User talk:Pcb21

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Fraser's dolphin in the Cocos Island[edit]

Can you check again the source of the sentence "At that time washed-up specimens were found on Cocos Island in the eastern Pacific, in South Australia and in South Africa." (Article "Fraser's dolphin")? The link of Cocos Island redirects to the Costa Rica Island (which is in fact in the Eastern Pacific) but seems strange that such dolphin lives near the Indian Ocean (S. Australia, S. Africa) and then eastern Pacific. I'll check your answer here. --79.49.58.19 (talk) 17:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quantum mineralogy[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Quantum mineralogy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not sure this exists as a distinct topic

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:04, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Quantum mineralogy for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Quantum mineralogy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quantum mineralogy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. IRWolfie- (talk) 15:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I have added you to Missing Wikipedians[edit]

Just to let you know (I am supposed to - this is what it says). Ottawahitech (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Rights Manager listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rights Manager. Since you had some involvement with the Rights Manager redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). AVRS (talk) 15:29, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Article notability notification[edit]

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Kelly Parsons, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Kelly Parsons" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 22:27, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 00:30, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity[edit]

Information icon Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 06:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Million Award[edit]

Million award logo.svg The Million Award
For your contributions to bring Killer whale (estimated annual readership: 1,523,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing Killer whale to Featured Article status.


If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it!

Though I realize you've been inactive for a while, I still wanted to leave this award as an acknowledgement of the way your work lives on. Cheers and all best, -- Khazar2 (talk) 11:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Looks like I owe you this, too:

Million award logo.svg This user won the Million Award for bringing Blue whale to Featured Article status.

Again, many thanks for these important articles! -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:25, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of QuickBuild for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article QuickBuild is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QuickBuild until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Codename Lisa (talk) 18:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of recent edits[edit]

Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of recent edits, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of recent edits (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:List of Wikipedians by number of recent edits during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Technical 13 (talk) 20:33, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

April 20, 2003 listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect April 20, 2003. Since you had some involvement with the April 20, 2003 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Hoops gza (talk) 20:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)