User talk:Paki.tv

Hi Paki.tv, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions to the coolest online encyclopedia I know of =). I sure hope you stick around; we're always in need of more people to create new articles and improve the ones we already have. You'll probably find it easiest to start with a tutorial of how the wikipedia works, and you can test stuff for yourself in the sandbox. When you're contributing, you'll probably find the manual of style to be helpful, and you'll also want to remember a couple important guidelines. First, write from a neutral point of view, second, be bold in editing pages, and third, use wikiquette. Those are probably the most important ones, and you can take a look at some others at the policies and guidelines page. You might also be interested in how to write a great article and possibly adding some images to your articles.

Be sure to get involved in the community – you can contact me at my talk page if you have any questions, and you can check out the village pump, where lots of wikipedians hang out and discuss things. If you're looking for something to do, check out the community portal. And whenever you ask a question or post something on a talk page, be sure to sign your name by typing ~~~~.

Again, welcome! It's great to have you. Happy editing! --Spangineer (háblame) June 29, 2005 14:58 (UTC)

Hezbi Islami and Wikipedia:Redirects

Hi there! I was the one who redirected Hezbi Islami to Hezb-e Islami, but I don't know a lot about the transliteration, only did it based on the amount of incoming links, since nobody gave me any input at the time. So if there's a standard, I'm glad that you're upholding it. One thing I'd like to mention, though, is that you left in place some double redirects. That is, you left Hezb-i-Islami and other alternate spellings redirecting to Hezb-e Islami, which was itself a redirect. And so if a person followed the link in U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, it wouldn't actually take them all the way to the article. This is no big deal, and I'm fixing it myself, but I wanted to let you know so you wouldn't make the same mistake in the future. See you around, and much appreciation for your efforts! NickelShoe 05:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Oh, if you didn't know, the way to tell if there's any double redirects is to click on "what links here" over in the toolbox on the left side of the page. Just check to make sure all the pages that say "redirect page" in parentheses redirect directly to the main article and not to each other. Later! NickelShoe 05:51, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry about checking the links for Hezbi Islami, because I went ahead and did that myself. I just wanted to make sure that you knew how to do it next time. NickelShoe 13:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Sabbatai Zevi's influence on Bektashism

I have never before heard of Sabbatai Zevi's influence on Bektashism. This is quite interesting. Could you provide any links? Thanks! KI 16:59, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

When editing, please only add comments on talk pages. Also, when you leave comments, post them to the bottom of the thread. Thanks. KI 01:44, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

RE Caravans Act

you're welcome. Kurando | ^_^ 11:33, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

East London

I removed your edit as it contained errors and repeated what was already in the article. Have you looked at the West Essex article you have linked to. It is about a place in the USA. Kind regards. Mrsteviec 16:15, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Bakunin reverts

As indicated, I have requested arbitration. Here is my statement:

To maintain the NPOV status of the Bakunin entry, his anti-semitic comments should not be given the undue prominence that certain people keep insisting on giving them. It is sufficient to note that Bakunin made anti-semitic comments, and then to provide a link to an acceptable original or NPOV secondary source. The current quotations are taken from anti-semitic websites and are of dubious provenance. The first quote (allegedly calling Jews an "exploiting sect," a "people of leeches," etc.) is taken from an "essay" posted on an anti-semitic website: http://library.flawlesslogic.com/jtr_01.htm. This is not an acceptable NPOV secondary source. The second quote is just a lengthier version of the first quote, and is supposedly from an essay attributed to Bakunin entitled "Polemique contre les Juifs." There is no link or other information given that would enable anyone to verify the authenticity of this alleged quotation or the essay it is supposed to be taken from. If you search for it on the internet, it shows up only on anti-semitic websites. I have yet to find a reference to this alleged essay in any library catalog or in any collection of Bakunin's writings. When I posted a "citation needed" note to this second quotation, the Iron Duke simply deleted that, claiming the current citation was adequate. Thus, I object to the inclusion of these particular quotations because they have not been properly authenticated. I also object to more than passing reference to Bakunin's anti-semitism because these lengthy quotations, even if authentic, exaggerate the importance of Bakunin's anti-semitic writings, which formed only a miniscule part of his voluminous literary output (the Archives Bakounine project published 7 large volumes of his writings, and that was not a complete collection; the International Institute for Social History in Amsterdam has since published his complete works on CD ROM. It contains thousands of pages of material). Robgraham 20:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Londonistan

I don't have to "explain" anything -- you're the one who is substituting a ranting personal tirade for factual information, so you're the one who has to explain things. In future, please put comments at the bottom of user talk pages (as is standard Wikipedia protocol). AnonMoos 16:36, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Displaying a certain degree of childish petulance if you don't get your ownway isn't necessarily the best way to improve Wikipedia articles... AnonMoos 00:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Anti-systemic library Muhammad Asif Muhsini Tony Conrad La Vieille Taupe Pavel Sergeevich Alexandrov Recuperation Steve Booth Al-Ahbash National Islamic Movement of Afghanistan Society of the Spectacle Islamic Movement of Afghanistan Giuseppe Fanelli Harakat-i-Islami Islamic party Golam Azam Tawalla Libyan Islamic Fighting Group Kastriot Islami Mustaali

Cleanup Arman Class War International movement for an imaginist Bauhaus Merge Islamic fundamentalism Assembly language Javed Ahmed Ghamdi Add Sources Major conflicts within anarchist thought Kalbe Abid Nubuwwah Wikify Syed Chand Patel Syed Mir Qasim Cresent International Expand Anarchism and Marxism Islamic art Indian Muslim Nationalism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 10:59, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Ricky Bishop

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ricky Bishop, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://uffc-annex.moonfruit.com/rickybishop, and therefore a copyright violation. Ricky Bishop has been nominated for deletion.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Ricky Bishop. Then you should do one of the following:

• Make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL at the site of the original publication.
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions at wikimedia dot org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation.

If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Ricky Bishop, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Whpq 11:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal case

Hi Paki.tv, there is now a mediation in progress concerning the disputes at Peoples' Global Action. Please consider sharing your perspective on the case page so that we can reach a consensus on how best to resolve everyone's concerns. Thanks! - N1h1l 01:12, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

'Smash Wikipedia, down with NPOV, down with consensus' - a note by 158-152-12-77

Hi Paki.tv, I just wrote this, and thought you might be interested. Best regards from 158-152-12-77

Prediction

My prediction: Wikipedia will sell to Microsoft or Google, or otherwise partner with them in a big way, or conduct its own IPO, within five years. Linux is already big money. Open source is big money. This is the real world, i.e. the business world. It saddens me, how few people realise the above. The bureaucratically-mediated 'closing down to what is acceptable' is visible from one end of Wikipedia to the other. On a central level this is indicated by the references to verifiability through academia. Who pays for academia? Who does academia serve? You certainly won't get a proper answer by applying 'NPOV'.

NPOV? What a load of crap!

'NPOV' is boss-talk, pure and simple. It is an ideology, a chimera, a lie. There is no such thing as NPOV, nor should there be. NPOV is a cover for the POV of the boss class, and of all who want petty positions under the boss class, telling the plebs what's what. Under the latter heading I'd include all long-time politicos.

The alternative? Well, it's when proletarians get together without role-playing, when neither the bosses, nor any representatives or 'activists', are around. In places such as the UK, usually this only happens in twos and threes nowadays. The fascist and totalitarian character of current conditions can't be got rid of by imagining it doesn't exist.

A cautionary tale

If you want an analogy, look at 'health'. Some 'health' controllers were annoyed for a time, fearing hordes of the great unwashed coming into medics' surgeries with information they had found on the internet. They really hated the idea that it would be easy for people to find stuff out and share their experiences. Soon they realised it wasn't so scary, and all they had to do was to set up some 'public-access' sites, ostensibly for patients but in practice upholding respect for the medical system as is. Or just let it roll, and let the 'opinion-formers', themselves taking their opinions from other opinion-formers, and so on, all the way up to WORLD CORPORATE PR CENTRAL, take the floor. In short, the internet is as sh*t as anything else.

Many 'participatory' patients' websites are openly sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. Public opinion of medicine is organised from the top, the same as public opinion of anything else. With other sites the relationship is less immediately obvious, i.e. the corporate logos aren't used.

The system is supple. It can recuperate. This is what Wikipedia is about. It's a big focus group where anyone can wander in. "Press the red button on your remote control now". "Contribute to a Wikipedia article now".

Same old lie, just a modern wrapping

Wikipedia is, in fact, an extremely important item in current worldwide internet bullsh*t and the perception thereof. Most journalists, being lazy swine, use it. But never mind them. Many decent people with good pro-social intentions will be fooled. They will either sell out for a bit of local fame, or get burned out, I'm afraid. 'Don't get sucked in' is the best advice. These waters are run by sharks. Capitalism really is a slaughterhouse, it's not just something to say from a stage.

In a nutshell

It's the 'participation' lie. The old cartoon had it right, showing someone with a rope around their neck, and the slogan 'I'll hold, you braid'.

The revolutionary 'line' must be: smash Wikipedia, smash the internet.

The hell with consensus!158-152-12-77 12:52, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Well a few comments. On one level, NPOV is like doing an exam paper, presenting all sides of the case etc. On another level you are right, it creates the same old illusions of democracy, dressed up as modern technology. Will it get sold off for a vaste amount of money: yes I reckon so. Also Open Source Software in general, including Linux, are very important for the capitalist future. Like the railways, at first developed by private capital, and then taken over by national capital. I agree with you that changes are on the cards as regards intellectual property rights (IPR). I think I would go further and suggest that one reason why the Soviet Union was done away with was because it failed to operate copyright laws (which led to all the restraints imposed about exporting IT there set up by the USA). I agree with you that it is disappointing how little discussion there is about the limitations of Open Source. I have seen rooms full of people talking about liberalising the IPR as the next revolution. Most of these peopel are themselves are young programmers who have more to gain by using other peoples work. Whether they will feel the same when they have a substantial back-catalogue of material is another matter. Aside from political naivety, the most significant current is individualist libertarianism . . .

Returning to NPOV, it creates a very constrained writing style, which can be easily internalised - you can just get used to writing with these constraints and forget you are doing so. The point of reference is broader than academia, but still creates problems. I think the issue is that all information is distributed in a fashion helping to perpetuate capitalism, this affects the information which is available on the internet, just as much as acaedmia etc. So any interventions take place in the situation of asymmetrical warfare. It is only in times of open contestation that we have any other situation.

So why use Wikipedia? I think on my part, laziness is part of the answer. It provides a big note pad where I can work on stuff (like Emile Acollas and Joseh Heco), and perhaps get help for others. A bit of an open research tool. Yes of course anything we do becomes alienated and can be used against us. And perhaps wikipedia provides a way in which that can be speeded up. I don't think wikipedia desrves a privileged place when it comes to seizing the means of production, nor a privileged place in terms of oppressive institutions which need to be smashed. Just as the Bolsheviks used their control of the electrical power stations to help seize control in the Soviet Union, or the anarchists fought with the stalinists over control of the telephone exchange, certain industries by their nature have strategic importance in how industry as a whole operates. And of course it can be turned off at teh flick of a switch, as we saw on 7-7, when the mobile phone network was disabled. What concerns me in all this is much more the internalisation of the values embedded in these institutions, eg that NPOV is in some way "good" or "fair", or that Open Source is somehow anti-thetical to capitalism, or that teh interneyt is liberating. These illusions need to be smashed, but to what extent this involves smashing the institutions which create them and the technologies upon which they are based I think remains to be seen. I do not know how to envisage a society without any institutions - by which I mean organisations which draw together specific activities, the skills, technologies and resources through which those activities can occur - i.e. a division of labour. I do not know how the existing organisation of resources, skills and technologies would be re-organised in a communist society. However, the anti-systemic library is a very limited attempt to look at some of those questions. Yes, workers have been sharing information for generations, even under conditions when possession of certain material could be met with death. I shall leave the question of "Escape" to another day. Even Gaughin going to sun himself on a South Pacific island could not escape the contradictions of contemporary capitalism. What hope is there today? I prefer resistance to escape - which of course can be done from teh South Pacific jus as much as anywhere else.Harrypotter 09:30, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi Harry! Nice to hear from you. We agree on the essentials. This will have to be short and aphoristic; I'm about to go to my Pacific island! :-)

What importance to give to the concept of institution? I don't think such an institution as a library will exist in communism. All books etc. will be in the same 'library', in which case the concept could only help to cause separation. If we kept the word, it would just mean books etc. But asking Is there a book on this in the library? would be an odd way of asking Is there a book on this?

I think some institutions will exist in communism, though. E.g. the institutionalisation of the first consumption of food after waking up, aka breakfast. Just without the hassle, the harmful additives, and any prospect of going to work. Calling for the abolition of breakfast would seem unserious and arty.

As for the internet institution, I think its abolition should be accepted as an aim by those who want a better world. I can't imagine how the internet could continue to exist in communism. It's much better to relate to people face-to-face. Getting to see them won't be a drag even if they are on the other side of the world.

I agree that open source is very important for the capitalist future, although how things will happen in China, as compared with in the US empire, is not wholly clear.

Roomsful of people thinking the liberalisation of intellectual property rights is the next revolution? I'd hazard the guess that most of them were computer programmers for whom the focus of a) their career aspirations and b) their politics was...the fascist US empire which has long carried 'FREEDOM' on its banner...

I tend to stick my fingers in my ears and go 'laaaaa' when computer programmers come out with social theories based on the economics of computer programming.

Some gibberish I found recently from a certain disreputable individual of our mutual acquaintance in the distant past is here. Presumably having a double first in classics, even one obtained via time travel, is an advantage in the US software industry.

You make an interesting point about the railways. Much of early railway investment (Russia, South America, Africa) was controlled by a handful of merchant banking families, e.g. Rothschilds and Hambros, who didn't step on each other's toes much. In those rare places where the State was involved in the construction effort, the money was raised from specific loans (largely from those same banking interests) rather than through general taxation.

Interesting that one of the spokespeople for the ones-and-zeros guys who wants to tell us all what's what, is Douglas Rushkoff who raps admiringly about how Judaism has been so successful because it's open source. Yeah, right.

"I prefer resistance to escape". Gauguin made his money on the French stock exchange before going in for the French myth of Tahiti etc., which the mass-murder advocate and marquess, de Sade, had also been into. In Tahiti he went to church every day!

Doubtless we'd agree that to build up a choice between resistance and escape as a big idea would be subjectivist, as perhaps indicated in the raising of 'preference' onto a pedestal that it would entail. I think much of the reason that resistance occurs is that it is forced. Resistance isn't a great deal of fun, just less undignified, degrading, and psychically unhealthy than being ground down into the sh*t without a fight. (Unmistakable evidence that the so-called 'anti-capitalist' movement is anything but, lies in their ignoring this point in their advertising. Quoting 'I won't make a revolution if I can't dance', or whatever that idiot American tourist Emma Goldman said, is pretty much typical). The overall aim of resistance is...to escape.

I was just making a more mundane point that too many people fail to escape what they could escape. Recently I encountered someone in her 50s, who I believe has been in debt for decades, who plans to buy a house and live in it with her elderly dad who is selling his own house and will put up some of the money. In order to get a large house, she will be getting a loan similar to the one that she has currently got, which is linked to the mortgage on 'her' present house. The result - she will probably have to continue to go to work up until she is maybe 65, to pay off the bank. And yet she has got a fine opportunity, right now, to get out of debt forever. This sort of mentality is widespread in the UK. People have much more sense in most of the rest of the world - Russia, India, wherever.

Wikipedia/NPOV. I participate on Wikipedia too... One crawls in through the interstices only. Conflict on given pages is bound to be lost, because it's the cops and our enemies generally who are most at home with NPOV, which we stand opposed to (as with moderation) but without being able to say so during a conflict. That cops find they are in the element here is indisputable. The page on archaeogeodesy was closed down by the cops, although admittedly they had unwitting help from a small businessman. Elsewhere, the encyclopaedic position is that the cold war ended in 1989 and that East European countries were mainly soviets. Not to mention the medical-industry lie that medics are doctors. Profiteering, cops, lies, all go well together. Recently I had cop trouble, people finding my choice of username objectionable, and interpreting misread rules to back themselves up. Perhaps a cop had a filter running to trap the phrase 'Smash Wikipedia'. Perhaps a GPAer called the cops. I dunno.

Talking of financially loaded greenery, I wonder whether Zack Goldsmith will be in the next front-of-house 'government'?

Catch you later; hope you're well; take care!158-152-12-77 11:13, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

link to British

Hello, when you want to link to the article about something British, please do not link to British, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the one of the options found on that page such as United Kingdom, Great Britain or British English by writing out [[United Kingdom|British]] or [[Great Britain|British]]. Regards, Jeff3000 00:05, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Many thanxxxxxxxxxxxxxx... how about Former British Empire ? Paki.tv 23:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

"Former British Empire" redirects to Commonwealth of Nations, which has officially not been British since 1949. One could make a link like "former British Empire" (no colon in an article link) or former British Empire (with a direct link disambiguation). It is always best to check links by using the "Show preview" button before pressing "Save page". That way you can edit the redirects and make them into direct links. Hu 11:57, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Jonathan Fifi'i

A tag has been placed on Jonathan Fifi'i, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Turlo Lomon 04:43, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, saw your response on my boards but it appears the admins already nuked the article despite your hang on tag. My apologies - after reading your changes, it was already becoming more clear that this was a person of historical significance. Turlo Lomon 04:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

London Action Resource Centre

Perhaps we can have a discussion on the talk page about how to progress further with this page? Cheers Mujinga 11:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Request for Comment: London Action Resource Centre

hello, i have set up an rfc here to see if we can resolve this dispute. As one of the persons involved in the dispute, i would like to ask you to make a comment in the section entitled "Statements by editors previously involved in dispute". Cheers! Mujinga 03:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

LARC

Paki.tv, I have asked for some responses and participation on LARC's talk page. Since you have been a principal member in the disagreement, I would appreciate your insight. Please respond as soon as possible. —bbatsell ¿? 17:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

I see you have been able to revert to your preferred version of the page (despite consensus that I can see), but have not been able to participate in discussion. Do you plan on continuing this particular course of action? Thanks, —bbatsell ¿? 17:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

If I were an Asian!

HmmmHarrypotter 17:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Fazlallah Astarabadi

I've been adding material from the Bashir book which is very interesting.Harrypotter 20:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Nonsense of Remote Control Effect and Manipulate Human Being Technology

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Remote Control Effect and Manipulate Human Being Technology, by Wnjr (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Remote Control Effect and Manipulate Human Being Technology provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Remote Control Effect and Manipulate Human Being Technology, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Remote Control Effect and Manipulate Human Being Technology itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 12:37, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

repeated malicious edits to London Action Resource Centre

Please do not assume ownership of articles such as London Action Resource Centre. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you.

Mark Brown and London Action Resource Centre

You added the following to the LARC article: LARC was purchased in the autumn of 1999 by the Reclaim the Streets faction centred around Mark Brown just after their success in the Carnival against Capitalism which occurred June 18th 1999. Please explain what in the cited references support the claims of (a) The existence of a faction of Reclaim the Streets centred around Mark Brown (b) The purchase of LARC by said faction. or leave this unverified material out of the article. Wnjr 14:44, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Surrealism

You are edit warring. Next revert and you will be blocked. Please discuss on talk page and achieve consensus first. Tyrenius 00:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring is never acceptable. See WP:3RR: you were right up to the maximum limit. Good faith edits are never vandalism, so please don't call them that - it violates WP:NPA. Wikipedia doesn't count as a reference (although references in an article may be usable). You've been asked to supply verifiable sources for inclusion: if you don't then the material can be removed. What I see on the talk page is people wanting to include their friends. Tyrenius 11:27, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Your continued accusations of racism, vandalism and lack of good faith constitute personal attacks. Stop them or face the consequences. Comment on edits not editors. The references have been questioned as not meeting WP:RS and a rationale provided. Please debate this on the article talk page, and if necessary follow dispute resolution procedures. There are a number of recourses open to you. Tyrenius 00:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)

I totally agree with you about the unacceptable nature of the comments on the link you've supplied, but you've only just pointed me to this, or I would have backed you up before. However, they were from April, so it would have been better to have reported them then for immediate redress. Nevertheless, regarding recent exchanges, AGF until you've proved illicit behaviour - which has now been done. Tyrenius 00:20, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Babylondon00.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Babylondon00.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:06, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Apartment Festival

Apartment Festival, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Apartment Festival satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apartment Festival and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Apartment Festival during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jmlk17 04:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Apartment Festivals

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Apartment Festivals, by Closedmouth (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Apartment Festivals is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Apartment Festivals, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 08:40, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR

Please read and understand wikipedia's 3RR policy. Do not breach it on the Immigration to Australia article. Prester John ^{-(Talk to the Hand)} 03:14, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule . Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. nat^tang 03:01, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paki.tv (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

I see no reason why your 3RR violation should be ignored. — jpgordon^∇∆∇∆ 05:34, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Same reasons as the last time this entrapment by the same user who reported me for the same problem - which was yesterday! It is User:Prester John who is making undiscussed deletions - all my changes are referenced and discussed! Paki.tv 04:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

It's not evident that this user has actually breached 3RR. Like yesterday's accusation by the same accuser on another article, paki.tv has made 4 edits, ie, 1 with new material, then reverted the 3 reverts of Prester John. Ie, each by my reckoning has made 3 reverts, but not more. --Merbabu 07:50, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, methinks somebody like Jpgordon has possibly being around long enough to understand WP:3RR. Shot info 04:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Ah, s/he may understand the rules but does s/he understand User:Prester John? Paki.tv 22:22, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Shhh, it's a conspiracy :-) Shot info 00:06, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

don't be so paranoid! i wouldn't recomend drugs or therapy, but maybe try a different lover (if u can find one that is - i mean a definition..!!!) Paki.tv 00:58, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Templates on History Wars in Australia article

The {{User WikiProject Melanesia}} template is for a user to put on their user page, so it did not belong on the article page. {{Melanesia}} or another template would go on an article page, {{WikiProject Melanesia}} on an article talk page. None appear clearly relevant to the History Wars in Australia. Paul foord 09:08, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sawhein404.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Sawhein404.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:13, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tubecropped.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tubecropped.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Babylondon00.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Babylondon00.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Metro00.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Metro00.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:34, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:LARC-Antisystemic-Library.jpeg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LARC-Antisystemic-Library.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 03:32, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mark Brown Vestey

I have nominated Mark Brown Vestey, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Brown Vestey. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Dlohcierekim 18:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Brian Paddick: Derek Bennett information

Hi, this is regarding your recent edits to "Brian Paddick" to add information regarding Derek Bennett and Movement for Justice. I think more facts need to be stated and references provided – please see my detailed comments on the article's talk page and continue the discussion there. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 22:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Certain accursed ones of no significance

I hope you like this page. I ama bit worried there might be some hardline followers of Fahreddin who insist that these Hurufi martyrs should not be included in wikipedia because they are of no significance. May their beards catch fire!

P.S. Wolley's back!Harrypotter (talk) 09:41, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leonid Savin (2nd nomination)

Harrypotter (talk) 00:17, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

African Mine Workers` Union

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of African Mine Workers` Union, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.anc.org.za/ancdocs/history/misc/miners.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:15, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of African Mine Workers` Union

A tag has been placed on African Mine Workers` Union requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LAAFan 16:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Palestinian general strike

A tag has been placed on Palestinian general strike requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Neuro√Logic 10:50, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

new article

Hi. I started Socialist Workers Party (Palestine), hope that settles some questions. --Soman (talk) 22:13, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

Wikimeets in London

The upcoming wikimeets in London are:

Wikipedia:Meetup/London 14 - Sunday 12 October

Wikipedia:Meetup/London 15 - Sunday 9 November

If you can face the trek out to Cambridge, there is always Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 1 on Saturday 18 October!

Harrypotter (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Sawhein404.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Sawhein404.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Purgatorio (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC) --Purgatorio (talk) 17:23, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:A13 03.gif

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:A13 03.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Purgatorio (talk) 17:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC) --Purgatorio (talk) 17:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Willam H. Andrews

was that first name a typo? Any objection to moving to William H. Andrews (communist) or some such? Dsp13 (talk) 12:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

On duty?

I don't quite know what you mean by asking if I'm on or off duty - when you asked, I was off duty as a Wikipedia admin. How can I help? Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:38, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

because of the reason quoted in my edit summary: "Possible BLP concerns and weasel wording - please come to a consensus before making contentious edits". Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

SI and Debord

Hi Paki.tv, I've replied you in my talk. I think it would be better to continue the discussion on the article talk. --Sum (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

'Error' in registration of title regarding 62 Fieldgate Street at the Land Registry

(I've also circulated this to Harrypotter).

From the LARC talk page:

(begin)

Research at the Land Registry and Companies House has shown the owner of 62 Fieldgate Street (with no charges on its title, so the asset is not mortgaged) to be Fieldgate Action Resource Centre Limited, company number 3836799, a company incorporated on 3 September 1999 which changed its name to London Action Resource Centre Limited on 5 February 2004. Curiously the number of that company as registered at Companies House is 3836099. Never mind the presence or absence of an initial 0 in the number, which relates only to the fact that Companies House uses an 8-digit number in the anticipation that all 8 will be needed some day. There seems to have been an error in the recording of the company's number when the title to the property at 62 Fieldgate was registered. There is no currently active company with the number 3836799... Explanation anyone?

(end)

Worth digging into a little bit maybe? Rising Tide UK, "Taking Action on the Root Causes of Climate Change," has hallmarks of a corporate/state-created pseudo-movement. Absolutely no shadow of a doubt about that. The climate has always changed and will always change. This is very clearly the realm of serious propaganda and manipulation. Follow the money.91.84.230.57 (talk) 10:55, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

London Anarcho Racist Centre

(my note: I've moved this here from 'my' talk page, because I've been doing this stuff anon and do not have a fixed IP. I don't wish to do it from a non-anon Wikipedia account. I am currently homeless and post from a variety of physical locations, always from IPs which others can also use. So it would be easier to have this dicussion on your page. I hope this is OK with you!)

paki.tv wrote:

(LARC) was indeed originally registered as FARC - it think they changed the name soon afterwards. Thanks for your comments. the Triodos Bank connection is also very interesting... Paki.tv (talk) 12:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi. I knew about FARC (1999) -> LARC (2004); this info is available for free from Companies House. But note that

• a) according to the 'office copy' of the title deed for the Fieldgate Street property (which I downloaded for £3 from the Land Registry), the company's number is wrongly recorded in that title deed, and
• b) according to Harrypotter, the property is not recorded in the company's filed accounts as an asset.

Might a) and b) possibly be related? The thing with the number is only very minor in itself (although a lawyer who made such an error when filing the TR1 transfer form after a property purchase would be very sloppy), but it adds to the feeling that something curious is going on with this company and this property.

Agreed about Triodos. They are connected with Goldsmith family interests, and come up in connection with all sorts of 'green' crap (e.g. Nick Rosen's 'off-grid' stuff), but I haven't tracked them further than that. On the Goldsmith klan, see for example here.

Rising Tide is absolutely certainly a State/corporate pseudo-movement. The idea of a 'grass roots' 'movement' against 'climate change' is completely and utterly ridiculous; such a 'movement' could ONLY be fake. I mention this because of Vestey/Brown's involvement with Rising Tide.

Anyway, nice to meet you (even if on a right-wing website like Wikipedia!), and solstitial best wishes!82.153.29.63 (talk) 19:42, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Cheers. I'd say the building's proboblaly owned by Vestey. Rising Tide, just like other LARC Usergroups eg Wombles, Indymedia etc aren't grassroots or mass movements at all... more like Bakuninists .. But I have heard/read nothing i would take seriously about State involvement. Thanks also for the links: The Mundi Club site which has the Goldsmiths article has right-wing views on it too...? They seem to be writing alot about Israel but don't have any grassroots connections there? Paki.tv (talk) 14:09, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Rather than under any ism, I'd file Rising Tide as a deliberate corporate/State creation, cf. the 'colour revolution' 'movements' in east-central Europe, Georgia, etc., albeit longer-lasting. Nobody who is serious enough to 'organise' (or do anything else that requires proper effort) gives a toss about 'climate change'. It is a totally manufactured 'issue'. The climate is changing (in England, some trees that blossomed in March in living memory are now blossoming in December), but it has always changed and it always will change. To say climate change should or can be stopped is loony. This is just an up-to-date form of the idea that 'we're all in the same boat'; that major cultural changes themed around permanent 'security' mobilisation are required (thus spake Ephraim Halevy on 7/7); and the proletarians are dirty and should tighten their belts and stop their dirty habits - like surviving maybe? The whole presentation of Rising Tide strikes me as utterly fake. Fake in the way that, say, the Zionist 'left' is fake in Israel (and elsewhere), because a person cannot seriously be 'left-wing' or 'socialist' and in favour of apartheid. Serious Bakuninists would be just as anti-revolutionary but at least they would be genuine.

RT has Vestey involvement. Not sure whether he or linked interests fund them, but wouldn't be surprising.

Indymedia is also a completely fake creation, in my opinion.

I give all these things and scenes a very wide berth indeed.

I only discovered the Mundi Club site recently. Haven't seen anything there that is right wing. I'm not saying it doesn't exist, but can you point to something in particular? Thought they were excellent on the history of greenism. I think they are 'political vegans'. It may be the work of one especially energetic person?

Re. the Mundi stuff on Zionism, well there are things that need to be said about the developments that have led to 'Sarko the sayan' in France (imagine if his CV included a stint for the Russian SVR or MI6 instead of Mossad), the rise of the (almost all Jewish) 'oligarchs' in Russia, the role of JINSA in the propaganda for US foreign policy under Bush, etc., etc. Obama's chief of staff is Emanuel Rahm, the so-called "ex"-Israeli who was so serious about giving up his Israeli passport that he went back to Israel to work with the military (supposedly in a civilian role and not as part of his national service, but who are they trying to kid?). Meanwhile in the UK the head of the Foreign Office's legal department, Daniel Bethlehem, previously did pretty much exactly the same job for Israel, being their chief adviser on international law. (He was the dude who advised them about dealing with the United Nations enquiry with regard to concerns over the Jenin massacre which took place in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 - advice which led them to tell the UN to f*ck off). Not for nothing did Robin Cook (later to found dead up a mountain) go on about UN Security Council Resolution 242 in his resignation speech. Over the past 20 years, the vast majority of uses of the veto on the UN Security Council have been by the US to defend Israel against censure. It is impossible not to conclude that Zionism is a very significant fact in geopolitics - even if one is unaware that the Israeli armed forces are the second or third most powerful military force in the world, according to one of their own main military strategic ideologues.

Sure, when coming across the Mundi Club for the first time, one has to bear in mind the possibility that they are some kind of Nazis or anti-Semites, but they don't seem to be so at all! E.g. when they talk about Israel and the UK Labour Party (and there's a lot to say, e.g. Blair's private money being run by leading Zionist Martin Paisner; and the role of Lord Levy, and so on), they are quite sedate and mention that various operators in the party are more inclined to be pro-Palestinian (whatever that may mean). I found reading the Mundi stuff like a breath of fresh air in fact! Power to their elbows!82.153.29.63 (talk) 19:46, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

The Mundi articles (eg 2006 article about "America"'s "Jewish masters" ) - are anti-Jewish, rather than anti-Israeli or anti-Zionist - and therefore feed into old racist conspiracy theories. In fact on another page - http://www.geocities.com/carbonomics/MCtfirm/10tf24/10tf24v.html - these conspiracies are even written out, eg the totally ridiculous claim that Communism and the Labour movement is a product of Judaism (do a search for 'communism' on the page - i'm not gonna quote such crap here but it reads like nazi propoganda to me ... some of the research is interesting though but i would be very wary when approaching them ... now LARC and the user groups of LARC are Anarcho-Racists even though they won't admit it too - but their racism is even more sophisticated . they occupy the same territory as National Anarchists but from a different perspective. See Euromayday or Precarity to see where they are coming from... As for darlings of the establishment... I reckon Plane Stupid are looking alot prettier... Paki.tv (talk) 10:10, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Notice of sanctions

In relation to the above mentioned article, I have to warn you that any further attempts by you to insert unsourced defamatory comments about the above mentioned London centre will result in a block from editing related articles, as stated at this arbitration decision. Please ensure that all of your additions are sourced in accordance with WP:V and WP:RS, and that they are not unduly biased one way or the other. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

January 2009

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for addition of unsourced vehemently negative comments on London Action Resource Centre. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 2

Provisionally scheduled for February 28. Comments welcome, & seeing you there even better! Dsp13 (talk) 18:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Check this

psychicProletArianKollecTiVe

i <3 PAKI.TV

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Art!

Harrypotter (talk) 20:07, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

• Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia Art Harrypotter (talk) 21:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

English Travellers

As you created the page English Travellers I think you should know I have suggested that it be deleted. --PBS (talk) 12:18, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alinjaq

A tag has been placed on Alinjaq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MrStalker ^(talk) 22:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alain Jouffroy

A tag has been placed on Alain Jouffroy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Falcon8765 (talk) 18:59, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Heath Bunting

The article Heath Bunting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. No reliable secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bladeofgrass (talk) 00:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Cambridge November meetup

Set for Saturday 14 November, 3 pm, CB2 cybercafé on Norfolk Street. Please come along if you can: Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 5. Charles Matthews (talk) 15:49, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Paki.tv! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 952 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Alain Jouffroy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

National-Anarchism

On the Talk:National-Anarchism page, I've explained my rationale for deleting the See also section you added and are trying to restore. As for your desire that national-anarchism be labeled a “far-right” syncretic political current, I think it is redundant in light of the definition of syncretic politics as well as the third paragraph of the lead section of the National-Anarchism article, which provides a strong criticism of this ideology as being crypto-fascist. --Loremaster (talk) 02:43, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

If you are going to restore content, please do so in a way that doesn't undo previous good edits unrelated to your content. --Loremaster (talk) 20:05, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

Is Ghostinthewikia sock puppet?Harrypotter (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-03-26/National-Anarchism

I've familiarized myself somewhat with the issues but I'm still not sure I have time to mediate this dispute. I have requested the Mediation Cabal assist. Please see the above linked page. –xeno^talk 01:23, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on National-Anarchism. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Though you did not technically violate 3RR since you only made three reverts, I expect you to engage in good-faith dispute resolution rather than simply reverting others to your preferred version. –xeno^talk 21:27, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

• I notice you're restored the term "radical right" into the lead when it is not supported by the body. In fact, the term "radical right" does not appear at all in the article. Please review Wikipedia:Lead section#Relative emphasis. Failure to adhere to the guidance provided there and continuing to engage in a slow-moving edit war to insert this contrary to the guideline may be considered a form of disruptive editing. –xeno^talk 14:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
  • Continuing to add "radical right" in the lead sentence [1] without addressing the concerns raised over relative emphasis may be considered edit warring/disruptive editing and may lead to a block for the same. –xeno^talk 19:34, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
    • And again. Please respond to my query which I've now cross-posted to the mediation page.. –xeno^talk 20:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

[2] ? Are you abandoning good-faith discussion? Please review and reply to Talk:National-Anarchism#arbitrary break - 12 april compromise suggestion –xeno^talk 14:48, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Meetup in Cambridge, 27 March

See Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 6 - much as before. We'd be glad to see you. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. "Liarmaster" and similar analogs are entirely unacceptable names to call another editor, especially in a mediation proceeding. –xeno^talk 19:41, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Note

There is a thread here that may be of interest to you. Thanks, –xeno^talk 13:16, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Mediation

As you may be aware, I volunteered to mediate Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2010-03-26/National-Anarchism. However, we haven't heard from you. Mediation is a non-binding way of figuring out if all of the parties can reach an agreement that makes everyone better off. Participation is voluntary, and does not require you to do anything, nor does it bind you to any agreement. If you don't like how mediation proceeds, you can quit at any time without any repircussions at all. Would you be interested in participating? Hipocrite (talk) 14:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)

Cambridge meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Cambridge 7 taking place on 29 May. Hope to see you there. Charles Matthews (talk) 08:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Next meetup on 28 November. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Paki.tv. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 01:14, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

Where?

A place image without location details is useless. Please tell us where the two images on your user page were taken. I think the first is Castlerigg Circle near Keswick - put tell us. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:53, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Ha ha!! You are correct - Castlerigg - the other is caer taliesin aka Bedd Taliesin PAKI.TV (talk) 22:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kamiriithu Community Education and Cultural Centre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autochthonous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Unitary urbanism

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Unitary urbanism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.jahsonic.com/ConstantNieuwenhuys.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GeorgeLouis (talk) 02:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

OER

Hi, see Open Educational Resource! Leutha (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Next Cambridge meetup

It's on August 15: page here. Hope to see you. Charles Matthews (talk) 19:44, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism of LARC page

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

The notice regards this edit Mujinga (talk) 18:29, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Mujinga (talk) 18:58, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Next Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at London Action Resource Centre, you may be blocked from editing.

Next Warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at London Action Resource Centre, you may be blocked from editing. Mujinga (talk) 00:24, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kate and joes day 003.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kate and joes day 003.jpg, which you've attributed to evoL Psychogeographyx for the Antisystemic Library, http://antisystemic.org/jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Paki.tv. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Julia Callan-Thompson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Julia Callan-Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Callan-Thompson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Keri (talk) 14:32, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Paki.tv. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:LARC-Antisystemic-Library.jpeg

The file File:LARC-Antisystemic-Library.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Deaths in Police custody/ Killings by law enforcement

Hi Paki.tv, I saw your message on my talk page. Is the Lists of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States the "killings on law enforcement page" you are referring? If so, I don't think that this page should be merged with Death in custody, as the two pages have a very different scope, format, and scale. Not all deaths occurring in police custody can be classified as killings by law enforcement, and not all persons killed by law enforcement are in custody when they are killed. They may be pedestrians struck by a police vehicle during a chase, for example. Also, there are dozens of pages connected to the Lists of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States page, and they are all list-class pages with hundreds of killings organized chronologically in tables. I think that the Death in custody page is a good place for an overview of police killings/deaths in custody from a global perspective, providing links to pages that are geographically specific. What are you hoping to see happen with the page?

I added a "see also" link to the Lists of killings by law enforcement officers in the United States page in the United States section of Death in Custody, but then I saw that there was already a link in the main See Also section. If you'd rather not have it linked in both places, feel free to undo my edit.

Best, Michellecornelison (talk) 05:02, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Voice Refugee Forum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voice Refugee Forum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voice Refugee Forum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 13:14, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

References

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Mujinga (talk) 14:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello Paki.tv. You've been warned per the outcome of the edit warring complaint about the London Action Resource Centre. You may be blocked if you revert this article again without getting a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. Evidently some disputes about this article have been running for more than ten years. The steps of WP:Dispute resolution are open to you. EdJohnston (talk) 21:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at London Action Resource Centre. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have continued to revert at London Action Resource Centre after being warned per a report at WP:AN3. See above. EdJohnston (talk) 19:29, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

User:Paki.tv, this is your last chance. If you revert again at London Action Resource Centre you may be indefinitely blocked. The only way you will be able to restore the disputed paragraphs is if you can get a prior consensus in your favor on the article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Mujinga (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (London Action Resource Centre) for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  GeneralNotability (talk) 17:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Cybertease moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cybertease, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 02:32, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Cybertease

Hello, Paki.tv. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cybertease, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:02, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Cybertease

Hello, Paki.tv. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cybertease".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 16:18, 11 December 2023 (UTC)