User talk:Plasmic Physics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Whisperback[edit]

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Flinders Petrie's talk page.

Bisulfide ionbox[edit]

Plasmic Physics
Wireframe structural formula of bisulfide with the explicit hydrogen added
Identifiers
CAS number 15035-72-0
PubChem 5047209
ChemSpider 4224877
ChEBI CHEBI:29919
ChEMBL CHEMBL38703
Gmelin Reference 24766
Jmol-3D images Image 1
Properties
Molecular formula HS
Molar mass 33.073 g mol−1
Acidity (pKa) >14
Basicity (pKb) <0
Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C (77 °F), 100 kPa)
Infobox references

Maintenance categories
+cat:Unverified chembox (verification)


Gallane[edit]

Plasmic Physics
Identifiers
CAS number 13572-93-5
PubChem 23983
ChemSpider 22419
ChEBI CHEBI:30427
Gmelin Reference 48991
Jmol-3D images Image 1
Properties
Molecular formula H3Ga
Molar mass 72.75 g mol−1
Appearance colourless gas
Solubility in water hydrolyses
Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C (77 °F), 100 kPa)
Infobox references

Maintenance categories
+cat:No image, no structure drawing (image checks)
+cat:Unverified chembox (verification)

Formal warning[edit]

Hi Plasmic Physics. You agreed here to seek consensus using high quality sources before making any changes to chemistry-related articles which might be seen as controversial, and I agreed to help enforce this and mentor you if you needed it. I find that this change, from a disambiguation page to a redirect, falls outside what you agreed to. I will not block this time, but I am here to warn you that if you do anything like this again, it will likely become necessary to block you to prevent disruption to the project. Don't forget, before doing anything like this, you have the options of asking the Chemistry project, asking me as I have offered, or raising it at the article's talk page. Please don't forget this, as I really don't want to block anyone, particularly not a well-intentioned contributor like yourself. --John (talk) 15:40, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I agreed to use high quality sources, on the condition that they are available. They are not. I agreed to seek consensus before making any changes to chemistry-related articles which might be seen as controversial. This was not seen as controversial, or even possibly so. I merely acted in accordance with policy. Plasmic Physics (talk) 22:22, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
Did you look for sources? I find it hard to believe that there are no sources whatsoever on the mercury hydrides. I am telling you that this is the sort of thing that others find controversial. Do not do it again, please. --John (talk) 06:36, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Yup, there are no secondary sources at all. If there are, they are very well hidden. The physical existence of HgH is so tenuous, that it is only of interest to those who are doing topical research. Knowledge of the existence of HgH2 is also too novel for it to be acknowledged by secondary sources. Don't think that I'm making intentionally controversial edits. Plasmic Physics (talk) 06:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)