User talk:Param Mudgal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Navy binoculars.jpg Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back.




Hello and Welcome to my talk page.Please remember to sign your posts after every query!!

Question[edit]

Ref: Created Journal page. Additional references and more content provided, please have a look at the draft journal page. Thanks.User:Rogen123

@Rogen123:Please provide a link to that Journal Page and please remember to sign your comment.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 10:31, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

@Param Mudgal:Param, thank you for your kind and prompt reply. The link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aging_and_Disease_%28Journal%29. I have added references and I hope it is sufficient for your approvalUser :User:Rogen123

@Rogen123: I am extremely sorry for the late reply.I was not present for wikipedia as i went for a vacation.Your draft has not yet been accepted as it needs to be expanded more and more Reliable , Independent sources needs to be added in the article.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 07:46, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

@Param Mudgal:Dear Param, thank you for your kind reply. Hope you had a good vacation. The article is expanded further and added notability by providing citation history in other professional journals as provided by Google Scholar Citation. The link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Aging_and_Disease_%28Journal%29. I hope it is sufficient for your approvalUser :User:Rogen123

22:05:31, 30 January 2015 review of submission by Perrydigm[edit]


I think I may have added enough references. Some of them are admittedly from the entity's own website, but I hope enough of them are from other sources to justify acceptance as a good starting Page... Perrydigm (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Perrydigm (talk) 22:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

@Perrydigm: Hi i am sorry for replying too late.I wasn't available for wikipedia then.I will look into your draft as soon as possible.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 12:04, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

08:53:36, 5 February 2015 review of submission by Guy redmill[edit]


Hello Param. Are there particular references that do not meet the Wikipedia acceptance criteria? Which? How would you improve the article? Guy redmill (talk) 08:53, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

@Guy redmill: Hi, you have to add more Independent, Reliable References in the article.For help see WP:Referencing.--Param Mudgal talk? 12:06, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited February 17, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Entente (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

Upen Patel[edit]

Hello Param i don't think i did anything wrong by posting "Not to be confused to Cesc Fabregas" on Upen Patel's page. He really does look like him — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.138.236.228 (talk) 18:00, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

You may be right but this information cant be added to a Wikipedia article as the information is un-encyclopedic.Thanks--Param Mudgal talk? 18:07, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Morrisons Undo[edit]

Hello Param Mudgal. Recently you undid my edit to Morrisons due to it being "non-constructive". With hindsight it may have not actually improved the article but I do not understand why it was marked as Vandalism as the information I put down was 100% correct and not intentionally non-constructive. Did you not know much about Morrisons so you thought it was vandalism or is it some other reason. I understand my edit might not have improved the article but I don't appreciate being labelled as a vandal when I was actually just trying to improve the article and the information was correct. I'm not nearly as expertised as you are but surely it should have been labelled as good-will rather than vandalism. If you did think what I put down was vandalism then maybe it would be good to check what your reviewing before making assumptions as I don't want to have a record of vandalism against me. I look forward to hearing your response.

Yours Faithfully, Lucyfurbear

Lucyfurbear (talk) 21:22, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lucyfurbear:Hi Lucyfurbear, thank you for edits to Wikipedia.There were some problems with your edit to Morrisons.First of all you didn't add any edit summary.This is a major help to the fellow editors in classifying Good Faith and Bad Faith edits.For help see:Help:Edit summary.Secondly, you didnt add any reference.Even if you didnt add an edit summary then also if you had added a reference then i would had something to look at to.For help see WP:References.Thirdly, you added somewhat negative information about morrisons, this forced me to classify your edit as unconstructive.

I am sorry if your edits were unintentional and then also classified as vandalism.I also commit mistakes sometimes.Even administrators can commit mistakes sometimes.And one warning doesnt affect the Track Record of any editor.If multiple warnings are given then it can create problems for editors , it can also lead to Blockage of Account.I hope you have understood now that due to which circumstances i classified your edits as unconstructive.Thank you for asking me clarification about my decision.I will be happy enough to help you again soon.Anyway, Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 10:51, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry Param Mudgal. I realise my mistakes now and have started adding them to Wikipedia edits. I wasn't aware I was being negative but thanks for your help. My recent edits haven't been picked up by STiki yet so hopefully I'm doing something right! Yours Faithfully, Lucyfurbear Lucyfurbear (talk) 12:08, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lucyfurbear:No problems.Please keep up your good work.Wikipedia needs editors like you.--Param Mudgal talk? 12:10, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


Congratulations from STiki![edit]

Barnstar of Reversion Hires.png
The Anti-Vandalism + STiki Barnstar
STiki logo.png

Congratulations, Param Mudgal! You're receiving this barnstar because you recently crossed the 1,000 classification threshold using STiki. We thank you both for your contributions to Wikipedia at-large and your use of the tool. We hope you continue your ascent up the leaderboard and stay in touch at the talk page. Thank you and keep up the good work! West.andrew.g (developer) and Ugog Nizdast (talk) 10:05, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


Thank you very much for this Barnstar.I will continue to work for the betterment of Wikipedia.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 10:54, 21 February 2015 (UTC)


Palaung undo[edit]

I'm afraid that there are no 'Reliable Sources' available to verify my comment. These are ethnic tribal people who do not generally use the internet and little is written about them. I am in almost daily contact with them here in Thailand. I do not speak their language but we do converse in Thai so i can only go by word of mouth. Fabianfred (talk) 20:37, 24 February 2015 (UTC)Fabianfred

@Fabianfred: Hi , I am afraid but Unsourced facts can't be added to Wikipedia.The information should be verifiable, Identified through Reliable, Independent Sources.If you can find the sources then you are welcome to add the information again.Meanwhile, you can help improving the quality of other articles present in Wikipedia.Thanks.

--Param Mudgal talk? 15:55, 25 February 2015 (UTC)


Winged horses[edit]

None of the information on the page "List of winged horses" appears to have a reference, and I would like to know why my contribution, which was a factually correct, notable example, was singled out for deletion over the others.User:107.141.198.1

Hi,whenever you provide useful information in any wikipedia article then please cite reliable sources to support your information and in List Of Winged Horses it was already written that unsourced information must not be added in the article.I did'nt single out your information for deletion ,i just prevented more unsourced information being added into the article.I hope you have received the answer to your question and please sign your comment while adding it on my talk page.Thanks.--Param Mudgal talk? 06:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)