User talk:PhillyPartTwo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome[edit]

Hello, PhillyPartTwo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

MTV Unplugged[edit]

Hello PhillyPartTwo, I saw your edits at MTV Unplugged, but I could not find any references regarding the Neil Young Freedom tour being an official MTV Unplugged show. Or is it that in that tour he performed some acoustic versions of his songs? Thank you! --Kio 02:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Well, the only reference I have is that I watched the thing myself at the time and I still have it on VHS... that's as good as I can do!
I have no doubts that Neil Young performed in its Freedom tour (and that you saw it)... but, was it really a MTV Unplugged performmance? I believe the Freedom tour began before the MTV unplugged series started... --Kio 01:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Note[edit]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jeff Garlin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EVula // talk // // 14:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Your edit summary usage[edit]

Information icon.svg

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Ohmpandya (Talk) 23:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of CBS Mandate[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is CBS Mandate. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBS Mandate (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Cliff Lee[edit]

Your edits have been reverted. The trade is not official, and it could be called off if the physicals don't go well. Until it is official, Lee is an Indian. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

How many sites that say 'done deal', including the Phillies and Indians sites do you want to see? EVERY trade is not final until physicals. The trade is done. The trade is final. It has passed the Commissioner's office. If someone fails the physical the trade is canceled. It is not dependent on the physical. The trade is complete. If the physical is failed, then the trade is nullified, but the trade did happen. Sorry to burst your bubble. -- Me, now.

If a player fails a physical, it nullifies the trade, meaning the players don't change teams. Therefore, if Carlos Carrasco fails his physical, Cliff Lee remains an Indian; the deal doesn't go through. Therefore we don't change his team until we know the deal is official. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

No point arguing with a stubborn mind. You win. It's never stopped any other player ever on here from being changed upon official word of his trade/signing, but you can feel all kinds of important and keep it Cleveland for 10 more hours. Enjoy. - Me, now.

Toyota recall[edit]

The recall is in progress or planned for several countries, not just the USA. By including that and other information that you have done and the article will be nicer! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

I have already noted the recall in Europe and China on the page. I don't have enough information to expand at this time, but I will keep an eye on it. The acceleration incidents seem to have been confined to the US.

ITN for 2010 Toyota Vehicle Recall[edit]

Current events globe On 30 January 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Toyota Vehicle Recall, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Congrats! 21655 ταλκ/01ҁ 00:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

File:WaitingForArmytoDie.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WaitingForArmytoDie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shubinator (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Warning[edit]

Do not remove FfD entries or tags indicating FfD listings from file pages. Continue to do so and you will be blocked. ÷seresin 04:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:5Portraits3.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:5Portraits3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Blurpeace 05:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

The Mayerson Law Offices, P.C.[edit]

I now see that this is an established office and has a Wikipedia article. If it was up to me I wouldn't use their website as a source; I'd probably find something a bit more neutral. Something a bit more removed from the business of making money off these kinds of incidents and accident articles that you're working on. Catch you around. Dawnseeker2000 16:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

This is not spam nor promotion. This is legitimate legal and information subject matter. I do not represent nor work for any company or firm.

Domonic Brown[edit]

Crossing Broad is in no way a reliable source for the Domonic Brown call-up. You need to wait until it's officially announced by the team, per WP:CRYSTAL. Stop inserting information that's not verifiable by reliable sources. Thanks. — KV5Talk • 18:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Already changed source to USA Today. PhillyPartTwo

That's a community-edited forum, not a reliable source, regardless of its being hosted on USA Today. — KV5Talk • 18:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Sourced MSNBC as well. - PhillyPartTwo

Fine dude, you win. If you really want your 'special' writing in the article instead of mine, so be it. This clearly is quite important for you for some reason. You could had just undid or put back my edits, but it's fine whateverdude.

It doesn't have anything to do with "my writing" or "your writing"; it had to do with sourcing. Once I found a reliable source, I put the information back in the article. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is never about being "right" or "wrong"; it's about being factually accurate and neutral. Thanks. — KV5Talk • 18:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

If that helps you sleep at night. - PhillyPartTwo

File source problem with File:LawBuilding3.jpg[edit]

Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading File:LawBuilding3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation[edit]

Your upload of File:5Portraits3.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Another one of your uploads, File:AnthonyWayne.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

FYI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ZeroesAndOnes The Banner talk 01:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Mayerson Law for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayerson Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayerson Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. OSborn arfcontribs. 04:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of The Meeting House Law Building & Gallery for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Meeting House Law Building & Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Meeting House Law Building & Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 22:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)