User talk:Ny2292000

Hello!

Thanks for uploading some pictures to Wikipedia. I wanted to make sure you were aware of some of the requirements and good practices for uploaded images.

Pick an image name.

When uploading an image, pick a file name that is descriptive, and unique. Remember that many images may be uploaded about the same topic, and remember that names are case sensitive.

Source the image.

On the image description page, explain where the image came from. If you created the image yourself, then say so. If it's from the web, give a URL. If it's a screenshot of a movie or game, or a scan from a book, give the title.

Provide copyright and license information.

This part is a little bit trickier, but it's very important. The copyright of the image generally belongs to whomever created it.

If it's a photograph you took, or an image you created (modifying an image that already exists doesn't count) in software like Photoshop or GIMP, then you own the copyright. To upload it to Wikipedia, you must agree to license it under the GFDL (which allows anyone to use it, but requires that they give credit to the original author and requires that any further edit to the image be licensed under the GFDL as well) or release it into the public domain (which allows anyone to use it for any purpose without restriction.) Do this by placing an appropriate tag on the image description page, like {{GFDL}} or {{PD}}. Be sure to mention that you created the image. If you're using {{PD}}, you may also want to use {{NoRightsReserved}}, since there is some dispute as to whether one may grant items into the public domain.

If you didn't create the image, or the copyright somehow belongs to another party (like a screenshot, which you might "create", but the copyright belongs to the author of the movie or video game), then you need to find another tag that describes the copyright status of the image. Images used on Wikipedia need to be free for our use and the use of sites which reproduce our content. This means that images cannot have a restriction such as "only for use by Wikipedia", or "for non-commercial use only", or "for educational use". Images without a free license may be usable in certain articles under fair use, but such a use should be justified on the image description page.

Describe the image.

To another reader, the image may not be immediately understood. A caption in an article doesn't explain the image to a visitor who sees it on its image page. Put a brief explanation of what is in the image on the image description page, similar to what you might include in a caption on an article.

Some links to Wikipedia pages on this subject:

Copyrights, Copyright tags, Fair use, Image description page, Public domain, Images for deletion, Possibly unfree images, Copyright problems, Uploading images

Thanks again for your contributions. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me at my talk page. --Slgr@ndson (page - messages - contribs) 20:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from each section appears to be copied from http://www.geocities.com/ny2292000/2.pdf.

The article is my article and I have the copyrights, so how can that be a copyrights violation?

As a copyright violation, Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Hypergeometrical Universe - Theory of Everything, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 11:55, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This happened a long time ago, so there is no point discussing this issue. It seems that I did just what was asked. I wrote: "The article is my article and I have the copyrights, so how can that be a copyrights violation?"

Did I do something wrong? The question is because somehow this issue wasn't solved at the time.

Am I allowed to write about my own theory - The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory in Wikipedia?

My recollection is that I was told I wasn't allowed to do so. Is that true? Ny2292000 (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images listed for deletion[edit]

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. Tim Shuba 20:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:ElectronNew.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:ElectronNew.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:NewNeutron.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:NewNeutron.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 14:51, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:NeutronNew.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:NewNeutron.jpg. The copy called Image:NewNeutron.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 15:19, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Fundamental Dilator in the Hypergeometrical Universe Model[edit]

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article The Fundamental Dilator in the Hypergeometrical Universe Model, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 19:52, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as The Fundamental Dilator in the Hypergeometrical Universe Model, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Pages about esoteric theories not covered in reliable, published sources conflict with our core content policies. Thank you. <eleland/talkedits> 20:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review[edit]

I noticed you nominated the deletion of the above article to be reviewed. While that is fine, you must provide a reason for undeletion. I have closed it because you did not. Thanks. NASCAR Fan24^{(radio me!)} 22:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate Image:Fig1CoherenceStates1.gif[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Fig1CoherenceStates1.gif, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Fig1CoherenceStates1.gif is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Fig1CoherenceStates1.gif, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 23:33, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images nominated for deletion[edit]

I would like to inform youthat I have nominated the images you have uploaded for deletion; they are only being used in deleted original research articles. For more details, see Images and media for deletion. Regards, Mike Rosoft 08:00, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Do not add your own work[edit]

Hello, Ny2292000. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Quantum gravity, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID). Thank you.

Please do not add your own work in our articles are you did here. See this. Thank you. - DVdm (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No legal threats[edit]

Please note that if you make any legal threats on Wikipedia (re: https://www.quora.com/How-do-I-sue-Wikipedia), you will be blocked. Please see WP:NLT. You also have no legal right to post about your theories in Wikipedia articles, so any lawsuit would be an expensive waste of time. Please resolve your dispute about hypergeometric theory by discussion (see WP:Dispute resolution); outside experts commenting on your ideas in reliable sources would be useful to show acceptance. Thanks. Fences&Windows 17:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really understand how I interact with Wikipedia. Is this the right place for me to discuss my grievances with moderators? Ny2292000 (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory Draft concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory Draft, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum gravity[edit]

Hi Ny2292000, I have reasons to believe that particle physics and more exactly Coulomb dipole formation is a key mechanism in the cause of gravity. Do you feel that this could be expressed in terms of quantum mechanics ? Please see www.dipole.se Bengt Nyman (talk) 21:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Does that means that you, Bengt Nyman would expect that Argon (dipole moment equal to zero) would be weightless? No. There is no reason to believe that dipole moments are the reason for Gravitation. On the other hand, Gravitation is a Van der Waals force, but you wouldn't be able to figure that out because you cannot map the frequency of the fluctuations nor the origin of them. It is all explained in my theory.

I never used this talk page and am totally lost here

Your draft article, Draft:The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory Draft[edit]

Hello, Ny2292000. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory Draft".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:00, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ny2292000/sandbox[edit]

User:Ny2292000/sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ny2292000/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ny2292000/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Orange Mike | Talk 16:56, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Ny2292000/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Ny2292000/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Java Hurricane 12:23, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]