User talk:Parradudes

Notable Residents of Toongabbie

your friend Tim Girling is a Hero!. Robbie 06:27, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Why did you remove Tim Girling from that list? He lives there, thats is his job, so who says hes not notable? You dont even live there, so how can you comment on that? Parradudes 01:57, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

What makes Tim Girling notable? Notable Residents listed should have a link to references. Otherwise they will be removed. J Bar 03:45, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:TNT(wrestler).jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TNT(wrestler).jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 03:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

AWF

Results of shows is not an appropriate source. You need verifiable news reports to confirm everything that has been marked on the AWF article. I suggest again that you fully review the rules of notability at WP:NOT !! Justa Punk !! 08:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Our discussion should be held on the AWF talk page. Please also note the third opinion that appears on my talk page. !! Justa Punk !! 07:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Reply from The Hybrid

Hello :). Yes, you most certainly did the right thing in contacting me. I'm afraid that this article may not pass our notability standards, but I'm not positive on this. I'll be bringing this up on the project talk page so some more people can assess it. If it does pass, then it will need some more sources, needless to say. Since this appears to be more than a one man job, I would get you some help in sourcing it. In the mean time, make yourself at home. We have soda and fried chicken in the fridge, the bathroom is down the hallway - second door on the left, and feel free to watch whatever you'd like on the TV. Cheers, The Hybrid T/C 02:09, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

It looks like it is notable enough for an article, so hopefully I'll be able to get some people working on the article. BTW, the official site indeed should be linked to. This stuff I've been reading by another user saying you shouldn't use it is a bunch of bullcrap. Cheers, The Hybrid T/C 07:40, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

My friends can handle it. The two that joined in both have several good articles under their belts, and will probably have several featured articles in the near future. The other person has already agreed to give the article a couple of months, so they should be able to pull an acceptable article out of it by then. BTW, just use the official website. If he says no, then come to me with his statement, and I'll give you your reply to him. I'm not going to leave you hanging; feel free to contact me any time. Cheers :) The Hybrid T/C 03:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I've done 2 things. First, I explained the situation at the AfD, and rather than make a bunch of lofty promises I actually told the voters exactly what I was going to do to improve the article, so I'm optimistic. Second, while I'm optimistic, I did plan for the article being deleted. I copied all of the material in the article to User:The Hybrid/AWF, so even if the main article gets deleted you and the rest of us can still work on it, and then put it back into the mainspace. Deletion doesn't mean the end of an article; it just means that you have to work on it somewhere else for a time. Cheers, The Hybrid T/C 05:28, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Yo back!

I'm glad you understand. It's easy to spit the dummy over something you love. It's really important here on Wikipedia to remain neutral and level headed. !! Justa Punk !! 05:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mark Soper (Salvationist)

A tag has been placed on Mark Soper (Salvationist), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per speedy deletion criterion A7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.Dethme0w 01:53, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

TNA PPV's

They aren't dark matches. TNA used to air a free live 30 minute show right before their PPVs, similar to what WWE used to do with HEAT (before they turned that into a internet-only show), they didn't have a name for the previews though. They have since stopped doing this though. TJ Spyke 23:36, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:PARRA.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:PARRA.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jusjih (talk) 04:04, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Parramatta Citadel Band

This speedy deletion request has been withdrawn following the establishment of notability per WP:BAND Guideline #7.

Apologies Parradudes, for forgetting to remove the tags from the article. I'm not normally that lax. :) Thor Malmjursson (talk) 01:51, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Parramatta Citadel Band

A tag has been placed on Parramatta Citadel Band requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mattinbgn\^talk 02:43, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

I disagree with that any form of notability has been established. With all due respect it seems no different to the many other worthy but non-notable church bands and choirs in Australia and around the world. Given that a previous speedy deletion tag has been withdrawn I will withdraw mine but I will list it for discussion at WP:AfD. Regards, Mattinbgn\^talk 02:58, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Parramatta Citadel Band

I have nominated Parramatta Citadel Band, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Parramatta Citadel Band. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mattinbgn\^talk 02:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC) Mattinbgn\^talk 02:59, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:ChosenToBeASoldier.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChosenToBeASoldier.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 08:21, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:SYBlogo.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SYBlogo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk) 08:27, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Pethy2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pethy2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:AET Map.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:AET Map.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY_sock ^(TALK) 05:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:Officer of The Salvation Army has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. HamburgerRadio (talk) 23:35, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give Soldier of The Salvation Army a different title by copying its content and pasting it into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other articles that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. HamburgerRadio (talk) 23:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

File:28042007409.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:28042007409.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:35, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

File:OnFireBigBandWithJamesMorrison.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:OnFireBigBandWithJamesMorrison.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:43, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Soldier's Covenant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Soldier's Covenant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soldier's Covenant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 14:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Salvation Army brass bands in the Australia Southern Territory for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Salvation Army brass bands in the Australia Southern Territory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Salvation Army brass bands in the Australia Southern Territory until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Allied45 (talk) 09:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)