparency of this. Nthep (talk) 12:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)