User talk:Piotrus
| "You have new messages" was designed for a purpose: letting people know you have replied to them. I do not watch your talk page and I will likely IGNORE your reply if it is not copied to my page, as I will not be aware that you replied! Thank you. |
|---|
| Please add new comments in new sections if you are addressing a new issue. Please sign it by typing four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Thanks in advance. |
|---|
Talk archives: Archive 1 (created Jan 17, 2005), Archive 2 (created Feb 21, 2005), Archive 3 (created May 19, 2005), Archive 4 (created July 14, 2005), Archive 5 (created September 27, 2005), Archive 6 (created November 23, 2005), Archive 7 (created January 7, 2006), Archive 8 (created 19 March, 2006), Archive 9 (created 6 May, 2006), Archive 10 (created 17 June, 2006), Archive 11 (created 28 July, 2006), Archive 12 (created 25 September, 2006), Archive 13 (created 28 October, 2006), Archive 14 (created 27 December, 2006), Archive 15 (created 4 February, 2007), Archive 16 created 20 March, 2007), Archive 17 (created 17 May, 2007), Archive 18 (created 30 July, 2007), Archive 19 (created 25 September, 2007), Archive 20 (created 5 November, 2007), Archive 21 (created 2 January, 2008), Archive 22 (created 19 February, 2008), Archive 23 (created 8 April, 2008), Archive 24 (created 15 May, 2008), Archive 25 (created 8 July, 2008), Archive 26 (created 5 October, 2008), Archive 27 (created 4 January, 2009), Archive 28 (created 19 March, 2009), Archive 29 (created 12 May, 2009), Archive 30 (created 20 July, 2009), Archive 31 (created 11 October, 2009), Archive 32 (created 1 December, 2009), Archive 33 (created 25 March, 2010), Archive 34 (created 29 July, 2010), Archive 35 (created 1 November, 2010), Archive 36 (created 24 January, 2011), Archive 37 (created 12 May, 2011), Archive 38 (created 28 September, 2011), Archive 39 (created 16 November, 2011) add new
|
Wikipedia is a kawaii mistress :)
[edit] Current RfAdminship
[edit] The Wagner article is in need of some helpWe're in a bit of a pickle in the Wagner discussion page. The issues concerns Social class (sociology) and the phrase supposedly common Germanic past and has now been dismissed by some editors as inconsequential. At the end of the Wagner discussion page (under Edit War solution topic) there issome suggested courses of action that I was requested to list, from my point of view. Please help. Just take fast look. Thank you In the introduction, removed as non consequential
In the Biography chapter removed as non consequential
User:Major Torp (talk) 15:20, 7 November 2011 (UTC) [edit] Student asking for helpHi, I am a student working on the Thomas Green Clemson Wikipedia page. I had just recently made a rather large edit for the current size of the page and was wondering if you had any feedback for me that would make my page better. My user page is User:Chewey93 so please contact me if you have any tips. Thank you. [edit] Bias real or perceived?Hello, I'm the anonymous editor that recently got involved in a coupe disputes regarding the editing style on a coupe of pages such as Haller's Blue Army and Poland Armed Forces. As a casual user of Wikipedia I was unsettled by editing which I consider as bias towards polish subject matter. When comparing pages on similar topics I noticed that the language used on pages related to a polish topics used much harder (judgmental) terms, and the phraseology used created a subtle, but clear bias towards Poles that presents them in a negative way. One example was the recent Buckshot06 edits on Polish Armed Forces page, when I stumbled on this page there was only one picture in the "History" section, and it showed Polish soldiers in a diminutive way that only invited negative and stereoscopical perceptions. So, I added the current pictures which show the Polish military in a respectable, but neutral way. Now, user Buckshot06 is trying to remove them one at a time, by claiming that they have nothing to do with the text. Another, editing issue that I'm involved in is that of American football coach Jerry Sandusky who was accused of child abuse. Sandusky himself is an American first... of mixed Polish and Irish descent. But, the page only mentioned his Polish roots omitting his Irish ancestry, and when his Irish ancestry was added, administrator Milowent was insistent on only highlighting Sandusky's Polish roots first, as if the man was 100% Polish. Please see the edits below to see how he keeps changing the page structure to highlight this, and in the most recent edit he locked the page despite the fact that no vandalism or edit warring took place. 1st edit: Sandusky was born in Washington, Pennsylvania, the only son of Evelyn Mae (née Lee) and Arthur Sandusky. His paternal grandparents were Polish immigrants and his mother came from a small coal-mining town. 2nd edit (neutral): Sandusky was born in Washington, Pennsylvania, the only son of Evelyn Mae (née Lee) an Irish Catholic homemaker who came from a small Pennsylvania coal-mining town, and Arthur Sandusky who's parents immigrated from Poland. ...and this is what the section was changed to (below). It seems strange how in this case someone wants too highlight the man's Polish root, even if it means that the structure of the text is moved in a incoherent way, since the earlier sections listed the mother first, than the father, and proceeded to list the father's accomplishments, Also, how many times is the editor going to try to use Poland or Polish in one sentence, it seems like he's trying to fill the page with this fact. 3rd edit: Sandusky was born in Washington, Pennsylvania, the only son of Arthur Sandusky, whose Polish parents had immigrated from Poland, and Evelyn Mae (née Lee) an Irish Catholic homemaker who came from a small Pennsylvania coal-mining town. Now, since the page is locked, I'm not able to revert the changes, and I can't constantly argue with an administrator who clearly has more power to block IP's or lock pages. And, to prove my point of a bias, don't see any mention of Polish ancestry on pages related to other football players/coaches such as Mike Ditka, Don Majkowski, or Rob Gronkowski. Yet, in the case of child abuser Jerry Sandusky his polish background is highlighted and edited to maintain this bias. --76.118.227.161 (talk) 02:01, 4 December 2011 [edit] Why would you leave a terrible site like www.westerneurope.info in wikipedia.org/Western_EuropeIs the site yours? Don't worry I did the job for you and removed it. [edit] Talkback[edit] Barnstar[edit] BiographiesHello, I want to ask You for Your permission (or The Wikipedia permission) to paste informations about Polish composers from site www.pwm.com.pl. Do we have to sign an agreement or a licence? We have a lot of informations and we want to share it. PolishMusicLover1945 (talk) 07:50, 25 January 2012 (UTC) [edit] January Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities MeetingThe January meeting has been scheduled. For instructions on joining and a time converter, see outreach:Wikipedia Education Program Metrics and Activities Meeting. Hope you can join the meeting. -- LiAnna Davis (WMF) (talk) 20:57, 25 January 2012 (UTC) [edit] Fix refsLet me know how the tool is doing, I haven't heard anything from you in a while. ΔT The only constant 00:14, 26 January 2012 (UTC) [edit] The Signpost: 23 January 2012
[edit] Disambiguation link notificationHi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC) [edit] ReferencesNice work on the references at Public Domain Day, that's a cleaner method, uncluttered and easier to find refs within a text. I might start it as my default method. Of course it won't stop others from adding new refs inline, creating a sort of mixed bag, but [edit] Good Article backlog elimination drive barnstar
[edit] Wikimedia Research NewsletterHi Piotrus, I know you have been well acquainted with academic research about Wikipedia for years. Any chance you could spend some time before tomorrow evening UTC to contribute something to the upcoming issue of the Wikimedia Research Newsletter? It just turns out that my co-editor Dario (WMF's research analyst) is unable to contribute this time due to travel and other obligations. I'm committed to getting this issue out as scheduled, but it might be a bare-boned version. Even a short summary (2-3 sentences) of a paper that interests you would be helpful. The draft page with a list of items that are intended be covered here and the coordination Etherpad (where one can sign up to cover a particular paper) is here. Thanks, and even if you can't find time on such short notice, your feedback and suggestions/contributions for future issues continue to be very welcome. Regards, Tbayer (WMF) (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
[edit] DYK for Abolition of serfdom in Poland
[edit] The Signpost: 30 January 2012
|

