User talk:ParkinsonProject

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Hello, ParkinsonProject, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on this page and someone will drop by to help. You can also contact me if you wish by clicking "talk" to the right of my name. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:55, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jürgen Locadia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Emmen and Willem II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Miiko Albornoz[edit]

Hi! Please read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:Neutral point of view before you make edits such as the one you were making at Miiko Albornoz. A minor news site with extremist views is not a reliable source. Since this is such a sensitive and highly controversial matter I believe it's common sense that we should wait until his name is confirmed by reliable sources such as DN, SDS, Sydsvenskan and so on. Statements such as this needs more than one source, especially if that source is like the one you used. Also when we do have those sources I would refrain from using the exact words that you did; 1. The player is only a suspect, he is not gulity until proven so in court. 2. The crime classification is not "våldtäkt mot barn" but "sexuellt utnyttjande av barn" as is mentioned in several reliable sources. I would also ask of you to please refrain from offensive language when discussing with me. Let's just wait this out until we have more to go on. Thanks! --Reckless182 (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Mound of Glory because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 00:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Some jerk on the Internet. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Glory hole (sexual slang) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 00:41, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Armenians in the Baltic states, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ararat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Your edits to the Pedophilia article[edit]

To put it simply, your edits to that article are messes. This bit that I reverted and this bit that I reverted are both messes. And, despite this revert by you, none of that mess will be in the Pedophilia article. None of it. Sexual attraction to a 15-year-old is not even pedophilia, which you would know if you had actually read and grasped the lead of the article. Oh, and your humor does not belong in that article in the least. Flyer22 (talk) 02:10, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit summary needed[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Frze > talk 07:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Use Preview button[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Pedophilia , it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. --Frze > talk 07:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Reliable sourcing and edit-warring[edit]

Hi there, regarding your recent edits: You need reliable sources to support your assertions in the article. Wikis like Wiktionary are not reliable sources. Please do not repeatedly revert to restore your poorly-sourced or unsourced material. If you keep doing it, it is called edit warring and you may be blocked for it. Zad68 19:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

I wrote a source. How reliable does it have to be? ParkinsonProject (talk) 19:49, 15 January 2014‎ (UTC)
Have you looked at WP:RS? Pedophilia is a well-studied field, you should be looking for up-to-date psychological publications such as review articles in peer-reviewed journals and university-level textbooks. Zad68 19:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Yes, also see Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (WP:MEDRS). And remember to sign your username at the end of the comments you make on Wikipedia talk pages. All you have to do to sign your username is simply type four tildes (~), like this: ~~~~. I signed your username for you above. Flyer22 (talk) 22:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

Hello ParkinsonProject. You may respond to this complaint if you wish: WP:AN3#User:ParkinsonProject reported by Zad68 (Result: ). Simply append your response there and sign it. You do appear to be guilty of edit warring, and sanctions are possible. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:19, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Pedophilia[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Pedophilia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case was at the 3RR noticeboard. Permanent link to the report. EdJohnston (talk) 22:42, 20 January 2014 (UTC)