User talk:Piotrus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
There is no Cabal

Qxz-ad39.png Qxz-ad20.gif

WikipediaSignpostIcon.svg You have the right to stay informed. Exercise it by reading the Wikipedia Signpost today.
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps (not signed with ~~~~) are archived manually when I get around to it.

"You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Oh, Template:Talkback is ok. Thank you.
Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance.

Talk archives: Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011), Archive 40 (created 12 February, 2012), Archive 41 (created 23 April, 2012), Archive 42 (created 7 July, 2012), Archive 43 (created 27 September, 2012), Archive 44 (created 8 February, 2013), Archive 45 (created 21 April, 2013), Archive 46 (created 13 June, 2013), Archive 47 (created 26 September, 2013), Archive 48 (created 27 December, 2013), Archive 49 (created 20 March, 2014), Archive 50 (created 8 June, 2014), Archive 51 (created 2 September, 2014), Archive 52 (created 24 November, 2014) add new archive

Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :)
I agree to the edit counter opt-in terms.

Current RfAdminship[edit]

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
EuroCarGT 60 15 4 80 01:47, 3 March 2015 3 days, 8 hours no report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

Last updated by cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online at 16:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


Hey Piotrus - I'm sorry but I have to disagree with your request to remove Azimo. This is one of the most referenced technology firms in the world after Facebook attempted to buy it in 2014. The founder is nominated for UK entrepreneur of the year in 2 weeks time. The CNN video was entirely about Azimo. There are currently around 3,000 referenced media articles on Azimo - I'll add more if that helps the cause. All of the businesses competitors, even those smaller with less coverage are included on Wikipedia so I'd ask that you strongly reconsider. I'll add new media links now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesocialpro (talkcontribs) 19:22, November 3, 2014

Answer in Immigration to Costa Rica[edit]

Thanks for your suggestions, and your interest in my article, sorry you do not answer in time, but I blocked two days for telling the truth in the face Taichi, although some took it as an insult, and then I forgot my password for that account, certainly I want you check other articles that I've created such as Immigration to Guatemala or Immigration to Nicaragua, thanks and greetings from Spain (Manuel) 23/12 18:56 (UTC)

Merry Christmas![edit]

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. If you don't like Christmas or just don't celebrate it in any of its forms, then please accept a generic "Happy Holidays". If you celebrate no holidays at this time of year, then hopefully you will be satisfied with an even more generic "Season's Greetings".  :)

Prod of Chin Chih Yang[edit]

I have contested this prod; I think the existing sources provide acceptable coverage to establish threshold notability, and at least merit the wider discussion at AfD, if you are so minded. Notifying you as you requested to be pinged. Regards, Espresso Addict (talk) 19:33, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Frampol bombing.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Frampol bombing.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for creating the much needed and long overdue article about torture of Polish children by German teachers in Wrzesnia. I myself planned it to do it, but like many other articles it didn't get my time. I will certainly try to improve it by adding information. --MyMoloboaccount (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Belatedly contested PROD[edit]

Hi. Piotr. Back in October of last year, you put a PROD on EWise, and I deleted the article. An editor by the name of SalineBrain has now posted a message to my talk page, expressing disagreement with the deletion, so I have restored the article. You may like to take it to Articles for deletion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:34, 23 February 2015 (UT

Września children strike[edit]

Symbol question.svg Hello! Your submission of Września children strike at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mchuedem (talk) 17:22, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Włodzimierz Kiniorski[edit]

Hello Piotrus. I recently declined the speedy deletion request on Włodzimierz Kiniorski, but I was frankly on the fence. The article doesn't assert notability, but I saw a few possible sources in Polish (thoough my translator wasn't working well). The subject also has articles on the Polish and Dutch Wikipedias. So, I'm debating whether to tag or PROD (or something else); care to offer an opinion, as one of our Polish experts?--Mojo Hand (talk) 17:58, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for taking a look and for the suggestion.--Mojo Hand (talk) 14:57, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Presentation proposal for Wikimania 2015[edit]

Wikimania 2015 Mexico City identity.jpg How to pick up more women...
Hi Piotrus! Victuallers and I have developed a proposal for a talk to be presented at Wikimania 2015. It's titled, How to pick up more women... -- as in more women editors and more women's biographies. Examples include the Edit-a-thon blitz during WikiWomen's History Month and the "new articles" work underway by WikiProject Women Writers. The Wikimania talk proposal review process has begun and there's no guarantee that our proposal will be accepted. That's where you come in. Please review it and, if you wish, give us feedback on the submission's talkpage or my talkpage (vs. your talkpage). Ultimately, we hope you add your name to the signup at the bottom of the proposal which signifies you'd be interested in the talk if you were attending it (it does not commit you to attending Wikimania). Thank you! Rosiestep (talk) 04:07, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

A Quiet Day in Spring[edit]

Hello Sir. I have a question about the 'dubious notability' of this album article that you have proposed for deletion. When I created this I also created six other Larry Coryell album articles to add to the twelve albums already on Wikipedia. What is it about this particular album that you saw as demonstrating lack of notability when all of the others are OK? I added references in exactly the same fashion as on the other six album articles. This album has been selling consistently for 30 years, it has a 3.5 star rating and an enthusiastic review on Allmusic; Google it and it is all over Amazon and Ebay. Larry Coryell and the Polish violinist Michael Urbaniak are famous jazz musicians and it is as notable as any of his other 50+ albums. I am not sure how to further prove it's notability and would appreciate advice. Thanks. Nostalgic34 (talk) 18:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Think Again Conclave[edit]

The page was meant to be used as an educating tool for the people who want to attend the conclave or know about it's past history. I have no vested interest in the event and am merely trying to help others like me who were confused whether to attend the event or not. With regards to the correctness and the reliability of the sources, I am of the opinion that they are enough evidence to the existence of the Conclave. Also, the correctness of the data can also be verified at, which is the official website of the event. I think you were completely unjustified and hasty in your assessment calling the article a spammy piece of 'add'. Also, the essence of an encyclopedia is to make people aware about stuff which I think is exactly what I catered to. I have not attempted to misuse Wikipedia in any way. Also, if you say that organizations that organize lectures should not be allowed to have WIkipedia entries, I would say that would be unjust. By that logic, there should be no page of the TED Conferences, the Royal Society Lectures and others of the like. Please do consider my arguments seriously.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dhairikfuletra (talkcontribs) 19:43, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]

The Signpost: 25 February 2015[edit]