User talk:Qxukhgiels/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

June 2012

Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage newer editors. Please read Wikipedia:NOTVAND for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:37, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Flyleaf

Hello, Qxukhgiels56. When you moved Flyleaf to a new title and then changed the old title into a disambiguation page, you may have overlooked WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:

A code of honor for creating disambiguation pages is to fix all resulting mis-directed links.
Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "Flyleaf" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. R'n'B (call me Russ) 23:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Re:Every_time_you_masturbate..._God_kills_a_kitten

Re:Every_time_you_masturbate..._God_kills_a_kitten

I removed cleanup template as I see nothing that can be described as "biased" Bulwersator (talk) 06:04, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion criteria

You tagged LMFAO sexy and i know it for G6 (housekeeping) speedy deletion as "useless, implausible rd". Just wanted to let you know that this isn't a valid example of housekeeping: G6 is for pagemoves, history merges, and other things where the software requires deletion, plus things such as cleaning up valid mistakes. However, recently-created implausible redirects can be deleted under speedy criterion R3, so I've deleted the page that way; I'd encourage you to use {{db-r3}} in the future. Nyttend (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

OK...that obviously wasn't a typo of misnomer.Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 15:52, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Justin Beeber

Hello Qxukhgiels56. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Justin Beeber, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Redirects are cheap, and I can't say this is entirely implausible. Thank you. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Justin Beiber:Never say never

Hello Qxukhgiels56. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Justin Beiber:Never say never, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a recently created redirect - consider WP:RfD. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:47, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, Nyttend... well... OK, I chose to use R3 (even though G8 might not apply, either).Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 18:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Forking&countryep.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Forking&countryep.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done

File copyright problem with File:Forking&countryep.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Forking&countryep.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done

File permission problem with File:Ashesremainjuly2012.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Ashesremainjuly2012.jpeg, which you've sourced to http://vimeo.com/45800986. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:30, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:I'mnotalright.ogg)

Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading File:I'mnotalright.ogg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:39, 20 August 2012 (UTC)

Dammit! I thought I'd cancelled that upload, but, Oh well, now I've added it to I'm Not Alright and Sanctus Real.Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 15:05, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Raindown.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Raindown.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:06, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes... and that was a false nomination; please see WP:NFCC.-Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 22:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Skilletsaviour.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Skilletsaviour.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:56, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but in this recent edit you removed a speedy deletion tag from File:Skilletsaviour.ogg, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File%3aSkilletsaviour.ogg?diff=510317513 RoboCop 19:21, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

The nomination was false, per WP:NFCC. It might be a good time to warn the editor about this, as this has happened repeatedly.-Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 19:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
My bad. I was going through Huggle and from afar it looked like an obvious template removal to me. It does look like the user needs to review the speedy criteria. Thank you for the message, and please let me know if I can be of any further service. Cheers! RoboCop 19:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

This Edit

Was this edit done in error or do you justify it? It was not in fact referenced as your edit summary said. RoboCop 20:12, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Brain fart- it was, however, an introduction of unsourced material-Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 20:14, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the response. The user, however, was removing unsourced material that had no business being in the lead section, so he did effectively nothing wrong at all. RoboCop 20:29, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Raindown.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Raindown.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status, as you did with File:Skilletsaviour.ogg. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 20:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Qxukhgiels. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Eye On It.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Toa Nidhiki05 00:03, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Skillet members

Category:Skillet members, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 13:58, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Forking&countryep.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forking&countryep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit war on Dara Maclean

Please stop warring over whether the template should be in the article or not. Instead, take the conversation to the talk page and try to fix the problem. There is a section on the article's talk page, would you please have a look and fill in the gaps for me? Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 16:56, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Secrets and Regrets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Heavy metal and Essential Records
Dear X (You Don't Own Me) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Heavy metal
September 11 attacks (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Hoboken

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:I'mnotalright.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:I'mnotalright.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:09, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Fixed...hopefully.-Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 22:52, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Good grief

Look, don't spam my page with 13 notices. Give it to me in one, please, if you want to do that. Second, fair use rationale is on each page, so there is no issue. I will be removing each notice due to this, as your tags are incorrect. Toa Nidhiki05 00:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I do now realise that that was not the best tag, F7 would have been better. But do not remove the tags.Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 00:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
I am going to revert those as well as you have not listed any sort of substantial concern. Most of these are on articles have passed GA and thus they have been determined as appropriate for use on articles. Please stop this, it is disruptive and is wasting my time. Toa Nidhiki05 00:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
If you feel this is a major issue, I'd be more than happy to request a third opinion. This clearly won't go anywhere, so getting third-party advice could resolve any concerns. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Go ahead, please do so. The first thing they probably will warn you of is CSD template removal of pages you have created. Also, I have again detected your evasive behaviour in which you appear to be attempting to confuse me (and maybe the pot is calling the kettle black, but all I can tell you is if it is intentional, it is not working).-Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 01:04, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
That is contingent on there being a 'Click here to contest speedy deletion' button, which there was not on the tags you used. They were also improper on the first and vague on the second, and as such you gave no way to remove them. Toa Nidhiki05 01:16, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Looks like the dog has got the cat's tail- You could have removed them by reverting me, removing the text, etc. And are you going to consult a third party?Qxukhgiels56 (talk) 01:27, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
I did, I made a request at Third Opinion. I presume a user is reading over the dispute and will comment at some point. Toa Nidhiki05 01:28, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Searchtool-80%.png Response to third opinion request:
Indeed the author (uploader) is not allowed to remove speedy deletion tags. Still, as speedy deletion is supposed to be used in non-controversial cases and these don't seem obvious deletion candidates, I would recommend WP:FFD process instead. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talktrack) 01:38, 15 September 2012 (UTC) — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talktrack) 01:38, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Dara Maclean

Was wondering what your reasons were for adding the maintenance templates to this article? (See edit history). Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 02:24, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

I will go further than that. I have reverted your addition of those templates. There is not ratio ale whatsoever for them. That the templates you added were suggested for consideration on the talk page is one thing, adding them in this manner before the building of consensus on the talk page is another. If you have a quarrel with the facts of the article, flag the relevant areas as requiring citations. Without this, which was part of the process suggested on the talk page, your edits look very pointy]. It;s time to leave this area of dispute. Wikipedia is large enough for you to leave this to others, surely? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 07:10, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
Police issue X26 TASER-white.jpg #BUTTOUT Qxukhgiels (talk) 07:12, 15 September 2012

DYK for Eye on It

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Qxukhgiels. You have new messages at Talk:Besses o' th' Barn.
Message added 07:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sitush (talk) 07:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Basically, as others have noted above, you appear to be incorrectly tagging articles. - Sitush (talk) 07:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Similarly, this tag at Vaishya was unnecessary. I think perhaps that you should refrain from tagging articles for now. There is plenty of other stuff that you could do. - Sitush (talk) 08:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Besses o' th' Barn and Vaishya- don't even remember placing those tags, but I can;t deny it now. You are right about the fact that I am having tag trouble...you may have also noticed that I have reverted myself on several tagging occasions. And those above, one of those was a seventeen-year-old who was apparently unfamiliar with COIs (who, BTW, was a third party, not the editor with the COI), but we discussed on the talk page to use a different template, and if he reverts that, he's in for trouble. But, anyways, I'm sort of stepping away from tagging for now.-Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:39, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. I have deleted the two sub-pages you tagged with db-u1. That left error messages showing at the top of this page, so I have taken the liberty of altering the template call there from qxukhgiels56/right to qxukhgiels/right, so that the "Keep calm and carry on" message displays again. I hope that is what you intended, if not change it as you like. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:15, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it is. Thanks. -Qxukhgiels (talk) 23:44, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Besses o' th' barn burial ground.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Besses o' th' barn burial ground.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 00:27, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Besses stuff

Please do not be discouraged. I am actually sat here in Besses right now and I appreciate that someone else is taking an interest in the subject area, even if they're still learning and probably getting a bit frustrated with all the gubbins that go on here regarding policies etc. Keep being bold and you'll pick it up. And feel free to ask any questions on my talk page. - Sitush (talk) 00:50, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Actually, not a huge interest exclusivelly with Besses, but with the effort of develloping stubs such as these (there's a lot of them lying around here and there; developing just one is an improvement). But thanks.-Qxukhgiels (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
"developing just one is an improvement"... you've got it! That's what this is all about. I spend most of my time on India-related stuff, despite never having been there, not being Indian/Pakistani etc. The rules etc are the same. Keep plugging on. - Sitush (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Besses - image and redirect

I deleted File:Besses o' th' barn burial ground.jpg because it was a copyright violation. If you want some images that you can use here, go to Geograph. Note: Geograph images must be uploaded to the Commons, not here and check first, we aleady have 1.7 million images from Geograph.

Besses o'th' Barn Metrolink station (the redirect with no space in o'th') should never be deleted - it is always likely to be receiving hits. If you actually want to do something useful, go through the articles which point to it and change the links in each article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Invitation to Shaktism Project

Your detailed knowledge of hinduism is most welcome in the Shaktism workgroup. There are a lot of articles related to Shaktism for which only 2 editors are keeping track, hopefully we will have more. sids 12:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC) User talk:Sidsahu

Thanks- upon a detailled examination, I shall try to spend some of my time patrolling here. However, I'd prefer to stay out of some of those long-term conflicts that occur in these areas.-Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:34, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

A Whole New World EP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aladdin (film)
Stellar Kart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Aladdin (film)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:24, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Stellar Kart

Category:Stellar Kart, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 13:46, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Portugal. The Man

Have the group made an official announcement as to whether or not Noah Gersh or Kane Ritchotte are official members of the band? If not, I think that it should be clarified that they are "touring" members. I would say that that is a necessary clarification and argue that adding "touring" were constructive edits.

Nope- "official member" and "touring member" are not the same thing; read the citation, please.Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Condom artistical depiction.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Condom artistical depiction.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Information.svg Hi Qxukhgiels. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Chunibyo, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Not gibberish or nonsense. This is clear understandable English. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

I have also declined your speedy deletion request for vandalism because the term does exist and is the bases of an ongoing anime series, and is therefore not a hoax or other form of vandalism. However, I have nominated the article for deletion because the term is a neologisms. —Farix (t | c) 16:05, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Help me with links

I added a link at Something Holy to that song"s official music video, andit was removed, and I am afraid to put it back, I know it might not be right. Can I put it back, the warning said i could?

That link that you added does not point to the official music video, and I don't recall ever seeing a music video for that song. A referenced list of music videos for this artist can be found here. And for links like this in the future, you would need to use Template:Official-Qxukhgiels (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oceans From The Rain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Digital download (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:For King & Country (band)

Category:For King & Country (band), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 05:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

editing of entry "Mary Lou Jepsen"

Qxukhgiels,

what is your reasoning around deleting the references and the slight updates?

Was simply trying to do what was requested at the top of "Mary Lou Jepsen" and added lots of references. Also, I updated her work status - she gave a big lecture last month at TED and told the whole world she was at Google[x] - it's also referenced. She is an important woman in technology and I'm a fan and wanted to get her wikipedia page to be more accurate. Can you help me with ways to do that without upsetting the apple cart?

Laura — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurav (talkcontribs) 20:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Oops- I didn't realise that you had made that many edits in a row. I only saw the first edit, which appeared to be the removal of content and addition of unsourced material, yet I realise that this change coincides with previous changes you made. You should consider providing an edit summary for future changes. -Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

ADF Solutions Article

Hello Qxukhgiels, and thank you for your help so far on the ADF Solutions article. I am obviously a newbie at doing this and need help. I am open to any and all necessary changes to make the page encyclopedic and acceptable, but I am having a hard time achieving this. This is my fourth attempt and I really would appreciate your clear input as to what needs to be removed and/or rewritten. Thank you so much in advance.

-Critic_W — Preceding unsigned comment added by Critic w (talkcontribs) 14:38, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy notice

I've mentioned your name at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Joe McCarthy.3BMcCarthy Army hearings. Acroterion (talk) 18:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
WorldDigitalLibraryLogo2.png
Hi Qxukhgiels! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 19:46, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
WorldDigitalLibraryLogo2.png
Hi Qxukhgiels! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! 14:19, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Kevin Carter

Re:August 2013

Hello, I have amended the Kevin Carter bio line because it was confusing. It read that he was born between the Chinese and Korean border, which A) contradicts the bio line in the blue box and B) doesn't say where about (was he born in China? Or in Korea?) and goes on describing the environment where he grew up without specifying where it is. As HE WAS born in Johannesburg (well documented fact in books and so on) I felt it should be changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.188.160.124 (talk) 18:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

We cannot do this without a verifiabile source.-Qxukhgiels (talk) 18:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
I have added Johannesburg as his birth place in the "Early Life" section.Qxukhgiels (talk) 18:21, 15 July 2013 (UTC)The addition was originally reverted by this member of the counter-vandalism unit and then put back by the anon that added it. Sorry for the lack of an edit summary, but removing it with this in mind seemed self-explanatory.

76.180.187.188 (talk) 19:41, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Good, just be careful for future references-Qxukhgiels (talk) 19:46, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Lifesave raft alternative3219304.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lifesave raft alternative3219304.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:01, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Xerxes the Great

Hi, thanks for your message. Regarding Xerxes, the title 'the Great' recognises Xerxes' immense contribution to world history, therefore, it is necessary to emphasise this in the infobox. This is universally recognised, otherwise we may be subjecting ourselves to historical bias. Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.31.247.12 (talk) 15:34, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Per MOS:INFOBOX, his actual name, Xerxes I, belongs in the infobox. As his title "Xerxes the Great" is already included in the lead section, it is unnecessary for this to be included in the infobox.Qxukhgiels (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
Actually, there is a parametre in Template:Infobox monarch for other titles that is not currently being used. You might want to add this.Qxukhgiels (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year Qxukhgiels!

Fireworks in Jaén (cropped).jpg
Happy New Year!
Hello Qxukhgiels:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, HotHat (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)


Peace sign.svg


Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.


I just hope your year of editing ahead will be great!HotHat (talk) 05:27, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Kudaezai

Hello Qxukhgiels. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kudaezai, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. kelapstick(bainuu) 20:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I guess there was obvious context, but it was unreferenced.Qxukhgiels (talk) 20:39, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) No worries, I was just going to drop this note after the automatic message from CSD helper, A1 is one of the more difficult CSD tags for editors to get a handle on, basically it means that by reading the article, you have no idea what it is about. In this case it is clearly about a group of people in Pakistan. The article may be eligible for deletion via another method (PROD or AfD), but CSD criteria are quite explicit, however Unreferenced is not one of them. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, --kelapstick(bainuu) 20:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia from the Anatomy Wikiproject!

Welcome to Wikipedia from Wikiproject Anatomy! We're a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of anatomy articles here on Wikipedia. One of our members has noticed that you are involved in editing anatomy articles; it's great to have a new interested editor on board. In your wiki-voyages, a few things that may be relevant to editing wikipedia articles are:

Sobo 1909 589.png
  • Thanks for coming aboard! We always appreciate a new editor. Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Anatomy talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
  • You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing anatomy articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
  • We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
  • Lastly, why not try and strive to create a good article! Anatomical articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!

Feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Anatomy talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. I wish you all the best on your wiki-voyages! --LT910001 (talk) 01:49, 12 March 2014 (UTC

delete this

Hi there,

please I want all my content out of this site. it is freaky. every time I write an article it gets the red deletion thing. now the company that hired me to write something about the company on wiki wont be happy to see the red thing on their wiki page. Please delete this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verxel_Arts that should include title and url. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadcadd (talk • contribs) 02:08, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Please delete the page title also and url. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verxel_Arts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nadcadd (talkcontribs) 02:40, 12 March 2014 (UTC) Please read WP:ADVERT, WP:COI, and WP:V. You still must support your claims with a verifiable source, even if you are being hired. You might want to explain to your boss or whoever's hiring you that Wikipedia is not where they need to be advertising. Also, see WP:TPG; place new discussions below the most recent discussion on a talk page, and comment below the most recent comment/entry on a discussion.Qxukhgiels (talk)

WikiProject Anatomy quarterly newsletter

WP:Anatomy quarterly update (#2)

Previous edition
Released: First quarter, 2014
Editor: LT910001

Hello WP:ANATOMY participant! This is the second quarterly update of goings-on in WP:ANATOMY, documenting the current state of WP:ANATOMY, current projects and items of interest, and any relevant news. I'd greatly value feedback on this, and if you think I've missed something, or don't wish to receive this again, please leave a note on my talkpage or remove your name from the mailing list

What's new
What's going on
How can I contribute?
  • Reword anatomical jargon: jargon is widespread and not helpful to lay readers.
  • Contribute on our talk page
  • Continue to add sources, content, and improve anatomical articles!
  • Replace images with better images from Wikipedia commons, or if there are too many images, remove some low-quality ones
Quarterly focus - Where to edit?
One of our two new featured images! (Also featured on the Signpost)

On any given week we have at least 4-10 editors making significant contributions to our articles, with probably more than double this making minor edits. As an editor, I am often wondering: with so many articles, where to start? There is so much to be done (as always, on Wikipedia!), and I aim here to provide a comprehensive list of venues within our project. If I've missed any, please let us know on the WikiProject Anatomy talk page.

An editor might edit:

  • By importance. A user can use our assessment table to view articles by their importance and class. The vital articles project provides a list of designated 'Vital articles' for Wikipedia.
  • By popularity. One way to edit is to edit the most popular pages -- the majority of these need help, and editing is sure to bring benefit to many users.
  • By need. There is always cleanup that needs to be done, whether commenting on mergers, adding infoboxes or adding images.
  • By interest. A series of inter-project categories has been developed to help facilitate inter-Wiki and inter-professional collaboration. These categories sort our articles into organs, system, gross anatomy, neuroanatomy, and several other categories. This should offer a buffet of articles for any interested editors! See here for more details.
  • By topic. Wikipedia's anatomical categories may provide impetus, as may editing a suite of related-articles, using a parent article such as ear for direction. A collection of series are slowly being rolled-out, including one for epithelia and for articles about the gastrointestinal wall, which also act as groups of topics. Templates, as documented on our main page, provide a similar categorisation.
  • By demand. Discussions relating to Anatomy are frequent occurrences on the talk pages for WPMED and WP:ANATOMY. Such topics almost always cry out for more editing.
  • By recent changes. One way to choose a destination for editing is to check the recent changes, revert vandalism, integrate/source edits, or generally collaborate in improving articles that are receiving contributions from other editors. This can be found in the external watchlist, or the (recent contributions for Index of Anatomy), a relatively comprehensive on-wiki list.
  • By chance. A user is always welcome to improve articles that they randomly 'bump into' by Wiki-surfing or by having bumped for other reasons into a particular article or topic that needs improvement

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by User:Mdann52, using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Secrets and Regrets

Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article Secrets and Regrets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSONGS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:29, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Golden Earring discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UK charts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Building 429

Category:Building 429, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 01:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

thanks for fixing my error, however

it's not "West Point Military Academy" - that does not exist. it's "United States Military Academy" or "United States Military Academy - West Point" thanks again — Preceding unsigned comment added by 214.10.6.120 (talk) 22:17, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

My bad- I reverted because it looked like a test edit or a simply a nonconstructive content tamper making it inconsistent with the reference. Being sat in the UK (even though I have spent a considerable deal of time in the US), I probably will miss details as these- one disadvantage of an RC patroller.-Qxukhgiels (talk) 16:31, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Smoke detector, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atomic Energy Commission (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Forking&countryep.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Forking&countryep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Satellite television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crank (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Sulaimandaud. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Delhi Colony, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Sulaimandaud (talk) 19:57, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

"respect{ing}" language usage in other countries

The article was not about the UK, and other instances in that section used the word "while" and not "whilst"; I simply made the poorly worded section more consistent. But thanks for trying to correct me. --19:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)65.66.161.253 (talk)

True, but New World monkeys are in South America, where many countries use a dialect of English similar to that of the UK. Just because the rest of the article uses a certain variety of English doesn't mean it's right; WP:OTHER is not an argument to ever use.Qxukhgiels (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Satellite Television

Hello, I removed and reverted it because it seems that you have scraped content from other websites, some of which have themselves taken content from other sources. Scraping content from websites and pasting it in an article is not what Wikipedia is about. Some of the references are just blogs and low quality content farms with no expertise in the field and some are just even using the same text in order to drop their links on Wikipedia. They are not considered reliable sources (WP:RS). Some of the newspaper refs are ok but they are out of place as they are typically covering the rise of scrambling on what were initially Free To Air/unencrypted services. Merely scraping content and changing a few words while leaving the much of the content the same is still plagiarism at worst and just content spinning and link dropping at best. The newspaper references are ok but they largely apply to the implementation of Videocipher II which is also covered as an article as a method of ensuring payment for programming (that's Conditional Access Systems and it has multiple articles on Wikipedia). Much of the history you cut and pasted is garbled and misunderstood. It is not surprising as much of this happened over thirty years ago and well before the development of the web. DBS (direct broadcast satellite TV), for example, developed from the ideas in WARC-77 (1977) but the technology developed at a far faster pace. There was little or no differentiation between C-Band (BUDs) and the development of DBS in Europe on Ku band while the US/CA continued on C-Band until the launch and general popularity of services like DirecTV. There are just so many problems with scraping what is often low quality content (some of it is barely coherent English) from unreliable source websites that reverting to the previous version is necessary. It looks like I'll have to write something about the development of Satellite TV. Jmccormac (talk) 07:57, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

There was a substantial section on the history of STV in the US but it was moved along with a block of content to its own Wikipedia article Satellite television in the United States. The problem is that much of Wikipedia's content has been copied and spun by content farms and spam blogs that it is now making its way back to Wikipedia. Do a Google search for this sentence "In 1976 Taylor Howard built an amateur system, which consisted of a converted military surplus radar dish and a satellite receiver designed and built by Howard, for home satellite reception.". It is from the old Satellite TV article and now in the Satelite TV in the US article. You can see how it has propagated. The other issue is that some of the sites you used as references are not references. They are content farms and low quality cut and paste jobs that also take content from other sites on the web and from printed books. If you read closely, you can see where the style abruptly changes from bland advertising English (at best) to coherent journalistic English (typically a professional level of writing and often in the US style). About thirty years ago, Taylor Howard wrote a manual, amongst other things, on how to build your own satellite TV receiver system. Luckily this has not made it into the hands of those people who run the content farms. However there are many others (Bob Cooper, Steve Birkill, Shaun Kenny, Clyde Washburn, Paul Shuch) that were equally important in the history of satellite TV. Jmccormac (talk) 08:59, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
And I have reverted you again. If you look at the sources, you will see that the text on the page is indeed not copy-pasted from the sources. For instance, ref 4 references a sentence in the article that says "The world's first commercial communications satellite, called Intelsat I (nicknamed "Early Bird"), was launched into synchronous orbit on April 6, 1965," while the source says "American communications satellite. One launch, 1965.04.06. Intelsat 1, also called Early Bird, was the world's first commercial communications satellite." Another example would be the sentence that says "In October 1984, the U.S. Congress passed the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, which gave those using TVRO systems the right to receive signals for free unless they were scrambled, and required those who did scramble to make their signals available for a reasonable fee." The source is a news, not encyclopedic article. Most of the sources are reliable news or encyclopedia articles, which meet WP:NEWSORG and WP:WPNOTRS. You also claimed that the madehow source is linkspam. I was, again, using a tertiary source, which WP:WPNOTRS says are OK for giving overviews or summaries, but should not be used for detailed descriptions, and if you notice, I did not include many sources like this. I added summaries of things covered in other articles, such as about Captain Midnight and Videocipher, not detailed descriptions; those are found in the separate articles. I am currently working to add more of a worldwide viewpoint to the history section, but do not remove the content; please continue to discuss on the talk page; irrelevant reasons will be disregarded. If you continue to do so, you may be in danger of breaking WP:3RR.Qxukhgiels (talk) 17:21, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Satellite television, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moskva. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Duanedpearsall.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Duanedpearsall.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. January (talk) 21:20, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Duanedpearsall.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Duanedpearsall.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. January (talk) 07:31, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

David Horvitz back up page

Thanks for catching that. I was just organizing my sandbox, and failed to make the correct link, so that it would stay in sandbox-space.--Theredproject (talk) 17:48, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Cute grey kitten.jpg

Thanks for reviewing my new page!

Mdnahas (talk) 21:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

You're welcome!Qxukhgiels (talk) 00:31, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft

Thanks for signing up for this project. It is a very busy and active project with lots going on and we can always use more help and especially a fresh set of eyes. If you haven't done so already you might want to add Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to your watch list as this is where much of the background discussion occurs. You may also want to watch Wikipedia:New articles (Aircraft) as this is where newly created articles get listed for peer review. Having a look over these new articles is a great way to get a feel for how things are done on the project and also most new articles need reviewing anyway. If you have any questions you can leave me a note or post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft, either way you will get a quick response. - Ahunt (talk) 22:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)