User talk:Ora7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

December 2013[edit]

Stop icon This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajputbhatti, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Did you really think that you'd get away with those edits? Thomas.W talk to me 11:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

  • I have blocked this account. I will come back in a while and explain why, and answer some of the issues you raised at the sockpuppet investigation case page, but there are other more urgent tasks which I will deal with first. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  • please do it fast. please unblock my account of user:rajputbhatti.Ora7 (talk) 12:39, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  • why have u been reverting my edits. that bad! plz stop it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ora7 (talkcontribs) 12:44, 13 December 2013‎
Yes, and I was originally intending to explain why, but see below. JamesBWatson (talk)
I was intending to give you a fairly long explanation of the reasons behind my decision, together with some advice on how to go forward from here. However, I have now seen your edits to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajputbhatti, where you blatantly tried to use underhanded methods to throw attention away from your actions, and that changes everything. You have written "", and if this, this, and this aren't "bad edits", then I don't know what would be. You asked to be blocked if you made "bad edits", and you have got your way. I no longer see any point in spending my time trying to give you help and advice. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:52, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  • that's too much. I had made all these edits before my sock was blocked. That's just not good. do u want me to create more socks and repeat all this. plz just give me last chance.plz. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ora7 (talkcontribs) 13:00, 13 December 2013‎
Oh my goodness! A blocked sockpuppeteer threatening to create more sockpuppets if we don't unblock his latest sockpuppet! That's never, never happened before! (Well, not more than a few thousand times, anyway.) Oh no! We'd better unblock him quickly! After all, that's what we usually do to sockpuppeteers who make that threat. Really, threatening to defy Wikipedia policy is a much more effective way of getting unblocked than requesting an unblock and making it clear that one intends to follow Wikipedia policy in the future.
And then there's "that's too much. I had made all these edits before my sock was blocked." Of course they were done before the account was blocked: you couldn't have made the edits with a blocked account: that's what "blocked" means. If we are dealing with someone who thinks that vandalism before the account is blocked somehow doesn't count as vandalism, and can't be taken into account when deciding whether to block, then we have a pretty serious WP:COMPETENCE issue. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:12, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  • all i know is that u have hurted me. when i made all those were reverted quikly. if no one had reverted them then in that case u have the full right to say this, but my edits had done no harm to that investigation case. i am sorry. all i have to do in this world is either to read articles of wiki or viewzone.com and edit wiki.please forgive me and plz unbloak my account rajputbhatti. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ora7 (talkcontribs) 13:42, 13 December 2013‎

Since I wrote the above messages, I have looked further at the history of your other accounts. I see that you have been persistently dishonest and underhanded to a huge extent, with no evidence whatever that you are likely to change. Your claims to be a poor innocent who never does any harm and who really deserves another chance fall completely apart when one looks at your history. You are dead right that your attempts to undermine the sockpuppet investigation case did no harm to it, but only because your tricks were spotted and reverted: it is clear that your intention was to undermine the investigation. Fortunately, you are so incompetent that you keep giving yourself away, so your sockpuppets keep getting found out. As far back as September another editor suggested that you should be community banned, and if I see one more of your sockpuppets then I shall propose exactly that. Go away, and find some other pointless way of wasting your time, instead of making a nuisance of yourself on Wikipedia. (And bear in mind that anything you do here will be a waste of your time, because every edit you make will be reverted. Why? Because it's just possible that even you will eventually get the point that there is no point trying to edit here if you know that everything you do will be undone again.) JamesBWatson (talk) 14:58, 13 December 2013 (UTC)