User talk:Piotrus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
There is no Cabal

Qxz-ad39.png Qxz-ad20.gif

WikipediaSignpostIcon.svg You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.


"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.
Archive

Talk archives: Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2013), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2013) add new

Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :)
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship[edit]

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 20:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC).—cyberbot I NotifyOnline


Re: Aleksander Żywiecki - I left my answer here https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Poczekalnia/biografie/2014:08:05:Aleksander_%C5%BBywiecki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marta1anna (talkcontribs) 14:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC) and edited the article adding quotations from articles, reviews plus full list of exhibitions Marta1anna (talk) 08:03, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Re: Mova Nanova recreated[edit]

Re your message: Sorry about the delay in getting back to you. I have been on a rather long break. I checked the deleted version with the recreated version and the recreated the article is much better. The article now has references, unlike the previous version. -- Gogo Dodo (talk)

Nomination of Padraic Kenney for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Padraic Kenney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padraic Kenney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article..

JuliaSchwenk (talk) 13:11, 7 August 2014 (UTC)be quiet! article[edit]

Dear Piotrus, I added much more links from independent and reliable sources. On the talk page you can find the argumentation about why this article meets the criteria. I hope you can cancel the proposition for delition of the article. Let me know if there is anything I can do or improve. Thanks a lot!

Thanks for The Signpost[edit]

I read your contribution "Wikipedia from the perspective of PR and marketing" in The Signpost. It got me motivated to do something. Thanks. — Brianhe (talk) 22:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wladyslaw IV. Wasa[edit]

Hello Piotrus,

I spent my morning, an hour of which I usually spend on browsing through the Wiki main pages of "my" languages, dabbling in editing the W article of which I found you to be the main contributor (through its history, though I failed to find it in your publications listings - which is not a criticism of your listings, but rather evidence of the tomatoes sometimes accumulating on my eyes).

On the article talk page, I left some comments, which for your convenience I also transferred here:

Contentiously vs contentedly

Though in the next paragraph we learn that the guy had a short temper, I somehow think that the author was trying here to convey that W died contentedly rather than contentiously, seeing that he had time to make his last will and receive sacraments... Anybody out there who could and would care to contribute the historical facts?

Meanwhile my apologies to the authors and the public for any deteriorations I might have made in my inept efforts at improvement dabbling in a foreign language. I hope that soon a competent native speaker will come out to give this really good article the last linguistic polish... Terminally uncool (talk) 10:19, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


Meanwhile my respects. It is a pleasure and honour to meet you. Browsing through your user pages both thrilled and terrified me... --Terminally uncool (talk) 13:32, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Your solution/clarification seems fine to me! --Terminally uncool (talk) 10:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scale (social sciences), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Typology. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

thanks for reviewing our AfC research for the Signpost![edit]

Hey Pitor,

Thanks for the thoughtful review!

Since you asked... (and here in public for transparency b/c I'm one of the authors of this paper), a few thoughts/comments:

  • The G13 backlog happened because G13 is new. The best person to ask about that is probably User:Anne_Delong. (AfC backlog is a different thing.)
  • "[despite clearly being notable] an article about an Emmy-award winning TV show from the 1980's was twice declined at AfC, before finally being published 15 months after the draft was started". At the time it was first submitted this didn't say it won the Emmy. The show is this one: Free_to_Be..._A_Family. There are some slides on that at pages 111-115 of our OpenSym slides. We didn't state that this was "clearly notable": my view is rather that its notability *becomes* clear once you know enough about it. It was a research project to find this info since this was pre-Web; if that had been asserted, it would have passed AfC!
  • Newbies do complain about rejections, too.
  • Newcomers sometimes do "drive by contribution"; they don't always come back.

Hope that helps, and feel free to ignore my kibbitzing Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 13:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

RfA...[edit]

I've noticed your contributions across the project and specifically at AfD; and was wondering whether you'd wish to apply for an RfA. I'd be more than pleased to nominate you, in case you do consider it. Best regards. Wifione Message 16:52, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Global Citizenship Education[edit]

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC) 00:03, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Political Parties (book)[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Political Parties (book) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Wasted Time R (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2014[edit]

WikiCup 2014 August newsletter[edit]

The final of the 2014 WikiCup begins in a few short minutes! Our eight finalists are listed below, along with their placement in Round 4:

  1. Smithsonian Institution Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer, finished top of Pool A and was the round's highest scorer. Godot is a featured picture specialist, claiming large numbers of points due to high-quality scans of historical documents, especially banknotes.
  2. Scotland Casliber (submissions) is a WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist every year since 2010. In the semi-final, he was Pool B's highest scorer. Cas's points primarily come from articles on the natural sciences.
  3. Nepal Czar (submissions) was Pool A's runner-up. Czar's points come mostly from content related to independent video games, including both articles and topics.
  4. Oh, better far to live and die / Under the brave black flag I fly... Adam Cuerden (submissions) was Pool B's runner-up. Another featured picture specialist, many of Adam's points come from the restoration of historical media. He has been a WikiCup finalist twice before.
  5. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) won the WikiCup in 2012 and 2013, and enters this final as the first wildcard. She focuses on biology-related articles, and has worked on several high-importance articles.
  6. Florida 12george1 (submissions) is the second wildcard. George's points come primarily from meteorology-related articles. This year and last year, George was the first person in the competition to score.
  7. Colorado Sturmvogel 66 (submissions), the third wildcard, was the 2010 champion and a finalist last year. His writes mostly on military history, especially naval history.
  8. Canada Bloom6132 (submissions), the fourth and final wildcard, has participated in previous WikiCups, but not reached any finals. Bloom's points are mostly thanks to did you knows, featured lists and good articles related to sport and national symbols.

We say goodbye to this year's semi-finalists. Herm Matty.007 (submissions), Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions), United States WikiRedactor (submissions), Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions), Greece Yellow Evan (submissions), Portugal Prism (submissions) and Bartošovice v Orlických horách Cloudz679 (submissions) have all performed well to reach this stage of the competition, and we hope they will all be joining us again next year.

There are two upcoming competitions unrelated to the WikiCup which may be of interest to those who receive this newsletter. The Stub Contest will run through September, and revolves around expanding stub articles, especially high-importance or old stubs. In addition, a proposal has been made for a new competition, the GA Cup, which the organisers plan to run next year. This competition is based on the WikiCup and aims to reduce the good article review backlog.

There is now a thread for brainstorming on how next year's WikiCup competition should work. Please come along and share your thoughts- What works? What doesn't work? What needs changing? Signups for next year's competition will be open soon; we will be in touch. If, at this stage of the competition, you are keen to help the with the WikiCup, please do what you can to participate in review processes. Our finalists will find things much easier if the backlogs at good article candidates, featured article candidates, featured picture candidates and the rest are kept at a minimum. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk · contribs) The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 22:09, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Lem (satellite)[edit]

Witaj, napiszę po polsku, choć jeśli to niezbędne, oczywiście mogę też po angielsku. Zrozumiałem, że uznałeś mój art. Lem (satellite): za interesujący i warty nominowania do rubryki DYK. To niezmiernie motywujące. Proszę Cię o dalsze wskazówki dotyczące umieszczenia hasła w rubryce DYK. Z pozdrowieniami, LukaszKatlewa (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Dzięki za zachętę i pomoc. Może jednak nie będzie to dobrze, jeśli to ja zgłoszę, może lepiej by zgłosił to ktoś inny (Ty?). Mogę podrzucić propozycje pytań:

hook = … that ’’’Lem’’’ started his stellar observations before ’’’Heweliusz’’’ ‘’(pictured)’’?

ALT1 =

… that ’’’Lem’’’ was launched before ’’’Heweliusz’’’ ‘’(pictured)’’?

ALT2 =

… what is the difference between ’’’Lem’’’ and ’’’Heweliusz’’’ ‘’(pictured)’’?

ALT3 =

… what was the name of the ’’’first Polish scientific satellite’’’ ‘’(pictured)’’?

ALT4 = ... what/why ’’’Lem’’’ can see in blue and ’’’Heweliusz’’’ can see in red ‘’(pictured)’’?

LukaszKatlewa (talk) 13:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

You have mail![edit]

Mail-message-new.svg
Hello, Piotrus. Please check your email – you've got mail!
Message added 10:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Revicomplaint? 10:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)