User talk:OBCPO1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

January 2013[edit]

Your edits to Fijian language[edit]

Hello OBCPO1, I'm Tucoxn. Thanks for adding {{flagicon|Fiji}} — I believe it was a useful addition to the article. Thanks again for your contributions! - ʈucoxn\talk 20:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of indigenous language names (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to British, Native American, Kayah and Tibetan language

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of language names (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to British, Dari language, Native American, Kayah and Tibetan language

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

2014 pro-Russian conflict in Ukraine[edit]

"Hello, Knowledgekid87.

Yesterday (June 28) I added flags to the infobox regarding the 2014 Pro-Russian Conflict in Ukraine. Today (June 29), you removed my work, and told me to read WP:INFOBOXFLAG. Well I did read this, and it clearly states "Examples of acceptable exceptions include military conflict infobox templates..." If you have any concerns, fell free to leave me a message on my talk page. User talk:OBCPO1" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.230.159.164 (talk) 03:08, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

The problem is that this article does not use a military conflict infobox, it uses a civil conflict one. If the article used a military conflict infobox then yes you would be right but that would require consensus on the talkpage to do so. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 18:42, 30 June 2014 (UTC)