LHC in popular culture
Hi. I see that last year you moved the content of Large Hadron Collider in popular culture to a section of Large Hadron Collider. The regular editors of that page don't want it there, but much of it (such as the material about Angels and Demons and the Torchwood radio episode Lost Souls) is notable and verifiable. Discussion at Talk:Large Hadron Collider#"In popular culture" AGAIN!!! seems to be heading towards moving the content back to a spin-out article; but before I did so, I wanted to run it by you, since you were the one who moved the content from the spin-out into the main article in the first place. Please join the discussion on the talk page. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 17:31, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Hey Apologies for what you construed as vandalism. I do not recall editing any wikipedia page, my younger brother/father might have done it since they use the same connection as me. Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 18.104.22.168 (talk) 23:57, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Methuselah Foundation
I have nominated Methuselah Foundation, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methuselah Foundation. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ScienceApologist (talk) 21:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
Catholic Church RfC
A tag has been placed on Methuselah Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --TimL (talk) 18:37, 3 July 2011 (UTC)