User talk:Osh33m

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome!

Hello, Osh33m, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Just H 15:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Swizz Beatz[edit]

Swizz Beatz might be Muslim, but you have to cite that source. Plenty of other hip hop producers have used Islamic samples, including Timbaland and Madlib, and neither of them are Muslim. So please cite your trivia or else it can be deleted. Rockstar915 00:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I have reverted the posting as a violation of WP:BLP - negative unsourced information. (Yes, you provided a source, but it's totally inadequate). Feel free to post again when you can meet the criteria for reliable sources. -- John Broughton (♫♫) 00:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Notability of We All Want the Same Thing[edit]

A tag has been placed on We All Want the Same Thing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --Finngall talk 16:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for Image:NeoCrimsonmon.gif[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:NeoCrimsonmon.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 01:09, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:NeoCrimsonmon.gif)[edit]

Nuvola apps important blue.svg Thanks for uploading Image:NeoCrimsonmon.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dumb It Down (single)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dumb It Down (single), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. DiverseMentality(Discuss it) 23:31, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

Boldfaced in music articles[edit]

I have reverted the boldfaced you added to Lupe Fiasco discography. Please read Wikipedia:Record charts before adding any more boldfaced to music articles. Aspects (talk) 18:30, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

February 2009[edit]

Information.svg Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Lupe Fiasco. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. please stop changing the Grammy noms to TBA, they are cited as nominations, and that's the way they must stay unless you have a reliable source referring to them as Grammy TBAs Mfield (talk) 04:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Hey[edit]

It's good to see you are enjoying contributing to wikipedia. Don't forget to always fill in the edit summary when making changes as it helps other users to see what has happened in the article history, it also helps you avoid your work being reverted as vandalism as non use of the edit summary box is one of the key red flags to the vandal patrollers. Also don't forget to sign your comments on talk pages by typing four tildes after your post like this ~~~~, when you hit save page the Wiki software will convert the tildes into your name and the date as you see after other peoples posts. More information on that at WP:Signatures. Mfield (talk) 04:37, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

March 2009[edit]

Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edit(s) to Grand Theft Auto (series), it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. A single edit is much easier for people to review when on the lookout for vandalism than a dozen edits. It also allows the history list to be much cleaner. TreyGeek (talk) 19:16, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Is there any particular reason why you refuse to use the preview button to make a single edit versus a dozen and why you refuse to put in edit summaries? I'm curious the reasoning. --TreyGeek (talk) 19:48, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:GTA images[edit]

You tell me why they are. Non-free images should only be used if the understanding of the topic could not be complete without them- they are a last resort. Take, for instance, File:GTAVC PC Gang Attack.jpg. Ok, so there was some controversy surrounding the perceived racism, but does it really mattered what it looked like to kill them? The issue is discussed briefly, and the appearance of the game has no real baring on the issue. J Milburn (talk) 19:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Niko drunk.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Niko drunk.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:11, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Eminem discography[edit]

Please stop changing the article with inaccurate sales certification data. This is considered vandalism. The Marshall Mathers LP was never awarded diamond status from the RIAA (see database). Thanks, Do U(knome)? yes...or no 00:28, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Lupe Fiasco[edit]

I guess I myself am not too concerned about the image, but you may want to bring the issue up on the Lupe Fiasco talk page to see what other editors think about it. The "Grammy winning" bit however, is definitely a unacceptable. It is POV and does not provide enough context to the reader. The lead sentence (the very first sentence) should be kept as basic as possible. That is not to say awards can't be mentioned later in the lead section. The category and nominated work should be mentioned, possibly the year depending on how the sentence is worded. - kollision (talk) 17:00, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Flo rida kfest.jpg[edit]

File:Flo rida kfest.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Flo rida kfest.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Flo rida kfest.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 10:25, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

GA Thanks[edit]

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your contributions to Lupe Fiasco, which has fairly recently achieved WP:GA status.

Symbol support vote.svg This user helped promote the article Lupe Fiasco to good article status.

--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 19:51, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Contributing[edit]

Basically, any subject that you are interested in has needs. Similar articles to Lupe Fiasco would be Kanye West and Common (entertainer). They are also popular R&B musicians from Chicago. West is already a GA, so maybe you might want to help Common. Since you don't have a user page it is hard to say what you might be interested in. I see from your edit history, that you do Comics related stuff. Powers (comics) might be an interesting subject. The TV adaptation is set in Chicago. I don't know if that is the case with the comic book, but that article needs some work. If this does not answer your question, please clarify on my talk page.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 06:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bane in other media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UPS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

January 2013[edit]

Your recent editing history at Bane in other media shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ArtistScientist (talk) 03:41, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Information.svg It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on Bane in other media, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. ArtistScientist (talk) 01:08, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello, Osh33m. This message is being sent to inform you that a discussion is taking place at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Bane in other media. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Easyjusteasy (talkcontribs) 00:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop re-adding material[edit]

Please stop reinserting constested material into articles until you have achieved a consensus to do so at the article's Talk page. I see you've previously been involved in discussions relating to original research and edit-warring, so I would strongly encourage you to work towards developing a consensus rather than focusing on adding your material as soon as possible. Letting it sit while the discussion runs its course will not hurt anything. DonIago (talk) 20:36, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Eminem shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 05:22, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

January 2014[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Stalley shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. STATic message me! 21:39, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Tekken 7[edit]

What makes Christian Today a reliable source as opposed to IGN and others? And as there has been no official announcement for consoles, which you yourself have admitted to, Wikipedia does not speculate on potential console releases, regardless of whether he "wants" to continue it on PS4, there's been no announcement of consoles at this time. Until such time as an official announcement is made, it's inappropriate to list it as such. Regards, --Tærkast (Discuss) 21:52, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree. Tekken 7 will come to PS4, sometimes it's mundane but the Wikipedia rules on sourcing and speculation are to be followed. However, given the likelihood of it coming to PS4, I don't see a problem in it being added. No point making a big deal out of it really.--Tærkast (Discuss) 13:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
For the infobox, though, sources are generally discouraged in them. It's fine to leave PS4 there as long as it's sourced in the rest of the article.--Tærkast (Discuss) 13:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Assassin's Creed Unity resolution issue[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Osh33m. You have new messages at Talk:Assassin's Creed Unity.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

November 2014[edit]

Hi there. As I mentioned before, please stop editing against consensus. As I mentioned, the last discussion on "Milestone Titles", seen at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:History_of_video_game_consoles_(eighth_generation)/Archive_2#What_is_a_.22milestone.22.3F - was that no one could define what one is, how they are determined, etc, so the consensus was to not included any at this point.

Just because other article's have them does not make it right. If you wish to change the consensus, then please start up a new discussion, and only make the changes if there is a consensus to do so, as described in WP:CONSENSUS and WP:NOCONSENSUS.

Continuing to edit against consensus will get you blocked, so please follow the correct avenues with this. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:03, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

The Interview : Eminem[edit]

When I was referring to Youtube being an unreliable source, I mean it in the fashion that even the uploader was not a important Youtube account. I can consider Youtube and Facebook reliable as long as it's a verified account, like Shane Dawson TV, Smosh, or Taylor Swift Vevo. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

I agree 100%, but the video itself was from the movie, it wasn't fake footage, and I added the source where I found it. Osh33m (talk) 02:13, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Oh, OK. Didn't check my watchlist before I posted this. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 02:17, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mass Effect 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

February 2015[edit]

Information.svg Hello! FYI, please do not add rowspans to sortable Wikitables, as you did at Emma Watson. Please wee WP:FILMOGRAPHY for mote details. Face-smile.svgATinySliver/ATalkPage 23:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Dennis Bratland. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Space Needle, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

Per WP:SPS, an open wiki is not a source. And pop culture mentions need some kind of reason why they matter. Why is this important to the Space Needle? What influence did it have? If it is only important to the game, then put it in the article about the game. Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Tekken series logo as of 2012.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Tekken series logo as of 2012.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tekken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page HD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Tekken 7 arcade system[edit]

Hi Osh33m,

I was on my phone earlier and couldn't check if the link I wrote in my edit summary was correct, but I meant to link to Template: Infobox video game. For the arcade system field, it reads "The name of or names associated with the arcade game's system board hardware. In case of unique arcade hardware, omit this field and use those below." Sounds to me like Tekken 7 has a unique arcade hardware setup and it doesn't have a name. I'm not saying that that bit of information shouldn't be in the article, it's just that right now it shouldn't be used in the infobox. I'll leave it up to you do as you see fit. Thanks, and happy editing. --Soetermans. T / C 00:14, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tekken 7, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arcade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:38, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Jin Kazama TTT2.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

April 2015[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bane in other media. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount and can lead to a block, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. TL22 (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Greatest Hits (PlayStation range), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Knack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)