- 1 Thanks for Ngati Haua
- 2 Thanks
- 3 CSA Illumina retired ?
- 4 Typos
- 5 Bitcoin
- 6 OER inquiry
- 7 Disambiguation link notification for June 7
- 8 Where to now?
- 9 Volkner incident
- 10 Disambiguation link notification for June 21
- 11 A kitten for you!
- 12 Disambiguation link notification for July 5
- 13 2010 Queenstown suppressed indecency case
- 14 Internet Party and MANA Movement
- 15 Ferries in Wellington
Thanks for Ngati Haua
Thanks for the heads up on this iwi -I was unaware there were 2 separate(?) iwi with the same name.I presume they were at one time linked? I know other iwi like Rangitane are widely scattered-this seems to have happened in the Musket wars mainly. Any further info you can add? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 09:47, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
- Hi. Can you refresh my memory about where I gave a heads-up about this/these iwi. I can't readily recall what edits I made about this. Nurg (talk) 19:11, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
CSA Illumina retired ?
Hi, I responded over at the ProQuest / CSA talk page here, about seven months after your query. The wheels of Wikipedia rotate slowly, at times, but at least they're movin'. --- Steve Quinn (talk) 07:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
- No worries, Tony, spelling is important when it comes to links. Winks. Nurg (talk) 09:49, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
I think using the currency identifier "USD" is more appropriate in this situation than the country identifier "US". The "$" is too ambiguous. it can be used to denote the Peso, Brazilian real, Cape Verdean escudo, etc. I don't think that I'm 100% right, but my opinion is that the original edit should remain. --WikiTryHardDieHard (talk) 17:56, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
- Hi there. It doesn't say just "$". It says "US$", which is not ambiguous and is the usage specified at Manual of Style/Dates and numbers#Currencies. Nurg (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2013
Hi Nurg, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:46, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bunbury (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Bunbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
Where to now?
Following Gisborne, do you have any ideas or suggestions about where we go now regarding the regions articles? I learned my lesson about combining discussions—won't do that again. I was considering perhaps a suggestion to move West Coast Region back to "West Coast, New Zealand". Or would "West Coast (New Zealand region)" be better? I'm not sure. Your discovery of the evidence that "Gisborne Region" was a legal name gives me pause as well. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:07, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Glad you dropped by - I was going to check with you what you planned next, in case a prelim discussion would be useful. If you proposed "West Coast, New Zealand", I would support that, unless new info or arguments came up. In fact, I think I would support "comma New Zealand" for a number of others that require disambiguation. I think Naming conventions (geographic names)#Disambiguation would rule out the "West Coast (New Zealand region)" form, as not the first preference. There are a couple of regions that might not need disamb and could possibly go to the simple name, like Otago did. There are a couple that need disamb but where the comma would not work, IMO, because the main part of the region name is the same as the main urban area - these are Wellington and Auckland. Not sure yet what I think should happen with these two - possibly even stay as they are. Nurg (talk) 10:34, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
- Are you comfortable for me to just proceed one-by-one?—I agree that there are some others (Northland, Southland?) which could use the "comma New Zealand" format, but given the complications that arose in the other situation, I'm a bit wary to combine discussions. Good Ol’factory (talk) 22:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi Nurg, It's good to see someone helping to improve this article. What the article badly needs, however, is more inline citations. Presumably you're extracting your details from a book or website, so it would be very good to include the citations as you go. Thanks. BlackCab (talk) 02:36, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kereopa Te Rau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gisborne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
A kitten for you!
For your recent tiding-up.
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fiji Rugby Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colonial Cup. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
2010 Queenstown suppressed indecency case
In light of recent discussion on a certain biographical article, allow me to draw your attention to stub article 2010 Queenstown suppressed indecency case. It may be possible to discuss on the new article's talk page whether to name the alleged perpetrator and the correct way to do so. Nankai (talk) 09:41, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Internet Party and MANA Movement
Thank you for your previous comments on this article's name. I have proposed to rename this article at Talk:Internet_Party_and_MANA_Movement. I invite your input. Ground Zero | t 15:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Hmmm, that deletion is a bit strange, so far as I'm aware until global warming is better underway Wellington is all above the waterline and so above ferry level. Do you mean ferries that visit wellington? Then don't you think you'd do better if you put your deletion back?
You want to talk about Wellington Harbour Ferries don't you but don't wipe out the Wellington Ferry that went from Lyttelton to Wellington and back. Are you youngish and living in Wellington? Cheers, Eddaido (talk) 13:17, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
- The Union Company article covers the Wellington–Lyttelton ferry. Nurg (talk) 08:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- "Wellington Harbour Ferries" with capitals is not correct, because it is not a proper name. "Wellington harbour ferries" and "Wellington Harbour ferries" are not so bad. But it is not just about the vessels, so maybe "Ferry transport in Wellington Harbour" is better, like Ferry transport in Berlin. But then maybe we should follow the Berlin pattern and have "Ferry transport in Wellington". I suggest using the Wikipedia:Requested moves process if you want to change the name, because that opens it up for discussion. That is what I have done for Talk:Public transport in Wellington#Requested move 6 February 2015, even though I think that is a more straightforward change. Nurg (talk) 09:52, 16 February 2015 (UTC)