|You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.|
|"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.|
|Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.|
Re: Mova Nanova recreated
Re your message: Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. I have been on a rather long break. I checked the deleted version with the recreated version and the recreated the article is much better. The article now has references, unlike the previous version. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)
Nomination of Padraic Kenney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Padraic Kenney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padraic Kenney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..
JuliaSchwenk (talk) 13:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)be quiet! article
Dear Piotrus, I added much more links from independent and reliable sources. On the talk page you can find the argumentation about why this article meets the criteria. I hope you can cancel the proposition for delition of the article. Let me know if there is anything I can do or improve. Thanks a lot!
Thanks for The Signpost
Wladyslaw IV. Wasa
I spent my morning, an hour of which I usually spend on browsing through the Wiki main pages of "my" languages, dabbling in editing the W article of which I found you to be the main contributor (through its history, though I failed to find it in your publications listings - which is not a criticism of your listings, but rather evidence of the tomatoes sometimes accumulating on my eyes).
On the article talk page, I left some comments, which for your convenience I also transferred here:
Contentiously vs contentedly
Though in the next paragraph we learn that the guy had a short temper, I somehow think that the author was trying here to convey that W died contentedly rather than contentiously, seeing that he had time to make his last will and receive sacraments... Anybody out there who could and would care to contribute the historical facts?
Meanwhile my apologies to the authors and the public for any deteriorations I might have made in my inept efforts at improvement dabbling in a foreign language. I hope that soon a competent native speaker will come out to give this really good article the last linguistic polish... Terminally uncool (talk) 10:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scale (social sciences), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Typology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
thanks for reviewing our AfC research for the Signpost!
Thanks for the thoughtful review!
I've noticed your contributions across the project and specifically at AfD; and was wondering whether you'd wish to apply for an RfA. I'd be more than pleased to nominate you, in case you do consider it. Best regards. Wifione Message 16:52, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Global Citizenship Education
DYK nomination of Political Parties (book)
Hello! Your submission of Political Parties (book) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 August 2014
The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:
We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Matty.007 (submissions), ThaddeusB (submissions), WikiRedactor (submissions), Figureskatingfan (submissions), Yellow Evan (submissions), Prism (submissions) and Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.
There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.
There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
DYK for Lem (satellite)
Witaj, napiszę po polsku, choć jeśli to niezbędne, oczywiście mogę też po angielsku. Zrozumiałem, że uznałeś mój art. Lem (satellite): za interesujący i warty nominowania do rubryki DYK. To niezmiernie motywujące. Proszę Cię o dalsze wskazówki dotyczące umieszczenia hasła w rubryce DYK. Z pozdrowieniami, LukaszKatlewa (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Dzięki za zachętę i pomoc. Może jednak nie będzie to dobrze, jeśli to ja zgłoszę, może lepiej by zgłosił to ktoś inny (Ty?). Mogę podrzucić propozycje pytań:
… what was the name of the ’’’first Polish scientific satellite’’’ ‘’(pictured)’’?
You have mail!