User talk:Liliana-60

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from User talk:Prince Kassad)
Jump to: navigation, search

{{TB}} Welcome!

Hello, Liliana-60, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Edchilvers 18:12, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD for List of Unicode characters[edit]

I've responded to your AfD. - PatricknoddyTALK (reply here)|HISTORY 18:35, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Kokuzna vremena[edit]

OK.--Anthony.bradbury 21:50, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Karkemish 1.jpg[edit]

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Karkemish_1.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Prince Kassad 07:54, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
Thanks for telling me. Please leave me about 1 month (I remove the tag) to ask to the copyright holder if he is OK to put the picture under the GFDL/CC licences. Thanks in advance. Poppypetty 07:57, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Image: Wikipedia_Malay.JPG[edit]

You have recently listed this image which I uploaded for deletion. I have to say that there is no basis to your claim. The Harry Potter cover shown is not the main subject of the screen shot. This image is a screen shot of the Malay Wikipedia. It clearly implies that that is that. Should there be claims that the Harry Potter cover is not a free image, the Harry Potter cover image uploaded at the Malay Wikipedia should be deleted instead of this screen shot.Horacenew (talk) 16:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Your reason applies to personality rights, but we're talking about copyright here, where it doesn't matter whether the copyrighted part is the main subject or not - if one part is copyrighted, the whole image is.
Also, of course the Harry Potter cover is copyrighted - copyright is granted to every object without registration or notice, and Rowling has not released the cover under a free license as far as I know. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 16:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Pointless redirs[edit]

I was just wondering, how do you search for/find those useless redirects containing control characters and the like? [Good job on that, by the way!] I was wondering if I could help find them. Thanks! RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 13:05, May 11, 2008 (UTC)

I go to Special:Allpages and list all pages starting from the Armenian letter Ա (logged out and with IE which conveniently shows all special characters in the adress bar). That's where the hunting ground begins, I use my eye and look for suspicious redirects, dotted circles (indicating a misspelling in Indic names) and the like. You can't believe just how many useless redirects are hidden there. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 14:13, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Something that might just make your day! A proposal to speedy these kinds of things without days of pointless prebaricating. Your input would be appreciated. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 14:33, May 11, 2008 (UTC)


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png}[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 06:42, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

독도[edit]

Re this edit: the article was not a substantial copy of the kowiki article; in fact, according to Google translate, it was an anti-Japanese rant about Dokdo. This mistake is pretty easy to make, but next time, if it isn't a copy of a foreign-language WP article, and it isn't a blatant copyvio, please bring it to WP:PNT and/or tag with {{notenglish}}. Thanks for your contributions, nneonneo talk 20:01, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Where is the requirement that the articles have to be identical? Most pages say the article only has to exist at the foreign language wiki to be eligible for speedy. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
"a foreign-language article that exists on another Wikimedia project". The interpretation I take is that the article has to be a copy (in full or in part) of the other article. The user notification template {{foreign-warn}} makes this more clear: "the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project". nneonneo talk 22:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

screenshot[edit]

Hello Kassad, How do you create screenshots for the whole screen? like this image: Image:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png.--Alnokta (talk) 19:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

I go to full screen mode in my browser, take a screenshot of every part of the page and then stitch them together. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 20:13, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:BAB-Plan-Parkplatz[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:BAB-Plan-Parkplatz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 15:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Composite phoneme[edit]

You may be right on this, but the connection g+b (the ones that make up a single phoneme in Ewe) shows wrongly, at least on my screen does, because what you did shows as if the phoneme were made up with ὲ+g (in Ewe there is no such a composite phoneme as ὲg) instead of g+b. Regards. --80.5.88.40 (talk) 10:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

As I said in the summary, it's a known bug in the Arial Unicode MS font. It cannot position the arc correctly and shows exactly as you described. In other fonts it works fine. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 10:54, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the answer. I did not noticed the last bit of the summary. The problem mentioned before takes place with IE but about a couple of hours ago I had the chance to look at it with Firefox and the problem was exactly the opposite; the arc went over b+è. It logically must be a lack of consistency about the design of each font but I find quite strange that at least two important fonts design that particular symbol so arbitrariously. It is not difficult at all designing a font character like this so that it should be placed between the couple of letters involved in order and show reasonable good results, so I wonder whether this happens out of sheer lack of co-ordination, lack of interest or simple personal taste by the designers. I guess the only way to solve this would be by Wikimedia automatically forcing the display of their own fonts or, maybe, of previously hand-fixed font versions installed in the monobook. This last option, might start copyright issues, though. Thanks anyway. --80.5.88.40 (talk) 17:55, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
It is easy to make the arc position correctly (I have some experience with developing fonts so I know). For the first case (over ὲg) it might have been a misunderstanding by the developer of the Arial Unicode MS font. It's not quite obvious how one should position the double arc, and even though officially it should go between the characters, the developer thought it must be positioned after both characters. Now, the other case (positioned over bè) is surprising, and is something I'd expect of monospaced fonts (where combining diacritics do not work due to design limitations).
Embedding fonts is a possibility and there was a discussion about it, I don't know how it turned out though. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 18:27, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Wasser![edit]

Hallo! Ja, Thogo hat mich da neulich auch drauf hingewiesen und ich dachte dann erstmal: "Mist!" ;)
Ich hatte vor längerer Zeit auch schon einmal 'ne Menge Übersetzungen aus dem Wiktionary übernommen, teilweise aber ersetzt und korrigiert, habe mir leider auch nie bei den Sprachen die Quelle drangeschrieben, so dass ich nicht mehr weiß, was von dir bzw. der Wiktionaryseite und was aus Wörterbüchern oder Grammatiken ist. Meine Sammlung beträgt zurzeit 2379 Sprachen, ich sammle sie "daheim" in einer Excel-Datei, wo ich mehrere Spalten habe für:

  • den Namen der Sprache (ich halte mich da an Ethnologue, sofern's die Sprache dort gibt)
  • das Wort für Wasser in Originalschrift
  • das Wort in einer üblichen Transliteration/Transkription
  • das Wort in IPA, falls ich das rausfinden konnte
  • die Verwandtschaftsbeziehung von Ethnologue, so dass man's auch danach sortieren kann

Ich hab noch nicht geplant, die Tabelle online zu stellen, würde das aber sicher irgendwann mal machen wollen. Zusammenarbeiten finde ich keine schlechte Idee, auch wenn ich meine Sammlung ungern "weggebe". Zurzeit habe ich leider Schwierigkeiten mit meinem Computer (vorgestern habe ich gebangt, meine Datei könnte für immer weg sein!), deswegen würd ich das mal lieber noch ein wenig rausschieben, bis bei mir zuhause rechnermäßig alles wieder in Ordnung ist. — N-true (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

ADU[edit]

cant work out where you are going with this one. You want it expanded or what? I am a software engineer do a number of languages but German is not my best but at the mo this is just a stub. SimonTrew (talk) 21:39, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

You seem to be referring to Application layer framing, in which case the problem is I don't quite understand the article. -- Prince Kassad (talk) 21:56, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

The Fear of Change Barnstar[edit]

Rescuebarnstar.png The Fear of Change Barnstar
Ha! I love it. For your clever rescuing of the original (and, imo, far superior) logo, I present to you the Fear of Change Barnstar. Why do they bother fixing things that ain't broke? –xenotalk 13:25, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Internet Explorer 2 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to MIPS
Internet Explorer 3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to MIPS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

File:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ArabicWikipedia 20071124.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kannada Wikipedia[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Kannada Wikipedia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable website, per WP:NOTABLE, composed of first-hand sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)TCM 22:50, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

File:CzechWikipedia 20071129.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:CzechWikipedia 20071129.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 14:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Windows NT 3.1, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mainframe and Localization (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:09, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Mae meh listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mae meh. Since you had some involvement with the Mae meh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). TheChampionMan1234 00:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

RFD[edit]

In your vote you posted to Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2012_October_20#Mae_meh you said "Wiktionary". Did you mean to say "Wikipedia"? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 08:10, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, yes I did. I guess working so long at Wiktionary has started to affect me. -- Liliana-60 (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bundesstraße 9 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bingen, Kranenburg and Worms
Bundesstraße 258 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Blankenheim
Bundesstraße 500 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Waldshut

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:48, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bundesstraße 99, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neiße (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Kannada Wikipedia for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kannada Wikipedia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kannada Wikipedia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. eh bien mon prince (talk) 01:37, 2 March 2014 (UTC)