User talk:Osborne

Osborne (talk) 19:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)====Additional tips====[reply]

Extra Tips[edit]

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.
You can sign your name using three tildes (~). If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Five will get you the datestamp only.
You may want to add yourself to the new user log.
If you ever think a page or image should be deleted, please list it at the votes for deletion page. There is also a votes for undeletion page if you want to retrieve something that you think should not have been deleted.
If you're still entirely confused, or would like to get a better grasp of your wikipedia skills, and you have an IRC client (or don't mind getting one), check out the Bootcamp. It's not what it sounds like, but it is fun and can help you with your editing skills.
If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random page button in the sidebar, or check out the Open Task message in the Community Portal.

Happy Wiki-ing. —Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs

Click here to respond to this message!

Oh crumbs - this is all getting too complicated for meOsborne 09:43, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Oogonia[edit]

See the article oogoni (or oögonia) it was written with Homo sapiens in mind - how to sort it out - it should refer to algae and other formas of life!Osborne 14:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC) oogoni (or oögonia) these are different links and the diaresis brakes the connection.Osborne 14:12, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's an editorial decision for you and fellow editors of the Oogonium page should make, not something that can, or should be answered by the {{helpme}} helpers :-) Since you've left a message on Talk:Oogonium, some editors who also edit that page may take a look at your comment, and may state their opinion. However, as the article doesn't seem to be regularly edited, you may like to just Be Bold and make any changes as you see fit. By the way, please don't use the {{helpme}} template on any page other than your own user talk page (i.e., this page). Cheers, Tangotango (talk) 14:37, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Right/rite{?}oh. I am about to retire so I am a little care-free! But thinks. I don't have a computer at home so this will be my last helpme....perhaps ever! So there. Many thanks for your help and best wishes:) Osborne 14:42, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osborne, in case you haven't seen them:

Great work on the Ulster Museum page by the way. Must make a visit soon, haven't been in years. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 14:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Prof. Jones[edit]

If you've still not "read the manual", read this article WP:N. It'll help. --Dweller 11:05, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article on W.E.Jones[edit]

I've copied over my answer from Requests for feedback - if you are still confused after this, drop me a note and I'll try to help.

I gather it may be unaccepted. Ok. I need help - I'm new and confused. May have to give-up! Osborne.

I think the problem with the Eifion Jones article is that it does not establish notability. In order for an article to merit inclusion on Wikipedia there must be some assertion that the subject is worthy of an entry in an encyclopedia. You can establish this in the article by giving references from third party works that prove that he is recognised as an expert in his field. In addition the article has several point of view statements such as "He was a well-liked lecturer and his enthusiasm was imparted to students". All wikipedia articles should written from a neutral point of view so this type of expression is discouraged. Yomangani ^talk 12:06, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eifion Jones[edit]

Well done for your perserverance. It'll be a good article. I'm sure Wikipedia can use some more botany expertise... please do stick around. --Dweller 13:46, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Helping you further[edit]

You might want to check out Portal:Biology and Wikipedia:WikiProject plants, particularly the latter. The WikiProjects always welcome newbies with enthusiasm and/or expertise. You appear to have both. --Dweller 13:49, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the encouraging note (on re-reading this page!) . However I am too lazy to read all the instructions. I have just jumped in at the deep end and get help and advice from helpful people as yourself.Osborne 09:42, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On looking through the Talk page I noted again your helpful comments. I would be grateful for a not ion how (an when) I should enter a "piped-link". That is how do I do it? Osborne 14:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast WikiProject[edit]

As you have contributed to an article relating to Belfast, I hope you could take some time to read this page about our new project: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Belfast.

Thanks. --Mal 01:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Had a quick look at it - Oh it's quite beyond me! But take a look at Ulster Museum, or Algae or History of Phycology and you will see my positon - or rather my ability at this contraption. Best wishes. Osborne 16:11, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading images[edit]

Hi Osborne, take a look at Wikipedia:Uploading images, it's fairly comprehensive. But image copyright tags can be a minefield, very confusing. If you upload anything and are having problems give me a shout and I'll try to help. Stu ^{’Bout ye!} 09:47, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages[edit]

You can find a guide to using talk pages over at Help:Talk page, hope this helps! Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 09:23, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Algae and Seaweed[edit]

I would ask at the Village Pump. They can be of more assistance than I can. Sorry. --Kf4bdy ^talk ^contribs 19:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kelp/Laminaria[edit]

I have not mastered the "Talk" page. However if anyone out there "hears" me please advise. Re. Kelp & Laninaria. I suspect Kelp shouls redirect to Laminaria - it seems to be the "Master" page. But is it. Will be grateful for advice please. Is this the way I ask for advice? Osborne

Hey Osborne - the best way to ask for help is to add a tag called 'helpme' to your user talk page - place two { and } around the tag to create it. I'm not entirely sure what you're asking - Kelp and Laminaria are two separate articles, Kelp doesn't redirect to Laminaria (and we don't have an article on Kelp shouls). Does this help you at all? If you want to discuss it with people who've written about Kelp and Laminara, the pages you need are Talk:Kelp and Talk:Laminaria (edited the same way you edited your own talk page just now). They don't seem to be very active, however, so I'm not sure how much help you'd get. Please don't hesitate to reply either here or on my talk page if I can help you any further. --Mnem e son 15:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will see if I can take your kind advice. I am wondering whether Kelp and Laminaria should be redirected or merged! I was in error We do not have an article on "Kelp shouls" probably I ment "Kelp" and added "shoul)d" in a "typing" error! I need a little practice.Osborne 08:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ALGAE - History of...[edit]

On further thought perhaps the details of Harvey's life should be left to the link - q.v. Osborne 08:07, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

W.H.Harvey[edit]

Any corrections on the publications of Harvey will be welcome!Osborne 09:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think I will have to rewrite this article! Does not look too good. Osborne 10:51, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm having trouble entering the References ==<.../>== If you can help I will be grateful. Osborne 12:08, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

History of Phycology[edit]

Thanks to those who have corrected my spelling! Osborne 11:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Osborne, you might be interested in Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Science and/or Wikipedia:WikiProject History of Biology. Cheers--ragesoss 22:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have tried to move "References" to the end " - did not work. Now a bit mixed-up!. Will stop for a while & recover! Osborne 14:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC). Should this be translated in other languages? and by whom?Osborne 10:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me}}...is this how I request help? If so I would be grateful: see "William Henry Harvey" I have not got the references quite right. {{help me}}Osborne 12:12, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you asked for help correctly. I've fixed the references for you; see [1] to see what I did. I hope that helps, if you have any further questions, place the {{helpme}} tag back up. --ais523 12:58, 2 February 2007 (U T C)

Thanks. I will keep a note of "Ais523" for help in the future. However I'm not sure what you mean by: ..."tag back up."

I have one other question - I'll return to Ais523 for that! Osborne 14:26, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

I would be most grateful if someone could explain to me - in a simple way - how to enter a reference. <ref> Is it like this? 2006/>...? Do I then rewrite the full reference at the end or in a "Reference" section at the end? If I entered another reference earlier towards the start will it be inserted? and how? I'm frightened to try too hard & muck up an article! ~~~~ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Osborne (talk • contribs) 10:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)..[reply]

Oh this seemed to do it in a fashion - but I lost the rest of my note!! - that's why I'm frightened!!!!~~~~ <ref. Morton,2006/>. Has this wiped out this and what? Noted in text: Morton, O.<ref>Morton, O. 2006. How to enter a reference. ''12'': 1 - 6.</ref>

And in the references:- Morton 2006 ^[1]

....But how to get these in order both in the text and in the list of refs in alphabetic orded.

I'll try again! Osborne 12:04, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Morton, O. 2006. How to enter a reference. 12: 1 - 6.

F.T.Kützing[edit]

Hi, Osborne! I am a student from Ukraine. I'm interested in algae too. Have you any information about F.T. Kützing (e.g., scans from books)? Dmitry Kapustin 13:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC) Try: /kbo/utst/stil/ktzing.html.en and: paper by Woelkerling, W.J. 1985. A taxonomic reassessment of Spongities (Corallinaceae, Rhodophyta) based on studies of Kützing's original collections. Br.phycol. J. 20: 123 - 153. We in the Ulster Museum, have some specimens of Kutzing (Specimen nos. F1171; F10281 - F10318).Osborne 15:23, 8 January 2007 (UTC) Further: Try :- Algae-L This will enable you to contact other phycologists.Osborne 16:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

or:- www.seaweed.ie Osborne 16:49, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Dmitry Kapustin 17:10, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wrack (science)[edit]

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Wrack (science), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Oo7565 20:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the template, beause I think the article can be expanded or combined, and you should right now try to do one or the other, because it will undoubted be relisted for deletion, though not by me .DGG 04:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have started extension. Is the article worth keeping & expanding? Osborne 15:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S what does "UTC" mean??

Oh dear - I wanted this to be laid out as a list will try again.Osborne 15:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this article is needed at all, see "Fucus" - cross-ref? Osborne 16:25, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Just helping with the formatting) Hows that? Leave a blank line to start a new paragraph, UTC is Coordinated Universal Time - basically GMT. « Keith ^t/_e» 12:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing question[edit]

Hi, I'm just letting you know that I've answered your question about footnotes at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)#Please Issue Easy Guidlines for Footnotes with Links. invincible 15:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I think I have mastered it. See: History of Phycology. Osborne 09:52, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Answers[edit]

How to add images

I depends. If there are images you want to add that are found in other Wikipedia articles, then you find the file names for the images (by clicking on the images in the articles), then using the following markup: [[Image:nameofimage.jpg|thumb|This is the image caption.]] .

If you have these images on your computer and the copyright status is acceptable (i.e., either you took them yourself or they have been released free of copyright or with a Wikipedia-compatible license), then you can upload them. After uploading them, you can use the same markup as above to add them to the article. To upload images, go to Wikimedia Commons and create an account, then click "Upload file" on the left. Follow the instructions on that page, making sure to include a good description of the image and where it came from, as well as selecting the appropriate license. If you have any trouble, let me know.

On translation

Translation is an informal process. If someone from another language Wikipedia decides to translate the article, they will; simple as that.

--ragesoss 16:37, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmmmm! Thanks09:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Osborne 09:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:(User talk:Ais523) Future help.[edit]

I have no objection to you asking me questions in future; you can contact me by editing User talk:ais523. However, I'm not always online (that's why it took me so long to answer your most recent question), and using {{helpme}} is likely to produce a faster response in such cases, so it's your call really. You can visit this page (your talk page) any time by clicking on the 'my talk' button at the top of the screen, and it contains the signatures of all the users who you've corresponded with; this should help you keep track of the people you've talked to. Hope that helps! --ais523 16:04, 2 February 2007 (U T C)

Many thanks. "My" History of phycology needs to be "wikified" - I fear there is a lot to do! I may have to come back to you on this! Osborne 14:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast Naturalists' Field Club[edit]

The article you wrote, Belfast Naturalists' Field Club, is uncategorized. Please help improve it by adding it to one or more categories, so it may be associated with related articles. A stub marker or other template doesn't count - please put in an actual category in the article. Eli Falk 16:17, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, how do I do that? Probably it is not worth keeping anyway. Regards.Osborne 16:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Category for technical detail. Beyond that, see WP:CAT - the link I already gave you above. Eli Falk 16:48, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see if I can get round to it. ThanksOsborne 16:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it seems you have done it for me - thanks very much. I will be careful not to open an article again! I have other things to look out - like "endash"–—−|.... and the like. Thankls .Osborne 08:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: (User talk:ais523) Two questions[edit]

The link Halichondria panicea that you came across on Algae is what's known as a redlink. As the link is displaying in red, it means that an editor thought that it would be a good page to have an article on, but that no article existed. Redlinks are created the same way as normal links (bluelinks) except that you link to a nonexistent article. If you know enough about the subject, you could try writing an article at the target of the link yourself; if you don't, or you don't feel like writing that article, and you want an article created at that link, you could try requesting it at Wikipedia:Requested articles if it isn't there already (although bear in mind that requests often take a long time to fulfil, as it depends on whether someone who knows about the subject wants to write that article or not).
The markup for an en dash is –: –. (Special character codes go between an ampersand and a semicolon.) You can also insert a literal en dash into the markup by clicking on the en dash in the 'insert' box under the 'save page' buttons, which looks slightly clearer in the markup (and if you use the – method, it's quite possible that an editor or bot will change it to the literal en dash for you).
And yes, I am replying on your talk page; if you ask a user a question and don't ask them to put a reply anywhere in particular, they're most likely to reply either on your talk page or their own talk page. Many users will write down their policy for replying at the top of their talk page.

Hope that helps! --ais523 10:15, 21 February 2007 (U T C)

Thanks. As I have written much of the article I have taken on myself the responsibility of "de-linking" Halichondria. It is possible I was in error myself by clicking the internal link "button" in error instead of the Italics! I will have to take a detailed look at your answer to my second point. Thanks. Osborne 11:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I screwed up the markup in my answer to the second question. I've corrected it now, sorry for the confusion! --ais523 09:57, 22 February 2007 (U T C)

Laminaria[edit]

Ref four edits on a Laminaria articla: dated 28.02.2007 I have added four species of North American Laminaria, with refs. However only two of these are shown in the 09.28 version. A box "North American Pacific shores" appears in an earlied version of today and the reference has vanished in one version. The four versions between 9.00 and 10.00 o'clock. In these three or four edits bits have been lost and others have come unwanted.Osborne 10:08, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it for you. When repeating a reference in the article, use <ref name="..." /> (as opposed to <ref name="...">...</ref> for the first use); note the extra slash that is needed when repeating the reference. Hope that helps! --ais523 10:41, 28 February 2007 (U T C)

An article you might have some interest in[edit]

Its no biggie, but you might be interested that I started a page for the Ulster American Folk Park, thanks to your question on the NI Project talk page. I also copyedited the Ulster Museum article, only a little.. and just for style really. If you've got the time, and haven't already, please take a look at both articles and change anything according to your own knowledge. Cheers. Keep up the good work. :) -- Mal 05:31, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still not at ease with Wikipedia. Where is WP:NI/NI Project ...see what I mean I can't even repeat the site as you have written, nor can I find the talk page you refer to! Ah well I will find out some day. I must say I like your colours - I will have to play with that some time.Ah I know. I will simply copy & paste:- NI Project However I stiill cant type ..that wee upright stroke between NI and NI! I better do some work of types now.Osborne 09:40, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phycology/psycology[edit]

These are two different words sometimes confused. Phycology is the study od algae. "Phycos" is the Greek from which "Fucus" (Latin) is derived (I understand). Fucus is the generic name for certain big brown algae common on European shores.Osborne 11:23, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osborne, thanks for that. You learn something new every day. My bot doesn't have a rule for phycology but it does have one for phycological. Is that what you saw? (What article was it in BTW?) In any event, I'm removing the rule for phycological as I did a search over an entire enwiki dump and every use of phycological was correct. Cheers, and apologies for the confusion, Cmdrjameson 13:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I'm not quite sure what a BTW is! good for it.(I suppose it is something to do with "word". Anyway I am a member of the British Phycological Society - try that in Google - it should work. All the Botanical (new word?) in Latin will be new words to your "bot". Some plants have lovely latin words: "Ceramium shuttleworthianum" and "Chrysosplenium oppositifolium" . Many people don't like these but can use Rhododendron and the like. Osborne 14:20, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading algae images[edit]

Hi, Osborne, I hope you intend to upload algae images, as the algae species of Ireland are well-researched. KP Botany 04:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The algae are fairly well researched - I did a fair bit of it see: Marine Algae of Northern Ireland. 1994 ISBN. As for images I don't know how to upload images and a little concerned about copyright. So I'm careful, perhaps too careful.Osborne 09:05, 12 March 2007 (UTC) I would be grateful for your help -how to upload/download an image. Osborne 09:55, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flora section you added to the Waterford (city) article[edit]

Hi Osborne, I'm going to remove this because a) The article is about Waterford City and not Co. Waterford, where presumably the Algae is to be found primarily, b) a flora section with just a reference to algae is not very good, and really a separate article on Waterford Flora would be more in order anyway, and c) your link pertains to Co. Wexford, not Waterford at all. Merlante 17:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK. The reference gave the list of species as from Wexford & Waterford & did not distinguish! Anyway it did not give much info & I'm not sure whether it is worth putting anywhere. Any advice will be welcome, I'm still new at this contraption.Osborne 08:52, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have done the same with Wexford and Northumberland. A couple of tips:

Don't overuse headings -- quite often these articles already have sections like "Ecology" (and if they don't they should). An article like "Northumberland" has to describe all aspects of the county -- geography, history, politics and culture -- in a limited number of words, so ecology sections on those articles have to be brief, describing only the notable aspects -- e.g. species and habitats found nowhere else, or which are particularly common in the county. The mere presence of a species in an area doesn't make the fact encyclopaedic if the fact is not unique to that area, or if it is a little interest to the average reader. An "Ecology of Northumberland" or "Flora and fauna of Northumberland" article would be another matter, and one can go into much more depth there.
Don't asume readers know the jargon, style/formating and common abbreviations of your field -- put things in context and link to articles which explain technical terms. Also, use sentences! ;)

Thanks, Joe D (t) 00:31, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invasive species in Ireland[edit]

Hello Osborne. The external link you're attempting to add to the Ireland article isn't appropriate. The focus of that article is far too broad for a whole section dedicated to a niche subject like the island's non-native flora & fauna. I might suggest that you create a new article, perhaps Flora and fauna of Ireland. Such an article would be appropriate for a subsection on Ireland's non-native species. Make sure to write your own text using verifiable sources (like the article you linked). Dppowell 13:11, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osborne. I also noticed that you added yet another reference (without context) to the "Flora" section of the Ireland article. And that it was quickly reverted. I have alluded to this in the Talk:Ireland page, but - per Dppowell - some of the detail you continue to add is far too specific for a general Ireland article. Beyond that, I'm not sure you're fully familiar with how and why references and external links should be added. With no context what-so-ever, the link you added was not meaningful, and - frankly - broke the wikipedia guidelines on external linking and references. (Which is likely why the other member removed it again). Please consider in future writing a few sentences on the subjects you are interested in (to give context to the articles you are contributing to) rather than just adding links. (See: Wikipedia is not a list of links). But also make sure that anything you add is relevant to the general context of the article. Guliolopez 13:19, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I had opened a section with info' I had found with the intention of coming back later to fill it out and expanding it. (Will have to take another look - back in a moment). Yes I agree, I had found what I thought was a good/nice site & rather than lose [previous spelling "loose"! -Osborne] it I decided to add it in and come back later to fill it out. If you wany to set up another site on Irelands non-native species - well jolly good - you may want to keep this website somewhere, but where? I'll take another look at it now and perhaps delete some for you. Jolly good, best wishes & thanks Osborne 13:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC) May I ask your advice? Following your advice - I was responsible for the two ref in the "Aran" site (flora). However I have not added any text - well as yet, I came upon the books while doing other work. Perhaps it should be deleted. I may do it myself unless ...thinking Osborne 15:18, 2 April 2007 (UTC) No answer or advice yet! will take a look and perhaps alter it now Osborne 10:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fucus distichus problems[edit]

I've had a go at sorting the format problems. Have a look and check - I had to resort to counting <ref> statments ! (signature was not saved for technical reasons)

{{Help me}}[edit]

Why are the topics scattered all over the place? That's not those in the box - (signature was not saved for technical reasons) Thanks Osborne 08:27, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

footnote format[edit]

Hi Osborne, you recently changed an edit of mine to move the position of the footnote outside the sentence (@ Chloroplast), as opposed to at the end of the sentence before the period. I am unfamiliar with any literature referencing styles that have footnotes after the period, so I was surprised that they needed to be corrected. Would you be able please direct me to a style guide so I can get this right in the future? Cheers--(signature was not saved for technical reasons)

Sorry if I cauesd offence - which file please? This note will not save! - will try again!!(signature was not saved for technical reasons)

This section - "==footnote format==" does not show up except under "Editing". Sorry "Cheers". the 4 (signature was not saved for technical reasons) does not leave a name - perhaps you are "Spamburgler". However I am keen to look at what I did which you did not approve of. So if you read this please tell me which article you are referring to. (signature was not saved for technical reasons) Osborne 26th April (incase (signature was not saved for technical reasons)does not show up.)

Question to original author of ==footnote format== signed "cheers" I will be grateful to know the name of the article to which you refer please. Osborne 08:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osborne. No offence was taken, just interested what the error was. The article is Chloroplast, thanks--Spamburgler 06:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I trust I have corrected my error now. I apologisa profusely for my mistake. I have much to learn - but I should have known I was wrong and not have been so assertive. With best wishes. I am finding the "saving" very slow and indeed just not working within the allotted time - very irritating. Will see if this saves now! Osborne 08:18, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me}}[edit]

Why does the above "==footnote format ==" not show up except under Editing... Thanks(signature was not saved for technical reasons)

Thanks again Osborne 08:28, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page[edit]

There seems to have been some chaos on your talk page recently due to a <ref> tag being written on the page by another user without being quoted. I've tried my best to reconstruct the page, but the signatures for comments haven't been saved. You can see your talk page history here to try to reconstruct who said what (to allow you to reply accordingly). Hope that helps! --ais523 08:07, 26 April 2007 (U T C)

Many thanks for your work...all a bit complicated for me. Pity Spambugler" did not tell me what article he was referreing to. However your help has been very welcome, thanks. Osborne 08:33, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ovules[edit]

Articles are titled in the singular, so I redirected your article to Ovule, already in existence. --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 09:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Jolly good! - wrote it in haste as "Ovules" was in red indicating an article was required. I'll take a look at the article now Osborne 09:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osborne, feel free to improve the ovule article, if you have more to add! I recently rewrote it based on a textbook and added some pictures because it had a "too technical" and "photo requested" tag on it. I'm not a botanist by training though, so it would be good to have someone else look it over for accuracy. - tameeria 14:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Polysiphonia[edit]

I saw that you are editing algae articles. I was wondering if you would be interested in creating one for Polysiphonia to add some content to a red link in sporogenesis? - tameeria 14:45, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well....I can try. It is a big job. First: What is Sporogenesis? There are 17 - 24 different species of Polysiphonia in the British Isles alone. The differences are small and require good photographs, so I would not attempt describing the species. I have no idea how to put a photo on Wiki anyway! and probably don't have any! So would keep it at genus level - that would be best (Sorry I'm thinking aloud in a sense). Will come back when I have looked up Sporogenesis!Osborne 14:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Quote:"Reproductive spores are formed in many eukaryotic organisms, such as plants, algae and fungi,..." from the article on Sporogenesis. All plants do not produce spores! Flowering plants do not produce spores! - they produce seeds. I have not yet found the word in any algal book. But I will look further.Osborne 15:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, flowering plants do produce spores (microspores in anthers and megaspores in ovules). Flowering plants just don't release spores directly for reproduction, but they develop inside the flowers into pollen grains and seeds that are then released instead. You need a microscope and look at bud sections to see the spores. I was wondering about Polysiphonia because it seems to have a quite interesting life cycle with three generations or phases instead of the usual two. If there are that many species around, I'm sure it deserves an entry on Wikipedia. - tameeria 15:42, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'll come back to you on megaspores! but for now - yes all the red algae have interesting life cycles! - I love telling people that seaweeds reproduce sexually :) up until about 20 years ago Palmaria palmata was known to have male plants but nobody had found the female plants! Sorry have to go home will reply further tomorrow.Osborne 15:57, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into this! As for the term sporogenesis: I'm not sure if it is a textbook term, but it is listed in several dictionaries, e.g. here, and used in more than 200 articles I found on PubMed, e.g. here, here and here. It is somewhat ambigious since it can refer to reproduction via spores as well as different processes of spore formation including non-dispersed and resting spores (e.g. endospores). Actually, most of the PubMed articles seem to use it for bacterial spore formation (probably because PubMed is biased towards medical research and does not contain as many plant-related journals). - tameeria 16:16, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes I think you are right, please excuse my doubt - but it took me back 40 years to undergraduate days!! My wife sorted me out! As I understand in the Flowering plants the original spore is produced by the "mother plant" it devides with meiosis, therefore the parent plant is a sporophyte and diploid. Of the three cells produced three degenerate (better word? disolve, disintergrate - I'm thinking) the remaining one resides within the ovule (I'm not sure of this point) which is then fertilised by the pollen which has developed from a haploid spore "the microsporocyte which undergrows 2 meiotic divisions to produce 4 microspores..." (I'll have to thing & read up more!) However I have rarely used it. My wife as a school teacher was in full knowledge of it and tried to explain it to me (23.00 hrs last night!) Osborne 08:03, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help Me}}[edit]

I have started an article but mis-spelt the title as Polysiphionia instead of Polysiphonia. How do I change this please. I can't edit the title!Osborne 08:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At the stop of the page, next to the "edit" tab, there should be a tab that says move. John Reaves (talk) 08:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! it worked - thanks Osborne 09:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Return:Polysiphonia[edit]

Cool, thanks for the page! I found that we actually have slides of Polysiphonia (not sure which species) life cycle stages here at the botany lab. All I need is a digital camera and a microscope and maybe I can take some pictures and upload them. - tameeria 17:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck. Are working in US now? - east or west coast? Identifying the species may be difficult, I would be interested to see the photographs! in http://www.algaebase.org you will find photographs which may intertest you. Osborne 07:49, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Algaebase will help: example:- http://www.algaebase.org/speciesdetail.lasso?species_id=173&sk=40&from=results&-session=abv3:51909EC30c4831C226oJXsCB8684[reply]

Osborne 07:56, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have just found a descrioption of a micriooscopic alga in the Chrysophyta: "Cell shape and size: the potato-shaped cells (8-25 x 6-15um...)" "Potato-shaped" I like that. Have heard of beans being "kidney-shaped" in a botany book and kidneys being bean-shaped in a zoological book!Osborne 08:05, 4 May 2007 (UTC) Nice illustration of a life cycle:- http://www.aussiealgae.org/lifeCycle.php[reply]

Osborne 08:51, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a picture and uploaded it. Might have to work on the lighting a little bit or find a microscope with a real camera attached to it, but I'm pretty excited how well it turned out with a classroom microscope and a digital camera held up to the eye piece! Any idea what the species might be? The slides have the following on their label: "POLYSIPHONIA - Antheridia, Cystocarps & Tetraspores; w.m." - tameeria 17:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting, the colour is a bit red - infact very red! As to which species it is? First which country does it come from - U.S., Europe...? Second I would need to see more of the specimen and perhaps a T.S. Even then I would not be confident, I can rule many out but I would still be uncertin. Sorry, but best wishes.Osborne 08:05, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting. I could not identify iit with confidence. First where does it come from? - which country -U.S. (east or west), Europe... Second I would need to see more of the specimen - to see if it has cortication and the lower branches. Even with this information I would not be confident. I can say what it is not! Osborne 08:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[This takes a long time to save and often does not save Osborne 08:27, 8 May 2007 (UTC)][reply]

I'm sure the color is off from the original! I didn't have the best setup and the lighting was a bit of a problem, but I found out yesterday that our herbarium has a microscope that actually has a camera mounted on it and I found someone who will show me how to use it later this morning, so hopefully I'll be able to provide a better picture soon! As to where it's from: I have no clue, but I would guess somewhere around the US because the company selling the slides is based in the US. I will dig a bit more and see if I can find out any details. - tameeria 13:50, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck. I'm not sure when I will be in contact again. I'm off on leave for about 10 days, then the department is moving, will the computer move safely? then from 4th July I will have retired. If we don't have contact again my best wishes to you. I don't have a computer at home. So that's me! Osborne 08:11, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops[edit]

Looks like I missed a question you left for me at User talk:Luna Santin#Advice_please. Did you still need help with that? – Luna Santin (talk) 19:23, 14 May 2007 (UTC) My question was "advice please". I had added an article from Time magazine to "Algae" - food/nourishment (section 19). I was not sure that this was permitted! Will go back and see if it is still there! Thanks for reply.Osborne 08:16, 15 May 2007 (UTC) - Yes it is still there - but could be deleted, not a good link.Osborne 08:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

O'Connell Street was built in the 1920s, by Irish people. It was flattened in 1916 by the English.18:20, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Coslett Herbert Waddell[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Coslett Herbert Waddell, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Coslett Herbert Waddell fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

duplicate page

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Coslett Herbert Waddell, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 20:30, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Phytoplankton species number[edit]

Hi Osborne. You recently added a note to phytoplankton about the total number of phytoplankton species (= 5,000). A while back now I added the total number of diatom species (= 100,000) to the appropriate article. Annoyingly, I can't presently locate the reference that I used to justify this total (I've just moved office and my references are in a state), but it seems difficult to reconcile both of our numbers. To be honest, my 100,000 sounds too large (I have a suspicion that it's an estimate based on an extrapolation from known species), but your 5,000 seems too small (especially if one includes prokaryotes). Can you remember if the reference you cited qualifies this total at all? For instance: eukaryotes only; identified species only; obligate photoautotrophs only; etc. It's too glaring an inconsistency for me to ignore! ;-)

As an aside, I'm very sorry to hear about the changes at your workplace. Given your expertise, it's a great shame to be losing you from the WP project. I can only hope (selfishly, perhaps!) that retirement just makes WP more alluring! Best regards, --Plumbago 12:14, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will get this note - it on my "Talk" I think! However to answer your question: "Among the 5,000 species of extant marine phytoplankton (Sournia et al,. 1991), some 300 species can at times occur in such high numbers that they obviously discolour the surface of the sea (so-called "red tides"), while only 80 or so species have the capacity to produce potent toxins that can find their way through fish and shellfish to humans (Table 1.1)."

--A full copy of the passage, from Hallegraeff, G.M. 2003. 'Harmful algal blooms: a global overview.' in Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae ed. Hallegraeff, G.M., Anderson, D.M., Cembella, A.D. UNESCO Publishing. The ref given in this quote is:- Sournia, A.; Chretiennot-Duinet,M.J.; Ricard, M. 1991. Marine phytoplankton: how many species in the world ocean? J. Plankton Res., No. 13, pp.1093 - 9. I don't think this answers your question - except the word "marine". I will give the matter further thought. This is "User Talk: Osborne" not in the "Discussion"...How do you know when to look for it? - are you told automatically? or should it be in the discussion page? - I'll look at it now. See how innocent I am of this site? Osborne 12:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC) Checked & resent Osborne 12:44, 12 June 2007 (UTC) http://rbg-web2.rbge.org.uk/algae/[reply]

Hi Osborne. Thanks for your reply. Here's fine for replies by the way. We could go to the phytoplankton talk page itself, but here's good for now. Regarding your answer to my question, the mention of marine species helps a bit, but 5,000 still seems rather low to me. Even for eukaryotic species - although I still think this might have something to do with described rather than estimated species. I'll have a look at my local textbooks as well to see if they help a bit. I've got a copy of Hoek et al. (Hoek, C. van den, Mann, D. G. and Jahns, H. M., 1995, Algae : An introduction to phycology, Cambridge University Press, UK) in my office - I'll see what he says. I'll also try to track down the references you mention above - I think my library's paid-up on those journals (famous last words!). Thanks again for your help. Cheers, --Plumbago 20:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have a quick look through Hoek et al 1995 - but Phytoplankton refers to diatoms and dinoflagellates and ,I think, other microscopic free floating unicellular stuff. There may be some disagreement as to what is included. Hoek et al refers to the Chrysophyceae (1000 species p.104). However I will look up other refs - they differ in their classification.Osborne 10:35, 13 June 2007 (UTC) Further; "Chrysophyta. Originally this phylum was...a miscellaneous collection of forms clustered around a central series of brown-pigmented geera of flagellates...It has been clarified greatly by the removal of awjole series of genera into Prymneisophyta (=Haptophyta). The Chrysophyta contains mainly freshwater genera...They are planktonic...(Round, F.E. 1981. The Ecology of Algae. Hoek etval include the blue-green algae as "Here they are often important components of the phytoplankton..." Seems to depend on the definition of Phytoplankton & freshwater / marine. Osborne 10:48, 13 June 2007 (UTC) One point, Plankton includes the stages in the life cycles of other organisms, and the "Bacterioplankton can mean plantonic bactreria..." and the word zooplankton.... well they are not Phytopankton.Osborne 15:56, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There may be as many as 200,000 morphologically distinct species,[2]RBGE - diatoms. But are these plantonic? marine/freshwater....Osborne 16:16, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oogonia[edit]

Help - I've mucked up the refs in this article somehow - probably it's not much but it is late in the day and I will be very grateful.Osborne 15:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. You can see what I did by checking the source code. Best regards. Yechiel Man 16:10, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ulva[edit]

This refers to an |Island but there is and Alga named Ulva BUT is "WEE WILLY WINKIE" or whatever has been written VANDILISM?Osborne 15:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an alga: Ulva lactuca q.v.Osborne 15:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC) Further: why is the section "Uses" surroundedby dots? Thanks Osborne 15:36, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed :) --ST47Talk 15:49, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English v Botanical names (see Toothed wrack)[edit]

The big brown algae are titled using their Common Names (English) This OK for the few big algae well known to the public, however there are thousands of algae without common names. There are over 10,000 red algae for example. See Toother Wrack - Talk for further discussion. Osborne 11:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC) Common names known to me: Sea lettuce (Ulva lactuca); Oyster theif (Colpomenia peregrina); Sea lace (''Chorda filum''); Oarweed (''Laminaria''); Tangle, Sea-girdles, Sea-staff, Sea-wand (''Laminaria digitata''); Curvie (''Laminaria hyperborea''); Sea belt (''Laminaria saccharina''); Furbelows, Bulbous-routed Tangle, Sea-furbelows, Furbelowed-hangers (''Saccorhiza polyschides''); Dabberlocks (''Alaria esculenta''); Peacock's tail (''Padina pavonia''); Wrack (''Fucus''); Toothed wrack (''Fucus serratus''); Bladder wrack (''Fucus vesiculosus''); Spiral wrack (''Fucus spiralis''); Horned wrack (''Fucus ceranoides''); Knotted wrack, Knobbed wrack (''Ascophyllum nodosum''); Channnelled wrack, Channelled Fucus (''Pelvetia canaliculata''); Sea thong (''Himanthalia elongata''); Purple laver (''Porphyra laver''); Cockscomb (''Plocamium cartilagineum''); Carragheen (''Chondrus crispus''); Goat tang (Polyides caprinus); Dulse (Palmaria palmata); Sea tail (Halurus equisetifolius); Pepper Dulse (Laurencia pinnatifida); Feathery Callithamnion (''Callithamnion plumula''); "Fern-leaved" Callithamnion (''Callithamnon gracillimum'') - Ref:- Dickinson, C.I. British Seaweeds. 1963. Eyre & Spottiswoode. The Kew Series; Landsborough, D. 1857. A Popular History of British Seaweeds. I am not sure what "Hart's-tongue Laminaria (Laminaria phyllitis) is! Botanical names are the same as English names in a few cases: Sargassum; Rhododendrom. I will have to take a look at the lichens, fungi and other "life forms." Osborne 11:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC) How many other plants have English names? LICHENS: Reindeer moss; Map (or mat) lichen. Flowering Plants: The grasses and sedges - Graminae.[reply]

Grasses and sedges etc may have English names - but they are rarely used, I suspect anyone studying grasses uses the Botanical name.Osborne 16:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conceptacles[edit]

Hi again Osborne. Just to say that I've copyedited your new article on conceptacles a bit. I hope you don't mind. I've changed some formatting issues to conform to the manual of style, and I fixed the source cited - previously the cite didn't tie up with the actual source cited (Chamberlain's name was missing). I may, however, have used the wrong volume/part for the source. Can you check I've not gotten that wrong please? Anyway, keep up the good work! Cheers, --Plumbago 11:02, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Plumbago. Advice on Wike-style(!) about which you know I know nothing is most welcome, and I am out of practice. What was the piped (or whatever) eg:- "Osborne" for and how do I do it. If you read this (ever) I will be grateful for your help. I will look at your changes again to see what you did. I have made further changes based on other publications and how the refs were given.Osborne 23:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Thanks for fixing up the volumes/parts of the cites at conceptacles and receptacles. Incidentally, you might want to move your articles to conceptacle and receptacle, since the manual of style prefers singular nouns. You should be able to do this via the "move" tab at the top of each page. Finally, regarding why I piped your username, well, that's just habit. :-) When one's knee-deep in a talkpage discussion I find that it helps to clearly delineate usernames so that people scanning the text can look out for particular editors (themselves for example). Similarly with articles under discussion. So, really just a style thing. Like so many of my edits! Cheers, --Plumbago 07:48, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pleural to singular. Will be grateful if you would check.Osborne 08:22, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. You can tell because the red links that I left previously have now gone blue! :-) I've just corrected the references in the articles to each other (just to avoid the redirects - although it's good that you've set those up too). Cheers, --Plumbago 08:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have further info' rather academic - will need to study it! Thanks.Osborne 16:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Osborne. Just a quick style point regarding your recent edits. I'd suggest dropping the bold format for author names. It's used in some academic circles, but not most, and tends not to be used here. I'm not sure why, but it may be because it draws attention away from the article too much to a relatively minor detail (well, that might just be me!). Bold tends to be used here just for volume number, with the journal/book title italicised and everything else in plain font. Anyway, good job expanding the phycology articles! Cheers, --Plumbago 10:18, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - I'm still at it! but now that I "have" you - I have doing esomething and "lost" the list of references!!! How did I do that. Osborne 10:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC) I'v got the refs - but something else is wrong! Osborne 10:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed up the problem now. I think it stemmed from your use of two single quotes, '', instead of double quotes, ", when you were giving the references names for labels. I hope you don't mind, but I've done a number of other tweaks and twiddles to the article now to fix various disambiguation and wikilinking issues. If you've any questions about the formatting changes I've made, let me know. Cheers, --Plumbago 11:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Think I understand most except the use of #. Have changed Natural History back to "British Museum" - that is how it was known then and how it is given on the opening page of the book.Osborne 18:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alaria[edit]

You have made the error of being helpful! If you wish to help further (!) please see Alaria an article I have just started, it was "rquired" in the artice Algae being shown in red. I have only just started - but you alterations & help will be welcome. Osborne 14:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How's that then? I've edited the article to comply with style conventions more. I've also added a taxobox and wikilinked like there's no tomorrow. I've tried to incorporate the external links into the text, but you may disagree with how I've done this. Have a look and see what you think. Cheers, --Plumbago 16:43, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Should this note be under Alaria & not "Conceptacles"? - does it matter? As for "Taxobox" - I had no idea how to do that! I have made a few other corrections, but will look closely again. Many thanks. Osborne 17:08, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You can divide up your own talkpage however you want, but putting this under Alaria makes things clearer. On this point, you might want to consider archiving old portions of your talkpage. I've done this on mine if you need an example. Regarding taxoboxes, etc., I didn't know how to do this either - I just stole the taxobox from another related genus and adapted it to suit this one. Generally speaking, I find this is usually the easiest way to proceed: see something that's done better and is related to what you're doing, then steal shamelessly from it. ;-) If you run into trouble formatting things, give me a shout. I'm no expert either, but I'm relatively comfortable with Wikipedia's markup language. Cheers, --Plumbago 17:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

I am having trouble again. Why will it not accept <ref name=Newton31/>????Osborne 19:58, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, you used the 'help me' tag but can you please be a little bit more specific with what you require help for? RyanLupin (^talk/_contribs) 20:02, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Lara Love 20:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Osborne (talk) 10:09, 18 January 2008 (UTC)== Alaria ==[reply]

I commented on Talk:Alaria. Please indulge my first comment (now struck): I obviously wasn't paying proper attention and actually suggested you should contact yourself... Anyway, if you need further help with proposing the merge following the instructions at Help:Merging and moving pages, don't hesitate to ask. — aldebaer⁠ 20:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Help Me Ref "Alaria" on 6th October "Tallard" made alterations deletting a big whack of this file - has anyone any idea why?

Village Pump[edit]

I havenever used the Village Pump - has anyone any advice about its use/value?Osborne 08:39, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages and naming conventions[edit]

Hi there! I see you've been moving some pages, specifically Chondrus crispus Stachkouse from common names to scientific names. When moving pages, make sure you don't include the authority. It should just be the binomial for ease of searching and linking to it. I've requested the pages be moved to their binomials. For some reading on naming conventions, check out the flora naming convention. For flora articles, the convention is to maintain common names if they're culturally or economically significant, otherwise we use binomials. While it specifically only can inform decisions on plants, the non-plant kingdom algae can probably be treated similarly. Hope that information helps. Cheers, --Rkitko ^(talk) 16:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice. I quite agree the botanical is best, I don't think I included the authority, sorry if I did and thanks for the correction. It is certainly best to use the scientific names as in some cases the common name referrs to different species in different countries. Cross referencing the names common name/biological name is important. The common names can be maintained in the write-up under the using the biolgical name. As most of the algae, among other plants, do not have a common name at they they must be noted under the botanical name. In some cases the common name is not used with accuracy I suspect! and in other cases there is more than one common name even within one country! I would like to make a write-up of all the algae under the generic name, but I will not be able to do that!! Best wishes. Osborne 19:51, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Ah! example: Plants are harvested on both sides of the North Atlantic and processe with Gigarina stellata as Irish Moss or Caragheen... ref Dixon, P.S, and Irvine, L.M. 1977. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Just to confuse things Gigartina stellata is now referred to as Mastocarpus stellatus!Osborne 19:58, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Further: Rhododendron is commonly used as a common name!- however I have often heard it misspronounced as Rhododendrum (I will have to see what Wiki says about that now!) Good luck Osborne 20:08, 29 October 2007 (UTC) Further though: The authority should remain associated with the bionomial of course.Osborne 23:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for attending to this comment. I quite agree on all points with the exception of the last, depending on what you meant. Are you referring to edits such as this? I would have to say that it's not common practice on Wikipedia to include the authority in the text directly after the first mention of the taxon. I believe common consensus is that that information is included in the taxobox and including the authority, while correct to other standards, may confuse lay readers who know nothing of botanic convention and clutters the prose. Cheers, --Rkitko ^(talk) 21:36, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK you know more about wiki than I. However if any reader is reading about Capsella bursa-patoris they will know something of botanical nomenclature! Perhaps it is ony Shepherd's purse they know? I confess Chrysospleium oppositifolium may not spring to the mind, however Golden saxifrage may not either let alone "Glóris"!! (Irish I gather). That's a thought - thinks, I will look at the higher plants so called and see how they are written up. My experience makes me want to note the authority at the first use of the botanical name (perhaps I'm getting old). Damn I have overwrite. Best stop.Osborne 09:35, 31 October 2007 (UTC) Have now corrected my overwrite and a few errors with it.Osborne 09:43, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your question on User talk:Kf4bdy[edit]

Hi there. You left a question on another user's talkpage; because you have your own, I'll answer it here. If you can recall, it was a question about references. First off:

You can't include any spaces or bold/italicised text (there's really no point in the latter; no one will see it in its bold/italc form anyway).

Be sure you are doing the following:

Typing <ref name=Example>http://www.example.com</ref> before the first instance of the reference (i.e. type the ref name inside the ref tag)
Including a space before the slash when you are using the <ref name=> tag. For example, <ref name=Maggs93/> will make MediaWiki think it's a completely new reference. It will throw up a cite error 8 (no text given) as well as include the rest of the article text in a reference because you haven't typed </ref>. But, typing <ref name=Maggs93 /> will work out correctly.

Hope this helps! In the future, you can just leave {{Helpme}} on your own talkpage, someone will come help you out. NF24^{(radio me!}_{Editor review)} 12:30, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The difference between my article & your correction did not show up under History & diff however it sems that it was just a space between maggs and /> Thanks Osborne 21:19, 6 November 2007

Nope - I can't do it! I tried it on "Malassezia" (which had few refs!) Help again {{Helpme}}Osborne 21:54, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! You made two mistakes:

You included a space in the ref name. That will cause the ref to break.
Don't forget to include {{reflist}} in the References section - it will automatically list the references for you.

If you need more help, you can always ask on my talkpage! (accessed by clicking "radio me!" in my signature) NF24^{(radio me!}_{Editor review)} 22:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, one more thing:

When citing a reference multiple times, put a space then a slash after a ref name.

Y <ref name=Example02 />
N <ref name=Example02/>

The latter will cause MediaWiki to believe that you are creating a new reference without any text inside of it. This will cause a "Cite error 2" to appear.

Again, feel free to leave a note on my talkpage if you have any more questions! NF24^{(radio me!}_{Editor review)} 22:16, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ceramium. Thanks - but you put a space after "Example02" and " />". Looking at my write-up under History I did not put a space here, however I did put a space between the reference name and the date which has worked elsewhere! I'll hunt out an example- if I can. did you by any chance get the tick & X the wrong way round? In other cases I have entered:-<ref name=''Example 02''/>.

Yes did use <ref name="Round 81"/> in previous article - and it worked.

As for the References section I use:- <references/> that gives me a reference section.

I don't know "{{reflist}}"

Sorry for the trouble & thanks.Osborne 10:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dulse[edit]

Thanks for your reply to me. You seem to have misunderstood my intention. I was not concerned specifically with algae, but with the integrity of Wikipedia. I had discovered (and linked to) forty-odd synonyms: I just wanted that synonym, by which I got to the page, to appear somewhere on it - which you did on 14 June. --ColinFine (talk) 11:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, it would have been useful if you had put at least one wikilink in your contribution on my talk page, particularly since the comment you were replying to was six months old! I've changed the section title to [[Dulse]] so there is a link to follow. --ColinFine (talk) 11:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've also tidied up some of the formatting of the previous section in this page ('Your question on User talk:Kf4bdy'), because the reference section you inadvertently created was swallowing my new section. When you are quoting any wiki special stuff in a discussion, you need to enclose them between <nowiki> and </nowiki>, otherwise it will try and interpret them, and the page won't look like what you intended. So when you wrote '<references/>' above the page as displayed started a reference section. If you look in the source, you'll see I've surrounded it by <nowiki> and </nowiki> (but if you look in the source of this section you'll see something more complicated, because I've had to do extra stuff to make it not interpret the <nowiki>!).

{{reflist}} is a more general (and more configurable) alternative to <references/>. You don't need it if <references/> does everything you need. You can read about it at Template:reflist. --ColinFine (talk) 12:14, 24 November 2007 (UTC) You may not find this as it is in "My" talk. However the above is all too troublesome for me I think I will pack in! Thanks for your help.Osborne (talk) 17:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cutleriales[edit]

Help me I have tried to add to Cutleriales - but only messed things up. Please someone will you wipe out all my efforts made today (14th Dec)- Thanks.Osborne (talk) 21:59, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to fix it. Does it look ok now? - tameeria (talk) 22:13, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Danke. That's better. I will look at it again some time! You have corrected my faults! Osborne (talk) 13:50, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Belfast Naturalists' Field Club[edit]

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Belfast Naturalists' Field Club, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 04:59, 11 February 2008 (UTC) If you think this article is to be dumped - well OK. I have no idea what prod is! OK. I will add to this article any informtion I think worth-while. Delete it if you think necessary. Osborne (talk) 11:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alors- Formidable[edit]

I see your History of Algology is now in French (box on right as I'm sure you know).Flicking through the French, German, Spanish and Italian sites is often very useful. Do you know about Babelfish? I broke my (right!) arm so I keep messages short these days.Why not stay in touch though? Have you sorted out images yet? All the best Robert Notafly (talk) 09:39, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should be "History of Phycology" - will have to check. Had heard you had broken your arm - where did I hear that?Osborne (talk) 19:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC) The "Other Languages" is shown in a box on the left-hand side on "my" screen.Osborne (talk) 17:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Further I have found one that has been translated into Chineese/Japanese!!! Alaria esculenta. So there!Osborne (talk) 17:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{Help me}}[edit]

Plese help. Concerning an article on Charales I have at 19.31 on 7th March deleted or esses up the illustration. I would be grateful for help to get it back! I am frightened to do much more ...!Osborne (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osborne, I've fixed the article - the only problem was that you accidentally removed the }} from a few lines down, which meant that the website didn't know what to do with the rest of the information. It's fine now, and you definitely shouldn't be frightened to edit anything more. Thanks for your contributions, and all the best —αlεx•mullεr 19:51, 7 March 2008 (UTC)Thanks to you too!!!Osborne (talk) 20:00, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature[edit]

Please do not add your signature to the top of articles. Your identity will be recorded in the page history; it should not appear in the article itself. When you do this, you make it likely that your edits will be reverted, because it is much easier and faster to revert such edits that to go in and re-edit every article with your signature in it. --EncycloPetey (talk) 22:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ireland[edit]

{{helpme|Please see Ireland, it seems the notes are arranged as references and the references as notes! I'll look again but they seem mxed up! ee ther ref no 77 especially.Osborne (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2008 (UTC)}}[reply]

Hi there! If you read Wikipedia:Citing_sources#Footnotes you'll see that the title 'Notes' is actually valid for the inline references (the small numbers in the text), and references are used for larger, alphabetical references; this is the case in Ireland. Cheers, Ale_Jrb ^talk 23:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

I tried to enter a list of species of Polysiphonia... but managed to wipe out all ref!! and something else. Sorry, frightened of making a bigger mess!!. OK of you delete my work - I don't mind. Damn!! Osborne (talk) 18:56, 22 May 2008 (UTC) 7th April seems the best! Osborne (talk) 21:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HELP -- someone out-there!Osborne (talk) 08:17, 23 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK no help - Have decided to save an older version of the article Hope this is he right thing to do.Osborne (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Osborne. Looks like I got here too late. Have you patched things back to what you wanted? You might like to practise using revert and undo operations on either your user or talk pages. They can be tricky if you've not used them before. Also, what I sometimes do is open up an older version of an article (using the page history tab), ask to edit it, and then copy-and-paste the bits I want from it into the current version. Anyway, sorry I missed your request for help. Cheers, --Plumbago (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Osborne 19:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)==Speedy deletion of Saccorhiza polyschiza==

A tag has been placed on Saccorhiza polyschiza requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:17, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again Osborne. I don't know anything about this article, but if you find your stubs on particular species are being deleted here, you might like to set yourself up with an account at the sister project Wikispecies. The username "Osborne" isn't taken there yet as far as I can tell, and you might find it a more conducive environment for articles on less well-known species. Anyway, I'm probably just telling you something that you already know. Cheers, --Plumbago (talk) 08:23, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No you are not telling me anything I already know! Thanks, however it sounds a bit much for me I may not have the time. Thanks will think about it.Osborne (talk) 18:51, 16 June 2008 (UTC) {{hangon}} This article may be lengthered when I have time. Osborne (talk) 19:38, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

HELP ME[edit]

Re: Acrochaetium efflorescens... I am having trouble entering repeat referencs! This has happened to me before. Will be grateful for your help.Osborne 19:48, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

To get help, you need to put this code[edit]

Best wishes to you from a mollusk person who spent the first 30 years in Britain. Invertzoo (talk) 14:05, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help for you[edit]

Repeat references? You mean using a reference more than once? Okay, this is how it works. A normal citation works like this, for example, <ref>[http://www.google.com Google]</ref>.

Well, of you want to use a reference more than once, use this. (as an example, but name the ="google" something appropriate to the reference.

<refname="google">[http://www.google.com Google]</ref>.

To repeat the use of that reference, use <refname="google"/>

Does that make sense? Steve Crossin ^Contact/₂₄ 14:13, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Birding[edit]

Have you seen List of birds of Ireland? The link at the end (Irish Birding) gives daily updates.I'm in Rome.All the best.Robert akaNotafly (talk) 18:38, 28 August 2008 (UTC) Many thanks please keep in contact - P.H. knows my address.Osborne 12:44, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice[edit]

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 23:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

EOL[edit]

Yes. I had seen it.Looks as ambitious as it's pretentious title.Nice images though but who hasn't? In Rome I took photos only for Wiki projects or of Gillian.Flickr has thousands of Rome photos mostly superb so why bother? This is an issue for me at the moment due to the culture clash at the museum.Hmmm Better discuss on Robert.Nash1945@live.co.uk (my e-mail (which I change if it's passed on, please note also no attachments without askig first and be preparedfor one word answers and Robert Nash may be lower case. I don't know I don't send e-mails to myself. Practise your French with this [3](look up especially Marie Therese of Austria (L'exemple de l'Autriche-Hongrie au XVIIIe siècle) and L'exemple de la Russie et l'œuvre de P.S. Pallas.I was in Paris earlier at Musee d'Histoire Naturelle,which of course made our own (BM (NH)) eighteenth century contribution (mostly by Fat Fool Sloane) look feeble.The French (c 1800) had an academy for ship's naturalists, training a dozen or so a year and built labs into the ships.They fell (slightly) behind after the revolution we screwed up for them I must admit but NHM is no great shakes at the moment.As you can see I am in fine fettle.Robert. PS. Look up Ecology of Commanster and sign your posts with four tildes so I can reply.Like this Notafly (talk) 19:32, 1 September 2008 (UTC)See also below[reply]

William Thompson[edit]

I put the Algae Catalogue numbers on the articles Talk page (linked to article) .I would like more on George Langtry father-in-law of the celebrated Lily Langtry and some idea of what kind of money WT had.The ridiculous notion that he sacrificed himself in poverty and never left his beloved land invented by CDD we have already dispelled but mark my words this will go ignored.Notafly (talk) 20:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC) Jolly good. As for George Langtry - I know nothing! Osborne 08:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Littorina[edit]

Hello, I would like to inform you, that there is something marked as contradict in Talk:Littorina article. I hope you will know what to do with it. Thank you. --Snek01 (talk) 20:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Yudilevich[edit]

A tag has been placed on Yudilevich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. noq (talk) 20:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - this is all too much for me! I expcted someone would delte my "stub". I intended to record his publications and to find out further info' concerning him. However best delete it I suppose. Thanks.

Harvey[edit]

No mention of Christian Friedrich Ecklon Perhaps you should mention him. Did you know Peter Skidmore died some time back? I am waiting for details for a Wiki page. Can you help.E-mail me at NMNI Al the best Robert aka Notafly (talk) 09:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Is this a tag & how does it work?[edit]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

HELP[edit]

I did something wrong, SORRY, and deleted most of "Uronema" - someone please reinstate the old version!!!!!!. how do I reserect an older "version" - panic-OSBORNE

Panic over: I think I have put things right! OSBORNE

Help[edit]

Help again. Re article on "Badgers" - have difficulty entering the ref "Sleeman" under Distribution. Osborne 14:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Fixed it. If you use the edit link at the top of the section you can see how. The "name" parameter in the ref tag allows you to allocate a name to the reference so that you can re-use it elsewhere in the article without having to spell out the source in full, for example

First occurence:

Subsequent refs using the same source:

Thanks: I tried this but it did not seem to work - something to do with the previous refs having been entered differently I think.Osborne 14:58, 8 January 2010 (UTC) A little extra, the removal of semi-colon etc made it OKOsborne 16:32, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Help[edit]

See: Myriophyllum spicatum - why is my note on the distribution of this plant surrounded by dots or dashes? Please.Osborne 11:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC) The "Tag " note in red below is an old note from somewhere and I can't get rid of it! Osborne 11:46, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

If you leave one or more spaces at the start of the line wiki puts the text in a one-line dashed box.

The message in red is because you added a ref, which wiki wants to list. However, in order for wiki to create a ref list you have to tell wiki where to put it using the {{reflist}} syntax. Looks like Shyamal has fixed these for you.

Any more questions - feel free to drop me a line on my talk page, I'd be happy to help -- Timberframe (talk)

WikiProject Algae[edit]

WikiProject Algae was started as a meeting space on Wikipedia for improving the taxonomic representations of the groups of organisms called algae. Please join other editors at the talk page (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Algae) to discuss a higher level taxonomy for algae to be used on Wikipedia. --68.127.232.132 (talk) 19:11, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Nitella flexilis[edit]

A tag has been placed on Nitella flexilis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 19:25, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Osborne: I recreated the article and submitted it for creation at Articles for Creation. I don't know what content you had in the article, but I contributed the taxobox and a source. Maybe the administrator who deleted it can add the rest of the content back. Please feel free to move the article from AfC to main space, or copy and paste the taxobox and simply create the article as you see fit. As the article is a major species, I was concerned that by not recreating it, you may not quickly get to do so, and it would get forgotten in the middle of so many other algae tasks. --68.127.232.132 (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help please: re William West Irish Botanist. I'm having trouble repeating the first & only ref.Osborne 17:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC) All OK now: Hqb has sorted it out,thanks Osborne 20:57, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Help - Elmwood Hall[edit]

What have I done wrong! I want to use the same reference twice. Osborne 15:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Retiring[edit]

I leave tomorrow (Friday).Wiki of course- Need you ask? Fauna of Italy and Entomology mainly. Off to Rome again soon.Happy days to you too Robert Notafly (talk) 19:49, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Osborne! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot notifying you on behalf of the the unreferenced biographies team that 1 of the articles that you created is currently tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 974 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Paul Hackney - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:21, 18 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the article if you wish! Osborne 15:57, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Oh go on delete it! - please.Osborne 16:49, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Flora Ireland[edit]

The algae info on the page Ireland won't survive a major edit. I've made a start on flora here [4] but it will take a lot of work to get to something like this [5] but I'll add an overview soon then you may wish to transfer your text. Or you can do it now adding the phrase "page in progress". How are you? atb Robert aka Notafly (talk) 07:22, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flora Ireland 2[edit]

Here is a start [6] Notafly (talk) 14:24, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Flora[edit]

Thanks. But can yoou be far, far less specific Notafly (talk) 15:11, 15 September 2010 (UTC) Yes I can! - But will have to find out what is required. A list of all species of flowering plants might be a bit much. I will have to consider what to do with the microscopic algae, the large algae also. Will look again to see what form the "article" is to take. Bogs, Grassland and what else? "Shores" ? ...rocky, sheltered, sandy etc? Osborne 16:15, 15 September 2010 (UTC) One further point- "Bog Rosemary" best be recorded as "Andromeda polifolia L." O.Osborne 16:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Radde's Warbler[edit]

Help! why does the Copeland Bird Observatory record not show under "References"? - the other is "Further reading I suppose???Osborne 21:41, 16 November 2010 (UTC) Ah - I have mastered the "References" - however how could the ref which I have moved to "Sources" be moved to the Refs also??Osborne 21:53, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

Harvey[edit]

Happy New Year to you. Did you see this [7]Robert Notafly (talk) 10:13, 6 January 2011 (UTC) No I did not - not sure whether I should do anything about it!!!Osborne 09:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William Alexander Maguire[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William Alexander Maguire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 15:20, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help: re Tollymore Forest Park[edit]

Have forgotten how to repeat a reference in an article - please someone out-there remind me.Osborne 09:28, 10 February 2011 (UTC) [OK - stupid I know!]

Proposed deletion of Paul Hackney[edit]

The article Paul Hackney has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable - no significant coverage able to be found.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 16:01, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

=="BOG MEADOWS"== Help. Have forgotten how to enter references. I must have done something wrong!!! Will add further information when I get going.Please help.

Plant[edit]

The English word "flowers" has more than one meaning. Chloroplasts (and photosynthesis) are not restricted to leaves, and indeed many plants have no leaves. --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:56, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are using only one of the possible meanings of the English word "flower". Please look it up; it can mean a morphological structure, but it also refers to whole plants that are cultivated for those structures. When a person says "I planted flowers in my garden" they are talking about the plants, not the structures. English words frequently have more than one possible meaning. --EncycloPetey (talk) 16:36, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I quite agree - some words do have more than one meaning! A example is "chronic" which means ong lasting or lingering. However many use it to mean very bad. I fear doctors and their patients misunderstand each other when this is used. However to use the word "flower" to refer to the whole plant is rather casual for Wikipedia - in my openion! Osborne 10:33, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

==Help - re: Cornus. I have added a note - but not in the same manner as others. What did I do wrong please. Osborne 14:44, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

Cardamine pratensis[edit]

HELP: Have made error in entering the same reference for the second time! What's wrong please? Osborne 15:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

HELP ME[edit]

I see I should use an asterisk. "*" to make a list as I think would be best in "Bog Meadows" (recently started) . Will be grateful for help. Would these "bullet" be best do you think? Bog Meadows

Disambiguation link notification for January 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Euthyneura (insect), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Britain and Antrim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Further HELP please. My start of article on Euthyneura myrtilli Shows at the top "Euthyneura (insect)" - I want to delete this. The title is to be "Euthyneura myrtilli Macquart". It is a small fly. If you cant do this then wipe the whole thing out!!!Osborne 20:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC) Sorry, I don't understand the system and an confused not to say frustrated! I give up unless you can help me more. Britain and Antrim were links geographically not taxonomically. Osborne 20:27, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eurasian Jay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Osborne. You have new messages at DPL bot's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Euthyneura (insect)[edit]

I looked at your changes to Euthyneura (insect) and I really don't understand what you were trying to do. I undid your edit, since it wasn't helpful. Please feel free to ask me any questions on my user talk page, but it will be easier for me to help if you can explain what you wanted to happen when you edited that page. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:49, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ceramium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cortex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Clare Island[edit]

I have removed the duplicate Further Reading bit as you requested. Have a look at the article to ensure you are happy.--File Éireann 19:33, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alexanders, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Down and Antrim (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:48, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alexanders[edit]

I am willing to help you with this, it may well be that it would be appropriate to rename the page. There is a policy that deals with this: Wikipedia:Naming conventions (flora). Quote: "Scientific names are to be used as article titles in all cases except when a plant has an agricultural, horticultural, economic or cultural use that makes it more prominent in some other field than in botany; e.g. rose, apple, watermelon. These exceptions are determined on a case-by-case basis through discussion towards consensus." If you have decided you wish to change the page name you have three choices:

1. Move the page yourself: see Wikipedia:Moving a page for details on the know-how and policies related to this. I suspect you would need to ask me or another admin to delete the redirect article that exists for the scientific name before moving the main article to this space.

2. Convince me or another experienced user to do it all for you. As yet, I don't feel I know enough this particular topic about it to plunge right in.

3. List this topic at Wikipedia:requested moves where it would be debated to get a community consensus. You could do this yourself or ask me to do it for you.

In any case you can rely on me to help you. --File Éireann 20:25, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now moved the page.--File Éireann 19:23, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded on my talk page--File Éireann 17:26, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alaria[edit]

I have carried out your requests!--File Éireann 20:45, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cardamine flexuosa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Annual and Biennial (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:29, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hornbeam may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

'''Hornbeams (''[[Carpinus betulus]]'' L.) (are relatively small [[hardwood]] [[tree]]s in the [[genus]] '''''Carpinus''''' (''[[Syllable

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature[edit]

Hello Osborne, I noticed at User talk:A930913 that your signature doesn't seem to contain a link to your user page, talk page or contributions. Signatures should contain such links. Huon (talk) 00:08, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You have a new message at Huon's talk page. Huon (talk) 20:57, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lisburn Road[edit]

Done! The heading was not on a separate line from the following information so the computer was confused and did not create the heading. Best wishes.--File Éireann 09:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Taxus baccata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:12, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stoat may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Irish stoats (Mustela erminea hibernica (Thomas & Barrett-Hamilton)is recorded in Ireland.<ref>Buckley, K.</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:11, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Belfast/GA1[edit]

Hi. I've opened a GAR on the Belfast article for which you are one of the main contributors. I have concerns that it does not quite meet current GA criteria regarding sourcing and several MoS issues, see Talk:Belfast/GA1 for more details if you're interested. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 21:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC) Oh crumbs I lost my last reply to you! What is/are the GA criteria", "MoS" "GA1" - you gather I know little about Wikipedia and It seem I added vey little to "Belfast". So I doubt if can help. Osborne[reply]

Reference Errors on 3 June[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Vicia sylvatica page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC) Ah!! I think I've done it!!!Osborne 13:55, 4 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

References How to repeat.[edit]

Concerning Corallina officinalis. Have tried to repeat a ref in this article but mucked things up! Will try again. However will be grateful for help.Osborne 19:12, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 2 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Corallina officinalis page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 9 July[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Vicia lathyroides page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Epipactis helleborine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labellum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Copeland Islands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parmelia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 4 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Epilobium pedunculare page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Editathon and Matilda Knowles[edit]

Hello! I'm part of the group getting an Irish Wikipedia User Group going and we've organised an editathon for this coming Sunday you might be interested in. I spotted your edit to Jane Stephens, and one of my main goals for the event is to get an article started for Matilda Knowles (as well as incorporating lot of Jane's details from John's INJ article). Even if you can't participate in the day, I would greatly appreciate any input, suggestions or more articles we should be looking at. Smirkybec (talk) 21:42, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laburnum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pod. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bonnemaisonia hamifera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marine. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Inishtrahull Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drachiella. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Bio-star
		Osborne, I am awarding you this barnstar in recognition of your many contributions over several years to algae-related articles. Thank you! — Earwig ^talk 04:47, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Schottera nicaeensis) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Schottera nicaeensis, Osborne!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Be sure to add specific page number(s) for book references, and journal names should be written in full, not abbreviated.

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Enteromorpha[edit]

I saw you were looking for some help with Enteromorpha. Algaebase treats it as a synonym of Ulva (see here). I don't know if there are more recent sources that Algaebase doesn't yet acknowledge that bring Enteromorpha back out of synonymy, but Algaebase is usually pretty up to date. The 1991 book by Burrows that you added to Ulva flexuosa is really too old to rely on to answer what the current scientific name should be (although it may be an excellent source for other information). Algaebase is following a 2003 paper in synonymizing Ulva and Enteromorpha; it's likely that Hardy & Guiry's 2003 book was too far along in production to account for the paper that did the synonymy. Unless you've got something more recent than 2003 that argues that Enteromorpha is a separate genus, they should probably be kept as synonyms. Plantdrew (talk) 23:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smyrnium olusatrum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No! The records come from Ireland in both cases and from two different publicationsOsborne 15:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charophyceae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chara. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Osborne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ulothrix zonata[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ulothrix zonata, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the BarnStar![edit]

SewerCat (talk) 14:46, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Tetrasporaphyte) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Tetrasporaphyte, Osborne!

Wikipedia editor Bfpage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I see you are still working on your new article - nice job. In the first sentence what does 'beard' mean.

To reply, leave a comment on Bfpage's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Bfpage _{let's talk...} 18:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Polysiphononia devoniensis) has been reviewed![edit]

Thanks for creating Polysiphononia devoniensis, Osborne!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please provide context, e.g. "Polysiphononia devoniensis is a species of _____." See Wikipedia:Writing better articles and improving a stub article for tips for a good short article..

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 03:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Polysiphonia elongate[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Why is my reference : "Hardy & Guiry...." not accepted!! What have I done wrong! ^[1] NOW CORRECTED!! How and why anything went wrong I don't understand.Osborne 09:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

I think the problem was that in this version, you didn't have a "/" at the end of the Maggs93 reference, which meant that everything after that (the entire habitat section, the Hardy and Guiry reference) was being read as being part of the Maggs93 reference. Plantdrew (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Hardy, G. and Guiry, M.D. 2003. Check-list and Atlas of Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. British Phycological Society. ISBN0-9527115-16

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polysiphonia elongata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Polysiphonia fibrata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted[edit]

Hi Osborne, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede 66 22:03, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ceramium echionetum[edit]

Hi, I think this was a misspelling of echionotum? I've moved it there. Blythwood (talk) 06:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Osborne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ceramium pallidum moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Ceramium pallidum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 21:43, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ceramium pallidum has been accepted[edit]

Ceramium pallidum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ceramium shuttleworthianum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mytilus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References[edit]

What's happened. I used to be able to click the Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page). at the bottom and now it seems I have to copy and paste it! Have I done some thing wrong? My laptop crashed recently that can't be the cause.Osborne 19:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC) - likewise with this note as to who is making this note! (ie me)Osborne 19:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC) Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Help me[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

What wee button did I press to give such small print?Osborne 16:51, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

When you open the source editor, there's a button with a capital A and an arrow pointing down on it that lets you decrease the font size. Maybe you pressed it by mistake? Also, please don't do this. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 17:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}}Thanks - but I cannot find this. No doubt I am at fault - The "source editor" does not show a capital "A". I will try again, but further help will be most valuable.Osborne 19:14, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Help me![edit]

{{help me}}

I have clicked some button and created small print. How can I correct this please.Osborne 19:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Please help me with...

Osborne 19:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Well, the markup for small print is <small> </small> so removing that should fix the problem unless we're dealing with something like {{sup}} or {{sub}}. Can you link the page where the problem occurs? It would make helping you much easier. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 19:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I found a help page [?] and a helper suggested ctrl and 0 that seemed to do the trick.Osborne 19:42, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Oh, so your browser was zoomed out? You must've accidentally used your mouse's scroll wheel while also having CTRL pressed or something. 78.28.45.127 (talk) 19:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I need a cup of coffee now!Osborne 19:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Atractophora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

Please confirm that I have made the correct edit.Osborne 16:19, 27 May 2018 (UTC)

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived[edit]

Hi Osborne! You created a thread called Small Print at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Delivered by Muninnbot, an automated account. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Help me[edit]

This help request was awaiting your input, but you have not replied in a timely manner. If you still need help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions.

Will be grateful if some editor would be so good as to help me to use the links as shown on the top "toolbar" I have never been so adventurous as to try!Osborne 19:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

I'm not quite sure what you mean, could you please elaborate further? Primefac (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apoglossum ruscifolium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Osborne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Laminaria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Laurencia hybrida[edit]

I have started an article entitled Laurencia hybrid. I would like to change this to Osmundea hybrid (A.P. De Candolle) K.W.Nam - I would be grateful for your help on how to do this, or if you will change it yourself. Regards Phycodrys (talk) 12:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Morton, O. 2006. How to enter a reference. 12: 1 - 6.

[2] Hardy, G. and Guiry, M.D. 2003. Check-list and Atlas of Seaweeds of Britain and Ireland. British Phycological Society. ISBN0-9527115-16

[1]

[1]