User talk:RE73

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome[edit]

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, RE73, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Paul (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space[edit]

Information.svg Hey there RE73, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:RE73/UniProt. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of files removed today here.
  • Shut off the bot here.
  • Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

COSMIC[edit]

Hi. I've nominated COSMIC cancer database, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Rockpocket 17:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

FYI, the COSMIC DYK will be on the front page on 10th September between 1 and 7pm. Well done. Rockpocket 12:23, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Excellent :o) --RE73 (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Nkx2-2as for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nkx2-2as is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nkx2-2as until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wilbysuffolk (talk) 11:43, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

Plasmodium[edit]

Thanks for the page on AMA1. Its great to see Im not alone here :) DrMicro (talk) 11:13, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

No problem :) --RE73 (talk) 07:06, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Template[edit]

Hello Ruth, thanks for pointing out that {{EC number}} was in need of updating. You are correct that I built the template in 2005 (seems ages ago). It is used by at least 3000 articles! I don't write much about biochemistry anymore...

Have you considered joining WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology? It is a very active project with a large number of articles under its scope. It seems your expertise may be welcomed! JFW | T@lk 10:09, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled[edit]

At Crusio's request, considering the number of high quality articles you have started, I've given you the WP:Autopatrolled user right. Your new pages will be automatically maked as patrolled in the New Pages list; they will not have to be reviewed. Colleague, keep up the good work ! DGG ( talk ) 19:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you :) --RE73 (talk) 06:59, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For gamely ploughing through what seems to be the entire catalogue of glycoside hydrolase families. I know precious little about biochemistry, but I recognise hard work when I see it. Yunshui (talk) 13:29, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

re:BVC[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, RE73. You have new messages at Burwellian's talk page.
Message added 08:49, 26 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

NPPbarnstar.jpg

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello RE73! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 12:54, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

November 1[edit]

Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, RE73. You have new messages at DoctorJoeE's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Protein families[edit]

What to do with protein complexes that consist of multiple subunits? Make a separate page for each subunit? Perhaps we should try but be sure that we follow WP:Notability. Having many boxes (for each subunit) on the same page (for the complex) does not look good. Do this? What do you think? My very best wishes (talk) 04:57, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

PF10409 ([1]) should be included in clan CL0154 (C2 domain). This is actually another question. Having this clan, should we have an "umbrella" article about all C2 domains (as a superfamily/clan) and subarticles about each family? Apparently yes... My very best wishes (talk) 05:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
There are several cases when several PFAM families may belong to the same superfamily/clan, but they were not classified as such in Pfam: [2], [3], [4], [5],[6],[7]. This probably should be fixed. ABC transporters maybe a more complicated case. My very best wishes (talk) 14:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
There are also many cases when proteins are simply not linked to Pfam, like Carnocyclin A (look here), but those are more difficult to count. My very best wishes (talk) 15:01, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Further reading[edit]

Good job keeping the reference/readings for RNAs up to date. I think this is very important! --Paul (talk) 22:42, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! It is a shame I don't have the time to add anything to the articles from these references. --RE73 (talk) 07:40, 22 May 2014 (UTC)