User talk:Opboss

January 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to George Rogers Clark has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: George Rogers Clark was changed by Opboss (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878408 on 2015-01-26T20:09:55+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:09, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Valley Forge, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 14:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Horatio Gates. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. JOJ ^Hutton 22:07, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Excirial. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Articles of Confederation— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Articles of Confederation with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Articles of Confederation, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Articles of Confederation was changed by Opboss (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.871015 on 2015-02-10T20:10:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:10, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Articles of Confederation with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 20:15, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]