User talk:Peregrine Fisher

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipe-tan for RPGs
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Contents

Help editing Michael Deibert article[edit]

For some time now, I have been trying to clean up a low-importance article on the American journalist and author Michael Deibert but a user registered as Context23 keeps vandalizing it. Chiefly, Context23 continues to link to what I believe is highly contentious and possibly libelous material in the form of an article attacking Deibert by a Haitian politician named Patrick Elie (one of Deibert’s specialities appears to be Haiti) in a website I have never heard of before. I researched Elie and found that he evidently has a history of making false claims (on his website, Deibert links to articles chronicling how Elie spent time in prison for falsely claiming to be a diplomat and using a false address on a federal firearms transaction in connection to some sort of apparent assassination plot), so I am very worried that this link goes several steps beyond Wiki’s no-libel policy. There is already one article linked to critical of Deibert’s writing (which appear the point of the creation of the Context23 account) and that article falls within Wiki’s standards. However, I find the second article - the one that Context23 continuously links to - and another one linked to by someone named Diana Barahona that accuses Deibert of libel - do not. Thoughts? Thank you for taking time to help with this! Just trying to make Wiki a better community for all concerned! — Preceding unsigned comment added by MultiWorlds (talkcontribs) 11:44, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Re help editing Michael Deibert article[edit]

First of all I have to admit that the frequency of my edits in the past 24 hours has been excessive, I do understand that and will refrain from making such frequent edits in any articles in a given 24 hour period.

In regard to the Michael Deibert [1] article on Wikipedia: Wikipedia user Multiworlds [2] has repeatedly deleted references with links to newspaper articles [3] [4] [5] documenting the massive amount of criticism Deibert's journalism has received, especially where it pertains to his reporting on Haiti.

The differential edits [6]do show my high frequency editing, but also serve to document that both the edition to the article as well as the references used, stay very well within the scope of user guidelines for wikipedia, and that any disputes should have been resolved on the discussion page. That of course includes me, which I must also admit that previously, I had not laid out my reasons for the edits with due diligence as could have been hoped for. I do realize that the need for discussion is implicit, but it should come from all sides involved in the editing process in order to result in Wikipedia articles that are of any value.

The range of Michael Deibert's vociferous critics includes among others Haitian, Canadian and U.S. activists for example a former Haitian government official in several administrations, political activist and writer: Patrick Elie [7], as well a plethora of journalists from the Caribbean nation and abroad such as Justin Podur: [see: A dishonest Case for a Coup [8]: part of a dialogue with the writer Michael Deibert].

Many newspaper articles, blog entries and and other written material [9] attest to the not inconsequential amount of negative attention Deibert has garnered. The criticism, ranging from the very well documented and researched to perhaps more deceptive claims, gives strong evidence that any objective article about Deibert should mention both the quantitative as well as qualitative discussions Michael Deiberts book and articles have engendered. It is not within the scope of the Wikipedia/Deibert article to examine all claims, may they be proven or unproven, in regard to the journalistic merits of Michael Deibert's journalistic skills, instead, in order to have any merit, it is imperative that the article examines both any positive as well as negative connotations being associated with Deibert's media contributions.

The claim that articles that were linked to by me [10] are potentially libelous is especially spurious in light of the fact that Mr. Deibert very frequently uses the accusation of libel in his comments and articles [see for example the numerous comments the writer leaves in public forums.[11]

Deibert's journalism has included allegations of child sacrifice: ["The charges culminate with Deibert’s uncritical reiteration of a gang leader’s claim, from his Florida exile, that a baby missing from a Port-au-Prince hospital had been kidnapped by So Anne and murdered in a vodou ritual to strengthen Aristide." by a well known Haitian activist, Annette Auguste a.k.a. Sò Anne [see: Amnesty International [12]]

Some of the media's claims against Deibert may be libelous, but in much the same fashion as his spurious and undocumented claims of child sacrifice in Haiti, just to stay with one example. No one has ever brought any allegations of this sort before a court in Haiti or abroad and no documents of verifiable testimony exist to make these claims any less absurd as they are even on superficial examination, given the well documented track record of of Annette Auguste as a community activist singer and grass roots activist in both Brooklyn, NY and Haiti. [13]

Furthermore Vodoun, the main religion of Haiti that Deibert implicates as being involved in child sacrifice in the case of Anette Auguste, is not mentioned in academic literature as being involved in human sacrifice which is not prevalent in contemporary Haiti.

Given the facts at hand: that Michael Deibert has made several highly defaming cklaims, to date unverified or backed up with primary research materials, it should not be considered potentially libelous to include articles into the Wikipedia/Deibert article that merely serve to illustrate the contentiousness of his writing. None of the changes to the "Michael Deibert" article as edited by me, contain anything that could be construed as defamatory or libelous.

The article is very one-sided in its current form and mainly reads like a public relations piece about the author. Without any references providing a more balanced viewpoint, the article merely mirrors the authors own web-pages [14] and has no encyclopedic value.


comment added by: User: Context23 (talk) 01:41, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

References[edit]
  1. ^ "Michael Deibert" on Wikipedia
  2. ^ User talk: Multiworlds
  3. ^ Podur, Justin."Kofi Annan's Haiti". New Left Review. January-February 2006 2006. Retrieved 6 July 2011.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. ^ Barahona, Diana. How to Turn a Priest Into a Cannibal CounterPunch. Feb 03/04, 2007. Retrieved Jul 05, 2011.
  5. ^ Elie, Patrick (22 - 28, 2006, Vol. 24, No. 2, mirrored on indybay.org). "Haitian Activist Speaks out Against Deibert's anti-Haiti Propaganda". Haiti Progres. Retrieved 6 July 2011.  Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ Wikipedia:"Michael Deibert" article revisions Revision as of 00:08, 8 July 2011 by Context23 compared to revision as of 01:25, 8 July 2011 by Multiworlds
  7. ^ Elie, Patrick. Taking us to democracy like cattle to a killing house Dec 14, 2005. ZNet. Retrieved Jul 07, 2011
  8. ^ Podur Justin. A Dishonest Case for a Coup. ZNet. February 16, 2006. Retrieved Jul 07, 2011.
  9. ^ Media articles related to writer Michael Deibert trunkly.com. Retrieved July 07, 2011. Very subjective collection of links, but able to serve as demonstration of the amount of articles re Deibert's reporting on Haiti.
  10. ^ Wikipedia user Context123
  11. ^ Deibert, Michael. [1]
  12. ^ Amnesty International Appeal case: AMR 36/003/2006
  13. ^ Interview with noted Haitian writer Edwidge Danticat and Annette “Sò An” Auguste. WBAI Radio NYC. Oct 21, 2006.
  14. ^ michaeldeibert.com

Thank you![edit]

Thank you for your comment, I did find your talk page after User Multiworlds started deleting multiple times on my talk page and also deleted content I had posted in the Michael Deibert article over 16 times without much any discussion. Since I was unable to have a constructive talk with Multiworlds, I thought responding to Multiworlds' comments on your talk page might at least lead to a dialogue. I hope that was o.k.. Context23 (talk) 02:25, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

It's fine. It's just that I don't do much wikipedia anymore. I'm not sure why that other user decided to talk to me. Hopefully someone will deal with it at the noticeboard. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 02:39, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:James Toofer Spurlock from 30 Rock.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:James Toofer Spurlock from 30 Rock.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

File:How to add an image.ogv[edit]

That image has been nominated for deletion. 123.24.96.94 (talk) 12:26, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Willamette River[edit]

Hello. Thanks for your comments at the closed FAC of Willamette River, Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Willamette River/archive1. I wanted to know if you had any more comments about how the article could be improved, as I am preparing for a peer review or a second FAC once the time comes. Any feedback on the talk page is vital to the article's future. Thanks so much. Jsayre64 (talk) 19:32, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

No comments right now, but I'll keep an eye on the situation. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 19:59, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
There's now a second FAC open here. Jsayre64 (talk) 17:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

HELP![edit]

We have an editor named — Legolas [[User talk:Legolas2186|(talk2me)]who is taking ownership of an article and not allowing ANY collaboration. Editor is trolling W.E (film) and is taking ownership of the article. As you can see, I have tried to make helpful edits and instead of taking it to the discussion page, Legolas has first tried to claim "plagiarism" and then "vandalism", threatening to have me blocked when I have been polite and courteous. please help. Thanks(talk) 16:09, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Don't worry, Peregrine. I've taken care of this by asking for a third opinion. Jsayre64 (talk) 17:17, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
OK. Good luck. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Re:Talk page edits[edit]

Dear User:Peregrine Fisher, thanks for your advice. I appreciate it. I'll consider archiving at a later date. With regards, AnupamTalk 01:04, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Dear User:Peregrine Fisher, that might be a hard habit to break! Also, thanks for the compliment. That really means a lot. My concern is that if the article is made a dab, the content will no longer be relevant to the other articles, which often discuss different subject matter, since all of the references I found in the article explicitly use the phrase "militant atheism." In fact, if you look at the article, every single citation has the original quote from the author in it and uses this phrase specifically. Nevertheless, thanks for participating in the discussion there. All the best to you! With regards, AnupamTalk 01:29, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
You shouldn't edit your post. You should say "I meant..." in the future. It's just the wiki way, I guess. God bless. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 02:07, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
God bless you too, AnupamTalk 02:38, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Hey, you ole rascal. Long time, no wiki. I have a new name...used to be Carmarg4. I'm still reading my way thru the presidents. I am currently busy ruining William Howard Taft. Hope you are well.Hoppyh (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Very cool. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 20:15, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Awesome[edit]

Thanks for the karma! Visitor7 (talk) 07:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Clarify comments on User talk:Spidey104[edit]

Hello. Spidey seems to think that in your comments on his talk page meant that he was right and that the pages shouldn't be redirected. I got the impression that you felt the redirects were valid, but you just wanted to make sure I was doing it for the right reason. Can you please clarify your opinion? JDDJS (talk) 00:15, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Neither person is right. The articles probably could be sourced, which means keep, but they probably never will be, which means redirect. It's basically just personal preference. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 00:28, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Thanks. JDDJS (talk) 00:31, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Occupy Portland[edit]

Keep up the great work! Sorry for removing your source--I was essentially starting the article from scratch (since, at the time, there was enough unsourced content) and collecting sources on the talk page (OPB included). Of course you are more than welcome to continue expanding and improving the article. Feel free to strike a source on the article's talk page if you feel as much info as possible has been extracted. --Another Believer (Talk) 04:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

OK! - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:09, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Hey there![edit]

Definitely missed having you around. :) I know Drilnoth has been editing for a while again as well, and he is occupied with other stuff. I've been thinking of "getting the band back together" - see the wikiproject talk page for some interim ideas I had. Lately I've been putting a lot of work into rewriting the Orcus page. BOZ (talk) 00:18, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

wt:n[edit]

Thanks - I didn't get any edit conflict warning so I have no idea what happened there, but I restored your original comment and added mine to it. --MASEM (t) 05:26, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

No worries. It was probably something funky about the cache. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Marvel Animated Universe[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Marvel Animated Universe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --ProfessorKilroy (talk) 08:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested[edit]

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Yoghurt". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by August 5, 2011.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:42, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected[edit]

The request for formal mediation concerning Yoghurt, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, AGK [] 12:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Dispute Resolution[edit]

You may be interested in this. Peter jackson (talk) 11:02, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for your support at my recent successful RFA. Being now the new fellow in the fraternity of administrators, I will do my best to live up to the confidence shown in me by others, will move slowly and carefully when using the mop, will seek input from others before any action of which I might be unsure, and will try not to break anything beyond repair. Best, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:09, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Talk:One Tree Hill (TV series)#Wikipedia:Good article reassessment[edit]

Hello, Peregrine Fisher, would you mind commenting on the above linked discussion when you get a chance...since it has to do with a comment you made at the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and since you have experience with getting articles to GA status? Flyer22 (talk) 21:12, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter[edit]

Rescuesquad - No text.png

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

Volume I, Issue III
February 2012

To contribute to the next newsletter, please visit the Newsletter draft page.
ARS Members automatically receive this newsletter. To opt out, please remove your name from the recipients list.


An opinion, if you might...[edit]

I'd like you to take a look at User:MichaelQSchmidt/Take This Lollipop and tell me if you think it's ready for mainspace. To be Frank, once I began the thing practically wrote itself. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 19:16, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Seems like you already decided. Anyways, nice work. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
Well... I did request input from some others... and used their comments to improve it. Neat film. Creepy. Causes one to think. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:42, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Television episode and season articles badly needed[edit]

Because of the high number of edits that you have made at Wikipedia talk:Television episodes, I would like to call your attention to a list of the most critically acclaimed episodes and season articles that need to be created: Wikipedia:TV-EPISODE#Important_articles_to_be_created.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:16, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

War of Souls[edit]

Because you have recently participated in AFDs regarding Dragonlance, I am alerting you that War of Souls is up for deletion. 99.126.204.164 (talk) 04:15, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Dispute resolution survey[edit]

Peace dove.svg

Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite


Hello Peregrine Fisher. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Wikipedia, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

Please click HERE to participate.
Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.


You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang DR goes to Wikimania! 23:08, 5 April 2012 (UTC)


User:EEMIV[edit]

Special:Contributions/EEMIV. 500 edits

  • Redirects without discussion
  • Actions against consensus of discussion
  • Subversion of AfD process
  • Use of redirects to bypass the AfD process
EEMIV seems to think that mentioning proposals at the Star Trek project page gives rights superseding the AfD process. So I guess that makes the others at that project page complicit in this as well. I have seen this sort of behaviour before, but it has always been isolated incidents. This user does it habitually, and seems to have the backing of other editors as well. I think a message needs to be sent, that nowhere in WP:REDIRECT does it say that redirects are what you do with articles you do not like and cannot be bothered to nominate for deletion, or that you think might have a chance of being improved later (as many and various guidelines and essays indicate that stubs are for that purpose).

After the decision to Keep by closer, User:Ron Ritzman, at:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ambush (Star Wars: The Clone Wars)

Wholesale redirect of a series of Star Wars The Clone Wars episodes to a list of episodes, against consensus, and without further discussion

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hostage_Crisis&diff=362738005&oldid=362702487

Keeps no record of archives on talk page. He has his TALK PAGE locked so only Users can edit it.

Redirects

Plo Koon, redirected to List of Star Wars characters#K

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plo_Koon&diff=488578144&oldid=488576242
Talk page. Proves he is not doing redirects for the purposes of WP:REDIRECT #13 : "Sub-topics or other topics which are described or listed within a wider article. (Such redirects are often targeted to a particular section of the article.)"
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3APlo_Koon&diff=488578097&oldid=477058778

Redirect (two of many, of Star Trek spaceship articles

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Starfleet_ship_registry_and_classes_in_Star_Trek&diff=484220024&oldid=482393620
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=USS_Excelsior&diff=482409508&oldid=478713241
Stubifying, outside of the Star Trek genre

Tropes in Agatha Christie's novels. Made Stub of article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tropes_in_Agatha_Christie%27s_novels&diff=483753776&oldid=478348348

I stopped after less than a week's worth of Edit History. There is no telling how much material this user has removed from mainspace

Copies of this message sent to editors who participated in the Ambush AfD: User:Ron Ritzman, User:DGG, User:Jclemens, User:Peregrine Fisher, User:Torritorri, and added to the Talk page of the Star Trek Project page, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Star Trek
Anarchangel (talk) 00:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Spooky.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Spooky.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:51, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Deceit module cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Deceit module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Dreams module cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Dreams module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Truth module cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Truth module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:05, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of Triumph module cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of Triumph module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:06, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dragons of War module cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dragons of War module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:36, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mists of Krynn module cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mists of Krynn module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:World of Krynn module cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:World of Krynn module cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:10, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Witch wendy comic2.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Witch wendy comic2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Plastic little dvd cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Plastic little dvd cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Rizelmine s01e01.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rizelmine s01e01.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Ultimate X-Men 40 Cover.jpg[edit]

Can you help me? --Ultimate Anna (talk) 18:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Just a heads up: Ultimate Anna is very likely a sock of the indefinitely blocked Shawnee Smith/Hawnee94. They do know how to upload image to Wikipedia, they just don't get the non-free content policies. They have also uploaded the same image to commons to try an circumvent the policies here. Lastly, they started out on the Russian Wikipedia with the same focus and seem to have had similar trouble there

- J Greb (talk) 11:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Peregrine Fisher. You have new messages at David Levy's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

David Levy 04:48, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Headlights (slang)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Headlights (slang) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
Headlights (slang)news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. G. C. Hood (talk) 23:38, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Ramona Quimby merger proposal[edit]

Hello. There's a merger proposal relating to an article or articles you've contributed to, relating to the Ramona Quimby books. You are invited to read about and discuss it here: Talk:Ramona (novel series)#Merger Proposal. Thank you. Tlqk56 (talk) 00:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Yukio (comics).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Yukio (comics).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:06, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Chthon (comics).jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Chthon (comics).jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:40, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Holiday cheer[edit]

Christmas tree.svg Holiday Cheer
Michael Q. Schmidt my talk page is wishing you Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings.

Merry Christmas![edit]

Thanks guys. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 20:56, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Scrapped Princess s01e04.png)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Scrapped Princess s01e04.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:God of Gamblers II DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:32, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Asgardian_appeal[edit]

Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Noticeboard#BASC:_Asgardian_appeal. As you were involved in edit wars with Asgardian you may be interested in commenting. SilkTork ✔Tea time 00:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Delphine Chanéac[edit]

I saw your post in the FP talk page from 2010 and found the image gorgeous. So with some slight adjustments, this was your idea: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Delphine Chanéac. – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 05:53, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Good luck. If it passes, tell me here if you don't mind. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
I will. Off to a rough start (it's black and white). – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 18:06, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
Didn't pass. :( Cheers! – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 07:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Funkytown by Lipps Inc.ogg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Funkytown by Lipps Inc.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre[edit]

Good Article Recruitment - Completion Award.png
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Downtown by Petula Clark.ogg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Downtown by Petula Clark.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 10:26, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Anderson three avong1127.jpg)[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:Anderson three avong1127.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:06, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Absolute employment[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Absolute employment has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dicdef, no sources for 7 years

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 21:36, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Absolute employment for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Absolute employment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Absolute employment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 03:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

An RfC that you may be interested in...[edit]

As one of the previous contributors to {{Infobox film}} or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a RfC started on the talk page as to implementation of previously deprecated parameters. Your comments and thoughts on the matter would be welcomed. Happy editing!

This message was sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of {{U|Technical 13}} (tec) 18:26, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Eureka season 1 episode 12.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Eureka season 1 episode 12.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:03, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ribsy cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ribsy cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:41, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fight Back to School 3 DVD cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fight Back to School 3 DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:What About Brian cast photo with Polly Shannon as Marjorie.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:What About Brian cast photo with Polly Shannon as Marjorie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:27, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

Erdely Discussion[edit]

A discussion in which you may be interested is occurring here. BlueSalix (talk) 03:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Article Split Proposal[edit]

A discussion in which you may be interested is occurring here. BlueSalix (talk) 21:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:A Gunfight film poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:A Gunfight film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:30, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alice In Wonderland 1933 film.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 17:38, 15 June 2015 (UTC)