User talk:Psychonaut

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Notalkback.svg I watchlist the discussions I participate in, as should you. There is no need to leave "talkback" templates here.
Barnstar free.svg I don't edit Wikipedia to collect baubles. Please don't leave me "awards" or "barnstars".

West-Berlin part of West-Germany[edit]

Why did you change that 2 days ago ? Regards Migrant (talk) 13:01, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm not sure which exact edit of mine you are talking about. I can tell you that in general I have been fixing some articles which incorrectly referred to West Berlin as part of the Federal Republic of Germany (commonly known as West Germany) some time between 1949 and 1990. If you don't understand why this is an error, please refer to the article West Berlin. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:13, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Okay, thanks for pointing that out! I can't say that I ever knew that (kinda surprising because even though I was born after the Cold War, I'm pretty knowledgeable about that part of history). So West Berlin wasn't part of any country at all? It was just an American/British/French-occupied zone? Survivorfan1995 (talk) 20:33, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Yes, it was not part of any country. It was just Allied-occupied territory. Psychonaut (talk) 20:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

U.S.A. v. Hudson, Whitfield & Dunlap[edit]

Hiya, I worked on your complaint - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mosfetfaser&diff=602761816&oldid=600751194 - see here - https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:U.S.A._v._Hudson,_Whitfield_%26_Dunlap&diff=prev&oldid=602762203 - Mosfetfaser (talk) 18:58, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! As I mentioned in the now-deleted message on your talk page, I already added the attribution via an edit summary, so your talk page message wasn't strictly necessary (though it's certainly helpful). —Psychonaut (talk) 19:01, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Logology (sociology)[edit]

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Logology (sociology) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable specialist meaning of word

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 22:52, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Nines (film) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nines (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nines (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DP 16:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)