User talk:Ollielollie

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ollielollie, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! 

Phil Robson[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Phil Robson, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 68.239.79.82 09:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning: Phil Robson lacks WP:A to establish WP:BIO[edit]

Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to establish notability ... without them, Phil Robson is just original research, which is prohibited by official policy.

Please read the Wikipedia official policies and guidelines that list the criteria for Notability (people) (WP:BIO) and Biographies of living persons (WP:BLP) for further information ... if you have written this article about yourself or a close relative, then you also need to read both Autobiography (WP:AUTO) and Conflict of interest (WP:COI).

As a litmus test of WP:A for a biographical article, there should be enough WP:RS publications about the subject that the first paragraph answers the questions "When and where was he born?" with a properly referenced citation ... for example, consider the following:

John Quincy Public (1963-11-23 to 2001-09-11) was born in Ypsilanti, Michigan.[1] He is notable for coincidentally having been born on the day of the John F. Kennedy assassination, surviving the same accident on the day of the first moon landing that killed both of his parents, and having died on the day of the September 11, 2001 attacks.[1]


References[edit]

  1. ^ a b Lane, Lois (2002-01-14). "The Coincidental Life and Death of John Q. Public". Daily Planet. p. 13. Retrieved 2007-05-11.

Just in case your article has already been deleted, please read What to do after your speedy delete has been restored to better understand what's probably going to happen if you disagree with at least two other editors who feel that the subject is not Notable enough by Wikipedia standards for an article.

Happy Editing! —68.239.79.82 09:24, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Ollielollie! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 939 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Billy Jenkins - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 11:20, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Babel Label for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Babel Label is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Babel Label until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]