User talk:Number 57

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome Click here to leave a new message.

thanks glad we got wikipedians like you who support peace on both sides[edit]

thanks glad we got wikipedians like you who support peace on both sides and not like this freaks who delete every facts that people say but i need to do me a favor in this and this freaks delete what i said only cuz it does not fit their opinions you can please block them or tell them you understand in this subject and they should stop please? they got really annoy me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 20:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately you are the one inserting incorrect information into the Herut article (the date the party was dissolved). The other text you are adding is very poorly written and unencyclopedic, so they are perfectly within their rights to remove it. You need to discuss what you want to be added on the article talk pages. Number 57 20:45, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

fine than i glad you know hebrew take a look on the hebrew wikipedia of begin it is saying " המפלגה אימצה קו שנחשב אז ימני קיצוני, ובין היתר תבעה את החזרה מההסכמה לתוכנית החלוקה. סיסמתה תאמה את קו אצ"ל, "שתי גדות לירדן, זו שלנו זו גם כן"" which is regulated like the wiki in english about begin you right but not about the herut. so please tell them to stop or block them i know you got a lot of power on wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC) oh and i want you to report this user ok he delete every thing that is not fit to his opinions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 21:39, 19 May 2015 (UTC) please please be a good man and report him for blocking please you seem like a good guy. or if you do not want to involved tell me how im report him he deleting facts by his opinion please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 23:58, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

AfD discussions[edit]

To continue the discussion we were having from Salisbury City Council elections. I agree with you that sometimes it may be possible for an editor to be too close to a subject to have a clear enough perspective. (though I don't know anything about soccer to understand your example) On the whole I don't think this is too much of a problem if there are other editors able to add that perspective based on their own interest/experience with articles in that subject area. I assume that you also hold this view which is why you thoughtfully invited people like me from the UK politics project into the discussion. From my experience there are editors who come into AfD discussions by other routes, such as other AfD dicscussions. There are editors who seem to essentially join these discussions offering little more than some understanding of wikipedia policy guidelines. This seemed to be the case with MelanieN who clearly expressed things from a perspective demonstrating no particular understanding of the subject area. A quick research on the editor confirmed their areas of interest and recent activity. I will repeat again, the nationality of the editor should be irrelevant and if you believe that I infer the opposite, then there really isn't a lot more I can say. Graemp (talk) 16:58, 24 May 2015 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Number 57. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 17:08, 27 May 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Mentioned you at ANI re: Herut. I'm probably misreading something, sorry. - Sitush (talk) 21:28, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

I will be reporting you for edit warring with me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Narbit (talkcontribs) 13:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Arab Voters[edit]

I don't understand why you deleted it. Archway (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2015 (UTC)

@Archwayh: Because something someone said during an election campaign is rarely, if ever, worthy of an article by itself. Number 57 21:18, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
@Number 57: At least can you add what President Obama said? Likewise, there's a necessity to the add the influence of the statement on the election results. Archway (talk) 17:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
@Archwayh: You're more than welcome to edit the election article yourself, but remember WP:UNDUE. The reason I left out the Obama statement was that it was far too large compared to the rest of the text. Also, you don't have to ping me on my own talk page! Number 57 18:09, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

James Shields[edit]

Hello Number 57. With this edit you show the result of the move as 'RESULT'. Probably you meant to say 'Moved.' Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:24, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@EdJohnston: Thanks for letting me know. Now corrected. Cheers, Number 57 15:26, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Salisbury City Council election, 2013[edit]

Following the outcome of the AfD for Salisbury City Council election, 2009, would you please now reinstate Salisbury City Council election, 2013? As previously discussed, the issues are the same. Moonraker (talk) 20:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

@Moonraker: Done. Number 57 21:02, 1 June 2015 (UTC)