User talk:PacificWarrior101

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

March 14/15/2014[edit]

Would you like to stop vandalizing wikipedia?, it destroys the filipino and the country's reputation. I work on behalf of the Spanish embassy in Manila and your stubbornness result's the foreign people's bad oppinnion towards the philippine people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.240.211 (talk) 15:52, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

First off, you can't even type in proper English. Second of all, it is you who is "opinionating" the article by filling it up with Mestizo Catholic priests, whereas I actually took the time to include notable natives from all regions of the Philippines, and yes that includes the Moro regions. Third of all, I am Filipino American and have been years into World History, and yes that includes Philippine history (among others including Arab, Spanish, Malay, Eastern European). So quit it with this nonsense, or else I will request to issue a block against your account. Other people have already seen your unnecessary edits. If you really do work for the Spanish embassy in the Philippines, it seems obvious to me that are trying to force a "pro-Hispanic" gimmick to the mosaic. It is very simply, I just revert your edits and it's DONE. I will keep doing it, unless you actually keep doing something that's productive and helpful. There is a talk page for the Filipino people, go express your problems there. You come from an un-registered account and an IP account, which probably destroys your validity. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 16:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
hey! listen! All the people I contribute to the Filipino category are Filipinos of Spanish descent, the important thing is we have an example of Authentic Filipinos and not only the native people of the country who revolted against the Spanish empire, the Spanish history accounts doesn't include Asians as Filipinos, the History of the Philippines or Filipino people never accounts "Indios", their only part of the history is after the independence, Their history begins on the Philippines republic, they don't have any accounts in Spain, and the Philippines history. The King of Spain is going to read your messages and this article, so you better stop your stupidity. code name: amor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.240.211 (talk) 18:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Now that you are mentioning the King of Spain, I can see that an obvious troll is an obvious troll and I shall now report you to Wikipedia. Yes, and the Sultan of Brunei is going to "read your messages". I can see that all that Filipinos you are including are all Mestizos, duh....and that's a problem. This article is about natives of the Philippines, NOT Catholic Mestizos. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 18:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
Oh yeah, and you are impersonating an embassy worker. I would quit that nonsense if were you.PacificWarrior101 (talk) 19:05, 14 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
the people of the Philippines are unbelievably stupid, maybe you should clean this country because it's a paradise.
^ obvious troll is an obvious troll ^
Why is this guy haven't bean ban in Wikipedia? who is this Asian warrior, somebody block this guy from this website, all his works are only to vandalize the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.240.211 (talk) 19:23, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
I have already contacted the administrators about you. I'm not the one posting pictures of Abu Sayyaf flags.PacificWarrior101 (talk) 19:27, 14 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
I will say, this IP's comments are likely untrue, considering they come from the UK. G S Palmer (talk) 20:06, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
This guy "pacificWarrion" is stupid, I'm working for the Filipino people, for their reputation on this world, every information I shared is to give accurate information's about the Philippines, the Filipino people, their culture and history.
Of course it is! Thank for you for your insult, now I shall report you to the administrators at once.PacificWarrior101 (talk) 03:31, 19 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
thank you for your insult,and now do you think you are disrespecting someone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.240.211 (talk) 03:42, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
You are disrespecting Wikipedia by making edits without summaries and sending me useless personal attacks. It is quite clear that your intentions are to waste people's time and troll editors on Wikipedia. The administrators have been notified.PacificWarrior101 (talk) 03:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
I'm a dear friend of ambassador Domecq, all your messages will be sent to the embassy. CODE NAME: AMOR, Greetings to my friends residing in the Philippines. :* — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.174.240.211 (talk) 03:53, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Of course you do! PacificWarrior101 (talk) 04:56, 19 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101

March 14/15/2014[edit]

Здравствуй, спокойный боец! Интересно, а зачем ты удалил коллаж портретов славян в статье Slavic People? А ведь так всё выглядело красиво!:)--Куниса (talk) 21:12, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Hmmm .... это немного прохладно, Вы можете использовать Гоогде, переводятся. Так могло я! I gave my warning, I'm removing it. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 03:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
LET'S HAVE SOME FUN SHALL WE!? PacificWarrior101 (talk) 19:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)PacificWarrior101

March 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Slavic peoples. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. AFAIK, you're aware of the talk page discussion going on about the undue weight towards some groups, and the frivolity of some of the inclusions on the gallery. Please use the talk page rather than reverting to the disputed version, which could constitute a display of article ownership. Львівське (говорити) 20:03, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Slavic peoples[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Slavic peoples. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Please stop making edits which do not reflect established consensus that has been discussed at the article's talk page. Such edits may constitute vandalism and can result in the loss of your editing privileges. Please discuss controversial edits on the talk page. Thank you. --Eleassar my talk 20:10, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Slavic peoples, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. You know how you're behaving. [1], [2], [3] and [4]. Cut it. Львівське (говорити) 20:16, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism? How are any of my edits vandalism? I am simply, reverting edits back to my original version. I'm simply sick of people messing with my infobox, nothing more. I told people, to tell me if they wanted to edit my infobox, but people just went ahead and started deleting and replacing stuff. I don't appreciate that. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 05:56, 25 March 2012 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
It isn't your infobox. Reverting consensus for the sake of self proclaimed ownership is disruptive editing, and can be construed as vandalism.--Львівське (говорити) 06:10, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
I created it. ME. Before this, there was NO infobox. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 06:38, 25 March 2012 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
That's fantastic.--Львівське (говорити) 00:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
I know it's fantastic! My creation! MY OWN. You know nothing. На Владимир (talk) 02:31, 8 April 2012 (UTC)НаВладимир!
You know what, you're using a comment that's a month old as an example. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 06:49, 25 March 2012 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
From the same talk page, you should have been called on it earlier, and you've shown a trend here. There isn't a statute of limitations on this.--Львівське (говорити) 00:03, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Called what on earlier!? A trend of what? I'm not the one posting blasphemous crap. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 05:11, 26 March 2012 (UTC)На Владимир
Your personal attacks and lack of civility. And no, the only one posting "blasphemous crap" is you so far. -Львівське (говорити) 05:16, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
Well I lost my civility long ago! Because people like you proved that you don't deserve my civility! Don't even start with this whole "You can't lose what you never had" BS because I'm out of it. Helping the blasphemy now aren't we!? PacificWarrior101 (talk) 22:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)PacificWarrior101

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited El Salvador, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Castilian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012[edit]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Islam, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. and other talk pages Dougweller (talk) 08:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Brian Viloria.jpg[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Brian Viloria.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
  2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. 07:58, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Marking edits as minor[edit]

I noticed that you marked several of your recent edits as minor. I realise they may seem quite minor and obvious to you, but just as one editor to another, may I recommend that you read WP:MINOR and mark a lot less of your edits as minor? The basic principle is that we shouldn't mark an edit as minor if it changes the meaning. Removing content, such as mentions of this or that religion in an article on a particular people, may well be an improvement and may not seem contentious, but it's not something for which we use the "minor" mark. NebY (talk) 17:16, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Listen, I'm into many languages. When it comes to figures of such ethnicities and religions, I simply add one or two translations that I feel is necessarry, that I MAKE SURE doesn't harm the article's meaning. Not to mention that I go around correcting articles such as Kapampangans and Ilocanos because some of the information about the religions are just completely unsourced. So quite frankly, yes I am doing "minor" edits. You need to specify which articles you are being diva-ing me about, I'm only human and I can't remember every single edit that I do. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 20:29, 21 December 2012 (UTC)PacificWarrior101

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arab cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Turkish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:East Asia mosaic.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:East Asia mosaic.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of converts to Christianity from Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abdul Masih (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moroccan people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loreen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

TB[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, PacificWarrior101. You have new messages at Talk:Ukrainians#Aftermath.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 17:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Mizrahi Jews[edit]

You unilaterally made a huge change to the infobox by significantly enlarging the number of people. I reverted you, indicating in the edit summary that you should first obtain consensus. What word didn't you understand, first or consensus? Debresser (talk) 18:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

You did not mention consensus, I checked it. I added an extended people, ranging from the Israeli society's reference of "Mizrahi" (as those who come from Arab and Muslim nations, with the exception of Maghrebi Jews), as well as the overall definition as those Jews who come from the Far East, such as Central Asia. You're reverting to an old crappy and unorganized mosaic that shows like four or five that nobody knows about, save for Ovadia Yosef and Paula Abdul. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101

No problem. Lay out your arguments on the talk page, and let's go by consensus there. Debresser (talk) 08:56, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm G S Palmer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Filipino people because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! G S Palmer (talk) 13:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Nope, I have been using Wikipedia for about two years now, and am very familiar with how infoboxes work. I am reverting the other user's edits, because he is being biased as to who goes into the infobox and does not seem to have a full knowledge of Filipino history.PacificWarrior101 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
Sorry, I thought you were the one changing all the images: looking through the page history, I see now that you were just changing it back. G S Palmer (talk) 14:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for understanding! PacificWarrior101 (talk) 15:34, 14 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:PacificWarrior101 reported by User:G S Palmer (Result: ). Thank you. G S Palmer (talk) 19:37, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

I'm sorry to do this, but both of you are well past the three-revert limit. G S Palmer (talk) 19:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Filipino people. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Atama 21:08, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Just a note[edit]

Hey PacificWarrior, just wanted to give a bit of advice outside the context of ANI. I know dealing with people like that makes things hard. Just keep in mind that you shouldn't indulge in edit warring in cases like this; the edits the IP is making aren't bright-line vandalism, or as far as I can tell otherwise exempted from the edit warring policy. So to go back to the same revert patterns right after coming off a block or warning for the same is likely to just result in a longer block.

I don't personally think a reblock is merited in your case at least in part because of the surrounding circumstances (i.e., the personal attacks). While you shouldn't let yourself be goaded into edit-warring even more, I think in light of what was being said some leniency is reasonable. Feel free to let me know if you run into further problems with this issue. While I'm not an admin, I'd be happy to help out however I can. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 13:18, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Also, I saw that you added a response to the old, archived thread at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive840. I reverted that response since it was to an archived thread... you really aren't supposed to add responses to archived threads. While minor corrections or clarifications may be appropriate at times, substantive responses in archives are in my experience highly discouraged. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 13:27, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Hey, sorry, I accidentally blocked you PacificWarrior while trying to block the IP. Too many windows open at once, etc. I unblocked you right away with a note that the previous block was by accident so it shouldn't count against you. In any case, the IP is blocked for a week. I'm hoping that they'll either go away from the project or at least move on to something else that doesn't cause them conflict with another editor. Basically I'm hoping that they'll get bored and find someplace else to troll people. -- Atama 15:30, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
Also, just an FYI, this comment on the article's talk page was technically a personal attack, I know it was made a long time ago (two weeks ago) but please try to make sure that you don't do that. That may have egged on the IP to start trolling you in the first place. The cleaner you keep your actions and comments, the easier it is to make a case against editors you come into conflict with. And it reduces the chances for conflict to start in the first place. Also, you did resume edit-warring again at the Filipino people article, and though you didn't breach 3RR this time it still wasn't a good idea (for the same reason, you don't want to be engaging in the same breaches of policy that the other editor is doing). -- Atama 15:36, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
I did make a couple more edits, simply changing a few images here and there. Things any Wikipedia editor would do to an article. As for as the IP user continuing, we shall see in one week.PacificWarrior101 (talk) 16:49, 19 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
Thanks for the help. I'm not "trying" to edit war, I was just making a couple changes to the infobox mosaic, I had a few constructive images, I did make sure that I didn't three-vert again but I did read rules regarding trying to "game" the season, that's not what I'm trying to do which is why I simply stopped after the first revert in the post-block situation. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 16:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101
Your new section on the article talk page was a good one. I have no reservations about blocking just the IP and not you, because you are sincerely trying. The IP clearly isn't. -- Atama 17:23, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Indeed. Again, thanks for the help. PacificWarrior101 (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2014 (UTC)PacificWarrior101